Advertisement

Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 237–251 | Cite as

Investigating the effectiveness of subject-integrated school garden teaching

  • Jacob Højgaard ChristensenEmail author
  • Karen Wistoft
Original Paper

Abstract

This article maps out existing research regarding the effectiveness of subject-integrated school garden teaching. The school subjects of interest are mathematics, languages and science, and subject integration is defined as a link between these subjects and school garden teaching. The article is based on an integrative review and is derived from existing research, which claims that teaching in school gardens has a predominantly positive influence on students’ academic learning outcome. However, experimental studies indicate that some programmes are less effective than more traditional teaching in the subjects concerned. The review extracts and discusses factors that are consistently regarded as vital to ensure the effectiveness of school garden teaching in terms of the integration of mathematics, languages and science. It is concluded that developing a school garden curriculum is essential with a view to planning, carrying out and evaluating subject-integrated school garden teaching. The teaching should include experiential learning and hands-on activities as teaching methods, making the subject content less abstract, stimulating the students’ senses, and increasing the feeling of meaningfulness. Furthermore, collaboration across subjects and links between indoor and outdoor teaching are central factors in ensuring the effectiveness of subject-integrated school garden teaching.

Keywords

School garden Teaching Learning Subject integration Effectiveness 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ampuero, D., Miranda, C. E., Delgado, L. E., Goyen, S., & Weaver, S. (2015). Empathy and critical thinking: Primary students solving local environmental problems through outdoor learning. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 15(1), 64–78.Google Scholar
  2. Berezowitz, C. K., Bontrager Yoder, A. B., & Schoeller, D. A. (2015). School gardens enhance academic performance and dietary outcomes in children. Journal of School Health, 85(8), 508–518.Google Scholar
  3. Blair, D. (2009). The child in the garden: An evaluative review of the benefits of school gardening. The Journal of Environmental Education, 40(2), 15–38.Google Scholar
  4. Block, K., Gibbs, L., Staiger, P. K., Gold, L., Johnson, B., Macfarlane, S., & Townsend, M. (2012). Growing community: The impact of the Stephanie Alexander kitchen garden program on the social and learning environment in primary schools. Health Education and Behavior, 39(4), 419–432.Google Scholar
  5. Boland, A., Cherry, M. G., & Dickson, R. (2014). Doing a systematic review: A student's guide. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  6. Bowker, R., & Tearle, P. (2007). Gardening as a learning environment: A study of children’s perceptions and understanding of school gardens as part of an international project. Learning Environments Research, 10(2), 83–100.Google Scholar
  7. Cynthia, L. R. (2005). An overview of the integrative research review. Progress in Transplantation, 15(1), 8–13.Google Scholar
  8. Davies, D. (2013). Creative learning environments in education: A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8(April), 80–91.Google Scholar
  9. Dillon, J., Rickinson, M., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2016). The value of outdoor learning: Towards a convergence between science and environmental education (p. 179). The Selected Works of Justin Dillon.Google Scholar
  10. Dochy, F., Segers, M., Bossche, P. V. D., & Struyven, K. (2005). Students’ perceptions of a problem-based learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 8(1), 41–66.Google Scholar
  11. Fisher-Maltese, C. B. (2013). Fostering science literacy, environmental stewardship, and collaboration: Assessing a garden-based approach to teaching life science. Rutgers: The State University of New Jersey.Google Scholar
  12. Graham, H., Beall, D. L., Lussier, M., McLaughlin, P., & Zidenberg-Cherr, S. (2005). Use of school gardens in academic instruction. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 37(3), 147–151.Google Scholar
  13. Gräsel, C., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2000). The use of additional information in problem-oriented learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 3(3), 287–305.Google Scholar
  14. Gray, T., & Martin, P. (2012). The role and place of outdoor education in the Australian national curriculum. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 16(1), 39–50.Google Scholar
