Advertisement

A Study on Efficacy of Wavelet Transform for Damage Identification in Reinforced Concrete Buildings

  • Shiv Singh Patel
  • Ajay Chourasia
  • S. K. Panigrahi
  • S. K. Bhattacharyya
  • Jalaj Parashar
Original Paper
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction

Structural damage and its extent can be detected by vibration-based techniques to avoid failure or to minimize maintenance. Among different damage identification techniques, modal curvature approaches are widely researched and applied one. On the contrary, wavelet transformation (WT) methods are gaining popularity in damage identification of real life buildings because of their suitability for non-stationary signals and non-dependency on baseline data. This paper presents a novel approach utilizing complex continuous wavelet to effectively locate change in physical properties of reinforced concrete (RC) buildings by virtue of variation in frequency and mode shapes due to small change in mass and stiffness.

Methods

In this paper, the effect of variation of mass and stiffness of a building on the modal parameters is established analytically using theequation of motion for a multi-degree freedom system under forced vibration condition. A 3-D finite element model was developed for predicting the modal frequencies and mode shapes of the scaled down six storey RC building and the effect of addition of mass on a particular level of structure on the modal parameters was studied. Further, acceleration time histories were recorded with variation in mass on 3rd story of building using wireless tri-axial accelerometers and the time histories were processed to arrive at Curvature Damage Factor and wavelet coefficients for identification of the additional load on the particular floor.

Results

Vibration responses from all floors of RC building in ambient and loaded conditions were analyzed for frequency response spectra (FRS). Mode shapes were drawn for unloaded case and loaded cases. It was observed that the modal frequency of building decreases with the increase in mass at floors. It is observed that CDF approach could detect the change in mass in both numerical and experimental results. However, CDF algorithm could not detect the addition of load in case 1, 2 and 3, i.e. when load was less than 25 kg, i.e. only 2.6% of floor mass (960 kg). The acquired data for the above stated load cases were analyzed using complex Gaussian ‘cgau5’ wavelet in MATLAB toolbox to determine the singularity in the signal in terms of wavelet coefficient modulus. It is observed that the WT approach is able to precisely locate the change in physical parameters of the RC model building. However, it is seen that additional load could not be detected in case where only 9 kg, i.e. 0.93% of the total floor mass, was placed on 3rd floor.

Conclusions

From the research work, it is observed that CDF technique is inefficient in damage detection and always demand prior baseline information, which is usually difficult to obtain in practice. However, the wavelet transform-based approach more accurately detects the location of change without relying on intact state vibration data.

Keywords

Wavelet transformation Damage identification Structural health monitoring Reinforced concrete building Signal processing Curvature damage factor 

References

  1. 1.
    Koohdaragh M, Lotfollahi-Yaghin MA, Ettefagh MM, Mojtehedi A, Beyghbabaye B (2011) Damage detection in beam-like structure based on wavelet packet. Sci Resa Essays 6(7):1537–1545Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rytter A (1993) Vibration based inspection of civil engineering structures. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Building Technology and Structural Engineering, Aalborg University, Denmark, vol R9314, no 44Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cawley P, Adams RD (1979) The location of defects in structures from measurements of natural frequencies. J Strain Anal 14(2):49–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fan W, Qiao P (2011) Vibration-based damage identification methods: a review and comparative study. Struct Health Monit 10(1):83–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Patel SS, Chourasia AP, Panigrahi SK, Parashar J, Parvez N, Kumar M (2016) Damage identification of RC structures using wavelet transformation. Procedia Eng 144:336–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Amiri GG, Asadi A (2009) Comparison of different methods of wavelet and wavelet packet transform in processing ground motion records. Int J Civil Eng 7(4):248–257Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Staszewski WJ, Tomlinson GR (1994) Application of the wavelet transform to fault detection in a spur gear. J Mech Syst Signal Process 8(3):289–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang WJ, McFadden PD (1996) Application of wavelets to gearbox vibration signals for fault detection. J Sound Vib 192(5):927–939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hou Z, Noori M, Amand RS (2000) Wavelet-based approach for structural damage detection. J Eng Mech 126(7):677–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mallat S (2001) A wavelet tour of signal processing. Academic Press, San DiegozbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moyo P, Brownjohn JMW (2002) Detection of anomalous structural behavior using wavelet analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process 16(2–3):429–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sun Z, Chang CC (2002) Structural damage assessment based on wavelet packet transform. J Struct Eng 128(10):1354–1361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Amaravadi V, Rao V, Koval LR, Derriso MM (2011) Structural health monitoring using wavelet transforms. In: Proceedings of SPIE, smart structures and materials 2001: smart structures and integrated systems, vol 4327, pp 258–269Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gurley K, Kijewski T, Kareem A (2003) First and higher order correlation detection using wavelet transforms. J Eng Mech 129(2):188–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jaya Prakash G, Swarnamani S (2008) Damage identification in composite beams using continuous wavelet transform applied to mode shape and strain energy data. Adv Vib Eng 7(2):127–141Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gentile A, Messina A (2003) On the continuous wavelet transforms applied to discrete vibrational data for detecting open cracks in damaged beams. Int J Solids Struct 40:95–315CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Panigrahi SK, Chakraverty S, Mishra BK (2013) Damage assessment in beam with sparse modal information. Adv Vib Eng 12(4):343–348Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Melhem H, Kim H (2003) Damage detection in concrete by Fourier and wavelet analyses. J Eng Mech 129(5):571–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kim H, Melhem H (2004) Damage detection of structures by wavelet analysis. J Eng Struct 26:347–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ovanesova AV, Suarez LE (2004) Applications of wavelet transforms to damage in frame structures. Eng Struct 26:39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Basu B (2005) Identification of stiffness degradation in structures using wavelet analysis. Constr Build Mater 19:713–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Goggins J, Broderick BM, Basu B, Elghazouli AY (2007) Investigation of seismic response of braced frames using wavelet analysis. Struct Control Health Monit 14:627–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Radzienski M, Krawczuk M (2009) Experimental verification and comparison of mode shape-based damage detection methods. In: 7th International conference on modern practice in stress and vibration analysis. J Phys Conf Ser, vol 181Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Asaee ZS, Anvar SA, Sherafat Z (2011) Comparison of modal parameters of multi-story buildings obtained by different wavelet functions. In: Proceedings of IOMAC11-4th international operational modal analysis conferenceGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Miao XY, Wang SL, Fan YJ (2011) Study on damage identification for reinforced concrete structures based on wavelet transform. Appl Mech Mater 94–96:1505–1510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Noh HY, Nair KK, Lignos DG, Kiremidjian AS (2011) Use of wavelet-based damage-sensitive features for structural damage diagnosis using strong motion data. J Struct Eng 137(10):1215–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Xue G (2012) Damage detection of reinforced concrete beams by wavelet analysis. Appl Mech Mater 166–169:1416–1421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chen B, Chen ZW, Wang GJ, Xie WP (2014) Damage detection on sudden stiffness reduction based on discrete wavelet transform. Sci World J 2014:807620.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/807620 Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Buyukozturk O, Yu T (2003) Structural health monitoring and seismic impact assessment. In: Proceedings of fifth national conference on earthquake engineering, Istanbul, Turkey, 26–30 May 2003Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pandey AK, Biswas M, Samman MM (1991) Damage detection from changes in curvature mode shapes. J Sound Vib 145(2):321–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wahab MMA, Roeck GD (1999) Damage detection in bridges using modal curvatures: application to a real damage scenario. J Sound Vib 226(2):217–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Harry HG, Gajanan MS (1999) Structural modeling and experimental techniques, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kanwar VS, Kwatra N, Aggarwal P, Gambir ML (2008) Health monitoring of RCC building model experimentally and its analytical validation. Eng Comput Int J Comput Aided Eng Softw 25(7):677–693Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Krishtel eMaging Solutions Private Limited 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shiv Singh Patel
    • 1
    • 3
  • Ajay Chourasia
    • 1
  • S. K. Panigrahi
    • 1
  • S. K. Bhattacharyya
    • 2
  • Jalaj Parashar
    • 1
  1. 1.CSIR-Central Building Research InstituteRoorkeeIndia
  2. 2.Indian Institute of Technology, KharagpurKharagpurIndia
  3. 3.Academy of Scientific and Innovative ResearchRoorkeeIndia

Personalised recommendations