Advertisement

Journal of Bionic Engineering

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 264–280 | Cite as

Numerical Simulation of Flapping Wing MAVs in V-formation

  • Wee-Beng TayEmail author
  • Kishen Raj Murugaya
  • Woei-Leong Chan
  • Boo-Cheong Khoo
Article
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to understand the aerodynamics of Flapping wing Micro Aerial Vehicles (FMAVs) flying in V-formation and how V-formation can improve the endurance of FMAVs. We tested FMAVs with two types of flapping kinematics: (1) idealized sinusoidal flapping/pitching motion, (2) actual FMAV wing deformation capture. Using the design of experiment methodology, together with an immersed boundary method numerical solver, we investigate the effects of phase angle and x, y, z separation between the wings on the FMAVs’ performance. Results show that it is possible to obtain an overall thrust and lift improvement of up to 25% and 14% respectively, or a reduction of both 19%, compared to the single wing configuration. Lastly, for certain cases, we extend another row, leading to a total of five wings. Results show that in general, the additional thrust or lift experienced by the second row of wings is also experienced by the third row of wings. Hence, this may apply to subsequent rows too.

Keywords

flapping wing V-formation immersed boundary methods MAV design of experiment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research used computational resources of the K computer provided by the RIKEN Center for Computational Science through the HPCI System Research project (Project ID: hp150306). The computational work for this article was also partially done on resources of the National Supercomputing Centre, Singapore (https://doi.org/www.nscc.sg). The authors would also like to thank Mr Cheng Kian Song for generating the Flowerfly FMAV wing deformation data.

References

  1. [1]
    Shyy W, Lian Y, Tang J, Liu H, Trizila P, Stanford B, Bernal L, Cesnik C, Friedmann P, Ifju P. Computational aerodynamics of low reynolds number plunging, pitching and flexible wings for MAV applications. Proceedings of the 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, USA, 2008, 1–33.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Lissaman P B, Shollenberger C A. Formation flight of birds. Science, 1970, 168, 1003–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Weimerskirch H, Martin J, Clerquin Y, Alexandre P, Jiraskova S. Energy saving in flight formation. Nature, 2001, 413, 697–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Willis D, Peraire J, Breuer K. A computational investigation of bio-inspired formation flight and ground effect. Proceedings of the 25th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Reston, USA, 2007, 1–35.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Cutts C, Speakman J. Energy savings in formation flight of pink-footed geese. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 1994, 189, 251–252.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Ghommem M, Calo V M. Performance analysis of flapping wings in formation flights. Proceedings of the 2nd ECCOMAS Young Investigators Conference, Bordeaux, France, 2013.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Portugal S J, Hubel T Y, Fritz J, Heese S, Trobe D, Voelkl B, Hailes S, Wilson A M, Usherwood J R. Upwash exploitation and downwash avoidance by flap phasing in ibis formation flight. Nature, 2014, 505, 399–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    De Clercq K M E, de Kat R, Remes B, van Oudheusden B W, Bijl H. Aerodynamic experiments on Delfly II: Unsteady lift enhancement. International Journal of Micro Air Vehicles, 2009, 1, 255–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Nguyen Q V, Chan W L, Debiasi M. Design, fabrication, and performance test of a hovering-based flapping-wing micro air vehicle capable of sustained and controlled flight. Proceedings of the International Micro Air Vehicle Conference and Competitions, Delft, The Netherlands, 2014.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Yang J, Balaras E. An embedded-boundary formulation for large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows interacting with moving boundaries. Journal of Computational Physics, 2006, 215, 12–40.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Kim J, Kim D, Choi H. An immersed-boundary finite-volume method for simulations of flow in complex geometries. Journal of Computational Physics, 2001, 171, 132–150.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Liao C C, Chang Y W, Lin C A, McDonough J M. Simulating flows with moving rigid boundary using immersed-boundary method. Computers & Fluids, 2010, 39, 152–167.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Tay W B, Deng S, van Oudheusden B W, Bijl H. Validation of immersed boundary method for the numerical simulation of flapping wing flight. Computers & Fluids, 2015, 115, 226–242.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Kim D, Choi H. A second-order time-accurate finite volume method for unsteady incompressible flow on hybrid unstructured grids. Journal of Computational Physics, 2000, 162, 411–428.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Balay S, Gropp W D, McInnes L C, Smith B F. Efficient management of parallelism in object oriented numerical software libraries. In: Arge E, Bruaset A M, Langtangen H P, eds., Modern Software Tools for Scientific Computing, Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, USA, 1997, 163–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Falgout R D, Jones J E, Yang U M. The design and implementation of hypre, a library of parallel high performance preconditioners. In: Bruaset A M, Tveito A, eds., Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations on Parallel Computers. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006, 51, 267–294.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Calderon D E, Wang Z, Gursul I. Lift enhancement of a rectangular wing undergoing a small amplitude plunging motion. Proceedings of the 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Orlando, USA, 2010, 1–18.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Lua K B, Lim T T, Yeo K S. Scaling of aerodynamic forces of three-dimensional flapping wings. AIAA Journal, 2014, 52, 1095–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Nguyen Q V, Chan W L, Debiasi M. Hybrid design and performance tests of a hovering insect-inspired flapping-wing micro aerial vehicle. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2016, 13, 235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Tay W B, van Oudheusden B W, Bijl H. Numerical simulation of a flapping four-wing micro-aerial vehicle. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2015, 55, 237–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Cheng K S. Study on the Effect of Changing Flapping Wing Kinematics by Means of Changing Wing Root Chord Angle, Final year project, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 2015.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Anderson M J, Whitcomb P J. DOE Simplified: Practical Tools for Effective Experimentation, 3rd ed, CRC Press, New York, USA, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Da Ronch A, Ghoreyshi M, Badcock K J. On the generation of flight dynamics aerodynamic tables by computational fluid dynamics. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2011, 47, 597–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Da Ronch A, Panzeri M, Bari M A A, D’Ippolito R, Franciolini M. Adaptive design of experiments for efficient and accurate estimation of aerodynamic loads. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 2017, 89, 558–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Minitab Support, [2017-01-21], https://doi.org/www.minitab.com/en-us/support/
  26. [26]
    Tay W B, Bijl H, van Oudheusden B W. Biplane and tail effects in flapping flight. AIAA Journal, 2013, 51, 2133–2146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Hunt J C R, Wray A A, P. Moin. Eddies, streams, and convergence zones in turbulent flows. Proceedings of the Summer Program, Moffett Field, USA, 1988, 193–208.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Lim K B, Tay W B. Numerical analysis of the s1020 airfoils in tandem under different flapping configurations. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2009, 26, 191–207.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Lee J, Kim J, Choi H, Yang K S. Sources of spurious force oscillations from an immersed boundary method for moving-body problems. Journal of Computational Physics, 2011, 230, 2677–2695.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Hedrick T L. Software techniques for two- and three-dimensional kinematic measurements of biological and biomimetic systems. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2008, 3, 034001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Jilin University 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wee-Beng Tay
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kishen Raj Murugaya
    • 2
  • Woei-Leong Chan
    • 1
  • Boo-Cheong Khoo
    • 2
  1. 1.Temasek LaboratoriesNational University of SingaporeSingaporeRepublic of Singapore
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational University of SingaporeSingaporeRepublic of Singapore

Personalised recommendations