Simultaneous reduction and surface functionalization of graphene oxide for highly conductive and water dispersible graphene derivatives
- 93 Downloads
A simple and effective preparation method for the simultaneous reduction and functionalization of graphene oxide (rGO) by 2,4-diamino benzene sulfonic acid has been developed. The derivatives exhibit excellent conductivity and high dispersibility in various solvents. The successful preparation of rGO and the presence of the sulfonated aromatic diamine on rGO surface has been confirmed by infrared and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, while, the analysis by micro-Raman spectroscopy indicated that the reduction/functionalization alters the lattice structure of GO by the increment the defect density when the 2,4-diamino benzene sulfonic acid is used. Moreover, the study of the dried products by X-ray diffraction spectroscopy suggested the turbostratic restacking of the exfoliated rGO into graphite-like nanostructures. The obtained derivative of simultaneous reduction and functionalization of GO was used for the preparation of highly conductive water-based gravure ink, which in turn, was successfully applied in printing on various flexible substrates, demonstrating its great potentiality in graphene-based flexible and printed electronics applications.
KeywordsReduced graphene oxide Surface functionalization Conductive inks Gravure Printed electronics
Graphene sheets, first isolated in 2004 by micro mechanical exfoliation of highly oriented pyrolytic graphite are planar monolayers of sp2-bonded carbon atoms tightly packed into a two-dimensional honeycomb lattice with remarkable electronic, optical and mechanical properties . The production of pristine graphene nanosheets have been further achieved by epitaxial growth , chemical vapor deposition , and liquid exfoliation of graphite in selected organic solvents or surfactant aqueous solutions [4, 5, 6]. However, despite the high quality of pristine graphene nanosheets and their remarkable electrical and mechanical properties that obtained by these techniques, their low yield at high costs and up-scaling difficulties are decisive parameters for their large scale production failure.
This handicap is overpassed by preparing of graphene nanosheets with the chemical reduction of graphene oxide (GO), as named the extensively exfoliated in water graphite oxide [7, 8]. The latter is a hydrophilic layered derivative of graphite produced by its oxidation under strong acidic conditions . The oxidation decorates the graphenic surfaces mainly with carbonyl and carboxy groups at the edges and hydroxyl and epoxide groups at both sides of the sheets [10, 11, 12, 13]. The most significant consequence of the oxidation process is the serious damage of the graphitic sp2-bonding of its lattice structure. All these, point and extended, defects, as vacancies, adatoms, dislocations and rings, result to a poor electrical conductivity of the easily exfoliated water dispersible GO nanosheets. The later, in turn, can be reduced to graphene like sheets (i.e. reduced graphene oxide, rGO) by several reductive agents including hydrazine and its derivatives, hydroiodic or ascorbic acid, hydroquinone, potassium and sodium hydroxide, diverse metal hydrides, hydroxylamine, sodium ammonia solution, urea and thiourea .
In addition, several authors have reported reduction of GO with aliphatic [14, 15, 16] or aromatic amines [17, 18]. While the current methods of GO chemical reduction provides the potentiality for its large scale and low cost production, the obtained rGO nanosheets exhibit, in all cases, significantly lower electrical conductivity than pristine graphene counterparts.
In general, the type of reducing agent can affect the reduction level of the rGO, while, under suitable reaction conditions, reduction can be accompanied by chemical functionalization offering a variety of graphene derivatives with enriched characteristics and properties.
For instance, p-phenylene diamine has been used simultaneously as reducing and functionalizing agent of graphene oxide, giving organically modified graphene nanosheets with high values of electrical conductivity [17, 18]. Lately, graphene has been widely studied as conductive ink that could be used for printed electronics in several printing methods [19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25]. Both, electrical conductivity and dispersibility, into either, water or organic solvents, are the major requirements for the applicability of graphene as conductive inks. In most cases in the literature, pristine graphene or rGO have been used as conductive inks, where their poor dispersibility is partly improved with the application of several dispersing agents such as polymers, ionic liquids or surfactants, which, unfortunately, have negative impact to the conductivity of the final product.
In an effort to avoid the use of dispersing agent in a conductive ink, we present here a graphene derivative that is formed by the simultaneous reduction and functionalization of GO by a sulfonated aromatic diamine. Dual reaction’s effect on resulting product combines its excellent conductivity and high dispersibility in water and proves that can exhibits outstanding results as a simple, cost-efficient, conductive ink for gravure printing technique. The 2,4-diamino benzene sulfonic acid (2,4-DBSA) provides extended reduction, while the functionalization with sulfonic benzene groups remarkably rises the aquatic dispersibility and the electrical conductivity of the final graphene derivative.
Such graphene derivatives can be potentially used as inks in the most common printing technologies such as gravure, flexography, screen printing and ink-jet on a variety of substrates such as paper, polymer, glass or metal [19, 21, 22, 23, 26, 27, 28, 29]. Printed electronics are widely employed in the fields of packaging, printing and graphic arts, logistics, energy, medical and pharmaceutical, automotive, lighting and textiles . Among printing technologies, gravure has found applications in the field of printed electronics on account of low cost production of electronic devices in huge volumes. The preparation method of an optimum conductive ink should be simple, low cost, scalable and of high yield, affording stable and printable inks with good rheological properties and high electrical conductivity at room temperature.
Characteristic examples of rather limited reports related to gravure inks based on graphene or rGO derivatives are presented below. Secor et al.  showed that graphene dispersed in ethanol with ethyl cellulose as stabilizing agent and terpineol as solvent can act as ink for gravure printing creating lines with conductivities up to 104 S m−1 but only after annealing at 250 °C. Recently, Georgakilas et al.  presented the fabrication of highly conductive water based gravure ink, based on a nanohybrid that combines pristine graphene nanosheets and hydroxylated MWNTs, with conductivities up to ~ 5000 S m−1 without any annealing procedure. In addition, high-resolution gravure printing with graphene ink on corona treated PET foil has been developed by Knoll et al.  for biomedical applications achieving sheet resistances up to ~ 15–20 Ohm sq−1. Interestingly, the research on the use of rGO especially for the development of gravure ink formulations is very deteriorated compared to other printing methods . But the advantages of this synthetic procedure e.g. higher yield and lower cost compared to other methods favor its use for realistic low cost, and high-volume industrial applications where gravure is useful. Xiao et al. [33, 34] has referred the use of gravure for the printing of sulfonated rGO and MoS2@sulfonated rGO active materials for applications such as the fabrication of SERS (Surface-enhanced Raman scattering) active substrates and interdigitated micro supercapacitors, respectively.
In the present work, a sulfonated aromatic diamine was used as reducing agent that allowed a facile, efficient and one-pot reduction and functionalization of GO. To the best of our knowledge, the behavior of this reductant has not been explored in this context. The as prepared amino-sulfonated graphene sheets were fully characterized by various methods and exhibited high electrical conductivity, reflecting that an extensive conjugated sp2 carbon network has been restored after the reduction procedure. The resulting reduced/functionalized graphene derivative showed high dispersibility in either aqueous and organic solvents without addition of surfactants or other stabilizers. Relying on these findings and using commercial resins, we proceeded with the preparation of water based gravure ink, and its printing on various flexible substrates.
2 Materials and methods
Graphite (powder, synthetic, particle size < 20 μm), 2,4-diaminobenzenesulfonic acid (2,4-DBSA) (≥ 98%), 2,5-diaminobenzenesulfonic acid (tech., 90%) (2,5-DBSA) and p-phenyldiamine (PPD) were purchased from Aldrich. Sulfuric acid (95–97%) and Potassium chlorate (purum > 99.0%) were purchased from Merck and nitric acid (65%) from Riedel-de Haen. All solvents were of analytical grade and were used as received. The NΜB 001 L 0003 is a commercial water-based varnish from Druckfarben Hellas S. A. which contains mainly a mixture of styrene–acrylate and acrylic resins, wax emulsion on modified polyethylene and silicone-based antifoaming agent. The solid content of the resin was estimated to 47%. The NΜB 001 L 0003 standard commercial grade is suitable for non absorbent substrates. The NRB 001 L 3099 is a commercial water-based varnish from Druckfarben Hellas S. A. which contains mainly a mixture of styrene-acrylic (MW > 200,000) and acrylic resins (MW ~ 8500), small amount of ammonia, polyethylene and silicone-based antifoaming agent. The solid content of the resin was estimated to be 73%. This standard commercial grade is suitable for absorbent substrates.
2.1 Preparation of graphene oxide (GO)
Graphite oxide was synthesized by the modified Staudenmaier method . According to this method, 2 g of powdered graphite were added in an ice-cooled flask containing a mixture of concentrated sulfuric (80 mL) and nitric acid (40 mL). Potassium chlorate (40 g) was slowly added to the mixture while stirring and cooling. The reactions were quenched after 18 h by pouring the mixture into distilled water and the product was isolated by centrifugation (13,000 rpm) and washed with water several times until the pH of the supernatant was almost neutral. The sample was then dried at room temperature.
2.2 Reduction and functionalization of GO with sulfonated aromatic diamines (rGO2,4-DBSA)
75 mg of GO were dispersed in 75 ml of deionized water and stirred for 24 h. The partly exfoliated GO was ultrasonicated for 30 min using a Branson 3800 bath sonicator (110 W, 40 kHz). Τhen, 225 mg of 2,4-diaminobenzenesulfonic acid (2,4-DBSA) were dispersed in the well-exfoliated GO suspension under stirring. The mixture was refluxed (~ 100 °C) under magnetic stirring for 5 h. After cooling the mixture to room temperature, it was centrifuged at 9000 rpm or vacuum filtered through Nylon membrane filters with 0.2 μm pore size (Whatman). Finally, the obtained solid was washed extensively with water, basic water solution (pH = 12), ethanol and acetone and air-dried. The same procedure was also followed with 2,5-diaminobenzenesulfonic acid (2,5-DBSA) as reductive agent.
2.3 Test of dispersibility
10 mg of rGO2,4-DBSA powder were dispersed in 2 ml of the following solvents (polarity index in parenthesis): dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) (7.2), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) (6.4), acetonitrile (5.8), ethanol (5.2), tetrahydrofuran (THF) (4.0), isopropanol (3.9), toluene (2.4) and dichloromethane (DCM) (3.1). The dispersions were sonicated in an ultrasound bath cleaner (Branson 3800, 110 W, 40 kHz).
2.4 Preparation of gravure inks
2.4.1 Conductive gravure ink suitable for absorbent substrates (Ink-1)
21.6 mg of the commercial resin emulsion NRB 001 L 3099 was diluted with distilled water to a final volume of 288 μL (75 μg μL−1) . Then, 800 μL of the rGO2,4-DBSA dispersion (33 mg mL−1) were slowly mixed with 288 μL of the diluted resin emulsion NRB 001 L 3099 (75 μg μL−1). The mixture was stirred mildly overnight. The percentage of the solids in the final suspension was 55% w/w in rGO2,4-DBSA.
2.4.2 Conductive gravure ink for non-absorbent substrates (Ink-2)
36.0 mg of the commercial resin emulsion NΜB 001 L 0003 was diluted with distilled water to a final volume of 540 μL (66.7 μg μL−1). Then, 649 μL of the rGO2,4-DBSA dispersion (44 mg mL−1) were slowly mixed with 351 μL of the diluted resin emulsion NΜB 001 L 0003. The mixture was stirred mildly overnight. The percentage of the solids in the final suspension was 55% w/w in rGO2,4-DBSA. It should be noted that the commercial varnishes are specially designed for water-based gravure inks.
2.5 Characterization of materials
X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) patterns were taken on a D-500 Siemens diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å). FT-IR spectra were collected on a Perkin Elmer Spectrum GX and a Bruker Tensor 27 FT-IR spectrometer, both equipped with DTGS detectors in the region of 400–4000 cm−1. The samples were measured in the form of KBr pellets (Aldrich, 99%, FT-IR grade). Similar amounts of GO and rGO samples were thoroughly mixed with KBr to prepare the pellets prior to analysis.
XPS measurements were performed under ultrahigh vacuum 4 × 10−9 mbar (base pressure) using a SPECS GmbH instrument equipped with a monochromatic MgKa source (hv = 1253.6 eV) and a Phoibos-100 hemispherical analyzer. The energy resolution was set to 1.2 eV and the photoelectron take-off angle was 45° with respect to the surface normal. Recorded spectra were set with energy step set of 0.05 eV and dwell time of 1 s. All binding energies were referenced with regard to the C1s core level centered at 284.6 eV . Spectral analysis included a Shirley background subtraction and peak deconvolution involved mixed Gaussian–Lorentzian functions and was conducted with a least squares curve-fitting program (WinSpec, University of Namur, Belgium).
Thermogravimetric analysis was performed on a SETARAM SETSYS Evolution 18 Analyser in an alumina crucible, at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 using Ar as the carrier gas, in the range of 25–650 °C. The nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms at 77 K were measured in a volumetric gas adsorption analyzer (Autosorb-1-MP, Quantachrome). Prior to measurement, the samples were outgassed at 100 °C for 12 h. The specific surface area values were calculated by the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method as applied at relative pressures between 0.07 and 0.3 (BET consistency criteria were respected).
Micro-Raman spectra, in the 300–3700 cm−1 range at room temperature, were measured in back scattering configuration on a dispersive Renishaw in-Via Reflex spectrometer with 250 mm focal length equipped with a high sensitivity, deep-depletion CCD detector. Excitation was performed by a solid state laser emitting at a wavelength of 514 nm. The laser beam was focused on several spots of 4.5 μm diameter on the sample’s surface using a 20 × objective lens of a Leica DMLM microscope in order to increase the statistic ensample by 25 times than using a 50 × objective lens. The power density, approximately 0.02 mW μm−2, was well below the damage threshold in order to avoid sample overheating. Raman scattered signal was filtered by a 100 cm−1 cut-off dielectric filter and analyzed with a 1200 lines mm−1 diffraction grating and resolution 2 cm−1. Spectral deconvolution was carried out by linear least squares fitting of the Raman peaks to a mixture of Lorentzian and Gaussian line shapes, after the hand-made background subtraction, using the WiRE software. Microscopic analysis of the samples was performed using Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) (JEOL-JEM 2100) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (JEOL JSM-6510LV).
For the electrical measurements, the rGO samples and rGO inks were drop casted on the selected coated paper as circular spots and dried at 75 °C for 60 min. To secure comparable results similar amounts of rGO were used for the spots. The samples were compressed at 2 tn according to previous works [21, 37] and the sample thickness was measured by an electronic micrometer (IP54, Tesa). Sheet resistance, resistivity and conductivity of the as deposited rGO samples were measured and estimated respectively by a 4-point probe system (Pro4 Resistivity System, Lucas Labs) and Keithley 2400 Source Meter.
2.6 Gravure printing of rGO ink
Printing substrates, machine speed and engraving are important parameters that contribute to the print quality. In the present case, the graphene ink prepared using the rGO2,4DBSA (Ink-1) was printed onto a 205 μm paper having hydrophilic nanoporous surface coating. The absorbent substrate was a special paper for organic and printed electronics obtained from Felix Schoeller Group (p_e: smart, paper type 2, thickness 205 μm). Τhe graphene ink prepared using the rGO2,4DBSA (Ink-2) was printed onto corona treated 16 μm BOPP (36 to 40 dynes cm−1) and 12 μm PET (44 to 50 dynes cm−1) substrates. The non absorbent substrates were available from Druckfarben Hellas S. A. The printing tests were done using the IGT G1-5 printability tester with two raster patterned printing cylinders named by IGT as 402.153 (70 lines per centimeter, screen angle 53, stylus angle 140 and cell depth 33; 31; 30; 29; 26; 24; 20; 17; 14; 11 µm) and 402.100 (40 and 70 lines per centimeter, screen angle 53, stylus angle 130 and cell depth 5; 10; 15; 20; 25; 30; 35; 40; 45; 50; 55; 60; 65; 70; 75; 80 µm). Before printing, the ink was applied with a pipette in front of a doctor blade and then transferred to the substrate. Τhe graphene inks were gravure printed for various print speeds (m min−1) and cylinder pressures (N) on the substrates.
3 Results and discussion
In order to clarify whether 2,4-DBSA was covalently attached or simply adsorbed on GO surface, a blank experiment was performed by mixing a water suspension of GO with 2,4-DBSA and after standing for several hours the product was isolated and washed thoroughly. The FT-IR spectrum of the blank product was almost identical with the spectrum of GO, indicating that 2,4-DBSA is not adsorbed by the GO surfaces at these conditions.
3.1 Dispersibility of functionalized rGOs
3.2 X-ray diffraction measurements of GO, rGO2,4-DBSA
On the other hand, a broad and weak peak appearing at 25.73 in rGO2,4-DBSA, corresponds to a d-spacing of ~ 0.34 nm close to the d002 spacing of graphite (0.335 nm) and could be attributed to the partial graphitic character of the reduced products in the form of a few layer turbostratic graphenic nanosheets . Accordingly, it could be reasonably supposed that GO layers were firstly reduced and organized in a few layers graphenic nanosheets and in a second step, these nanosheets were functionalized by the DBSA groups acquiring their final hydrophilic character in aqueous environment.
3.3 FTIR spectroscopy of GO, rGO2,4-DBSA
FTIR spectroscopy helps to reveal various chemical changes taking place during reduction of GO by 2,4-DBSA and functionalization. The FTIR spectra of GO, rGO2,4-DBSA are shown in Fig. 3b, c, respectively. The spectrum of GO is very similar to those already reported [15, 46]. Τhus, the strong and broad peak at ~ 3428 cm−1 is due to the stretching vibrations of O–H bond (carboxylic) [17, 46, 47], the shoulder at 1700 cm−1 to C=O stretching vibrations in carboxylic and carbonyl moieties presented at the edges of the GO sheets and at the edges of holes [17, 46, 47, 48, 49], the peaks at 1623 cm−1 and 1400 cm−1 are allocated to C=C in aromatic rings [46, 49, 50] and to the deformation vibrations of carboxylic O–H groups [17, 48]. The peak at 1220 cm−1 is usually assigned to phenolic C–OH vibration [48, 51] and that of 1053 cm−1 is assigned to the epoxy (or alcoxy) vibration [52, 53, 54].
Regarding the spectra of the product, the first observation is that following the reductive treatment with the sulfonated aromatic diamine, the FTIR spectrum of rGO2,4-DBSA clearly shows that GO peaks have undergone significant reduction in intensity indicating the presence of partially oxidized graphitic nanoplatelets (Fig. 3c). The successful reduction of GO is further indicated by the removal of the epoxy peak at 1053 cm−1 while the presence of the sulfonic groups is confirmed by the appearance of the intense peaks at 1165 (deformation vibration for S=O) [49, 50, 55, 56] and 1030 cm−1 (shoulder, symmetric vibration of O=S=O group) [56, 57] in agreement with the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy results (shown below). Thus, the spectra show clearly that the sulfonated aromatic diamines are present in the reduced GO sheets.
We note that the presence of the peaks at 1400 cm−1 (O–H deformation vibration) and at 1715 cm−1 in treated sample indicates that carboxylic and C=O groups are still present in rGO layers (Fig. 3c) in good agreement with the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements presented below. Furthermore, the peak at 1565 cm−1 and the wide shoulder around 730 cm−1 correspond to the stretching and deformation vibrations of N–H in –C–NH–C group indicating a covalent binding of DBSA on graphene surface [14, 58]. The presence of nitrogen is confirmed by the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements and presented below.
3.4 X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of GO and rGO2,4-DBSA
3.5 TGA measurements of GO, rGO2,4-DBSA
The thermogravimetric (TGA) behavior of the samples helps to evaluate the level of reduction of GO by the aromatic sulfonated diamines. The TGA thermograms in argon atmosphere, depicted in Fig. 6a, show the weight loss as a function of temperature. GO exhibits different thermal response compared to rGO2,4-DBSA. The weight loss of GO up to 135 °C (~ 15%) is usually attributed to the evaporation of adsorbed water. The most important weight loss (~ 60%), observed in the region of 180–205 °C, is assigned to water, CO and CO2 removal after the decomposition of the oxygen-containing functional groups . The weight loss is continued slowly in the region of 200–600 °C, where a ~ 10% loss is observed and is attributed to the pyrolytic degradation of the carbon skeleton as well as SO2, CO2 and water removal [40, 47, 61]. In contrast, the rGO2,4-DBSA sample shows overall weight loss of 24% up to 600 °C, reflecting its significantly higher thermal stability owing to the partial deoxygenation and graphitization during the reductive treatments [40, 62]. rGO2,4-DBSA shows a weight loss of ~ 6% up to 180 °C due to the water removal and a ~ 20% between 200 and 400 °C from the pyrolytic removal of the oxygen functional and DBSA groups from the graphene surface (see Fig. 6a). The main carbon skeleton is stable up to 600 °C, indicating the successful graphitization of the procedure.
3.6 Raman spectroscopy of GO, rGO2,4-DBSA
The main result here is the sharpness and the size of 2D band. After the reduction/functionalization procedure, the broad and weak 2D band of GO become sharper and more intense as a result of the graphitization of the products. The ratio of ID/IG for rGO2,4-DBSA is enhanced compared to GO indicating that reduction process and functionalization from DBSA alters the structure of GO [7, 62, 64, 65, 67, 68]. It is well documented that the removal of oxygen functional groups during the reduction process creates graphenic networks (sp2 carbon) which are usually much smaller than the starting GO, leading to an increase in the ID/IG ratio [7, 9, 62, 63, 69, 70, 71].
3.7 Measurements of surface area
3.8 Electrical measurements
Electrical conductivity (S m−1) of GO, rGOs (dried at 75 °C, after drop casting in paper and pressed at 2 tn)
Conductivity (S m−1)
9 × 10−4
2 × 103
1.0 × 105
Such high values of conductivity, that are among the highest in the literature  in combination with the high dispersibilities of the as prepared rGOs are hardly achieved for chemically reduced GO.
In terms of conductivity of gravure inks thus ranges between 12,000 and 15,400 S m−1, values which are among the higher reported in the literature [29, 75, 76]. In Fig. 7f, the stability and flexibility of the conductive ink (Ink-1), drop casted on a filter paper, with or without curved surface is depicted for demonstration. The resistance in both cases remained the same, while the compression process at 2 tn was not applied in these samples .
3.9 Gravure printing of graphene
The gravure printing process is one of the highest throughput printing processes of graphic arts. Gravure found application in the field of printed electronics in recent years as a way to low cost electronic devices for huge production volumes. However, this method has always been used extensively in industrial scale applications such as printing of magazines, newspapers, flexible packaging, labels, wallpapers, floor coverings, kitchen units, security documents etc. Gravure is a roll-to-roll printing technology achieving excellent image quality with high production speeds (20–1000 m min−1) and fine resolution. Also, a wide range of substrates such as paper, board, plastic films and metal foils are printed by this technology. The principle of this method is simple. The printing unit includes the engraved gravure cylinder, the ink fountain, the doctor blade (tightly pressed blade) and the impression roller. The process comprises an image engraving onto the surface of gravure cylinder in the form of cells acting as ink wells. The gravure cylinder is immersed in the ink fountain filling the cells of the gravure cylinder. The ink is removed from the non-image by blades in order to have ink only in the cells. The substrate is consequently rolled between the gravure cylinder and the impression cylinder. Applying suitable pressure, the ink is transferred from cylinder cells to the substrate . The gravure process requires low viscosity inks (0.05–0.20 Pa s) combined with rapid solvent evaporation and formulated from soluble materials or nanoparticle dispersions . The thickness of the ink layer on the substrate varies between 0.8 and 8 μm.
Gravure inks, Ink-1 and Ink-2, derived from rGO2,4-DBSA, were prepared as described in the experimental section and showed excellent homogeneity as derived from the SEM image (Si wafer, Fig. 7a). Similar results were observed when a hydrophilic graphene/carbon nanotube hybrid was used as filler for gravure printing ink based on the same resin (NRB 001 L 3099) . From Fig. 7d derives that the printed cells show ink uniformity (complete printed image area coverage). This means that ink parameters (viscosity, surface tension), quality of the substrate, interaction of ink with the substrate and parameters of printing (velocity, cylinder pressure etc.) are in a satisfying level. Selected patterns having promising printability properties are presented in Fig. 7b, c. However, the application of such gravure rGO inks in printed electronics is a distinguishable scientific work and demands further optimization of the parameters related to printing (e.g. ink formulation, engraving specifications, printability tolerance regards on printing parameters such as printing speed and printing pressure using standard printing test image etc.) .
We have described a facile, efficient, one-pot reduction and functionalization method of graphene oxide using sulfonated aromatic diamine, avoiding harsh chemical treatments or annealing at high temperature. The as prepared reduced/functionalized graphene derivative was fully characterized by various methods and found to possess high dispersibilities in various solvents and excellent electrical conductivity. We have also demonstrated gravure printing of water-based graphene inks on flexible substrates through the formulation of inks from chemically reduced graphene oxide and commercial water-based varnishes. A further optimization of such ink formulations and gravure printing parameters would be the next step for their potential commercial applications in flexible electronics.
This research has been co‐financed by the European Union and Greek national funds through the Operational Program Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation, under the call RESEARCH – CREATE – INNOVATE (Project Code: T1EDK-02093). The authors would also like to thank (a) IOANNOU ICR S.A. manufacturer of rotogravure cylinders for the donation of IGT G1-5 printability tester used in this research (b) D. Mantis from Druckfarben Hellas S.A. for the donation of various resin systems, corona treated substrates and helpful discussions and (c) Dr. G. Vlahopoulos for his helpful comments and technical support (d) Prof. D. Triantis and Prof. Elias Stavrakas for the resistivity measurements at the Electronic Devices and Materials Lab - EDML (Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, University of West Attica) (e) Dr. R. Gumbiowski from Felix-Schoeller for the donation of various types of p_e: smart paper. The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr Mary Kollia and the Laboratory of Electron Microscopy and Microanalysis, School of Natural Sciences, University of Patras for the TEM measurements.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 5.Hernandez Y, Nicolosi V, Lotya M, Blighe F, Sun Z, De S, McGovern IT, Holland B, Byrne M, Gunko Y, Boland J, Niraj P, Duesberg G, Krishnamurti S, Goodhue R, Hutchison J, Scardaci V, Ferrari AC, Coleman JN (2008) High yield production of graphene by liquid phase exfoliation of graphite. Nat Nanotechnol 3:563–568. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.215 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Ma HL, Zhang HB, Hu QH, Li WJ, Jiang ZG, Yu ZZ, Dasari A (2012) Functionalization and reduction of graphene oxide with p-phenylene diamine for electrically conductive and thermally stable polystyrene composites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:1948–1953. https://doi.org/10.1021/am201654b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Georgakilas V, Demeslis A, Ntararas E, Kouloumpis A, Dimos K, Gournis D, Kocman M, Otyepka M, Zboril R (2015) Hydrophilic nanotube supported graphene-water dispersible carbon superstructure with excellent conductivity. Adv Funct Mater 25:1481–1487. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201403801 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Hrehorova E, Rebros M, Pekarovicova A, Bazuin B, Ranganathan A, Garner S, Merz G, Tosch J, Boudreau R (2011) Gravure printing of conductive inks on glass substrates for applications in printed electronics. IEEE/OSA J Disp Technol 7:318–324. https://doi.org/10.1109/JDT.2010.2065214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Kirchmeyer S, Hecker K (2014) LOPE-C exhibition: visitor target groups. Org Print Electron 9. http://www.oe-a.org/documents/10179/31903/OE-A_Brochure2013.pdf
- 31.Knoll T (2016) High-resolution gravure printing of graphene for biomedical applications. Presentation at Advanced Functional & Industrial Printing conference (AFIP), 2–3 March 2016. Düsseldorf. https://www.graphene-biosensors.eu/modx-2.3.3-pl/media/pdf/Presentation_Th.Knoll_AFIP2016_komprimiert.pdf
- 36.Xie Y, Sherwood PMA (1990) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic studies of carbon fiber surfaces. 11. Differences in the surface chemistry and bulk structure of different carbon fibers based on poly (acrylonitrile) and pitch and comparison with various graphite samples. Chem Mater 2:293–299. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm00009a020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 47.Mirza-Aghayan M, Molaee Tavana M, Boukherroub R (2016) Sulfonated reduced graphene oxide as a highly efficient catalyst for direct amidation of carboxylic acids with amines using ultrasonic irradiation. Ultrason Sonochem 29:371–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.10.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 56.Kuila T, Khanra P, Kim NH, Choi SK, Yun HJ, Lee JH (2013) One-step electrochemical synthesis of 6-amino-4-hydroxy-2-napthalene-sulfonic acid functionalized graphene for green energy storage electrode materials. Nanotechnology 24:365706–365716. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/24/36/365706 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 59.Han N, Cuong TV, Han M, Ryu BD, Chandramohan S, Park JB, Kang JH, Park YJ, Ko KB, Kim HYHK, Ryu JH, Katharria YS, Choi GJ, Hong C (2013) Improved heat dissipation in gallium nitride light-emitting diodes with embedded graphene oxide pattern. Nat Commun 4:1452. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2448 CrossRefGoogle Scholar