Advertisement

SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 134–141 | Cite as

Piriformis Muscle Syndrome, Post Discectomy: a Comprehensive Review of its Diagnostic Process and Management, Illustrated with the Aid of a Case Report

  • Emanuel Schembri
Medicine
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Medicine

Abstract

This review, with the help of a case study, provides a detailed account of the possible biopsychosocial risk factors underlying piriformis muscle syndrome, post discectomy. The diagnostic process including imaging, nerve conduction studies, musculoskeletal examination coupled with provocation maneuvers, palpation, and the musculoskeletal differential diagnosis of buttock pain is illustrated. Reference is made to the aberrant sciatic nerve anatomy and to the myofascial component which is frequently reported to underlie piriformis muscle syndrome. Additionally, the use of validated neuropathic pain assessment tools in grading the possibility of neuropathic pain due to piriformis muscle syndrome is discussed. The prevalence and mechanisms of piriformis muscle syndrome, especially post sipnal surgery, are reviewed. Evidence-based multidisciplinary management underlying this condition is discussed. In refractory cases, treatment escalation, using intramuscular botulinum neurotoxin injection, usually yields very positive results and long-term pain resolution, as evidenced by the case study.

Keywords

Piriformis muscle syndrome Piriformis syndrome Botulinum toxin Failed back surgery syndrome Discectomy 

Introduction

This review, with an integrated case report of a patient suffering predominantly from piriformis muscle syndrome (PMS) post discectomy, will detail the latest evidence-based risk factors, differential diagnosis, and management of PMS.

Case Study Assessment (Supplementary Material)

Patient History

The patient is a 37-year-old male, who works as an office clerk on a full-time basis. The patient’s low back pain (LBP) started insidiously in 2005. He was prescribed celecoxib 400 mg daily, to no avail. Soon afterwards, a conventional supine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan without myelography showed a moderately sized posterior disc herniation at L5/S1, impinging on the left S1 root. Three years later, the patient underwent an L5/S1 discectomy, due to severe LBP with radiculopathy. The patient recovered relatively well but still suffered from frequent episodes of LBP.

Following a fall, he fractured the left tibia, increasing his LBP. A repeat spine and pelvis conventional supine MRI without myelography did not show any recurrence of disc herniation. Following the recovery from the fracture, he started to attend Pilates classes which decreased his LBP but caused moderate to severe neck pain. Consequently, he soon stopped attending classes as he felt that this was increasing his pain, fearing that the exercises could jeopardize his spine.

Subjective Assessment

Currently, his main complaint is left-sided, deep-seated, severe buttock pain, aching in nature, of relatively stable intensity with frequent pain attacks lasting for about half an hour. He complained of moderate intensity, non-specific, mechanical LBP too. The short-form McGill pain questionnaire was used and the following descriptors were chosen for his buttock pain:
  • Aching—severe

  • Tender—severe

  • Tiring/exhausting—severe

  • Punishing—severe

The visual analog scale (VAS) for the hip pain was 9.3 out of 10. Although he did not mention any associated physical features, his buttock pain is described as “mood altering pain” portrayed in his Hospital Anxiety and Depression score (HADs) (Supplementary Material, page 3).

The pain is eased temporarily by heat and bed rest. Paracetamol 1 g daily in the morning and pregabalin 150 mg/day decreased his hip pain slightly. His left buttock pain is aggravated by sitting for more than 10–20 min, especially on hard surfaces and during cross-legged sitting. His LBP increased with prolonged standing and spasms after 15-min walking. He complains of daily morning stiffness lasting for 30 min. He spends much time in bed, and he avoids lifting heavy objects or doing house maintenance works. He underwent intra-articular steroid facet joint infiltrations and a medial branch block which decreased his LBP slightly.

The patient is a clerk and currently employed within the family run business. Thus, he felt safe and understood at work. However, he feels isolated from his friends, as he cannot continue to play the occasional football game with them due to the pain. He acknowledged his wife for her great support and the more significant burden of the housework was relying on her.

Objective Assessment

The lumbar spine was screened considering its potential role in referring pain distally [1]. There was the absence of the flexion-relaxation phenomenon [2], which was evidenced by an excursion of 1 cm on the Schober test, while the normal range for this test should be at least 5 cm [3]. Lumbar extension increased his LBP. This could suggest a facet joint pathology, but the pain during lumbar extension was partly decreased by placing the patient’s left leg on a stool. This coupled with a reduction in the range of motion (ROM) in both passive hip extension and the femoral stretch test, implicating a shortened left iliopsoas muscle. In addition, the patient had stiff left hip flexor muscle, tightness in both hamstrings, and both piriformis muscles coupled with abdominal muscle weakness, marked gluteal, and erector spinae muscle atrophy. The hip joint had a marked limitation of passive lateral rotation and a positive Flexion Adduction Internal Rotation (FAIR) maneuver. He had hypoesthesia to brush, vibration, and pinprick in the lateral aspects of both feet, therefore implicating the S1 dermatome bilaterally. The myotomes corresponding to the lumbar levels exhibited weakness in the left hip extension and hip abduction but were normal on the right side. Furthermore, bilateral standing plantarflexion was normal, but single-leg standing plantarflexion was graded as 3 on the Oxford scale in both lower limbs. The remaining myotomes being hip flexion, knee extension and flexion, extensor hallucis longus extension, and ankle dorsiflexion were normal bilaterally. The straight leg raise (SLR) test was limited to 40° on the left-hand side and to 50° on the right-hand side. However, the SLR test did not reproduce radicular pain; on the contrary, there was a pulling sensation in the corresponding hamstring muscle of the tested leg, which was not increased by sensitizing movements. Patellar tendon reflexes were normal bilaterally; however, the Achilles tendon reflexes were absent bilaterally.

The Diagnostic Process

The presence of red flags, despite their debated accuracy, was excluded through history taking and examination [4]. The persistence of pain despite appropriate surgical intervention is the basis of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) [5], which becomes the primary focus of the diagnosis [6]. Thus, the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) diagnosis [7] is:

Severe Lumbar Spinal Pain after Failed Spinal Surgery of more than 6 month’s duration. 533.91gS.

The reduced passive hip lateral rotation could be caused by shortened hip internal rotators. The piriformis muscle (PM) becomes an internal hip rotator above 60° of hip flexion, while it acts as an external hip rotator below this angle [8]. Also, the PM abducts the femur with hip flexion and additionally tilts anteriorly and rotates the sacrum to the opposite side together with the ipsilateral gluteus maximus [9]. Nonetheless, the action of the PM during hip flexion is debatable [10]. The tight ipsilateral iliopsoas muscle can cause reciprocal inhibition of the weak gluteal muscles [11]. Gluteal muscle weakness affects hip stability by increasing the internal femoral rotation and the valgus stress on the limb, further stretching the hip external rotators, including the PM [12].

The positive FAIR test indicates the possibility of PMS, which can be validated by a local diagnostic injection [13] especially when the imaging and/or electrophysiological modalities are normal [14]. However, the clinical diagnosis of PMS does not have a gold standard test [15], and the diagnostic process is by exclusion [16]. The PM originates from the anterior surface of the sacrum, and its tendon attaches to the medial aspect of the greater trochanter of the hip [17].

A combination of history, physical examination of the sciatic notch region, eliciting tenderness, coupled with various provocative maneuvers that tension the PM, can be used to support the diagnosis of PMS [18]. If three of the FAIR test, Freiberg test, Lasègue test, and Beatty test, are positive, the diagnosis is PMS [19, 20]. The FAIR test is shown to be the most sensitive test for diagnosing PMS [21]. The presence of the quartet of symptoms being buttock pain, the pain increased by sitting, tenderness near the greater sciatic notch, and any maneuver that increases tension in the PM, make the diagnosis of PMS highly likely [10]. Furthermore, his GP had previously conducted hematology tests including C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), with normal results.

Differential Diagnosis of PMS

The differential diagnosis included the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) [22]. Although maneuvers that asses the SIJ have moderate evidence [23], their absence in eliciting pain eliminates the SIJ as a source of pain [24]. Obturator internus muscle (OIM) has a close anatomical relationship to PM [25]. Contrary to PM, pain originating from the OIM is aggravated in the lateral recumbent position, while the trigger point of OIM is found more caudal [26].

PMS can be mistaken for a disc herniation, lumbar disc disease, radiculopathy, stenosis, facet joint arthropathy, neuropathic pain (NP), neural sensitization, and referred pain from the lumbar spine [18]. The zygapophyseal joints can only be definitely diagnosed with an intra-articular block [7]. The painful lumbar extension as a provocation test of the facet joints must be interpreted in the light of the poor sensitivity and specificity of these tests [27]. The absence of centralization decreases the likelihood of the discogenic pain [28]. However, discogenic pain lacks precise diagnostic criteria, terminology, and uniform treatment [29]; therefore, according to IASP [7], discogenic LBP can only be diagnosed by provocation discography or by selective anesthetization. In addition, the patient’s pain started in his buttock, and it has progressed proximally, which is not the usual presentation of radicular symptoms [1].

Electrodiagnostic tests can be used to rule out radiculopathies [22], but their role in diagnosing PMS is mixed and equivocal [18] since frequently, these are normal in PMS [16]. However, patients with PMS can be easily distinguished from normal subjects by performing electrophysiological tests with the patients in the FAIR position. In patients without PMS, the FAIR position was found to have little or no effect on the H-reflex. On the other hand, patients with PMS having sufficient pressure on the sciatic nerve causes a functional prolongation of the posterior tibial or fibular nerve H-reflex that was three standard deviations or more beyond the mean during the FAIR test [30].

Imaging is frequently normal in PMS [16], and the patient’s previous conventional supine MRI scan without myelography ruled out most of the spinal and hip pathologies [22]. Patients with variant proximal sciatic nerve anatomy are commonly asymptomatic in terms of PMS [31]. A recent radiologic study [32] noted no significant differences in the prevalence of PMS, buttock pain, or sciatica between normal and variant sciatic nerve anatomy. Sciatic nerve anatomy variants are present in about 19% of the population, where 97% of the variant anatomy cases correspond to the type II Beaton and Anson category, where the common peroneal nerve passes through the PM, instead of passing anterior to the muscle along with the tibial nerve [32]. Similarly, a study on 755 consecutive scans found that 87% of the cases had normal anatomy (type I), while in 13%, a type II variant anatomy was present [33].

Nevertheless, the patient’s MRI scan did not report any aberrant passage of the sciatic nerve. It is the opinion of many authors that sciatic nerve entrapment is not vital for diagnosing PMS and that this condition is mostly of myofascial origin [14, 34, 35]. Therefore, PMS can exist without radiation to the leg [10].

The limited SLR ROM cannot be used to exclude the PM in favor of a radicular component [10] since tight hamstrings increase the chance of a false-positive result [36]. Buttock pain is significantly and positively associated with NP regardless the presence of leg pain [37], in fact, NP is present in 41.1% of soft tissue syndromes, e.g., PMS [38]. The DN4 due to its high sensitivity and specificity [39] was used to screen for NP [40]. The patient scored 0/10, making the presence of NP unlikely. However, the patient is taking pregabalin which decreased the buttock pain slightly, jeopardizing the DN4 diagnostic value [41].

On the other hand, the updated IASP grading system to diagnose the possibility of NP [42] would categorize this patient as having probable NP, since he has a history of a relevant neurological lesion and pain distribution in a neuroanatomically plausible distribution, yet it is debatable if the altered sensory signs are in the same distribution. This is because certain dermatome charts depict the S1 dermatome originating from the buttock area, while other charts do not. However, in patients with S1 nerve root lesions, most of their pain is located in the buttock area [43]. The patient also had the MRI scan previous to the discectomy showing impingement on the S1 nerve root.

The presence of bilateral hypoesthesia over the lateral toes coupled with the absence of both Achilles deep tendon reflexes indicates maladaptive changes in the S1 nerve root, possibly due to a polyneuropathy, which would necessitate electromyography and nerve conduction studies. The latter tests apart from confirming or rejecting the diagnosis of a polyneuropathy are helpful in excluding an S1 radiculopathy [44]. In addition, the presence of the left side hip abductor weakness coupled with gluteal atrophy could be due to L5/S1 nerve roots radiculopathy [15], but the presence of a painful radiculopathy was excluded due to good distal myotome power. Nonetheless, the altered distal sensation is of doubtful clinical significance considering the patient never complained of pain radiating down to his toes coupled with the absence of radicular pain in both the crossed SLR and SLR and the DN4 score of 0 decreases the likelihood of radicular pain [45]. Thus, an additional IASP, diagnosis [7] is:

Severe Piriformis Syndrome of more than 6 month’s duration. 632.91f.

The Patient’s Psychosocial Aspects

His possible preoperative and current psychological state could partly explain the transition to chronic disabling pain [46]. There is a bidirectional association between chronic pain and depression [47] with chronic pain being prevalent in up to 70% of persons, who like our patient have high anxious and depressive disturbances, as evidenced by the HAD score (Supplementary Material, page 3) [48]. The severity of his psychological symptoms portrayed in the phrase “mood altering pain” amplifies and perpetuates his suffering [49]. His poor self-coping and pacing strategies coupled with failed previous biomedical treatment augment his disability [50]. Though he acknowledges his supportive wife, the dyspareunia could stress his marriage. The lack of a proper biopsychosocial (BPS) diagnosis coupled with untreated psychological aspects reduced the effectiveness of his previous treatments. This enhances a catastrophic state [51] which is a crucial step in the fear-avoidance model [52], reducing his social and occupational functioning and further deconditions his muscles [53].

Prevalence of FBSS and PMS

Discectomies generally provide short-term pain relief [54] since approximately 75% of the persons who undergo this type of surgery will suffer from chronic LBP in the following 10-20 years [55]. FBSS is characterized by recurrent or residual back pain after spinal surgery, and it has a reported incidence of 20–40% [56], which increases the likelihood of the patient suffering from PMS as part of the constellation of the painful symptoms. PMS is prevalent in 13.7% of the general population, in 17% of low LBP patients [57], and reaching 40.4% of chronic LBP post discectomy patients [13].

Mechanisms of FBSS and PMS

The sources of FBSS can be attributed to the pre-, intra-, and postoperative period. The presence of preoperative psychosocial aspects increases the incidence of PMS [13]. Going into the mechanisms of FBSS is too complex owing to its multitude of mechanisms. Thus, below are the possible etiological mechanisms for PMS.

PMS can have somatic and neuropathic mechanisms [21]. In the case of type II Beaton and Anson category, there is the possibility of NP in the common peroneal nerve distribution [32], yet this is debatable [10]. The discectomy at L5/S1 level can cause the release of inflammatory mediators leading to segmental sensitization [58] of the proximal L5 and S1 nerve roots, [59] both of which innervate the PM, causing PMS [13]. The myofascial component of PMS which presents as trigger points could be a sign of central sensitization [60].

The overactive and tight ipsilateral hip flexor muscle causes reciprocal inhibition of the inactive gluteal muscles, stretching further the PM [11]. There is substantial evidence that the somatic component underlying PMS represents a myofascial pain disorder [61, 62, 63]. Etiology of trigger points is not clear, but the most accepted mechanism is the motor end-plate theory [19]. It is postulated that there is sustained acetylcholine release leading to a constant sarcomere contraction, causing hypoxia and thus releasing inflammatory mediators, causing sensitization [64].

Management

Conservative Multidisciplinary Treatment

Management of chronic pain and FBSS is best tackled with a BPS approach necessitating a multidisciplinary collaboration [6]. The NP component was treated with pregabalin [65]. Once the BPS formulation was discussed with the referring GP, conservative treatment was initially attempted [66].

First line physiotherapy treatment for PMS was conducted within a cognitive behavioral approach [67] utilizing graded exposure [68], and it aimed to reduce his buttock pain through the restoration of the PM length and to address the patient’s flexibility and strength deficits. There is no standard gold therapy for PMS [25], but its first-line treatment consists of conservative treatment [66]. Treatment consisted of two physiotherapy sessions per week for six weeks and the provision of explanatory sheets, thus facilitating self-rehabilitation [16].

The session consisted initially of manual therapy including soft tissue therapy in prone lying with the hip in external rotation, thus placing the PM in a shortened position. Afterward stretching was carried out [1]. There is a multitude of studies which provide evidence for stretching as the first line of treatment [11, 16, 21, 22, 64]. PM has different functions at different hip flexion angles, implying that PM can be stretched using two techniques [8]. Gulledge et al., [11] presented a refined stretching technique for PM, in which the hip is flexed to 90°, adducted and then externally rotated, producing the greatest amount of PM stretch. Neural stretching was given considering its effectiveness in PMS [69].

Any other deficits were corrected, including stretching the shortened iliopsoas, hamstrings and strengthening weak gluteal, and spine muscles [22]. Two studies [70, 71] found that PM EMG activation was high during hip extension, external rotation, and abduction. Recently, Morimoto et la. [72] reported that prone extension in external hip rotation leads to the highest PM EMG activation of all movements and that PM EMG activity is similar to gluteal activity. Therefore, prone hip extension in lateral rotation was given as a strengthening exercise, specifically for PM. An unloading kinesiotape technique was used since a study [19] obtained a significant reduction in VAS score with this technique, which is speculated to stimulate the neuromuscular pathways by increased afferent feedback. Lifestyle modification involving a change in sitting postures and any corrections of abnormal gait and foot mechanics were done [15]. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation provided only short-term analgesia [73].

There is some evidence for passive therapies in myofascial pain, like heat, soft tissue mobilization, ultrasound [31], and needling [74]. However, these were avoided so as not to encourage a passive role by the patient [75]. Likewise, due to the severity of pain, needling the PM was avoided as it could further sensitize the area [76]. At the beginning of every session, a reassessment was carried out via the VAS pain score and the ROM of hip internal rotation in prone lying, passive ROM of lateral hip rotation, muscle power, FAIR, Freiberg, and Pace and Betty maneuvers. Additionally, his GP increased the paracetamol dosing and titrated amitriptyline up to 75 mg/day [77] for which there is more of an evidence based compared to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and muscle relaxants in myofascial pain syndromes [78].

A referral for psychology services was done since these are effective in chronic pain [79] including LBP [80]. The psychologist used a combination of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), and mindfulness therapy [81]. It aims to reconceptualize the patient’s pain [82], lessen his catastrophizing [83], and it provided everyday coping skills, e.g., problem-solving, relaxation, breathing techniques, and pacing [84]. In ACT, the patient learned to accept in a non-judgmental way the thoughts and feelings aiming to reduce disability [81] and preventing him from getting entangled in the maladaptive emotions [85]. Mindfulness allowed the patient to respond more wisely to pain by attending his unhelpful thoughts and feelings in an open and accepting way [86]. The patient also learned how to reach his goals despite his pain [87].

Intramuscular Botulinum Neurotoxin Injection

After 2 months of physiotherapy (12 sessions in total) and psychological sessions with moderate pain relief (VAS 9.3 decreased to 6.5), a pain specialist referral was done, with the possibility of providing botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections, which are effective in the long-term [31]. The patient received 50 IU BoNT intramuscular injection in the PM, which produced a drastic reduction in VAS score from 6.5 to 0.3, for 7 months, after which a repeat injection provided further long-term pain relief. The main effect of BoNT is achieved through the muscle weakening effect by inhibiting neurotransmitter release, e.g., acetylcholine, from the presynaptic vesicles and reducing muscle spasm [88]. BoNT also produces analgesia through its significant anti-inflammatory effect [89] while it inhibits sodium channels in central and peripheral neurons [90] thus it decreases sensitization [91]. BoNT injection is superior to placebo [30, 92]. However, it has a synergistic effect when combined with physiotherapy [93]. Seventy-seven percent of patients obtained an excellent or good response rate with BoNT injection [16]. Comparator studies [94, 95] have shown that BoNT is more efficient than local anesthetic and steroids in relieving PMS. Due to the high effectiveness of BoNT, surgical release of the PM is rarely required [22]. Toxin diffusion is rare, and its side effects are mostly related to the injection technique [88]. Nonetheless, BoNT should be reserved for cases refractory to conservative approaches considering the higher cost of BoNT compared with that of local anesthetics coupled with the risk of muscular atrophy and fibrosis following repeated BoNT injections [92].

Flare-up Plan

The fluctuating nature of chronic pain necessitates a flare-up plan which was developed in a joint session between the physiotherapist, the psychologist together with the patient so that the long-term benefits can be maintained [96]. The flare-up plan included [97]:
  1. 1.

    The adherence to the home exercise program beyond the treatment period.

     
  2. 2.

    The identification of high-risk situations.

     
  3. 3.

    Criteria for visiting the physician.

     
  4. 4.

    Performing relaxation techniques.

     
  5. 5.

    Activity management through pacing [98].

     
  6. 6.

    Using cognitive behavioral techniques when confronted with maladaptive thoughts [99].

     
  7. 7.

    Reassuring the patient while simultaneously discouraging any passive treatment.

     

If necessary booster sessions were made available to prevent or deal with relapses [100]. Therefore, this case was well managed through a multidisciplinary collaboration [6]. Treatment in its entirety was effective, and it followed an evidence-based procedure with an escalation of procedural interventions to gain better analgesia. The chronic nature of the patient’s pain, his psychological aspects, and the neural sensitization could justify the reason why initial conservative treatment only provided moderate pain relief. Despite the possible sensitization, gentle needling could have been attempted to deactivate the PM trigger point [101].

Conclusion

Therefore, PMS is highly prevalent in post discectomy patients. Differential diagnosis of other nearby structures and medical causes that refer pain to the buttock needs to be ruled out, since the diagnosis of PMS does not have a gold standard and on the contrary, it is driven by exclusion. The quartet of symptoms being buttock pain, pain increased by sitting, tenderness near the greater sciatic notch, and maneuvers that tension, the PM help in diagnosing PMS. There is an abundance of literature stating that the first line of treatment for PMS is conservative therapy, which is based on PM stretching, correction of any muscular strength and flexibility deficits, psychological assistance, and lifestyle modifications. If conservative treatment fails, interventional procedures are advocated, with the best long-term results obtained with intramuscular BoNT injections.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is a modified version of a previous document completed as part of the MSc in the Clinical Management of Pain Programme at the University of Edinburgh, UK.

Funding Information

The research work disclosed in this publication is partially funded by the Endeavor Scholarship Scheme (Malta). Scholarships are part-financed by the European Union - European Social Fund (ESF) - Operational Programme II – Cohesion Policy 2014-2020 “Investing in human capital to create more opportunities and promote the well-being of society.”

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Statement of Animal Welfare

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

42399_2018_22_MOESM1_ESM.docx (28 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 28 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Atkins E, Kerr J, Goodlad E. A practical approach to musculoskeletal medicine. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2016. p. 298.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    McGorry R, Lin J. Flexion relaxation and its relation to pain and function over the duration of a back pain episode. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39207.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Robinson H, Mengshoel A. Assessments of lumbar flexion range of motion. Spine. 2014;39(4):E270–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Verhagen A, Downie A, Popal N, Maher C, Koes B. Red flags presented in current low back pain guidelines: a review. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(9):2788–802.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baber Z, Erdek M. Failed back surgery syndrome: current perspectives. J Pain Res. 2016;9:979–87.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vleggeert-Lankamp C, Arts M, Jacobs W, Peul W. Failed back (surgery) syndrome: time for a paradigm shift. Br J Pain. 2013;7(1):48–55.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    IASP. 2017. Classification of Chronic Pain, Second Edition (Revised) - IASP. [online] Available at: https://www.iasp-pain.org/PublicationsNews/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=1673&navItemNumber=677 [Accessed 1 Jul. 2017].
  8. 8.
    Gluck N, Liebenson C. Clinical implications of paradoxical muscle function in muscle stretching or strengthening. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 1997;1(4):219–22.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mohanty P, Pattnaik M. Effect of stretching of piriformis and iliopsoas in coccydynia. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017;21(3):743–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hopayian K, Danielyan A. Four symptoms define the piriformis syndrome: an updated systematic review of its clinical features. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017;28(2):155–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gulledge B, Marcellin-Little D, Levine D, Tillman L, Harrysson O, Osborne J, et al. Comparison of two stretching methods and optimization of stretching protocol for the piriformis muscle. Med Eng Phys. 2014;36(2):212–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grimaldi A. Assessing lateral stability of the hip and pelvis. Man Ther. 2011;16(1):26–32.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim J, Kim K. Piriformis syndrome after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy via the posterolateral approach. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(10):1663–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Misirlioglu T, Palamar D, Akgun K. Letter to the editor involving the article “Piriformis muscle syndrome: a cross-sectional imaging study in 116 patients and evaluation of therapeutic outcome”. Eur Radiol. 2018.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cooper G. Piriformis syndrome. In: Non-operative treatment of the lumbar spine. 1st ed. Switzerland: Springer International; 2015. p. 65–7.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Michel F, Decavel P, Toussirot E, Tatu L, Aleton E, Monnier G, et al. Piriformis muscle syndrome: diagnostic criteria and treatment of a monocentric series of 250 patients. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2013;56(5):371–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Snell R. Clinical anatomy by regions. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Robinson E, Lindley E, Gonzalez P, Estes S, Cooley R, Burger E, et al. Piriformis syndrome versus radiculopathy following lumbar artificial disc replacement. Spine. 2011;36(4):E282–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hashemirad F, Karimi N, Keshavarz R. The effect of Kinesio taping technique on trigger points of the piriformis muscle. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2016;20(4):807–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Beatty R. The piriformis muscle syndrome. Neurosurgery. 1994;34(3):512–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Siddiq M, Hossain M, Uddin M, Jahan I, Khasru M, Haider N, et al. Piriformis syndrome: a case series of 31 Bangladeshi people with literature review. Eur J of Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016;27(2):193–203.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gupta R. Pain management. 1st ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2014. p. 111–4.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Simopoulos T, Manchikanti L, Singh V, Gupta S, Hameed H, Diwan S, et al. A systematic evaluation of prevalence and diagnostic accuracy of sacroiliac joint interventions. Pain Phys. 2012;15(3):E305–44.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Laslett M, Aprill C, McDonald B, Young S. Diagnosis of sacroiliac joint pain: validity of individual provocation tests and composites of tests. Man Ther. 2005;10(3):207–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Michel F, Decavel P, Toussirot E, Tatu L, Aleton E, Monnier G, et al. The piriformis muscle syndrome: an exploration of anatomical context, pathophysiological hypotheses and diagnostic criteria. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2013;56(4):300–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dalmau-Carola J. Myofascial pain syndrome affecting the piriformis and the obturator internus muscle. Pain Pract. 2005;5(4):361–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    van Tilburg C, Groeneweg J, Stronks D, Huygen F. Inter-rater reliability of diagnostic criteria for sacroiliac joint-, disc- and facet joint pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017;30(3):551–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hancock M, Maher C, Latimer J, Spindler M, McAuley J, Laslett M, et al. Systematic review of tests to identify the disc, SIJ or facet joint as the source of low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(10):1539–50.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Malik K, Cohen S, Walega D, Benzon H. Diagnostic criteria and treatment of discogenic pain: a systematic review of recent clinical literature. Spine J. 2013;13(11):1675–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fishman L, Wilkins A, Rosner B. Electrophysiologically identified piriformis syndrome is successfully treated with incobotulinum toxin a and physical therapy. Muscle Nerve. 2017;56(2):258–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kirschner J, Foye P, Cole J. Piriformis syndrome, diagnosis and treatment. Muscle Nerve. 2009;40(1):10–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bartret A, Beaulieu C, Lutz A. Is it painful to be different? Sciatic nerve anatomical variants on MRI and their relationship to piriformis syndrome. Eur Radiol. 2018.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Varenika V, Lutz A, Beaulieu C, Bucknor M. Detection and prevalence of variant sciatic nerve anatomy in relation to the piriformis muscle on MRI. Skelet Radiol. 2017;46(6):751–7.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Reus M, de Dios Berná J, Vázquez V, Redondo M, Alonso J. Piriformis syndrome: a simple technique for US-guided infiltration of the perisciatic nerve. Preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 2008;18(3):616–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Misirlioglu T, Akgun K, Palamar D, Erden M, Erbilir T. Piriformis syndrome: comparison of the effectiveness of local anesthetic and corticosteroid injections: a double-blinded, randomized controlled study. Pain Physician. 2015;18(2):163–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Scaia V, Baxter D, Cook C. The pain provocation-based straight leg raise test for diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation, lumbar radiculopathy, and/or sciatica: a systematic review of clinical utility. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2012;25(4):215–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Orita S, Yamashita T, Ohtori S, Yonenobu K, Kawakami M, Taguchi T, et al. Prevalence and location of neuropathic pain in lumbar spinal disorders. SPINE. 2016;41(15):1224–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fishbain D, Cole B, Lewis J, Gao J. What is the evidence that neuropathic pain is present in chronic low back pain and soft tissue syndromes? An evidence-based structured review. Pain Med. 2014;15(1):4–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Durand G, Girodon J, Debiais F. Medical management of failed back surgery syndrome in Europe: evaluation modalities and treatment proposals. Neurochirurgie. 2015;61:S57–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Attal N, Perrot S, Fermanian J, Bouhassira D. The neuropathic components of chronic low back pain: a prospective multicenter study using the DN4 questionnaire. J Pain. 2011;12(10):1080–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gudala K. Challenges in using symptoms based screening tools while assessing neuropathic pain component in patients with chronic low back pain. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(5).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Finnerup N, Haroutounian S, Kamerman P, Baron R, Bennett D, Bouhassira D, et al. Neuropathic pain. PAIN. 2016;157(8):1599–606.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Furman M, Johnson S. Induced lumbosacral radicular symptom referral patterns: a descriptive study. Spine J. 2018.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Watson J, Dyck P. Peripheral neuropathy: a practical approach to diagnosis and symptom management. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(7):940–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Berthelot J, Laredo J, Darrieutort-Laffite C, Maugars Y. Stretching of roots contributes to the pathophysiology of radiculopathies. Joint Bone Spine. 2017.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Edmond S, Werneke M, Hart D. Association between centralization, depression, somatization, and disability among patients with nonspecific low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40(12):801–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gureje O, Von Korff M, Kola L, Demyttenaere K, He Y, Posada-Villa J, et al. The relation between multiple pains and mental disorders: results from the world mental health surveys. Pain. 2008;135(1):82–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Means-Christensen A, Roy-Byrne P, Sherbourne C, Craske M, Stein M. Relationships among pain, anxiety, and depression in primary care. Depress Anxiety. 2008;25(7):593–600.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    de Heer E, Gerrits M, Beekman A, Dekker J, van Marwijk H, de Waal M, et al. The Association of Depression and Anxiety with pain: a study from NESDA. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e106907.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Jamieson-Lega K, Berry R, Brown C. Pacing: a concept analysis of a chronic pain intervention. Pain Res Manag. 2013;18(4):207–13.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Leung L. Pain catastrophizing: an updated review. Indian J Psychol Med. 2012;34(3):204–17.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Vlaeyen J, Crombez G, Linton S. The fear-avoidance model of pain. PAIN. 2016;157(8):1588–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Steele J, Bruce-Low S, Smith D. A reappraisal of the deconditioning hypothesis in low back pain: review of evidence from a triumvirate of research methods on specific lumbar extensor deconditioning. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014;30(5):865–911.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Owens R, Carreon L, Bisson E, Bydon M, Potts E, Glassman S. Back pain improves significantly following discectomy for lumbar disc herniation. Spine J. 2018.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hussain A, Erdek M. Interventional pain management for failed back surgery syndrome. Pain Practice. 2013;14(1):64–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Thomson S. Failed back surgery syndrome – definition, epidemiology and demographics. Br J Pain. 2013;7(1):56–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kean Chen C, Nizar A. Prevalence of piriformis syndrome in chronic low back pain patients. A clinical diagnosis with modified FAIR test. Pain Pract. 2012;13(4):276–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Samuel A, Peter A, Ramanathan K. The association of active trigger points with lumbar disc lesions. J Musculoskelet Pain. 2007;15(2):11–8.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Wilmink J. Lumbar spinal imaging in radicular pain and related conditions. 1st ed. New York: Springer; 2014.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Levesque A, Riant T, Ploteau S, Rigaud J, Labat J, Gérard A, et al. Clinical criteria of central sensitization in chronic pelvic and perineal pain (convergences PP criteria): elaboration of a clinical evaluation tool based on formal expert consensus. Pain Med. 2018;19:2009–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Jankovic D, Peng P, van Zundert A. Brief review: piriformis syndrome: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Can J Anesth. 2013;60(10):1003–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Masala S, Crusco S, Meschini A, Taglieri A, Calabria E, Simonetti G. Piriformis syndrome: long-term follow-up in patients treated with percutaneous injection of anesthetic and corticosteroid under CT guidance. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011;35(2):375–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Miller T, White K, Ross D. The diagnosis and management of piriformis syndrome: myths and facts. Can J Neurol Sci. 2012;39(05):577–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Woolf C. Central sensitization: implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain. Pain. 2011;152(Supplement):S2–S15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Deng Y, Luo L, Hu Y, Fang K, Liu J. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of neuropathic pain: a systematic review. BMC Anaesthesiol. 2015;16(1).Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Stephens K, Ward A. Patient selection for spinal cord stimulators: mental health perspective. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2014;18(3):398.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Critchley D, Ratcliffe J, Noonan S, Jones R, Hurley M. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three types of physiotherapy used to reduce chronic low back pain disability. Spine. 2007;32(14):1474–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    López-de-Uralde-Villanueva I, Muñoz-García D, Gil-Martínez A, Pardo-Montero J, Muñoz-Plata R, Angulo-Díaz-Parreño S, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of graded activity and graded exposure for chronic nonspecific low back pain. Pain Med. 2016;17(1):172–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Nazlıkul H, Ural F, Öztürk G, Öztürk A. Evaluation of neural therapy effect in patients with piriformis syndrome. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2018:1–6.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Giphart J, Stull J, LaPrade R, Wahoff M, Philippon M. Recruitment and activity of the pectineus and piriformis muscles during hip rehabilitation exercises. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(7):1654–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Hodges P, McLean L, Hodder J. Insight into the function of the obturator internus muscle in humans: observations with development and validation of an electromyography recording technique. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2014;24(4):489–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Morimoto Y, Oshikawa T, Imai A, Okubo Y, Kaneoka K. Piriformis electromyography activity during prone and side-lying hip joint movement. J Phys Ther Sci. 2018;30(1):154–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Ardiç F, Sarhus M, Topuz O. Comparison of two different techniques of electrotherapy on myofascial pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2002;16(1):11–6.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Tekin L, Akarsu S, Durmuş O, Çakar E, Dinçer Ü, Kıralp M. The effect of dry needling in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome: a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial. Clin Rheumatol. 2012;32(3):309–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    O’Keeffe M, Maher C, O’Sullivan K. Unlocking the potential of physical activity for back health. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(10):760–1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Lluch Girbés E, Meeus M, Baert I, Nijs J. Balancing “hands-on” with “hands-off” physical therapy interventions for the treatment of central sensitization pain in osteoarthritis. Man Ther. 2015;20(2):349–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Annaswamy T, De Luigi A, O'Neill B, Keole N, Berbrayer D. Emerging concepts in the treatment of myofascial pain: a review of medications, modalities, and needle-based interventions. PM R. 2011;3(10):940–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Borg-Stein J, Iaccarino M. Myofascial pain syndrome treatments. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2014;25(2):357–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Bailey K, Carleton R, Vlaeyen J, Asmundson G. Treatments addressing pain-related fear and anxiety in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a preliminary review. Cogn Behav Ther. 2010;39(1):46–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Hoffman B, Papas R, Chatkoff D, Kerns R. Meta-analysis of psychological interventions for chronic low back pain. Health Psychol. 2007;26(1):1–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Wetherell J, Afari N, Rutledge T, Sorrell J, Stoddard J, Petkus A, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy for chronic pain. Pain. 2011;152(9):2098–107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Giles K. Cognitive Behavioural therapies for fibromyalgia. Am J Nurs. 2014;114(10):21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Day M, Smitherman A, Ward L, Thorn B. An investigation of the associations between measures of mindfulness and pain catastrophizing. Clin J Pain. 2015;31(3):222–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Tang N. Cognitive behavioural therapy in pain and psychological disorders: towards a hybrid future. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2017.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Hayes S, Pistorello J, Levin M. Acceptance and commitment therapy as a unified model of behavior change. Couns Psychol. 2012;40(7):976–1002.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Greeson J, Eisenlohr-Moul T. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for chronic pain. In: R B, editor. Mindfulness-based treatment approaches. 2nd ed: Academic Press; 2014. p. 267–92.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Cherkin D, Sherman K, Balderson B, Cook A, Anderson M, Hawkes R, et al. Effect of mindfulness-based stress reduction vs cognitive behavioural therapy or usual care on back pain and functional limitations in adults with chronic low back pain. JAMA. 2016;315(12):1240–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Jabbari B. Botulinum toxin treatment of pain disorders. 1st ed. New York: SPRINGER-VERLAG NEW YORK; 2015. p. 99–108.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Cui M, Khanijou S, Rubino J, Aoki K. Subcutaneous administration of botulinum toxin a reduces formalin-induced pain. Pain. 2004;107(1):125–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Marinelli S, Luvisetto S, Cobianchi S, Makuch W, Obara I, Mezzaroma E, et al. Botulinum neurotoxin type a counteracts neuropathic pain and facilitates functional recovery after peripheral nerve injury in animal models. Neuroscience. 2010;171(1):316–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Marino M, Terashima T, Steinauer J, Eddinger K, Yaksh T, Xu Q. Botulinum toxin B in the sensory afferent: transmitter release, spinal activation, and pain behavior. Pain. 2014;155(4):674–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Rodríguez-Piñero M, Vidal Vargas V, Jiménez Sarmiento A. Long-term efficacy of ultrasound-guided injection of incobotulinumtoxinA in piriformis syndrome. Pain Med. 2017;19(2):408–11.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Cramp F, Bottrell O, Campbell H, Ellyatt P, Smith C, Wilde B. Non-surgical management of piriformis syndrome: a systematic review. Phys Ther Rev. 2007;12(1):66–72.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Fishman L, Anderson C, Rosner B. BOTOX and physical therapy in the treatment of piriformis syndrome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;81(12):936–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Yoon S, Ho J, Kang H, Lee S, Kim K, Shin W, et al. Low-dose botulinum toxin type a for the treatment of refractory piriformis syndrome. Pharmacotherapy. 2007;27(5):657–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Boswell M, Cole B, Weiner R. Weiner’s pain management. 7th ed. New York: Informa Healthcare; 2007. p. 696–9.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Harding V, Watson P. Increasing activity and improving function in chronic pain management. Physiotherapy. 2000;86(12):619–30.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Partridge C. Recent advances in physiotherapy. 1st ed. New York: Wiley; 2007. p. 160–79.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Fledderus M, Schreurs K, Bohlmeijer E, Vollenbroek-Hutten M. Development and pilot evaluation of an online relapse-prevention program based on acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain patients. JMIR Hum Factors. 2015;2(1):e1.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Wall P, Melzack R, McMahon S. Wall and Melzacks textbook of pain. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2013. p. 592–602.Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Shah J, Thaker N, Heimur J, Aredo J, Sikdar S, Gerber L. Myofascial trigger points then and now: a historical and scientific perspective. PM R. 2015;7(7):746–61.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Division of Health SciencesDeanery of Clinical Sciences, University of EdinburghEdinburghUK
  2. 2.Physiotherapy Out PatientsKarin Grech HospitalPietaMalta

Personalised recommendations