Indian Phytopathology

, Volume 71, Issue 4, pp 555–561 | Cite as

Effect of physiological factors on production of cellulolytic enzymes by Rhizoctonia bataticola

  • D. B. GawadeEmail author
  • R. R. Perane
  • C. D. Deokar
  • K. S. Raghuwanshi
  • A. P. Suryawanshi
Research Article


Cellulose, an abundant carbohydrate, forms an integral part of the plant cell walls and provides structural integrity. Ability of any pathogenic fungus to degrade it depends largely on the extent of cellulolytic enzymes produced by a fungus. Therefore, present in vitro study was conducted to assess the effect of five each carbon and nitrogen sources on production of cellulolytic enzymes and growth of Rhizoctonia bataticola isolates the dry root rot pathogen of soybean. The results revealed that cellulolytic enzyme activity (µg of d-glucose/ml) of the 20 isolates of R. bataticola was strongly influenced and varied with the sources of carbon and nitrogen tested. Among five carbon sources tested, the cellulolytic enzyme activity was highest with Carboxy methyl cellulose (CMC) in the range of 0.629–1.286 µg, followed by Glucose (0.589–0.996 µg), Sucrose (0.549–0.961 µg), Starch (0.199–0.797 µg) and Pectin (0.152–0.293 µg) compared to control (0.107–0.187 µg). Similarly, all five nitrogen sources tested exhibited a wide range of cellulolytic enzyme activity among the test isolates. However, it was highest with Ammonium chloride (0.196–0.420 µg), followed by Potassium nitrate (0.170–0.425 µg), Glutamic acid (0.118–0.174 µg), Glutamine (0.109–0.171 µg) and Urea (0.100–0.167 µg), compared to control (0.080–0.107 µg).Various temperature regimes and pH of CMC broth medium also influenced the growth (mycelium dry weight) of the test isolates of R. bataticola and their cellulolytic enzyme activity. However, the temperature of 30 °C and 6.0 pH where found to be optimum.


Rhizoctonia bataticola Cellulolytic enzyme Carbon Nitrogen Temperature pH 



The authors are thankful to the Dean, Post Graduate Institute and Head, Department of Plant Pathology and Agriculture Microbiology, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Ahmednagar, Maharashtra, India, for the facilities provided to this works.


  1. Adeleke AJ, Odunfa SA, Olanbiwonninu A, Owoseni MC (2012) Production of cellulase and pectinase from orange Peels by Fungi. Nat Sci 10(5):107–112Google Scholar
  2. Amadioha AC, Oladiram (1993) Production of cellulolytic enzymes by Rhizopus oryzae in culture and Rhizopus infected tissues of Potato tubers. Mycologia 85(4):574–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhattacharya A (2013) Adaptive expression of host cell wall degrading enzymes in fungal disease: an example from Fusarium root rot of medicinal Coleus. Pak J Biol Sci 16(24):2036–2040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chapman ES, Evans E, Jacobelli MC, Laogan AA (1975) The cellulolytic and amylolytic activity of Papulaspora thermophila. Mycologia 67:608–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Charul Kanchan, Biswas SK (2009) Morphological and pathogenic variability of Rhizoctonia bataticola (Taub) Butler, causal agent of leaf spot and blight disease of Pigeonpea. Ann Pl Prot Sci 17(1):124–126Google Scholar
  6. Chaurasia AK, Chaurasia S, Chaurasia S, Chaurasia S (2015) Influence of culture conditions on cellulase production by Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. Internat J Multidisc Res Dev 2(5):41–49Google Scholar
  7. El-Said AHM, Saleem A, Maghraby TA, Hussein MA (2014) Cellulase activity of some phytopathogenic fungi isolated from diseased leaves of broad bean. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 3(2):883–900Google Scholar
  8. Gautam SP, Bundela PS, Pandey AK, Khan Jamaluddin, Awasthi MK, Sarsaiya S (2011) Optimization for the production of cellulase enzyme from municipal solid waste residue by two novel cellulolytic fungi. Biotech. Res. Internat. 2011:8. (Article ID 810425) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kasana RC, Salwan R, Dhar H, Dutt S, Gulati A (2008) A rapid and easy method for the detection of microbial cellulases on agar plates using gram’s iodine. Curr Microbiol 57(5):503–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS (2002) Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Micro Mol Biol Rev 66:506–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mallikharjuna Rao KLN, Siva Rajub K, Ravisankar H (2016) Cultural conditions on the production of extracellular enzymes by Trichoderma isolates from tobacco rhizosphere. Brazil J Microbiol 47:25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Miller GL (1959) Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem 31:426–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Moreira FG, Simone R, Costa MA, Marques de souza CG, Peralta RM (2005) Production of hydrolytic enzymes by the plant pathogenic fungus Myrothecium verrucaria in submerged cultures. Braz J Microbiol 36(1):7–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moussa TAA, Tharwat NA (2013) Optimization of cellulase and glucosidase induction by sugarbeet pathogen Sclerotium rolfsii. Afr J Bot 1(4):44–49Google Scholar
  15. Nagasathya A, Sivanesan D, Ali EA (2014) Extracellular cellulase enzyme production from Penicillium funiculosum. Int J Adv Res Biol Sci 1(1):87–100Google Scholar
  16. Oyeleke SB, Oyewole OA, Egwim EC, Dauda BEN, Ibeh EN (2012) Cellulase and pectinase production potentials of Aspergillus niger isolated from corn cob. Bayer J Pure App Sci 5(1):78–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ramos AM, Gally M, Szapiro G, Itzcovich T, Carabajal M, Levin L (2016) In vitro growth and cell wall degrading enzyme production by Argentinean isolates of Macrophomina phaseolina, the causative agent of charcoal rot in corn. Rev Argent Microbiol 48(4):267–273Google Scholar
  18. Singh L, Bagri RK, Thakore BBL, Singh J, Sharma P (2012) Effect of carbon sources on production of enzyme by Fusarium oxysporm f. sp. pisi. Ann Pl Prot Sci 20(2):430–433Google Scholar
  19. Wood TM, Mc Crae SI, Bhat KM (1989) The mechanism of fungal cellulase action synergism between enzyme components of Penicillium pinophilum cellulose in solubilizing hydrogen bond-orderded cellulose. Biochem J 260:37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Phytopathological Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. B. Gawade
    • 1
    Email author
  • R. R. Perane
    • 1
  • C. D. Deokar
    • 1
  • K. S. Raghuwanshi
    • 1
  • A. P. Suryawanshi
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Plant Pathology and Agriculture MicrobiologyMahatma Phule Krishi VidyapeethRahuriIndia
  2. 2.Department of Plant PathologyDr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi VidyapeethRatnagiriIndia

Personalised recommendations