Advertisement

Acknowledging the agency of a more-than-human world: material relations on a Snowy River journey

  • Scott JukesEmail author
  • Alistair Stewart
  • Marcus Morse
Original paper

Abstract

In this article we describe our attempt to challenge our anthropocentric gaze during an outdoor environmental education (OEE) research project involving a 10-day journey with high school students on the Snowy River in south-eastern Australia. Although much contemporary OEE research explores place responsive methodologies that provide possibilities for expanding beyond human centered practices, such movements can be difficult to make. We attempt, through this project, to shift our gaze away from a human-centered viewpoint to understand ways in which new perspectives of journeys, place(s) and learning might be available. To do this we adopt a posthuman/relational materialist approach to explore how the material world is creative of places, people and learning opportunities beyond human centered ways of seeing. We argue for a focus on the more-than-human aspects of places and engage posthuman concepts that allow us to challenge traditional ways of researching. In doing so we seek to uncover and acknowledge the agency of the more-than-human world, and how material places and their elements are valuable in the creation of emergent learning possibilities on an OEE journey. Rather than exact findings, this article is an exploratory journey of thinking OEE in different ways, to explore new opportunities for place and context responsive learning and environmental understanding.

Keywords

Journey Relational materialism Rhizome Assemblages Posthuman Intra-action 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the valuable constructive feedback provided by the reviewers and the Editor, John Quay, in helping improve the clarity and quality of this article. We would also like to the thank the students from the Snowy River journey for their input into this research project.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abram, D. (2010). Becoming animal: An earthly cosmology. New York: Vintage Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe half way: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, UK: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barad, K. (2008). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. In S. Alaimo & S. Hekman (Eds.), Material feminisms (pp. 135–169). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bishop-Taylor, R. (2016). Every mapped stream and river in Australia. Retrieved from https://github.com/robbibt/australian-rivers#data.
  6. Clarke, D. A. G., & Mcphie, J. (2014). Becoming animate in education: Immanent materiality and outdoor learning for sustainability. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 14(3), 198–216.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2014.919866.
  7. Clarke, D. A. G., & Mcphie, J. (2016). From places to paths: Learning for sustainability, teacher education and a philosophy of becoming. Environmental Education Research, 22(7), 1002–1024.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1057554.
  8. Colebrook, C. (2002a). Gilles Deleuze. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Colebrook, C. (2002b). Understanding Deleuze. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  10. Coleman, R., & Ringrose, J. (2013). Introduction: Deleuze and research methodologies. In R. Coleman & J. Ringrose (Eds.), Deleuze and research methdologies (pp. 1–22). Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Coole, D., & Frost, S. (2010). Introducing the new materialisms. In D. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms: ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 1–43). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  13. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? (H. Tomlinson, & Burchell, G., Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Denzin, N. K. (2013). The death of data? Cultural Studies↔Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 353–356.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708613487882.
  15. Fox, N. J., & Alldred, P. (2015). New materialist social inquiry: Designs, methods and the research-assemblage. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(4), 399–414.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2014.921458.
  16. Gough, N. (2016). Postparadigmatic materialisms: A ‘new movement of thought’ for outdoor environmental education research? Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 19(2), 51–65.Google Scholar
  17. Honan, E., & Bright, D. (2016). Writing a thesis differently. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29(5), 731–743.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2016.1145280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hultman, K., & Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: A relational materialist methodological approach to educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 525–542.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2010.500628.
  19. Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. USA: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2013). Plugging one text into another: Thinking with theory in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(4), 261–271.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800412471510.
  21. Jukes, S. (2018). Thinking outdoor environmental education differently: Material relations on a Snowy River journey. (Unpublished master's thesis). La Trobe University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.Google Scholar
  22. Lenz Taguchi, H. (2011). Investigating learning, participation and becoming in early childhood practices with a relational materialist approach. Global Studies of Childhood, 1(1), 36.  https://doi.org/10.2304/gsch.2011.1.1.36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lynch, J., & Mannion, G. (2016). Enacting a place-responsive research methodology: Walking interviews with educators. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 16(4), 330–345.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2016.1163271.
  24. Masny, D. (2013). Rhizoanalytic pathways in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(5), 339–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mikaels, J., & Asfeldt, M. (2016). Becoming-crocus, becoming-river, becoming-bear: A relational materialist exploration of place(s). Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 20(2), 2–13.Google Scholar
  26. Morton, T. (2016). Dark ecology: For a logic of future coexistence. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Raffan, J. (1993). The experience of place: Exploring the land as teacher. The Journal of Experiential Education, 16(1), 39–45.Google Scholar
  28. Rautio, P. (2013). Children who carry stones in their pockets: On autotelic material practices in everyday life. Children's Geographies, 11(4), 394–408.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2013.812278.
  29. Sellers, W., & Gough, N. (2010). Sharing outsider thinking: Thinking (differently) with Deleuze in educational philosophy and curriculum inquiry. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 589–614.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2010.500631.
  30. St. Pierre, E. A. (2008). Decentering voice in qualitative inquiry. International Review of Qualitative Research, 1(3), 319–336.Google Scholar
  31. St. Pierre, E. A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (Vol. 4, pp. 611–625). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. St. Pierre, E. A. (2013a). The posts continue: Becoming. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 646–657.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788754.
  33. St. Pierre, E. A. (2013b). The appearance of data. Cultural Studies↔Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 223–227.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708613487862.
  34. St. Pierre, E. A. (2016). The empirical and the new empiricisms. Cultural Studies↔Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 111–124.Google Scholar
  35. St. Pierre, E. A., & Jackson, A. Y. (2014). Qualitative data analysis after coding. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 715–719.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414532435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. St. Pierre, E., Jackson, A., & Mazzei, L. (2016). New empiricisms and new materialisms: Conditions for new inquiry. Cultural Studies↔Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 99–110.Google Scholar
  37. Stewart, A. (2008). Whose place, whose history? Outdoor environmental education pedagogy as ‘reading’ the landscape. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 8(2), 79–98.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14729670801906125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stewart, A. (2015). Rhizocurrere: A Deleuzo-Guattarian approach to curriculum autobiography. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 28(10), 1169–1185.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2014.974719.
  39. Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human Science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London: The Althouse Press.Google Scholar
  40. Wattchow, B., & Brown, M. (2011). A pedagogy of place: Outdoor education for a changing world. Clayton, VIC: Monash University Publishing.Google Scholar
  41. Williams, J. (2011). Event. In C. Stivale (Ed.), Gilles Deleuze: Key Concepts (pp. 80–90). Montreal, QC: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Outdoor Education Australia 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.La Trobe UniversityBendigoAustralia

Personalised recommendations