Advertisement

Journal of Bionic Engineering

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 175–188 | Cite as

Modification of Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch and Sugarcane Bagasse Biomass as Potential Reinforcement for Composites Panel and Thermal Insulation Materials

  • Nor Azlina Ramlee
  • Mohammad JawaidEmail author
  • Edi Syams Zainudin
  • Shaikh Abdul Karim Yamani
Article
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

This paper focuses on the study of the effect of modification of Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch (OPEFB) and sugarcane bagasse (SCB) biomass as potential reinforcement for composites panel and thermal insulation. Both fibres were treated with three types of chemicals: 2% silane, 4% H2O2 and 4% H2O2-2% silane for 3 h. The influence of modified fibres content in composites was examined by structural changes using image analyser, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), tensile, interfacial shear strength (IFSS) and thermal characteristic. The diameter of both fibres was reduced after treatment and showed decreasing of lignin and hemicellulose in fibre. Tensile strength has been increased by 2% silane treatment for both fibres and 4% H2O2 treatment displays higher result for IFSS. Thermal properties of treated SCB fibre with silane display higher residual content and better thermal stability. SEM characterization showed that 2% silane treatment removed silica bodies of OPEFB fibre while 4% H2O2 treatment uniformly filled porosity of SCB fibre. Finally, results revealed that treated OPEFB fibre is enough to improve compatibility and mechanical properties, while treated SCB fibre was effective in thermal stability for fabrication of composite materials.

Keywords

oil palm empty fruit bunch sugarcane bagasse fibre treatment tensile properties thermal properties interfacial shear strength 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgement

We are thankful to Universiti Putra Malaysia for supporting this work through Putra Berimpak Grant No: UPM/800-3/3/1/GPB/2018/9668300.

References

  1. [1]
    Li X, Tabil L G, Panigrahi S, Crerar W J. The influence of fiber content on properties of injection molded flax fiber- HDPE biocomposites. ASAE Annual Meeting, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA, 2006.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Panyasart, K, Chaiyut N, Amornsakchai T, Santawitee O. Effect of surface treatment on the properties of pineapple leaf fibers reinforced polyamide 6 composites. Energy procedia, 2014, 56, 406–413.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Siyamak S, Ibrahim N A, Abdolmohammadi S, Yunus W M, Rahman M Z. Effect of fiber esterification on fundamental properties of oil palm empty fruit bunch fiber/poly (butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) biocomposites. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2012, 2, 1327–1346.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Danso H. Properties of coconut, oil palm and bagasse fibres: As potential building materials. Procedia Engineering, 2017, 200, 1–9.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Norsuraya S, Fazlena H, Norhasyimi R. Sugarcane bagasse as a renewable Source of silica to synthesize Santa Barbara Amorphous-15 (SBA-15). Procedia Engineering, 2016, 148, 839–846.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Vargas Betancur G J, Pereira Jr N. Sugar cane bagasse as feedstock for second generation ethanol production: Part I: Diluted acid pretreatment optimization. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 2010, 3, 10–11.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Onésippe C, Passe-Coutrin N, Toro F, Delvasto S, Bilba K, Arsène M A. Sugar cane bagasse fibres reinforced cement composites: Thermal considerations. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2010, 4, 549–556.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Jayamani E. Hamdan S, Rahman M R, Bakri M K. Investigation of fiber surface treatment on mechanical, acoustical and thermal properties of betelnut fiber polyester composites. Procedia Engineering, 2014, 97, 545–554.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Motaung T E, Mochane M J. Systematic review on recent studies on sugar cane bagasse and bagasse cellulose polymer composites. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, 2018, 10, 1416–1432.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Rachini A, Le Troedec M, Peyratout C, Smith A. Comparison of the thermal degradation of natural, alkali-treated and silane-treated hemp fibers under air and an inert atmosphere. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2009, 112, 226–234.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Wong K J, Yousif B F, Low K O. The effects of alkali treatment on the interfacial adhesion of bamboo fibres. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications, 2010, 224, 139–148.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Faizi M K, Shahriman A B, Majid M S A, Ahmad Z A, Shamsul B M T, Ng Y G. The effect of alkaline treatments soaking time on oil palm empty fruit bunch (OPEFB) fibre structure. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 2017, 908, UNSP 012033.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Fatra W, Sanjaya R, Zulfansyah Z, Rionaldo H, Helwani Z. Alkaline treatment of oil palm frond fibers by using extract of oil palm EFB ash for better adhesion toward polymeric matrix. Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences, 2015, 47, 498–507.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Fatra W, Rouhillahi H, Helwani Z, Zulfansyah, Asmura J. Effect of alkaline treatment on the properties of oil palm empty fruit bunch fiber-reinforced polypropylene composite. International Journal of Technology, 2016, 7, 1026–1034.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Jawaid M, Alothman O Y, Paridah M T, Khalil H S. Effect of oil palm and jute fiber treatment on mechanical performance of epoxy hybrid composites. International Journal of Polymer Analysis and Characterization, 2014, 19, 62–69.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Anggono J, Sugondo S, Sewucipto S, Purwaningsih H, Henrico S. The use of sugarcane bagasse in PP matrix composites: A comparative study of bagasse treatment using calcium hydroxide and sodium hydroxide on composite strength. AIP Conference Proceedings, Solo, Indonesia, 2017, 1788, UNSP 030055.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Acharya S K, Mishra P, Mehar S K. Effect of surface treatment on the mechanical properties of bagasse fiber reinforced polymer composite. BioResources, 2011, 6, 3155–3165.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Mulinari D R, Cipriano J D, Capri M R, Brandão A T. Influence of surgarcane bagasse fibers with modified surface on polypropylene composites. Journal of Natural Fibers, 2018, 15, 174–82.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    La Rosa A D, Recca A, Gagliano A, Summerscales J, Latteri A, Cozzo G, Cicala G. Environmental impacts and thermal insulation performance of innovative composite solutions for building applications. Construction and Building Materials, 2014, 55, 406–414.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Sair S, Oushabi A, Kammouni A, Tanane O, Abboud Y, Hassani F O, Laachachi A, El Bouari A. Effect of surface modification on morphological, mechanical and thermal conductivity of hemp fiber: Characterization of the interface of hemp–Polyurethane composite. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 2017, 10, 550–559.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Agrawal R, Saxena N S, Sreekala M S, Thomas S. Effect of treatment on the thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity of oil-palm-fiber-reinforced phenolformaldehyde composites. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics, 2000, 38, 916–921.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Asdrubali F, D'Alessandro F, Schiavoni S. A review of unconventional sustainable building insulation materials. Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 2015, 4, 1–7.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Manohar, K, Manohar K. Experimental investigation of building thermal insulation from agricultural by-products. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 2012, 2, 227–239.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Binici H, Eken M, Dolaz M, Aksogan O, Kara M. An environmentally friendly thermal insulation material from sunflower stalk, textile waste and stubble fibres. Construction and Building Materials, 2014, 51, 24–33.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Yarbrough D W, Wilkes K E, Olivier P A, Graves R S, Vohra A. Apparent thermal conductivity data and related information for rice hulls and crushed pecan shells. Thermal Conductivity, 2005, 27, 222–230.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Chikhi M, Agoudjil B, Boudenne A, Gherabli A. Experimental investigation of new biocomposite with low cost for thermal insulation. Energy and Buildings, 2013, 66, 267–273.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Abril D, Medina M, Abril A. Sugar cane bagasse prehydrolysis using hot water. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2012, 29, 31–3.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Asim M, Jawaid M, Abdan K, Nasir M. Effect of alkali treatments on physical and mechanical strength of pineapple leaf fibres. IOP Conference Series-Materials Science and Engineering, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2018, 290, UNSP 012030.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Villain G, Thiery M, Platret G. Measurement methods of carbonation profiles in concrete: Thermogravimetry, chemical analysis and gammadensimetry. Cement and Concrete Research, 2007, 37, 1182–1192.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    Dai, Z, Zhang B, Shi F, Li M, Zhang Z, Gu Y. Effect of heat treatment on carbon fiber surface properties and fibers/epoxy interfacial adhesion. Applied Surface Science, 2011, 257, 8457–8461.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    Atiqah A, Jawaid M, Ishak M R, Sapuan S M. Effect of alkali and silane treatments on mechanical and interfacial bonding strength of sugar palm fibers with thermoplastic polyurethane. Journal of Natural Fibers, 2018, 15, 251–261.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    Razak N I, Ibrahim N A, Zainuddin N, Rayung M, Saad W Z. The influence of chemical surface modification of kenaf fiber using hydrogen peroxide on the mechanical properties of biodegradable kenaf fiber/poly (lactic acid) composites. Molecules, 2014, 19, 2957–2968.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    Chen H Z. Chemical composition and structure of natural lignocellulose. Biotechnology of Lignocellulose, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2014, 25–71.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    Hossain M K, Dewan M W, Hosur M, Jeelani S. Mechanical performances of surface modified jute fiber reinforced biopol nanophased green composites. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2011, 42, 1701–1707.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    Sreekala M S, Kumaran M G, Thomas S. Oil palm fibers: Morphology, chemical composition, surface modification, and mechanical properties. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 1997, 66, 821–835.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    Sawpan M A, Pickering K L, Fernyhough A. Effect of fibre treatments on interfacial shear strength of hemp fibre reinforced polylactide and unsaturated polyester composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2011, 42, 1189–1196.Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    Rabelo S C, Fonseca N A, Andrade R R, Maciel Filho R, Costa A C. Ethanol production from enzymatic hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse pretreated with lime and alkaline hydrogen peroxide. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2011, 35, 2600–2607.Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    Asim Asim M, Jawaid M, Abdan K, Ishak M R. Effect of alkali and silane treatments on mechanical and fibre-matrix bond strength of kenaf and pineapple leaf fibres. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2016, 13, 426–435.Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    Pyun J H, Shin T B, Lee J H, Ahn K M, Kim T H, Cha H S. Effects of hydrogen peroxide pretreatment and heat activation of silane on the shear bond strength of fiber-reinforced composite posts to resin cement. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, 2016, 8, 94–100.Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    Ishola M M, Millati R, Syamsiah S, Cahyanto M N, Niklasson C, Taherzadeh M J. Structural changes of oil palm empty fruit bunch (OPEFB) after fungal and phosphoric acid pretreatment. Molecules, 2012, 17, 14995–15012.Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    Mohd N H, Alim A, Aqila A, Zahari J I, Yarmo M A, Ahmad I, Tahari A, Najiha M, Kargarzadeh H, Othaman R. Properties of aminosilane modified nanocrytalline cellulose (NCC) from oil palm empty fruit bunch (OPEFB) fibers. Materials Science Forum, 2017, 888, 284–289.Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    Faix O, Bremer J, Schmidt O, Tatjana S J. Monitoring of chemical changes in white-rot degraded beech wood by pyrolysis—gas chromatography and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 1991, 21, 147–162.Google Scholar
  43. [43]
    Fatriasari W, Syafii W, Wistara N J, Syamsu K, Prasetya B. The Characteristic changes of betung bamboo (Dendrocalamus asper) pretreated by fungal pretreatment. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 2014, 3, 133–143.Google Scholar
  44. [44]
    Fackler K, Stevanic J S, Ters T, Hinterstoisser B, Schwanninger M, Salmén L. Localisation and characterisation of incipient brown-rot decay within spruce wood cell walls using FT-IR imaging microscopy. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2010, 47, 257–267.Google Scholar
  45. [45]
    Rayung M, Ibrahim N A, Zainuddin N, Saad W Z, Razak N I, Chieng B W. The effect of fiber bleaching treatment on the properties of poly (lactic acid)/oil palm empty fruit bunch fiber composites. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2014, 15, 14728–14742.Google Scholar
  46. [46]
    Schwanninger M, Rodrigues J C, Pereira H, Hinterstoisser B. Effects of short-time vibratory ball milling on the shape of FT-IR spectra of wood and cellulose. Vibrational Spectroscopy, 2004, 36, 23–40.Google Scholar
  47. [47]
    Koutsianitis D, Mitani C, Giagli K, Tsalagkas D, Halász K, Kolonics O, Gallis C, Csóka L. Properties of ultrasound extracted bicomponent lignocellulose thin films. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2015, 23, 148–55.Google Scholar
  48. [48]
    Chandel A K, Antunes F A, Anjos V, Bell M J, Rodrigues L N, Polikarpov I, de Azevedo E R, Bernardinelli O D, Rosa C A, Pagnocca F C, da Silva S S. Multi-scale structural and chemical analysis of sugarcane bagasse in the process of sequential acid–base pretreatment and ethanol production by Scheffersomyces shehatae and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2014, 7, 63.Google Scholar
  49. [49]
    Cao Y, Shibata S, Fukumoto I. Fabrication and flexural properties of bagasse fiber reinforced biodegradable composites. Journal of Macromolecular Science, Part B, 2006, 45, 463–474.Google Scholar
  50. [50]
    Colom X, Carrillo F, Nogués F, Garriga P. Structural analysis of photodegraded wood by means of FTIR spectroscopy. Journal of Polymer Degradation and Stability, 2003, 80, 543–549.Google Scholar
  51. [51]
    Mothé C, de Miranda I. Characterization of sugarcane and coconut fibers by thermal analysis and FTIR. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2009, 97, 661–665.Google Scholar
  52. [52]
    Indarti E, Wanrosli W D. Thermal stability of oil palm empty fruit bunch (OPEFB) nanocrystalline cellulose: Effects of post-treatment of oven drying and solvent exchange techniques. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 2015, 622, 012025.Google Scholar
  53. [53]
    Poletto M, Dettenborn J, Pistor V, Zeni M, Zattera A J. Materials produced from plant biomass: Part I: Evaluation of thermal stability and pyrolysis of wood. Materials Research, 2010, 13, 375–379.Google Scholar
  54. [54]
    Cruz G, Monteiro P A, Braz C E, Seleghin Jr P, Polikarpov I, Crnkovic P M. Thermal and morphological evaluation of chemically pretreated sugarcane bagasse. International Journal of Chemical, Molecular, Nuclear, Materials and Metallurgical Engineering, 2013, 7, 435–440.Google Scholar
  55. [55]
    Mohomane S M, Motaung T E, Revaprasadu N. Thermal degradation kinetics of sugarcane bagasse and soft wood cellulose. Materials, 2017, 10, 1246.Google Scholar
  56. [56]
    Barkoula N M, Peijs T. Interface engineering through matrix modification in natural fibre composites. In: Zafeiropoulos N E, ed., Interface Engineering of Natural Fibre Composites for Maximum Performance, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2011, 43–81.Google Scholar
  57. [57]
    Baltazar Baltazar-Y-Jimenez A, Bismarck A. Surface modification of lignocellulosic fibres in atmospheric air pressure plasma. Journal of Green Chemistry, 2007, 9, 1057–1066.Google Scholar
  58. [58]
    Salam M A. Effect of hydrogen peroxide bleaching onto sulfonated jute fiber. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2006, 99, 3603–3607.Google Scholar
  59. [59]
    García-Hernández E, Licea-Claveríe A, Zizumbo A, Alvarez-Castillo A, Herrera-Franco P J. Improvement of the interfacial compatibility between sugar cane bagasse fibers and polystyrene for composites. Polymer Composites, 2004, 25, 134–145.Google Scholar
  60. [60]
    Alwani M S, Khalil H A, Islam N, Sulaiman O, Zaidon A, Dungani R. Microstructural study, tensile properties, and scanning electron microscopy fractography failure analysis of various agricultural residue fibers. Journal of Natural Fibers, 2015, 12, 154–168.Google Scholar
  61. [61]
    Law K N, Daud W R, Ghazali A. Morphological and chemical nature of fiber strands of oil palm empty-fruit-bunch (OPEFB). BioResources, 2007, 2, 351–362.Google Scholar
  62. [62]
    Rosli N S, Harun S, Jahim J M, Othaman R. Chemical and physical characterization of oil palm empty fruit bunch. Malaysian Journal of Analytical Sciences, 2017, 21, 188–196.Google Scholar
  63. [63]
    Puglia D, Monti M, Santulli C, Sarasini F, De Rosa I M, Kenny J M. Effect of alkali and silane treatments on mechanical and thermal behavior of Phormium tenax fibers. Fibers and Polymers, 2013, 14, 423–427.Google Scholar
  64. [64]
    Yunus R, Salleh S F, Abdullah N, Biak D R. Effect of ultrasonic pre-treatment on low temperature acid hydrolysis of oil palm empty fruit bunch. Bioresource Technology, 2010, 101, 9792–9796.Google Scholar
  65. [65]
    Pereira P H, Voorwald H C, Cioffi M O, Mullinari D R, Da Luz S M, Da Silva M L. Sugarcane bagasse pulping and bleaching: Thermal and chemical characterization. BioResources, 2011, 6, 2471–2482.Google Scholar
  66. [66]
    Sant’Anna C, de Souza W. Microscopy as a Tool to Follow Deconstruction of Lignocellulosic Biomass, Formatex Research Center, Espanha, 2012, 639–645.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Jilin University 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nor Azlina Ramlee
    • 1
  • Mohammad Jawaid
    • 1
    Email author
  • Edi Syams Zainudin
    • 2
  • Shaikh Abdul Karim Yamani
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Biocomposite Laboratory, Institute of Tropical Forestry and Forest Products (INTROP)Universiti Putra MalaysiaSerdangMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversiti Putra MalaysiaSerdangMalaysia
  3. 3.Faculty of Applied Science Wood Industry Universiti Teknologi MARACampus of Jengka 26400 Bandar Tun Abdul Razak JengkaPahangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations