Advertisement

Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials

, Volume 1, Issue 4, pp 759–765 | Cite as

Study of photocatalytic and antibacterial activities of graphene oxide nanosheets

  • Manmeet Singh
  • Nardev Kumar Bajaj
  • Aditya Bhardwaj
  • Pritpal Singh
  • Pushpender Kumar
  • Jeewan SharmaEmail author
Original Research
  • 241 Downloads

Abstract

Graphene oxide (GO) is a biocompatible material that is easily dispersible in water making its mixing easy with ceramic or polymer matrixes while trying to enhance their properties. In the present study, the photocatalytic and antibacterial activities of GO have been studied. GO has been synthesized by modified Hummer’s method. The synthesized material has been characterized using X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and UV-visible spectroscopy. HR-TEM confirmed the formation of GO nanosheets. It has been observed that GO nanosheets with excellent morphology exhibit efficient photocatalytic activity towards Congo red (CR) dye. Using advanced oxidation process, toxic organic dye CR is oxidized through reaction with reactive oxidative species generated by GO photocatalyst under UV-light irradiation. The study reflects new possibilities of GO for degradation of toxic organic pollutants. The effect of GO dose has also been studied and the reaction has been evaluated to be first order. Antibacterial activity of GO has been evaluated via well diffusion assay by growing Escherichia coli and Bacillus on LB agar plates.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Dye degradation Graphene oxide Photocatalysis Congo red Antibacterial 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

42114_2018_56_MOESM1_ESM.docx (151 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 151 kb)
42114_2018_56_MOESM2_ESM.docx (72 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 72.2 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Dong LX, Chen Q (2010) Properties, synthesis, and characterization of graphene. Front Mater Sci China 4:45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Radich JG, Krenselewski AL, Zhu J, Kamat PV (2014) Is graphene a stable platform for photocatalysis? Mineralization of reduced graphene oxide with UV-irradiated TiO2 nanoparticles. Chem Mater 26(15):4662–4668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Weiss NO, Zhou H, Liao L, Liu Y, Jiang S, Huang Y, Duan X (2012) Graphene: an emerging electronic material. Adv Mater 24(43):5776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang F, Zhang T, Yang X, Zhang L, Leng K, Huang Y, Chen Y (2013) A high-performance supercapacitor-battery hybrid energy storage device based on graphene-enhanced electrode materials with ultrahigh energy density. Energy Environ Sci 6(5):1623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mahdavi H, Kahriz PK, Gholipour-Ranjbar H, Shahalizade T (2017) Synthesis and performance study of amino functionalized graphene aerogel grafted with polyaniline nanofibers as an efficient supercapacitor material. J Mater Sci: Mater Electro 28(5):4295Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liang M, Zhi L (2009) Graphene-based electrode materials for rechargeable lithium batteries. J Mater Chem 19(33):5871–5878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kalaiselvimary J, Prabhu MR (2018) Influence of sulfonated GO/sulfonated biopolymer as polymer electrolyte membrane for fuel cell application. J Mater Sci: Mater Electro 29(7):5525–5535Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shao Y, Wang J, Wu H, Liu J, Aksay IA, Lin Y (2010) Graphene based electrochemical sensors and biosensors: a review. Electro analysis 22(10):1027–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li X, Yu J, Wageh S, Al-Ghamdi AA, Xie J (2016) Graphene in photocatalysis: a review. Small 12(48):6640–6696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang L, Li Y, Zhang Q, Wang H (2013) Hierarchical nanostructure of WO3 nanorods on TiO2 nanofibers and the enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity for degradation of organic pollutants. Cryst Eng Comm 15:5986–5993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hu W, Peng C, Luo W, Lv M, Li X, Li D, Huang Q, Fan C (2010) Graphene-based antibacterial paper. ACS Nano 4(7):4317–4323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Adan-Mas A, Wei D (2013) Photoelectrochemical properties of graphene and its derivatives. Nanomaterials 3(3):325–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Krishnamoorthy K, Mohan R, Kim SJ (2011) Graphene oxide as a photocatalytic material. Appl Phys Lett 98(24):244101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang L, Li Y, Zhang Q, Wang H (2013) Hierarchical nanostructure of WO3 nanorods on TiO2 nanofibers and the enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity for degradation of organic pollutants. Cryst Eng Comm 15:5986–5993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang L, Zhang Q, Xie H, Guo J, Lyu H, Li Y, Sun Z, Wang H, Guo Z (2017) Electrospun titania nanofibers segregated by graphene oxide for improved visible light photocatalysis. Appl Catal B:Environ 201:470–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang L, Li Y, Zhang Q, Shi G, Wang H (2011) Fast synthesis of highly dispersed anatase TiO2 nanocrystals in a microfluidic reactor. Chem Lett 40:1371–1373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stengl V, Bakardjieva S, Grygar TM, Bludska J, Kormunda M (2013) TiO2-graphene oxide nanocomposite as advanced photocatalytic materials. Chem Central J 7(1):41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yeh TF, Cihlar J, Chang CY, Cheng C, Teng H (2013) Roles of graphene oxide in photocatalytic water splitting. Mater Today 16(3):78–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Krishnamoorthy K, Veerapandian M, Zhang LH, Yun K, Kim SJ (2012) Antibacterial efficiency of graphene nanosheets against pathogenic bacteria via lipid peroxidation. J Phys Chem C 116:17280–17287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hou WC, Lee PL, Chou YC, Wang YS (2017) Antibacterial property of graphene oxide: the role of phototransformation. Environ Sci Nano 4:647–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sharma A, Varshney M, Nanda SS, Shin HJ, Kim N, Yi DK, Chae KH, Wona SO (2018) Structural, electronic structure and antibacterial properties of graphene oxide nano-sheets. Chem Phys Lett 698:85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Krishnamoorthy K, Umasuthan N, Mohan R, Lee J, Kim SJ (2012) Investigation of the antibacterial activity of graphene oxide nanosheets. Sci Adv Mater 4:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Usman MS, Zowalaty ME, Shameli K, Zainuddin N, Salama M, Ibrahim NA (2013) Synthesis, characterization, and antimicrobial properties of copper nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine 8:4467Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hu W, Peng C, Luo W, Lv M, Li X, Li D, Huang Q, Fan C (2010) Graphene-based antibacterial paper. ACS Nano 4(7):4317–4323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Guo X, Mei N (2014) Assessment of the toxic potential of graphene family nanomaterials. J Food Drug Analysis 22:105–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Li X, Li F, Gao Z, Fang L (2015) Toxicology of graphene oxide nanosheets against Paecilomyces catenlannulatus. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 95(1):25–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Guo Z, Xie C, Zhang P, Zhang J, Wang G, He X, Ma Y, Zhao B, Zhang Z (2017) Toxicity and transformation of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide in bacteria biofilm. Sci Total Environ 580:1300–1308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gies V, Zou S (2018) Systematic toxicity investigation of graphene oxide: evaluation of assay selection, cell type, exposure period and flake size. Toxicol Res 7:93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chen X, Wang X, Li L, Qi S (2016) Preparation and excellent microwave absorption properties of silver/strontium ferrite/graphite nanosheet composites via sol–gel method. J Mater Sci: Mater Electro 27(10):10045–10051Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Paska O, Ianos R, Pacurariu C, Bradeanu A (2014) Magnetic nanopowder as effective adsorbent for the removal of Congo red from aqueous solution. Water Sci Techno 69(6):1234–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hummers WS Jr, Offeman RE (1958) Preparation of graphitic oxide. J ACS 80(6):1339Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kaur J, Anand K, Thangaraj R, Singh RC (2016) Synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic activity of visible-light-driven reduced graphene oxide–CeO2 nanocomposite. Indian J Phys 90(10):1183–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ghorbani M, Abdizadeh H, Golobostanfard MR (2015) Reduction of graphene oxide via modified hydrothermal method. Procedia MaterSci 11:326–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Segal E, Gedanken A (2016) Can r-graphene oxide replace the noble metals in SERS studies: the detection of acrylamide. Environ Chem 13(1):58–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Deng W, Zhang Y, Tan Y, Ma M (2017) Three-dimensional nitrogen-doped graphene derived from poly-o-phenylenediamine for high-performance supercapacitors. J Electroanalytical Chem 787:103–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Jiang X, Nisar J, Pathak B, Zhao J, Ahuja R (2013) Graphene oxide as a chemically tunable 2-D material for visible-light photocatalyst applications. J Catal 299:204–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gurushantha K, Anantharaju KS, Renuka L, Sharma SC, Nagaswarupa HP, Prashantha SC, Vidya YS, Nagabhushana H (2017) New green synthesized reduced graphene oxide–ZrO 2 composite as high performance photocatalyst under sunlight. RSC Adv 7(21):12690–12703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dadvar E, Kalantary RR, Ahmad Panahi H, Peyravi M (2017) Efficiency of polymeric membrane graphene oxide-TiO2 for removal of azo dye. J Chem 2017:13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhang Z, Wang W, Wang L, Sun S (2012) Enhancement of visible-light photocatalysis by coupling with narrow-band-gap semiconductor: a case study on Bi2S3/Bi2WO6. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4(2):593–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chen J, Peng H, Wang X, Shao F, Yuan Z, Han H (2014) Graphene oxide exhibits broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against bacterial phytopathogens and fungal conidia by intertwining and membrane perturbation. Nanoscale 6(3):1879–1889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kaushal S, Badru R, Kumar S, Sharma PK, Mittal SK, Singh P (2016) Electrochemical behavior of a membrane based on zirconium (IV) phosphoborate nanocomposite and its application in dye removal. RSC Adv 6(112):111606–116015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Grainger EM, Kim HS, Monk JP, Lemeshow SA, Gong M, Bahnson RR, Clinton SK (2008) Consumption of dietary supplements and over-the-counter and prescription medications in men participating in the. Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial at an academic center Urol Oncol 26(2):125–132Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Li WR, Xie XB, Shi QS, Zeng HY, You-Sheng OY, Chen YB (2010) Antibacterial activity and mechanism of silver nanoparticles on Escherichia coli. Appl Microbial biotechnol 85(4):1115–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistrySri Guru Granth Sahib World UniversityFatehgarh SahibIndia
  2. 2.Department of NanotechnologySri Guru Granth Sahib World UniversityFatehgarh SahibIndia
  3. 3.Department of BiotechnologySri Guru Granth Sahib World UniversityFatehgarh SahibIndia

Personalised recommendations