Advertisement

Effectiveness of radiative heat flux in MHD flow of Jeffrey-nanofluid subject to Brownian and thermophoresis diffusions

  • Muhammad Ijaz KhanEmail author
  • Tasawar Hayat
  • Muhammad Waqas
  • Ahmed Alsaedi
  • Muhammad Imran Khan
Article
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

Our interest here in this investigation is to explore the thermophoresis and Brownian motion characteristics in flow induced by stretched surface. Electrically conducted Jeffrey material formulates the flow equation. Linear forms of stretching and free stream velocities are imposed. Nonlinear radiation and convective heating processes describe the phenomenon of heat transfer. Passive controls of nanoparticles are considered on the boundary. The compatible transformations produce the strong nonlinear differential systems. The problems are computed analytically utilizing HAM. Convergence domain is determined and major results are concluded for different involved parameters. Heat transfer rate and drag force are also explained for various physical variables. Our analysis reveals that heat transfer rate augments via larger radiation parameter and Biot number. Moreover larger Brownian motion and thermophoresis parameters have opposite characteristics on concentration field.

Key words

Jeffrey nanomaterial Non-linear radiative heat flux Convective boundary conditions Brownian and thermophoresis diffusions 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful to the reviewers for their comments which have served to improve the present work.

References

  1. [1]
    Choi S. U. S., Eastman J. A. Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles, The Proceedings of the 1995 ASME [C]. International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, San Francisco, USA, ASME, FED 231/MD66, 1995, 99–105.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Ramesh G. K., Gireesha B. J. Influence of heat source/sink on a Maxwell fluid over a stretching surface with convective boundary condition in the presence of nanoparticles [J]. Ain Shams Engineering, 2014, 5: 991–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Krishnamurthy M. R., Prasannakumara B. C., Gireesha B. J. et al. Effect of chemical reaction on MHD boundary layer flow and melting heat transfer of Williamson nanofluid in porous medium [J]. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 2016, 19: 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Turkyilmazoglu M. Exact analytical solutions for heat and mass transfer of MHD slip flow in nanofluids [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2012, 84: 182–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Hayat T., Qayyum S., Waqas M. et al. Thermally radiative stagnation point flow of Maxwell nanofluid due to unsteady convectively heated stretched surface [J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2016, 224: 801–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Gaffar S. A., Prasad V. R., Reddy E. K. Computational study of Jeffrey's non–Newtonian fluid past a semi–infinite vertical plate with thermal radiation and heat generation/absorption [J]. Ain Shams Engineering, 2017, 8: 277–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Hayat T., Qayyum S., Alsaedi A. et al. Simultaneous influences of mixed convection and nonlinear thermal radiation in stagnation point flow of Oldroyd–B fluid towards an unsteady convectively heated stretched surface [J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2016, 224: 811–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Lopez A., Ibáñez G., Pantoja J. et al. Entropy generation analysis of MHD nanofluid flow in a porous vertical microchannel with nonlinear thermal radiation, slip flow and convective–radiative boundary conditions [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2017, 107: 982–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Lin Y., Li B., Zheng L. et al. Particle shape and radiation effects on Marangoni boundary layer flow and heat transfer of copper–water nanofluid driven by an exponential temperature [J]. Powder Technology, 2016, 301: 379–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Hayat T., Qayyum S., Alsaedi A. et al. Nonlinear thermal radiation aspects in stagnation point flow of tangent hyperbolic nanofluid with double diffusive convection [J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2016, 223: 969–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Turkyilmazoglu M., Pop I. Exact analytical solutions for the flow and heat transfer near the stagnation point on a stretching/shrinking sheet in a Jeffrey fluid [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2013, 57: 82–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Hayat T., Waqas M., Khan M. I. et al. Impacts of constructive and destructive chemical reactions in magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) flow of Jeffrey liquid due to nonlinear radially stretched surface [J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2017, 225: 302–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Reddy G. B., Sreenadh S., Reddy R.H., Kavitha A. Flow of a Jeffrey fluid between torsionally oscillating disks [J]. Ain Shams Engineering, 2015, 6: 355–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Hayat T., Khan M. I., Waqas M. et al. Numerical simulation for melting heat transfer and radiation effects in stagnation point flow of carbon––water nanofluid [J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 315: 1011–1024.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Hayat T., Khan M. I., Farooq M. et al. Stagnation point flow with Cattaneo–Christov heat flux and homogeneous–heterogeneous reactions [J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2016, 220: 49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Soid S. K., Kechil S. A., Ishak A. Axisymmetric stagnation–point flow over a stretching/shrinking plate with second–order velocity slip [J]. Propulsion and Power Research, 2016, 5: 194–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Hayat T., Khan M. I., Farooq M. et al. Impact of Cattaneo–Christov heat flux model in flow of variable thermal conductivity fluid over a variable thicked surface [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2016, 99: 702–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Liao S. J. Homotopy analysis method in nonlinear differential equations [M]. (Springer and Higher Education Press, Heidelberg, 2012).CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Pop S. R., Grosan T., Pop I. Radiation effects on the flow near the stagnation point of a stretching sheet [J]. Technische Mechanik, 2004, 25: 100–106.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Sharma P. R., Singh G. Effects of variable thermal conductivity and heat source/sink on MHD flow near a stagnation point on a linearly stretching sheet [J]. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, 2009, 2: 13–21.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© China Ship Scientific Research Center 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammad Ijaz Khan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tasawar Hayat
    • 1
    • 2
  • Muhammad Waqas
    • 1
  • Ahmed Alsaedi
    • 2
  • Muhammad Imran Khan
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsQuaid-I-Azam University 45320IslamabadPakistan
  2. 2.Nonlinear Analysis and Applied Mathematics (NAAM) Research Group, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of ScienceKing Abdulaziz UniversityJeddah 21589Saudi Arabia
  3. 3.Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh CampusEdinburghUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations