Advertisement

Design of Synchronization Controller for the Station-Keeping Hovering Mode of Quad-Rotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

  • Khoa Dang NguyenEmail author
  • Cheolkeun Ha
Original Paper
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

Quad-rotors are a common type of small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) that consist of a body frame connected to four independent motors. The motors in quad-rotor UAVs are independently controlled by tracking controllers, which receive no information for each other. The overall performance of quad-rotor UAVs is affected by the performance of its motor control. Therefore, poor performance in the control of its motors causes the overall performance of quad-rotor UAVs to deteriorate. In this paper, we address this issue by developing a synchronization controller (SYNC) for a quad-rotor UAV for achieving the station-keeping hovering. The proposed control scheme consists of two controllers, which include a sliding mode controller (SMC) that is used to control the motor velocity, and a motor synchronization controller (M_SYNC) based on a PID and neural network controller that is used to compensate for the synchronization errors that occur between the motors due to system nonlinearities, uncertainties and external disturbances. To guarantee the stability of the quad-rotor UAV, a Lyapunov stability condition was introduced to design both the SMC and the M_SYNC. The proposed SYNC controller was evaluated through numerical simulations. The simulation results demonstrate that the SYNC controller was effective at improving the tracking performance of the UAV.

Keywords

Synchronization Quad-rotor UAV Neural network Sliding mode control 

References

  1. 1.
    Sanghyuk P (2016) Vision-based guidance for loitering over a target. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci 17(3):366–377.  https://doi.org/10.5139/ijass.2016.17.3.366 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sudiyanto T, Muljowidodo M, Budiyono A (2009) First principle approach to modeling of primitive quad rotor. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci 10(2):148–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jangho Lee, Choi HS (2016) Fault tolerant control of hexacopter for actuator faults using time delay control method. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci 17:54–63.  https://doi.org/10.5139/ijass.2016.17.1.54 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gnemmi P, Changey S, Wey P, Roussel E, Rey C, Boutayeb M, Lozano R (2017) Flight phases with tests of a projectile-drone hybrid system. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 99:1–15Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jun L, Yuntang L (2011) Dynamic analysis and PID control for a quadrotor. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation. China, pp 573–578Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Salih AL, Moghavvemi M, Mohamed HAF, Gaeid KS (2010) Modelling and PID controller design for a quadrotor unmanned air vehicle. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics. Romania, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Seidabad EA, Vandaki S, Kamyad AV (2014) Designing fuzzy PID controller for quadrotor. Int J Adv Res Comput Sci Technol 2(4):221–227Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deepak G, Cheolkeun H (2013) Control of a quadrotor using a smart self-tuning fuzzy PID controller. Int J Adv Robot Syst 10:380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ji Y, Yu Y, Zhang W, Sun C (2015) Attitude control of a quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicle based on linear extended state observer. In: The 27th Chinese Control and Decision Conference. China, pp 1350–1355Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li-ben Y, Wei-guo Z, Yong H (2015) Sliding mode control based on extended observer for underactuated Quadrotor UAV. In: Proceedings of the 34th Chinese Control Conference. China, pp 5513–5516Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mian AA, Daobo W (2008) Modeling and backstepping-based nonlinear control strategy for a 6 DOF quadrotor helicopter. Chin J Aeronaut 21:261–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mian AA, Ahmad MI, Wang D (2008) Backstepping based PID control strategy for an underactuated aerial robot. IFAC Proc 41:15636–15641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kriuaya R, Varawan V (2017) Sliding mode control of quadrotor. In: International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technology. China, pp 244–252Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xiong JJ, Zhang G (2016) Sliding mode control for a quadrotor UAV with parameter uncertainties. In: 2016 2nd International Conference on Control, Automation and Robotics, pp 207–212Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khatoon S, Gupta D, Das LK (2015) PID & LQR control for a quadrotor: modeling and simulation. In: 2015 Workshop on Research, Education and Development of Unmanned Aerial Systems, pp 411–418Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rajappa S, Masone C, Bulthoff HH, Stegagno P (2016) Adaptive super twisting controller for a Quadrotor UAV. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp 2971–2977Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chan HL, Woo KT (2015) Design and control of small Quadcopter system with motor closed loop speed control. Int J Mech Eng Robot Res 4(4):287–292Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gonzalez I, Salazar S, Torres J, Lozano R, Romero H (2013) Real-time attitude stabilization of a mini-UAV quad-rotor using motor speed feedback. J Intell Rob Syst 70:93–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu H, Gao G (2017) Dynamic modeling and analyzing for a novel X-Quadrotor. In; 3rd IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chotai J, Narwekar K (2017) Modelling and position control of brushed DC motor. In: 2017 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication and Control. IndiaGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ibrahim HEA, Hassan FN, Shomer AO (2014) Optimal PID control of a brushless DC motor using PSO and BF techniques. Ain Shams Eng J 5:391–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li J, Cheng J, Shi J, Huang F (2012) Brief introduction of back propagation (BP) neural network algorithm and its improvement. Adv Comput Sci Inf Eng 2:553–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vepa R (2016) Nonlinear control of robots and unmanned aerial vehicle. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society for Aeronautical & Space Sciences and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Thuyloi UniversityHanoiVietnam
  2. 2.School of Mechanical and Automotive EngineeringUniversity of UlsanUlsanSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations