Advertisement

Journal of Bionic Engineering

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 593–607 | Cite as

Design and Development of a Wheel-less Snake Robot with Active Stiffness Control for Adaptive Pedal Wave Locomotion

  • Mohammadali Javaheri KoopaeeEmail author
  • Sander Bal
  • Christopher Pretty
  • Xiaoqi Chen
Article

Abstract

This paper presents the design and manufacture process of a wheel-less, modular snake robot with series elastic actuators to reliably measure motor torque signal and investigate the effectiveness of active stiffness control for achieving adaptive snake-like locomotion. A polyurethane based elastic element to be attached between the motor and the links at each joint was designed and manufactured using water jet cutter, which makes the final design easier to develop and more cost-effective, compared to existing snake robots with torque measurement capabilities. The reliability of such torque measurement mechanism was examined using simulated dynamical model of pedal wave motion, which proves the efficacy of the design. A distributed control system was also designed, which with the help of an admittance controller, enables active control of the joint stiffness to achieve adaptive snake robot pedal wave locomotion to climb over obstacles, which unlike existing methods does not require prior information about the location of the obstacle. The effectiveness of the proposed controller in comparison to open-loop control strategy was verified by the number of experiments. The results show the capability of the robot to successfully climb over obstacles with the height of more than 55% of the diameter of the snake robot modules.

Keywords

modular snake robot series elastic actuator active stiffness control pedal wave locomotion adaptive locomotion 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material, approximately 5.15 MB.

Supplementary material, approximately 28.7 MB.

Supplementary material, approximately 22.2 MB.

Supplementary material, approximately 15.2 MB.

References

  1. [1]
    Hirose S. Biologically inspired robots: Snake-like locomotors and manipulators. Oxford University Press, New York, USA 1993.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Rollinson D, Choset H. Pipe network locomotion with a snake robot. Journal of Field Robotics, 2016, 33, 322–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Marvi H, Gong C, Gravish N, Astley H, Travers M, Hatton R L, Mendelson J R, Choset H, Hu D L, Goldman D I. Sidewinding with minimal slip: Snake and robot ascent of sandy slopes. Science, 2014, 346, 224–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Transeth A A, Leine R I, Glocker C, Pettersen K Y, Liljeback P. Snake robot obstacle-aided locomotion: Modeling, simulations, and experiments. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2008, 24, 88–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Hutchinson H F. About snakes. Nature, 1879, 20, 528–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Mosauer W. On the locomotion of snakes. Science, 1932, 76, 583–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Gray J. The mechanism of locomotion in snakes. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1946, 23, 101–120.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Toyoshima S, Tanaka M, Matsuno F. A study on sinuslifting motion of a snake robot with sequential optimization of a hybrid system. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2014, 11, 139–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Hopkins J K, Spranklin B W, Gupta S K. A survey of snake-inspired robot designs. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2009, 4, 21001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Liljebäck P, Pettersen K Y, Stavdahl O, Gravdahl J T. Hybrid modelling and control of obstacle-aided snake robot locomotion. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2010, 26, 781–799.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Ryu J K, Chong N Y, You B J, Christensen H I. Locomotion of snake-like robots using adaptive neural oscillators. Intelligent Service Robotics, 2009, 3, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Li G Y, Zhang H X, Zhang J W, Bye R T. Development of adaptive locomotion of a caterpillar-like robot based on a sensory feedback CPG model. Advanced Robotics, 2014, 28, 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Yamada H, Hirose S. Steering of pedal wave of a snake-like robot by superposition of curvatures. Proceedings of 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Taipei, Taiwan, 2010, 419–424.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Kano T, Watanabe Y, Satake F, Ishiguro A. Decentralized-controlled multi-terrain robot inspired by flatworm locomotion. Advanced Robotics, 2014, 28, 523–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Torricelli D, Gonzalez J, Weckx M, Jimenez-Fabian R, Vanderborght B, Sartori M, Dosen S, Farina D, Lefeber D, Pons J L. Human-like compliant locomotion: State of the art of robotic implementations. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2016, 11, 051002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Vespignani M, Melo K, Bonardi S, Ijspeert A J. Role of compliance on the locomotion of a reconfigurable modular snake robot. Proceedings of 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Hamburg, Germany, 2015, 2238–2245.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Kandhari A, Huang Y, Daltorio K A, Chiel H J, Quinn R D. Body stiffness in orthogonal directions oppositely affects worm-like robot turning and straight-line locomotion. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2018, 13, 026003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Whitman, J, Ruscelli F, Travers M, Choset H. Shape-based compliant control with variable coordination centralization on a snake robot. Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Las Vegas, USA, 2016, 5165–5170.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Sato T, Kano T, Ishiguro A. A decentralized control scheme for an effective coordination of phasic and tonic control in a snake-like robot. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2012, 7, 016005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Liljebäck P, Pettersen K Y, Stavdahl Ø, Gravdahl J T. Snake Robots: Modelling, Mechatronics, and Control. Springer-Verlag London, UK 2013.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Liljebäck P, Stavdahl Ø, Pettersen K Y, Gravdahl J T. A modular and waterproof snake robot joint mechanism with a novel force/torque sensor. Proceedings of 2012 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Vilamoura, Portugal, 2012, 4898–4905.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Takaoka S, Yamada H, Hirose S. Snake-like active wheel robot ACM-R4.1 with joint torque sensor and limiter. Proceedings of 2011 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, San Francisco, USA, 2011, 1081–1086.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Rollinson D, Bilgen Y, Brown B, Enner F, Ford S, Layton C, Rembisz J, Schwerin M, Willig A, Velagapudi P, Choset H. Design and architecture of a series elastic snake robot. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Chicago, USA, 2014, 4630–4636.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Martins L T, Arend Tatsch C A, Maciel E H, Gerndt R, da Silva Guerra R. A polyurethane-based compliant element for upgrading conventional servos into series elastic actuators. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2015, 48, 112–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Pratt G A, Williamson M. Series elastic actuators. Proceedings of 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots, Pittsburgh, USA, 1995, 399–406.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Zhao Y, Paine N, Jorgensen S J, Sentis L. Impedance control and performance measure of series elastic actuators. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2018, 65, 2817–2827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Kano T, Sato T, Kobayashi R, Ishiguro A. Local reflexive mechanisms essential for snakes’ scaffold-based locomotion. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2012, 7, 46008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Tesch M, Lipkin K, Brown I, Hatton R, Peck A, Rembisz J, Choset H. Parameterized and scripted gaits for modular snake robots. Advanced Robotics, 2009, 23, 1131–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Chen L, Ma S G, Wang Y C, Li B, Duan D P. Design and modelling of a snake robot in traveling wave locomotion. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2007, 42, 1632–1642.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Li G Y, Li W, Zhang J W, Zhang H X. Analysis and design of asymmetric oscillation for caterpillar-like locomotion. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2015, 12, 190–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Moreira F, Abundis A, Aguirre M, Castillo J, Bhounsule P. An inchworm-inspired robot based on modular body, electronics and passive friction pads performing the two-anchor crawl gait. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2018, 15, 820–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Akbarzadeh A, Kalani H. Design and modeling of a snake robot based on worm-like locomotion. Advanced Robotics, 2012, 26, 537–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    De Luca A, Book W. Robots with flexible elements. Handbook of Robotics, Springer, 2008, 287–319.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    Chen L, Ma S G, Wang Y C, Li B, Duan D P. Design and modelling of a snake robot in traveling wave locomotion. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2007, 42, 1632–1642.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    Kerdok A E, Biewener A A, Mcmahon T A, Weyand P G, Herr H M. Energetics and mechanics of human running on surfaces of different stiffnesses. Journal of Applied Physiology, 2002, 92, 469–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Geyer H, Seyfarth A, Blickhan R. Compliant leg behaviour explains basic dynamics of walking and running. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2006, 273, 2861–2867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    Hurst J W. The Role and Implementation of Compliance in Legged Locomotion, PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, 2008.Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    Calanca A, Muradore R, Fiorini P. Impedance control of series elastic actuators: Passivity and acceleration-based control. Mechatronics, 2017, 47, 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Jilin University 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammadali Javaheri Koopaee
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sander Bal
    • 1
  • Christopher Pretty
    • 1
  • Xiaoqi Chen
    • 2
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentUniversity of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand
  2. 2.Manufacturing Futures Research InstituteSwinburne University of TechnologyHawthornAustralia

Personalised recommendations