  15. Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA 'effect' in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23.Google Scholar
  16. Hazzard, E. L., Moreno, E., Beall, D. L., & Zidenberg-Cherr, S. (2011). Best practices models for implementing, sustaining, and using instructional school gardens in California. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 43(5), 409–413.Google Scholar
  17. Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.Google Scholar
  18. Hugerat, M. (2016). How teaching science using project-based learning strategies affects the classroom learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 19(3), 383–395.Google Scholar
  19. Jolly, L., and Leisner, M. (2012). Skolehager i Oslo og Akershus 2012 – Status og utfordringer, Fylkesmannen iOslo og Akershus, landbruksavdelingen, repport nr. 1/2012.Google Scholar
  20. Kangas, M., Kopisto, K., Löfman, K., Salo, L., & Krokfors, L. (2017). ‘I’ll take care of the flowers!’: Researching agency through initiatives across different learning environments. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 17(1), 82–91.Google Scholar
  21. Kirby, T. (2008). A garden of learning. Science and Children, 45(9), 28.Google Scholar
  22. Klemmer, C. D., Waliczek, T. M., & Zajicek, J. M. (2005). Growing minds: The effect of a school gardening program on the science achievement of elementary students. HortTechnology, 15(3), 448.Google Scholar
  23. Lindblom, Y. S., Pihlajamäki, H., & Kotkas, T. (2003). What makes a student group successful?: Student-student and student-teacher interaction in a problem-based learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 6(1), 59–76.Google Scholar
  24. Luna, M. J., Rye, J. A., Forinash, M., & Minor, A. (2015). Gardening for homonyms: Integrating science and language arts to support children's creative use of multiple meaning words. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas, 52(4), 92–105.Google Scholar
  25. Maynard, T., Waters, J., & Clement, J. (2013). Child-initiated learning, the outdoor environment and the ‘underachieving’ child. Early Years, 33(3), 212–225.Google Scholar
  26. McCarty, J. (2010). The nature of school gardens. Exchange(195).Google Scholar
  27. McLeod, B., & Craig, A. S. (2007). What outcomes are we trying to achieve in our outdoor education programs? Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 11(2), 41–49.Google Scholar
  28. Moutsios, S. (2010). Power, politics and transnational policy-making in education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 8(1), 121.Google Scholar
  29. Nedovic, S., & Morrissey, A. M. (2013). Calm active and focused: Children’s responses to an organic outdoor learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 16(2), 281–295.Google Scholar
  30. Neill, J. T., & Richards, G. E. (1998). Does outdoor education really work? A summary of recent meta-analyses. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 3(1), 2–9.Google Scholar
  31. Nyberg, L. (2014). “Seeding science in elementary schools.” Science and Children. March 2014, Vol. 51 Issue 7, s. 84–88.Google Scholar
  32. Ord, J., & Leather, M. (2011). The substance beneath the labels of experiential learning: The importance of John Dewey for outdoor educators. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 15(2), 13–23.Google Scholar
  33. Pascoe, J., & Watt-Smith, C. (2013). Curriculum literacies and the school garden. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 21(1), 34–47.Google Scholar
  34. Passy, R. (2014). School gardens: Teaching and learning outside the front door. Education 3–13, 42(1), 23–38.Google Scholar
  35. Peacock, A., & Pratt, N. (2011). How young people respond to learning spaces outside school: A sociocultural perspective. Learning Environments Research, 14(1), 11–24.Google Scholar
  36. Pigg, A. E., Waliczek, T. M., & Zajicek, J. M. (2006). Effects of a gardening program on the academic progress of third, fourth, and fifth grade math and science students. HortTechnology, 16(2), 262.Google Scholar
  37. Ratcliffe, M. M., Merrigan, K. A., Rogers, B. L., & Goldberg, J. P. (2011). The effects of school garden experiences on middle school-aged students’ knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors associated with vegetable consumption. Health Promotion Practice, 12(1), 36–43.Google Scholar
  38. Reynolds, D., Sammons, P., De Fraine, B., Van Damme, J., Townsend, T., Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (2014). Educational effectiveness research (EER): A state-of-the-art review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(2), 197–230.Google Scholar
  39. Richards, D. 2010, “Primary school permaculture”. Primary Geographer, Vol. 95 issue 3, s. 7–9.Google Scholar
  40. Roelofs, E., Visser, J., & Terwel, J. (2003). Preferences for various learning environments: Teachers' and parents' perceptions. Learning Environments Research, 6(1), 77–110.Google Scholar
  41. Rye, J. A., Selmer, S. J., Pennington, S., Vanhorn, L., Fox, S., & Kane, S. (2012). Elementary school garden programs enhance science education for all learners. Teaching Exceptional Children, 44(6), 58–65.Google Scholar
  42. Selmer, S. J., Rye, J. A., Malone, E., Fernandez, D., & Trebino, K. (2014). What should we grow in our school garden to sell at the farmers’ market?: Initiating statistical literacy through science and mathematics integration. Science Activities, 51(1), 17–32.Google Scholar
  43. Selmer, S., Valentine, K., Luna, M., Rummel, S., & Rye, J. (2016). How can we best use our school garden space?: Exploring the concepts of area and perimeter in an authentic learning context. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 21(4), 3–10.Google Scholar
  44. Silverman, J., & Corneau, N. (2017). From nature deficit to outdoor exploration: Curriculum for sustainability in Vermont’s public schools. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 17(3), 258–273.Google Scholar
  45. Smith, L. L., & Motsenbocker, C. E. (2005). Impact of hands-on science through school gardening in Louisiana public elementary schools. HortTechnology, 15(3), 439.Google Scholar
  46. Souza, M. T. d., Silva, M. D. d., & Carvalho, R. d. (2010). Integrative review: What is it? How to do it? Einstein, 8, 102–106.Google Scholar
  47. Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367.Google Scholar
  48. Walter, P. (2012). Educational alternatives in food production, knowledge and consumption: The public pedagogies of growing power and tsyunhehkw. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 52, 3, s. 573–3, s. 594.Google Scholar
  49. Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553.Google Scholar
  50. Wijnen, M., Loyens, S. M. M., Wijnia, L., Smeets, G., Kroeze, M. J., & Van der Molen, H. T. (2017). Is problem-based learning associated with students’ motivation?: A quantitative and qualitative study. Learning Environments Research. Google Scholar
  51. Williams, D. R., & Brown, J. D. (2012). Learning gardens and sustainability education: Bringing life to schools and schools to life. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Williams, D. R., & Dixon, P. S. (2013). Impact of garden-based learning on academic outcomes in schools: Synthesis of research between 1990 and 2010. Review of Educational Research, 83(2), 211–235.Google Scholar
  53. Williams, D. R., Brule, H., Kelley, S. S., & Skinner, E. A. (2018). Science in the learning gardens (SciLG): A study of students’ motivation, achievement, and science identity in low-income middle schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 8.Google Scholar
  54. Winters, J., Ring, T., & Burriss, K. (2010). Cultivating math and science in a school garden. Childhood Education, 86(4), 248.Google Scholar
  55. Wistoft, K. (2013). The desire to learn as a kind of love: Gardening, cooking, and passion in outdoor education. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 13(2), 125–141.Google Scholar
  56. Wistoft, K., & Dyg, P. M. (2017). Wellbeing and social relations in school gardens: The case of the gardens for bellies food and environmental education program. Environmental Education Research. Google Scholar
  57. Wood, S. T., (2010). Gardening in schools – A vital tool for children’s learning. Retrieved from: www.rhs.org.uk/schoolgardening.Google Scholar
  58. Wurdinger, S., & Paxton, T. (2003). Using multiple levels of experience to promote autonomy in adventure education students. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 3(1), 41–48.Google Scholar
  59. Yan, L., & Kember, D. (2003). Influence of the curriculum and learning environment on group learning approaches outside the classroom. Learning Environments Research, 6(3), 285–307.Google Scholar
  60. Zandvliet, D. B. (2012). Development and validation of the place-based learning and constructivist environment survey (PLACES). Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 125–140.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Outdoor Education Australia 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Danish School of EducationAarhus UniversityAarhus CDenmark
  2. 2.Danish School of EducationAarhus UniversityCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations