Axial compressive response of grouted cement–clay interlocking hollow brick walls
- 12 Downloads
This study presents an experimental and theoretical study on the axial compressive response of cement–clay interlocking (CCI) hollow brick masonry walls. The axial compressive response of the masonry walls was investigated by performing laboratory tests on large size (1000 mm × 1000 mm) CCI hollow brick masonry walls. Hydraulically pressed cement–clay interlocking (CCI) hollow bricks were used for the preparation of the masonry walls. CCI hollow brick masonry walls were constructed using different techniques to represent existing construction practice in Thailand. In this study five masonry walls were constructed and tested under pure axial compression. One masonry wall was constructed by placing CCI hollow bricks over each other in the running bond pattern without using any binding material (i.e., ungrouted masonry wall). In the second and third wall, circular and square holes in the CCI bricks were filled with ordinary portland cement–sand grout and high strength nonshrink cement–sand grout, respectively. The remaining two walls (i.e., wall number 4 and 5) were similar to the wall number two and three, however, prior to the grout filling, steel bars were also inserted into the holes at different locations to reinforce the CCI hollow brick masonry walls. The experimental results show that cement grout impact compressive strength and axial deformation of the CCI brick masonry walls, and that the axial compressive strength versus axial deformation relationship becomes increasingly stiffer as grout strength increases. It was also found that the reinforced CCI hollow brick masonry walls exhibit very ductile damage pattern as compared with unreinforced CCI hollow brick masonry walls along with an increase in the ultimate load carrying capacity of the CCI masonry walls. Based on the experimental results, the performance of existing compressive strength models to predict the compressive strength of masonry is accessed to examine its applicability to the CCI hollow brick masonry walls. It was noticed that none of the existing models are capable of precisely predicting the compressive strength of CCI hollow interlocking masonry.
KeywordsCement Clay Interlocking Axial deformation Compressive strength Bricks and masonry
The authors are very grateful to the Faculty of Engineering, Srinakharinwirot University, Thailand, for providing research grant (Research Grant ID 568/2560) to carry out the research wk. The authors are also very thankful to the Asian Institute of Technology (AIT) for supporting test facilities.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Abu Bakar, B. H., Ibrahim, W., Haziman, M., & Johari, M. (2011). A review: Durability of fired clay brick masonry wall due to salt attack. International Journal of Integrated Engineering, 1(2), 111–127.Google Scholar
- ASTM C1314-16. (2016). Standard test method for compressive strength of masonry prisms. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.Google Scholar
- ASTM C109/C109M-16a. (2016). Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars (using 2-in. or [50-mm] cube specimens). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.Google Scholar
- ASTM E8/E8M-16a. (2016). Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.Google Scholar
- Bröcker, O. (1963). Die auswertung von tragfähigkeitsversuchen an gemauerten wänden. Betonstein-Zeitung, 10, 19–21.Google Scholar
- Christy, C. F., Tensing, D., & Shanthi, R. (2013). Experimental study on axial compressive strength and elastic modulus of the clay and fly ash brick masonry. Journal of Civil Engineering and Construction Technology, 4(4), 134–141.Google Scholar
- Dayaratnam, P. (1987). Brick and reinforced brick structures. New Delhi: Oxford & IBH.Google Scholar
- Engesser, F. (1907). Über weitgespannte wölbbrücken Zeitschrift für. Architekturs und Ingenieurwesen, 53, 403–440.Google Scholar
- Hendry, A. W., & Malek, M. H. (1986). Characteristic compressive strength of brickwork walls from collected test results. Masonry International, 7, 15–24.Google Scholar
- Joseph, S., McGarry, B., Sajjakulnukit, B., & Sopchokchai, O. (1990). A study of brick production in Thailand, issues on women, energy, and the environment. TDRI Quarterly Review, 5, 11–15.Google Scholar
- Joyklad, P., Areecharoen, S., & Hussain, Q. (2018). Mechanical properties of local cement–clay interlocking bricks in central part of Thailand. SWU Engineering Journal, 13(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
- Kaaki, T. (2013). Behavior and strength of masonry prisms loaded in compression.Google Scholar
- Khalaf, F. M., Hendry, A. W., & Fairbairn, D. R. (1994). Study of the compressive strength of blockwork masonry. Structural Journal, 91(4), 367–375.Google Scholar
- Kumavat, H. R. (2016). An experimental investigation of mechanical properties in clay brick masonry by partial replacement of fine aggregate with clay brick waste. Journal of the Institution of Engineers, 97(3), 199–204.Google Scholar
- Mann, W. (1982). Statistical evaluation of tests on masonry by potential functions. In Proceedings of the sixth international brick masonry conference, Rome, Italy (pp. 86–98).Google Scholar
- Sarhat, S. R., & Sherwood, E. G. (2012). The prediction of compressive strength of grouted hollow concrete block masonry based on the contributions of its individual components. In 12th Canadian masonry symposium.Google Scholar