Advertisement

The Mechanism for the Quasi-Back-Attack Phenomenon of Gas Jets Submerged in Water

  • Tang YunlongEmail author
  • Li Shipeng
Original Paper

Abstract

Over-expanded and under-expanded gas jets submerged in water have been studied through numerical simulation and experiments. Comparisons between numerical and experimental results are made to validate the conclusion that the ‘quasi-back-attack’ phenomenon in high-unexpanded conditions is caused by the obstruction of the shock waves acted on back-attacked gas. As a consequence, back-attacked gas cannot reach the wall of the motor. A detailed analysis of the results reveals the underlying mechanism of the structure of the gas jet under different operating conditions. Meanwhile, the characterization of the motor’s thrust indicates that the oscillation amplitude of thrust drops sharply after the occurrence of quasi-back-attack phenomenon, which is beneficial to the stability of the motor.

Keywords

Gas jets Subaqueous Quasi-back-attack Shock waves Thrust oscillation 

References

  1. 1.
    Oryall GN, Brimacombe JK (1976) The physical behavior of a gas jet injected horizontally into liquid metal. Metall Trans B 7(3):391–403.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02652710 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hoefele EO, Brimacombe JK (1979) Flow regime in submerged gas injection. Metall Trans B 10(4):631–648.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02662566 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yang QX, Gustavsson H (1992) Effects of gas jet instability on refractory wear. a study by high-speed photography. Scand J Metall 21(1):15–26Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ozawa Y, Mori K (2006) Effect of physical properties of gas and liquid on bubbling-jetting phenomena in gas injection into liquid. ISIJ Int 26(4):291–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Loth E, Faeth GM (1989) Structure of underexpanded round air jets submerged in water. Int J Multiph Flow 15(4):589–603.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(89)90055-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guo Q, Wang XG, Shi HH et al (2009) Experimental study on the dynamic instability of quasi-two-dimensional submerged high-speed gas jet. In: National symposium on hydrodynamics Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aoki T, Masuda S, Hatano A, Taga M (1982) Characteristics of submerged gas jets and a new type bottom blowing tuyere. In: Wraith AE (ed) Injection phenomena in extraction and refining. University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle, pp A1–A36Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bisio G, Rubatto G (2002) Process improvements in iron and steel industry by analysis of heat and mass transfer. Energy Convers Manag 43(2):205–220.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(01)00026-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weiland C, Yagla J, Vlachos P (2008) Submerged gas jet interface stability. XXII ICTAM 8:25–29Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhu W, Chen H, Huang S (2010) Numerical study of the process of the evolution of bubble of high-speed jet underwater. J Propul Tech 31(4):496–502.  https://doi.org/10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.2010.04.019
  11. 11.
    Cao JY, Lu CJ, Li J et al (2009) Research on dynamic characteristics of underwater supersonic gas jets. J Hydrodyn 24(5):595–582.  https://doi.org/10.16076/j.cnki.cjhd.2009.05.003
  12. 12.
    Tang JN, Wang NF, Wei S (2011) Flow structures of gaseous jets injected into water for underwater propulsion. Acta Mech Sin 27(4):461–472CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tang JN, Liu XY, Wang NF (2012) Study on the thrust characteristics of the underwater solid rocket motor. Missiles Space Veh 5:15–21Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Qi LX, Chao Y, Wang BY (2012) Experimental study of under-expand sonic air jets in water. Acta Mech Sin 32(6):667–675Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tang YL, Li SP, Liu Z et al (2015) Horizontal jet characteristics of an underwater solid rocket motor at the beginning of working. Acta Phys Sin 23(64):234702-1–234702-13.  https://doi.org/10.7498/aps.64.234702 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang C, Wang JF, Shi HH (2015) Numerical simulation and experiments on submerged supersonic gas jets. CIESC J 65(11):4293–4300.  https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.11.011 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kam HD, Kim JS (2013) Assessment and validation of turbulence models for the optimal computation of supersonic nozzle flow. Korean Soc Propuls Eng 17(1):18–25.  https://doi.org/10.6108/KSPE.2013.17.1.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shi HH, Wang BY, Dai ZQ (2010) Research on the mechanics of underwater supersonic gas jets. Chin Phys Mech 53(3):527–535.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-010-0150-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tang J, Li S, Wang N et al (2010) Flow structures of gaseous jet injected into liquid for underwater propulsion. In: AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibitGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang X, Tang Y, Tang J et al (2015) Impact of phase transitions on the flow structure of gaseous jets injected into water. In: AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibitGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tang JN, Li SP, Wang NF (2012) Study on the negative thrust of the underwater solid rocket engines. J Solid Rocket Technol 35(3):325–329Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Verma SB (2012) Performance characteristics of an annular conical aerospike nozzle with freestream effect. J Propuls Power 25(3):783–791.  https://doi.org/10.2514/1.40302 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society for Aeronautical & Space Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.AML, Department of Engineering MechanicsTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Center for Mechanics and MaterialsTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.School of Aerospace EngineeringBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations