Advertisement

Persistent low fertility among the East Asia descendants in the United States: perspectives and implications

  • Yong CaiEmail author
  • S. Philip Morgan
Original Article

Abstract

We focus on a small but growing segment of the U.S. population, those who identify as Chinese, Japanese and Korean (CJK), and compare CJK fertility to other race/ethnic groups in the United States. CJK women in the U.S. exhibit a distinct, pervasive, and persistent pattern of late and low fertility with nearly all births occurring within marriage; this pattern displays a strong parallel to their counterparts in their countries of origin. To accompany this description, we offer a perspective on fertility difference that has broad applicability and that does not consistently predict that differences will disappear/remain. This discussion unites the literature on assimilation, segmented assimilation and pluralistic outcomes and processes. We also discuss the possible implications of these findings for country level policies to increase fertility. Most generally, these discussions are a corrective to demographer’s penchant for predicting secular change and convergence.

Keywords

Low fertility Chinese/Japanese/Korean Theory of conjunctural action Segmented assimilation U.S. fertility differences 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by NIH/NICHD R01-HD075560. We are grateful to the Carolina Population Center and its NIH/NICHD center grant (P2C HD050924) for general support. We thank Herbert Smith and Peter McDonald for comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

References

  1. Barringer, H. R., Takeuchi, D. T., & Xenos, P. (1990). Education, occupational prestige, and income of asian americans. Sociology of Education, 1, 27–43.Google Scholar
  2. Bongaarts, J., & Casterline, J. (2013). Fertility transition: is sub-saharan africa different? Population and Development Review, 38(Suppl 1), 153–168.Google Scholar
  3. Byun, S.-Y., & Park, H. (2012). The academic success of East Asian American youth: the role of shadow education. Sociology of Education, 85(1), 40–60.Google Scholar
  4. Cai, Y. (2013). China’s new demographic reality—learning from the 2010 census. Population and Development Review, 39, 371–396.Google Scholar
  5. Cai, Y., Rybińska, A. (2017).’Missing babies’ and ‘missing mothers’ in the American community survey: data problems and social differentiations. Presented at the population association of America 2018 Annual Meeting, Denver, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  6. Caldwell, J. C. (2007). Demographic transition theory. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  7. Casterline, J. B. (2017). Prospects for fertility decline in Africa. Population and Development Review, 43(S1), 3–18.Google Scholar
  8. Chaves, M. (2010). SSSR presidential address rain dances in the dry season: overcoming the religious congruence fallacy. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  9. Davis, K. (1945). The world demographic transition. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 237(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
  10. Dharmalingam, A., & Morgan, S. P. (2004). Pervasive muslim-hindu fertility differences in India. Demography, 41(3), 529–545.Google Scholar
  11. Dye, J. L. (2008). Fertility of American Women: 2006. Washington, DC.: Census Bureau. Retrieved October 2, 2015 (https://www.census.gov/prod/2008pubs/p20-558.pdf). Accessed 2 Oct 2015.
  12. Dye, J. L. (2010). Fertility of American women: 2008. Washington: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  13. Espenshade, T. J., & Ye, W. (1994). Differential fertility within an ethnic minority: the effect of ‘trying harder’ among Chinese–American women. Social Problems, 41(1), 97–113.Google Scholar
  14. Flood, S., King, M., Ruggles, S., Warren, R. (2015) Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, Current Population Survey: Version 4.0. [dataset]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota. http://doi.org/10.18128/D030.V4.0.
  15. Goldscheider, C. (1971). Population, modernization, and social structure. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  16. Goldscheider, C., & Uhlenberg, P. R. (1969). Minority group status and fertility. American Journal of Sociology, 74(4), 361–372.Google Scholar
  17. Greenhalgh, S. (1988). Fertility as mobility: sinic transitions. Population and Development Review, 14(4), 629–674.Google Scholar
  18. Greenman, E. (2011). Asian American-white differences in the effect of motherhood on career outcomes. Work and Occupations, 38(1), 37–67.Google Scholar
  19. Guo, Z., Gietel-Basten, S., & Gu, B. (2018). The lowest fertility rates in the world? Evidence from the 2015 Chinese 1% sample census. China Population and Development Studies, 2018, 1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s42379-018-0012-1.Google Scholar
  20. Hirschman, C. (2001). The educational enrollment of immigrant youth: a test of the segmented-assimilation hypothesis. Demography, 38(3), 317–336.Google Scholar
  21. Johnson-Hanks, J. A., Bachrach, C. A., & Morgan, S. P. (2011). Understanding family change and variation: toward a theory of conjunctural action (2011th ed.). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Jones, G. W. (2007). Delayed Marriage and very low fertility in Pacific Asia. Population and Development Review, 33(3), 453–478.Google Scholar
  23. Kao, G. (1995). Asian Americans as model minorities? A look at their academic performance. American Journal of Education, 103(2), 121–159.  https://doi.org/10.1086/444094.Google Scholar
  24. Kirk, D. (1996). Demographic transition theory. Population Studies, 50(3), 361–387.Google Scholar
  25. Lee, J. Z., & Wang, F. (1999). One quarter of humanity: malthusian mythology and Chinese realities, 1700–2000. Cambridge: Mass. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 36(2), 211–251.Google Scholar
  27. Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Osterman, M. J., Driscoll, A. K., & Mathews, T. J. (2017). Births: final data for 2015. National Vital Statistics Reports Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System, 66(1), 1.Google Scholar
  28. Mathews, T. J., & Hamilton, B. E. (2016). Mean age of mothers is on the rise: United States, 2000–2014. NCHS Data Brief, no. 232, 1–8.Google Scholar
  29. McDonald, P. (2000a). Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Population and Development Review, 26(3), 427–439.Google Scholar
  30. McDonald, P. (2000b). Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility. Journal of the Australian Population Association, 17(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  31. McDonald, P. (2002). Sustaining fertility through public policy: the range of options. Population, 57(3), 417–446.Google Scholar
  32. McDonald, P. (2006). Low fertility and the state: the efficacy of policy. Population and Development Review, 32(3), 485–510.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2006.00134.x.Google Scholar
  33. Gordon, M. M. (1964). Assimilation in American life: the role of race, religion, and national origins. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Monte, L. M., & Ellis, R. R. (2014). Fertility of women in the United States: 2012. Current population reports, P20–575. Washington: US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  35. Morgan, S. P. (2003). Is low fertility a twenty-first-century demographic crisis? Demography, 40(4), 589–603.Google Scholar
  36. Morgan, S. P. (2015). Variation in U.S. Fertility: low and not so low, but not lowest-low. In M. K. Choe (Ed.), Rindfuss RR. Low and Lower Fertility (pp. 125–141). Berlin: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  37. Morgan, S. P., McDaniel, A., Miller, A. T., & Preston, S. H. (1993). Racial differences in household and family structure at the turn of the century. American Journal of Sociology, 98(4), 799–828.Google Scholar
  38. Morgan, S. P., Stash, S., Smith, H. L., & Mason, K. O. (2002). Muslim and non-muslim differences in female autonomy and fertility: evidence from four Asian countries. Population and Development Review, 28(3), 515–537.Google Scholar
  39. Morgan, S. P., Watkins, S. C., & Ewbank, D. (1994). Generating Americans: the fertility of the foreign-born in the U.S. In S. C. Watkins (Ed.), After Ellis island: a 1910 census monograph (pp. 1905–1910). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  40. Notestein, F. W. (1945). Population: the long view. In T. W. Schultz (Ed.), Food for the world (pp. 36–57). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. Ono, K. A. (2008). A companion to Asian American studies. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  42. Parrado, E. A. (2011). How high is hispanic/mexican fertility in the United States? Immigration and tempo considerations. Demography, 48(3), 1059–1080.Google Scholar
  43. Parrado, E. A., & Philip Morgan, S. (2008). Intergenerational fertility among hispanic women: new evidence of immigrant assimilation. Demography, 45(3), 651–671.Google Scholar
  44. Portes, A., & Zhou, M. (1993). The new second generation: segmented assimilation and its variants. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 530(1), 74–96.Google Scholar
  45. Rindfuss, R.R., Choe, M.K. (2015) Diversity across Low-Fertility Countries: An Overview. In: R. R. Rindfuss and M. K. Choe (Ed.), Low and Lower Fertility: Variations across Developed Countries, Springer International Publishing (pp. 1–13), Retrieved February 22, 2017 (http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-21482-5_1).
  46. Ruggles, S., Genadek, K., Goeken, R., Grover, J., Sobek, M. (2015). Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 6.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, http://doi.org/10.18128/D010.V6.0.
  47. Ryder, N. B. (1973). Recent Trends and Group Differences in Fertility. In C. F. Westoff (Ed.), Toward the End of Growth: Population in America, (pp. 57–68). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  48. Schneider, B., & Lee, Y. (1990). A model for academic success: the school and home environment of east asian students. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 21(4), 358–377.Google Scholar
  49. Skinner, G. W. (1997). Family systems and demographic processes. In D. I. Kertzer, T. Fricke (Eds.), Anthropological demography: toward a new synthesis (pp. 53–95). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  50. Tan, P. L., Morgan, S. P., & Zagheni, E. (2016). A case for ‘reverse one-child’ policies in japan and south Korea? Examining the link between education costs and lowest-low fertility. Population Research and Policy Review, 35(3), 327–350.Google Scholar
  51. Tang, Z. (2004). Immigration and Chinese reproductive behavior in Canada. Social Biology, 51(1–2), 37–53.Google Scholar
  52. Thornton, A. (2001). The developmental paradigm, reading history sideways, and family change. Demography, 38(4), 449–465.Google Scholar
  53. Thornton, A. (2005). Reading history sideways: the fallacy and enduring impact of the developmental paradigm on family life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  54. Waters, J. L. (2005). Transnational family strategies and education in the contemporary Chinese Diaspora. Global Networks, 5(4), 359–377.Google Scholar
  55. Yap, K. B. (2010). The impact of host country policies on the overseas Chinese family in Singapore. Journal of Macromarketing, 30(4), 354–365.Google Scholar
  56. Zhou, M., & Kamo, Y. (1994). An analysis of earnings patterns for Chinese, Japanese, and non-hispanic white males in the United States. The Sociological Quarterly, 35(4), 581–602.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© China Population and Development Research 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Carolina Population CenterUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations