Advertisement

Vibration Suppression of Quarter Car Using Sliding-Mode and Internal Model-Based Skyhook Controller

  • Arunshankar Jayabalan
  • Nivas Kumar Suresh Kumar
Original Paper
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

In the present day world, ride comfort is one of the prime factors that is used for determining the performance of an automobile. Traditionally, skyhook control algorithm is employed to provide good ride quality.

Procedure

This paper proposes a technique to improve the performance of the traditional skyhook control algorithm by combining it with the sliding mode and internal model principle.

Results

The simulation results show that the technique devised in this paper is more effective than the traditional stand-alone skyhook controller.

Keywords

Quarter car Skyhook controller Groundhook controller Sliding-mode controller (SMC) Internal model controller (IMC) 

References

  1. 1.
    Chen C, Li H, Gao H (2006) Study on self-optimizing integrated skyhook control algorithm of semi-active suspension system. Intell Control Autom 2:6513–6516Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Guo S, Xu B, Xing H, Pan C (2006) Skyhook isolation with magnetorheological damper. Intell Control Autom 2:7860–7863Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nguyen LH, Park S, Turnip A, Hong KS (2009) Modified Skyhook control of a suspension system with hydraulic strut. In: ICCAS-SICE International Joint Conference, pp 1347–1352Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim RK, Hong KS (2007) Skyhook control using a full-vehicle model and four displacement sensors. In: International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems, pp 268–272Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang BL, Tang GY, Cao FL (2009) Optimal sliding mode control for active suspension systems. In: International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control, pp 351–356Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yao J, Zheng J (2006) Semi-active suspension system design for quarter-car model using model reference sliding mode control. In: IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety, pp 398–402Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tamboli JA (2006) Measurement of ride comfort of a vehicle: a case study. Adv Vib Eng 5(3):201–205Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hazra S, Ghosh MK (2009) Vibration isolation performance of a vehicle suspension system using dual dynamic dampers. Adv Vib Eng 8(2):193–200Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rao JS (2009) Engineering mechanical vibrations in 20th century. Adv Vib Eng 8(2):87–113Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pable MJ, Seshu P (2010) Optimization of a passive suspensions to mimic active suspensions. Adv Vib Eng 9(2):131–144Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xu ZB, Gong X, Chen X (2011) Development of a mechanical semi-active vibration absorber. Adv Vib Eng 10(3):229–238Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ashory MR, Najafi M, Jamshidi E (2012) Optimal design of a damped vibration absorber using genetic algorithm. Adv Vib Eng 11(1):47–58Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Conde EC, González FBCAV, Bracamontes RC (2011) Generalized PI control of active vehicle suspension systems with MATLAB. In: Michalowski T (ed) Applications of MATLAB in Science and Engineering. InTech, pp 335–352Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Miller LR (1986) An introduction to semi active suspension systems. Lord Library of Technical Articles, Document LL-1204Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Agharkakli A, Sabet GS, Barouz A (2012) Simulation and analysis of passive and active suspension system using quarter car model for different road profile. Int J Eng Trends Technol 3(5)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chen Y (2009) Skyhook surface sliding mode control on semi-active vehicle suspension system for ride comfort enhancement. Sci Res 1:23–32Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Utkin VI (1977) Variable structure systems with sliding modes. IEEE Trans Autom Control 22(2):212–222MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    DeCarlo RA, Zak SH, Mathews G (1988) Variable structure control of nonlinear multivariable systems: a tutorial. Proc IEEE 76(3)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hung JY, Gao W, Hung JC (1993) Variable structure control: a survey. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 40(1)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Young KD, Utkin VI, Özgüner Ü (1999) A control engineer’s guide to sliding mode control. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 7(3):328–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bartolini G, Fridman L, Pisano A, Usai E. Modern sliding mode control theory—new perspectives and applications. In: Springer Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol 375Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Song X (2009) Cost-effective skyhook control for semiactive vehicle suspension applications. Open Mech Eng J 3:17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Goncalves FD (2001) Dynamic analysis of semi-active control techniques for vehicle applications. MS Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Galanti F (2013) Modelling, simulation and control for a skyhook algorithm. Pontifical Catholic UniversityGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bayrakdar O (2010) Random vibration of a road vehicle. MS Thesis, Izmir Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Costa-Castello R, Olm JM, Vargas H, Ramos GA (2012) An educational approach to the internal model principle for periodic signals. Int J Innov Comput Inf Control 8(8):5591–5606Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lu YS (2004) Sliding-mode controller design with internal model principle for systems subject to periodic signals. In: Proceeding of the 2004 American Control Conference Boston, pp 1952–1957Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tham MT (2002) Introduction to robust control, lecture notes. University of NewcastleGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bequette BW (2002) Process control: modelling, design and simulation. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Moudgalya K (2007) Digital control. WileyGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Apkarian J, Abdossalami A (2013) Laboratory guide: active suspension experiment for MATLAB/Simulink Users, QuanserGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Krishtel eMaging Solutions Private Limited 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arunshankar Jayabalan
    • 1
  • Nivas Kumar Suresh Kumar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Instrumentation and Control Systems EngineeringPSG College of TechnologyCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations