Wild pedagogies and wilding pedagogies: teacher-student-nature centredness and the challenges for teaching
- 11 Downloads
The notion of wild pedagogies entreats teachers to act – to wild pedagogies – by acknowledging that more than a singular will characterizes pedagogical situations. Wilding pedagogies requires going beyond ideas of teacher-centred and student-centred pedagogies to encompass nature-centred pedagogies: recognizing the self-will of wider nature. In attempting this wilding, we suggest teachers can learn from the the previous movement from teacher-centred pedagogy to what Larry Cuban describes as teacher-centred progressivism; a hybrid pedagogy that emerged as a result of compromises between teacher-centred and student-centred pedagogies. Attempting to incorporate nature-centred pedagogies presents difficulties and opportunities for educational responses and we highlight a way forward that might be achievable via Dewey’s notion of education through occupations. Occupations are important to Dewey’s theory of experience, drawing together purpose and meaning into occupational wholes. This, we argue, presents challenges for teaching.
KeywordsWild pedagogies Wilding pedagogies Nature-centred Occupations Outdoor education Dewey Næss
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- Cuban, L. (1984). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms 1880–1990 (1st ed.). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
- Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms 1880–1990 (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Cuban, L. (2007). Hugging the middle: Teaching in an era of testing and accountability. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 15(1) Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v15n1/. Accessed 25 Sept 2018.
- Dewey, J. (1902a). The educational situation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Dewey, J. (1902b). The child and the curriculum. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Dewey, J. (1930). How much freedom in schools? New Republic, 63(9), 204–206.Google Scholar
- Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
- Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
- Jickling, B., Blenkinsop, S., Morse, M., & Jensen, A. (2018). Wild pedagogies: Six initial touchstones for early childhood environmental educators. Australian Journal of Environmental Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2018.19.
- Martin, P. (1999). Critical outdoor education and nature as a friend. In J. C. Miles & S. Priest (Eds.), Adventure Programming. State College: Venture.Google Scholar
- Næss, A., & Jickling, B. (2000). Deep ecology and education: A conversation with Arne Næss. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 5, 48–62.Google Scholar
- Orr, D. (1992). Ecological literacy: Education and the transition to a postmodern world. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- Quay, J. (2016). Outdoor education and school curriculum distinctiveness: More than content, more than process. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 19(2), 42–50.Google Scholar
- Quay, J., & Seaman, J. (2013). John Dewey and education outdoors: Making sense of the 'educational situation' through more than a century of progressive reforms. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
- Skeat, W. W. (1888). An etymological dictionary of the English language. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Vest, J. H. C. (1985). Will-of-the-land: Wilderness among primal indo-Europeans. Environmental Review: ER, 9(4), 323–329.Google Scholar