Advertisement

Journal of Plant Pathology

, Volume 101, Issue 1, pp 155–160 | Cite as

Standard area diagrams to aid assessments of the severity of blight leaf spot symptoms on cassava leaves

  • Iris Carolina Henrique Lima Leite
  • Francisco Alberto Sousa Lima Filho
  • Rejane Livramento Freitas-Lopes
  • Sami Jorge Michereff
  • Alexandre Sandri Capucho
  • Ueder Pedro LopesEmail author
Short Communication
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

A standard area diagram (SAD) set to assess the severity of blight leaf spot (BliLS) caused by Passalora vicosae on cassava leaves was developed and validated. The proposed SAD set includes diagrams illustrating six leaves with different severities of blight leaf spot (5, 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50%). The SAD set was validated by ten raters with no previous experience in disease assessment. Lin’s concordance correlation analysis of estimated versus actual disease severity showed that the statistical parameters (υ, u, r and ρc) were improved when raters were aided by the SADs. Overall agreement measured by Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (ρc) increased from 0.70 to 0.82, without and with SADs, respectively. Similarly, by analysing the coefficient of determination (R2) and intra-class correlation coefficient (ρ), the estimates of severity were more reliable by using the SADs. The proposed SAD set increases the accuracy and reliability of estimates of the severity of BliLS in cassava and therefore is a valuable aid for research on the epidemiology, breeding for resistance, fungicide screening and pathotype characterization.

Keywords

Manihot esculenta Passalora vicosae Diagrammatic scale Disease assessment Phytopatometry 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia de Pernambuco (APQ-1542-5.01/15) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (Universal CNPq 454010/2014-1).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest in this work.

All forms of financial support are acknowledged in the contribution.

This work does not involve any human participants or animals.

All authors have offered their consent for the submission.

References

  1. Bock CH, Poole G, Parker PE, Gottwald TR (2010) Plant disease severity estimated visually, by digital photography and image analysis, and by hyperspectral imaging. Crit Rev Plant Sci 29:59–107Google Scholar
  2. Bock CH, Wood BW, Gottwald TR (2013) Pecan scab severity – effects of assessment methods. Plant Dis 97:675–684Google Scholar
  3. Bock CH, Chiang KS, Del Ponte EM (2016a) Accuracy of plant specimen disease severity estimates: concepts, history, methods, ramifications and challenges for the future. Perspect Agric, Vet Sci, Nutr and Nat Res 11:1–21Google Scholar
  4. Bock CH, Hotchkiss MW, Wood BW (2016b) Assessing disease severity: accuracy and reliability of rater estimates in relation to number of diagrams in a standard area diagram set. Plant Pathol 65:261–272Google Scholar
  5. Capucho AS, Zambolim L, Duarte HSS, Vaz GRO (2011) Development and validation of a standard area diagram set to estimate severity of leaf rust in Coffea arabica and C. canephora. Plant Pathol 60:1144–1150Google Scholar
  6. Chiang KS, Bock CH, El Jarroudi M, Delfosse P, Lee IH, Liu HI (2016) Effects of rater bias and assessment method on disease severity estimation with regard to hypothesis testing. Plant Pathol 65:523–535Google Scholar
  7. Correia KC, Queiroz JVJ, Souza RM, Nicoli A, Ponte EM, Michereff SJ (2017) Development and evaluation of a standard area diagram set for the severity of phomopsis leaf blight on eggplant. Eur J Plant Pathol 149:269–276Google Scholar
  8. Del Ponte E, Pethybridge SJ, Bock CH, Michereff SJ, Machado FJ, Spolti P (2017) Standard area diagrams for aiding severity estimation: Scientometrics, pathosystems and methodological trends in the last 25 years. Phytopathol 107:1161–1174Google Scholar
  9. Dolinski MA, Duarte HSS, Silva JB, May De Mio LL (2017) Development and validation of a standard area diagram set for assessment of peach rust. Eur J Plant Pathol 148:817–824Google Scholar
  10. Duarte HSS, Zambolim L, Capucho AS, Nogueira Júnior AF, Rosado AWC, Cardoso CR, Paul PA, Mizubuti ESG (2013) Development and validation of a set of standard area diagrams to estimate severity of potato early blight. Eur J Plant Pathol 137:249–257Google Scholar
  11. FAO (2017) FAOSTAT. [http://faostat3.fao.org/home/index.html]. Accessed on 18 October 2017
  12. Freitas JPX, Diniz RP, Oliveira SAS, Santos VS, Oliveira EJ (2017) Inbreeding depression for severity caused by leaf diseases in cassava. Euphytica 213:205  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-017-1995-0 Google Scholar
  13. González-Domínguez E, Martins RB, Del Ponte EM, Michereff SJ, García-Jiménez J, Armengol J (2014) Development and validation of a standard area diagram set to aid assessment of severity of loquat scab on fruit. Eur J Plant Pathol 139:419–428Google Scholar
  14. Lamari L (2008) ASSESS 2.0: image analysis software for plant disease quantification. St. Paul: APS PressGoogle Scholar
  15. Lin L (1989) A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45:255–268Google Scholar
  16. Madden LV, Hughes G, Van den Bosch F (2007) The study of plant disease epidemics. APS Press, St. PaulGoogle Scholar
  17. Massola NS, Bedendo IP, Oliveira SAS (2016) Doenças da Mandioca. In: Himati H, Amorim L, Rezende JAM, Bergamin Filho A, Camargo LEA (eds) Manual de Fitopatologia: Doenças de Plantas Cultivadas. Agronômica Ceres, Ouro Fino, pp 515–522Google Scholar
  18. Michereff SJ, Noronha MA, Lima GSA, Albert ICL, Melo EA, Gusmão LO (2009) Diagrammatic scale to assess downy mildew severity in melon. Hortic Bras 27:76–79Google Scholar
  19. Nita M, Ellis MA, Madden LV (2003) Reliability and accuracy of visual estimation of Phomopsis leaf blight of strawberry. Phytopathol 93:995–1005Google Scholar
  20. Nutter FW Jr, Schultz PM (1995) Improving the accuracy and precision of disease assessments: selection of methods and use of computer-aided training programs. Can J Plant Pathol 17:174–184Google Scholar
  21. Nutter FW Jr, Worawitlikit O (1989) Disease pro: a computer program for evaluating and improving a person ability to assess disease proportion. Phytopathol 79:1135Google Scholar
  22. Reddy PP (2015) Plant protection in tropical root and tuber crops. Springer, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  23. Rios JA, Debona D, Duarte HSS, Rodrigues FA (2013) Development and validation of a standard area diagram set to assess blast severity on wheat leaves. Eur J Plant Pathol 136:603–611Google Scholar
  24. Shoukri MM, Pause CA (1999) Statistical methods for health science, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  25. Teri JM, Thurston HD, Lozano JC (1978) The Cercospora leaf diseases of cassava. In: Brekelbaum T, Belloti A, Lozano JD (ed) Proceedings of cassava protection workshop. Annual Report, Cali, pp 101–116Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Patologia Vegetale (S.I.Pa.V.) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iris Carolina Henrique Lima Leite
    • 1
  • Francisco Alberto Sousa Lima Filho
    • 1
  • Rejane Livramento Freitas-Lopes
    • 2
  • Sami Jorge Michereff
    • 2
  • Alexandre Sandri Capucho
    • 3
  • Ueder Pedro Lopes
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Unidade Acadêmica de GaranhunsUniversidade Federal Rural de PernambucoGaranhunsBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de AgronomiaUniversidade Federal Rural de PernambucoRecifeBrazil
  3. 3.Universidade Federal do Vale do São FranciscoPetrolinaBrazil

Personalised recommendations