Advertisement

Journal of Bionic Engineering

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 814–827 | Cite as

A Bifurcated Vascular Channel Construction Method based on Diploic Vein Characteristics

  • Jian Qi
  • Jia Li
  • Shuxian ZhengEmail author
Article
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

In skull bone tissue engineering, cells do not easily survive and proliferate in the scaffold because of the lack of nutrient transport channels. To address these problems, a vascular design and fabrication method based on human skull diploic vein characteristics was proposed. The skull sample was scanned by micro-CT, and the 3D model was constructed by Avizo. By analyzing the characteristics of the diploic vein, the vascular centerline model, path model, taper model and bifurcation model were proposed. Two vascular network examples were constructed by iteration of the bifurcation unit. The mold method of constructing vascular scaffolds embedded within the bionic channels was proposed. The scaffold material is PDMS, and the surface was coated with collagen. The Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVECs) were planted into the lumen of the channels for 7 days in vitro and found to be able to proliferate. The cells cultured for three days were fluorescently stained, and it was found that the cells were well attached to the surfaces of the lumen. This vascular design and fabrication process can lay a foundation for vascularization in bone tissue engineering.

Keywords

diploic vein vascular channels bifurcation model vascular mold vascular scaffold fabrication bionic 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51575380).

Supplementary material

42235_2019_99_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (2.4 mb)
A Bifurcated Vascular Channel Construction Method based on Diploic Vein Characteristics

References

  1. [1]
    Horch R E, Boos A M, Quan Y, Bleiziffer O, Detsch R, Boccaccini A R, Alexiou C, Sun J, Beier J P, Arkudas A. Cancer research by means of tissue engineering — Is there a rationale? Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 2013, 17, 1197–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Fitzsimmons R E B, Aquilino M S, Quigley J, Chebotarev O, Tarlan F, Simmons C A. Generating vascular channels within hydrogel constructs using an economical open-source 3D bioprinter and thermoreversible gels. Bioprinting, 2018, 9, 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Rafaelof M, Mustak H, Rootman D B. Anomalous sphenoid diploe vein: Case report highlighting the value of careful CT evaluation prior to decompression surgery. Ophthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, 2018, 34, e74–e75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    de Lazaro G R, de la Cuétara J M, Pisova H, Lorenzo C, Bruner E. Diploic vessels and computed tomography: Segmentation and comparison in modern humans and fossil hominids. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2016, 159, 313–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Chung M, Lee J, Chung J W, Shin Y G. Accurate liver vessel segmentation via active contour model with dense vessel candidates. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2018, 166, 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    He J K, Mao M, Liu Y X, Shao J Y, Jin Z M, Li D C. Fabrication of nature-inspired microfluidic network for perfusable tissue constructs. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 2013, 2, 1108–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Ehricke H H, Hauser T K, Nägele T, Schult T, Klose U. Magnetic resonance angiography contrast enhancement and combined 3D visualization of cerebral vasculature and white matter pathways. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 2018, 70, 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Gong X, Ma C, Yang P, Chen Y, Du C, Fu C, Lu J P. Computer-aided pancreas segmentation based on 3D GRE Dixon MRI: A feasibility study. Acta Radiologica Open, 2019, 8, 2058460119834690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Suran S, Pattanaik V, Malathi D. Discovering shortest path between points in cerebrovascular system. Proceedings of the 6th IBM Collaborative Academia Research Exchange Conference (I-CARE) on I-CARE, Bangalore, India, 2014, 1–3.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Wang R, Li C, Wang J, Wei X E, Li Y H, Zhu Y M, Zhang S. Threshold segmentation algorithm for automatic extraction of cerebral vessels from brain magnetic resonance angiography images. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 2015, 241, 30–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Kamiya A, Takahashi T. Quantitative assessments of morphological and functional properties of biological trees based on their fractal nature. Journal of Applied Physiology, 2007, 102, 2315–2323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Rigatelli G, Zuin M, Dell’Avvocata F, Vassilev D, Daggubati R, Nguyen T, Nguyen M T N, Foin N. Complex coronary bifurcation treatment by a novel stenting technique: Bench test, fluid dynamic study and clinical outcomes. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2018, 92, 907–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Zamir M. Arterial branching within the confines of fractal L-system formalism. The Journal of General Physiology, 2001, 118, 267–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Schreiner W. Computer generation of complex arterial tree models. Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 1993, 15, 148–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Qi J, Li J, Zheng S X. A mosaic structure multi-level vascular network design for skull tissue engineering. Computers in Biology and Bedicine, 2019, 104, 70–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Jaquet C, Najman L, Talbot H, Grady L, Schaap M, Spain B, Kim H J, Vignon-Clementel I, Taylor C A. Generation of patient-specific cardiac vascular networks: A hybrid image-based and synthetic geometric model. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2019, 66, 946–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Schreiner W, Neumann F, Neumann M, End A, Roedler S M, Aharinejad S. The influence of optimization target selection on the structure of arterial tree models generated by constrained constructive optimization. The Journal of General Physiology, 1995, 106, 583–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Schreiner W, Neumann F, Neumann M, Adelheid E, Muller M R. Structural quantification and bifurcation symmetry in arterial tree models generated by constrained constructive optimization. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1996, 180, 161–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Bui A, Manasseh R, Sutalo I, Liffman K. Multiscale modeling ofcerebral blood flow. The 7th International Conference on CFD in the Minerals and Process Industries, Melbourne, Australia, 2009, 145–147.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Bui A, Šutalo I D, Manasseh R, Liffman K. Dynamics of pulsatile flow in fractal models of vascular branching networks. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2009, 47, 763–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Schreiner W, Neumann F, Neumann M, End A, Roedler S M. Anatomical variability and functional ability of vascular trees modeled by constrained constructive optimization. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1997, 187, 147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Schreiner W, Neumann F, Karch R, Neumann M, Roedler S M, End A. Shear stress distribution in arterial tree models, generated by constrained constructive optimization. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1999, 198, 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Karch R, Neumann F, Neumann M, Szawlowski P, Schreiner W. Voronoi polyhedra analysis of optimized arterial tree models. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2003, 31, 548–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Blanco P J, de Queiroz R A B, Feijóo R A. A computational approach to generate concurrent arterial networks in vascular territories. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering, 2013, 29, 601–614.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Zamir M. On fractal properties of arterial trees. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1999, 197, 517–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Wu P K, Ringeisen B R. Development of human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) and human umbilical vein smooth muscle cell (HUVSMC) branch/stem structures on hydrogel layers via biological laser printing (BioLP). Biofabrication, 2010, 2, 014111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Guillotin B, Souquet A, Catros S, Duocastella M, Pippenger B, Bellance S, Bareille R, Remy M, Bordenave L, Amedee J, Guillemot F. Laser assisted bioprinting of engineered tissue with high cell density and microscale organization. Biomaterials, 2010, 31, 7250–7256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Chang C C, Krishnan L, Nunes S S, Church K H, Edgar L T, Boland E D, Weiss J A, Williams S K, Hoying J B. Determinants of microvascular network topologies in implanted neovasculatures. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 2012, 32, 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Visser J, Peters B, Burger T J, Jelle B, Dhert W J A, Melchels F P W, Malda J. Biofabrication of multi-material anatomically shaped tissue constructs. Biofabrication, 2013, 5, 035007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    He J, Chen R, Lu Y, Zhan L, Liu Y, Li D, Jin Z. Fabrication of circular microfluidic network in enzymatically-crosslinked gelatin hydrogel. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2016, 59, 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Dong G R, Lian Q, Yang L X, Mao W, Liu S Y, Xu C. Preparation and endothelialization of multi-level vessel-like network in enzymated gelatin scaffolds. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2018, 15, 673–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Mao M, He J K, Lu Y J, Li X, Li T J, Zhou W X, Li D C. Leaf-templated, microwell-integrated microfluidic chips for high-throughput cell experiments. Biofabrication, 2018, 10, 025008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Bellan L M, Pearsall M, Cropek D M, Langer R. A 3D interconnected microchannel network formed in gelatin by sacrificial shellac microfibers. Advanced Materials, 2012, 24, 5187–5191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Miller J S, Stevens K R, Yang M T, Baker B M, Nguyen D T, Cohen D M, Toro E, Chen A A, Galie P A, Xu X, Chaturvedi R, Bhatia S N, Chen C S. Rapid casting of patterned vascular networks for perfusable engineered three-dimensional tissues. Nature Materials, 2012, 11, 768–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    Lee W, Lee V, Polio S, Keegan P, Lee J H, Fischer K, Park J K, Yoo S S. On-demand three-dimensional freeform fabrication of multi-layered hydrogel scaffold with fluidic channels. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2010, 105, 1178–1186.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    Wu W, DeConinck A, Lewis J A. Omnidirectional printing of 3D microvascular networks. Advanced Materials, 2011, 23, H178–H183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    Kolesky D B, Truby R L, Gladman A S, Busbee T A, Homan K A, Lewis J A. 3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue constructs. Advanced Materials, 2014, 26, 3124–3130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    Homan K A, Kolesky D B, Skylar-Scott M A, Herrmann J, Obuobi H, Moisan A, Lewis J A. Bioprinting of 3D convoluted renal proximal tubules on perfusable chips. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6, 34845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    Wu P, Nakamura N, Morita H, Nam K, Fujisato T, Kimura T, Kishida A. A hybrid small-diameter tube fabricated from decellularized aortic intima-media and electrospun fiber for artificial small-diameter blood vessel. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2019, 107, 1064–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    Hinton T J, Jallerat Q, Palchesko R N, Park J H, Grodzicki M S, Shue H, Ramadan M H, Hudson A R, Feinberg A W. Three-dimensional printing of complex biological structures by freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels. Science Advances, 2015, 1, e1500758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    Moghadas H, Saidi M S, Kashaninejad N, Kiyoumarsioskouei A, Nguyen N. Fabrication and characterization of low-cost, bead-free, durable and hydrophobic electrospun membrane for 3D cell culture. Biomedical Microdevices, 2017, 19, UNSP 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    Grinberg L, Anor T, Madsen J R, Yakhot A, Karniadakis G E. Large-scale simulation of the human arterial tree. Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology, 2009, 36, 194–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Jilin University 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tianjin Key Laboratory of Equipment Design and Manufacturing Technology, School of Mechanical EngineeringTianjin UniversityTianjinChina
  2. 2.School of Mechanical EngineeringTianjin University of Technology and EducationTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations