Advertisement

Journal of Hydrodynamics

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 400–412 | Cite as

Numerical study on variation characteristics of the unsteady bearing forces of a propeller with an external transverse excitation

  • Min-hua Shu
  • Ke ChenEmail author
  • Yun-xiang You
  • Tian-qun Hu
  • Ren-feng Wang
Articles
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

The unsteady bearing forces of a propeller can be significantly affected by external transverse excitations. This paper numerically studies the unsteady variation characteristics of the bearing forces of a three-blade conventional propeller with external transverse excitations or without excitations. The dynamic mesh method combined with the RANS turbulence model is employed. The numerical simulation shows the frequency response in the frequency domain of KT, KQ under external transverse excitations. The frequency of the response is found always equal to twice of the excitation frequency. If the amplitude of the external transverse excitation keeps constant, the amplitude of the response increases with the increase of the excitation frequency. If the excitation frequency keeps constant, the amplitude of the response increases with the increase of the excitation amplitude, in a power-law relationship. The pressure distribution can be significantly affected by the external transverse excitation, leading to a high irregularity of the flow field.

Key words

External transverse excitation unsteady bearing forces excitation frequency propeller dynamic mesh method 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Wei Y., Wang Y. Unsteady hydrodynamics of blade forces and acoustic responses of a model scaled submarine excited by propeller’s thrust and side-forces [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2013, 332(8): 2038–2056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Zhou C. Vibration research on ship shafting system [D]. Doctoral Thesis, Harbin, China, Harbin Engineering University, 2006(in Chinese).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Zheng J., Meng F., Li Y. Design and experimental testing of a free-running ship motion control platform [J]. IEEE Access, 2018, 6: 4690–4696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Fuad N., Chowdhury M. K., Yasin M. S. et al. Development of a novel device for harnessing wasted energy behind a marine propeller [J]. Procedia Engineering, 2017, 194: 378–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Wang G. Q., Zhang J. H. A design method of ducted propeller by coupled lifting surface theory/panel method [J]. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2003, 7(4): 21–27(in Chinese).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Ma C., Qian Z. F., Chen K. Using vortex lattice and surface panel method to predict the unsteady hydrodynamic performance of podded propulsors [J]. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2014, 18(9): 1035–1043(in Chinese).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Zhang H., Cui H. Predicting hydrodynamic performance of ducted propeller using surface panel method [J]. Mine Warfare and Ship Self-defence, 2013, 21(3): 33–37.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Koushan K., Krasilnikov V. Experimental and numerical investigation of open thrusters in oblique flow conditions [C]. Proceeding of 27th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Seoul, Korea, 2008.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Zhang Z. R., Hong F. W. The study of numerical analysis method on the performance of propeller under oblique flow [C]. Proceeding of the Ship Mechanics Congress, Chengdu, China, 2007(in Chinese).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Hu X. F., Huang Z. Y., Hong F. W. Unsteady hydrodynamics forces of propeller predicted with viscous CFD [J]. Chinese Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2009, 24(6): 734–739(in Chinese).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Guo C. Y., Ma N., Yang C. J. Numerical simulation of a podded propulsor in viscous flow [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2009, 21(1): 71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Lesfvendahl M., Troeng C. Computation of cycle-to-cycle variation in blade load for a submarine propeller using LES [C]. Proceedings of Second International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, Hamburg, Germany, 2011.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Zhu P., Bi Y., Ye J. Comparison analysis of three kinds of computational methods for the bearing force of propellers [J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2015, 10(1): 83–87(in Chinese).Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Zhang K. Q., Ye J. M., Yu A. B. Numerical simulation of propeller unsteady hydrodynamics in non-uniform flow [J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2018, 40(2): 33–38.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Li L., Wang C., Sun S. Numerical prediction analysis of propeller exciting force for hull-propeller-rudder system [J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Transportation Science and Engineering), 2015, 39(4): 768–772, 777.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Huang M. M., Wu C. S. Effect of heaving on propeller performance in open water [J]. Chinese Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2015, 30(3): 284–290(in Chinese).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Sharma A. Numerical modeling of a hydrofoil or a marine propeller undergoing unsteady motion via a panel method and rans [D]. Doctoral Thesis, Austin, USA, The University of Texas at Austin, 2011.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Sharma A., He L., Spyros A. K. Numerical modeling of a hydrofoil or a marine propeller undergoing unsteady motion [C]. Second International Symposium on Marine Propulsors smp’11, Hamburg, Germany, 2011.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Spyros A. K., Ye T., Abhinav S. Numerical modeling of a marine propeller undergoing surge and heave motion [J]. International Journal of Rotating Machinery, 2012, 2012: Article ID 257461.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    ANSYS FLUENT. Theory guide [M]. ANSYS Inc., 2011.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Domont K., Stijnen J. M. A., Vierendeels J. et al. Validation of a fluid-structure interaction model of heart valve using the dynamic mesh method in fluent [J]. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 2004, 7(3): 139–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Gao F. D., Pan C. Y., Han Y. Y. Numerical computation and analysis of unsteady viscous flow around autonomous underwater vehicle with propellers based on sliding mesh [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19: 944–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Ji B., Luo X., Wu Y. Unsteady cavitation characteristics and alleviation of pressure fluctuations around marine propellers with different skew angles [J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2014, 28(4): 1339–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Jessup S. D. Measurement of multiple blade rate unsteady propeller force [R]. David Taylor Research Center, 1990.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Boswell R. J., Miller M. L. Unsteady propeller loading-measurement, correlation with theory,and parametric study [R]. Washington, USA: Naval Ship Research and Development Center, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© China Ship Scientific Research Center 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Min-hua Shu
    • 1
  • Ke Chen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yun-xiang You
    • 1
  • Tian-qun Hu
    • 1
  • Ren-feng Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, Collaboration Innovation Center for Advanced Ship and Deep-Sea Exploitation EquipmentShanghai JiaoTong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations