Developing of a mathematical model for selecting a project manager using hierarchical analysis process
- 7 Downloads
The project manager represents the actual leadership of the human resources in every project process. This position refers to the most important human components of the project. Establishing a scientific approach to its selection process is the cornerstone of successful project planning. This study examined the factors influencing the selection of the project manager and the basis of the required skills in general. The researcher concluded that the criteria adopted in the selection process in general, representing the construction industry in Iraq, which numbered (51). The part of this research is developed a mathematical model that facilitates the selection process. It makes the process of selection project manager is more logical and well-understand from all contractual parties. The researcher adopted analytic hierarchy process technology known for its ability to compare alternatives and to promote the best alternative to determine the set of critical criteria to be considered in the project manager selection process. Significantly, the researcher built and developed a mathematical model that includes critical criteria only for selecting the project manager in the construction industry in Iraq. The researcher applied the mathematical model to select project managers for four projects of the University of Baghdad (under implementation), and compared this with the evaluation forms for these projects. The researcher found the success of the mathematical model in the evaluation process and then evaluated the results in the closed questionnaire. This study shows a set of conclusions from different levels of results during the procedures of applying this research.
KeywordsProject management Project manager Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) Leadership
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- Bennett, F. L. (2011). The management of construction a project life cycle approach. Oxford: Spon Press Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
- Chao, L.-C. (2013). Evaluation of alternative construction sites with analytic network process method. In Proceedings of the international symposium on the analytic hierarchy process. http://www.isahp.org/uploads/7.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2018.
- Heerkens, G. R. (2002). Project management. Pennsylvania: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, M., & Sutton, M. M. (2017). Project management in practice (6th ed.). Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Meola, A. T. (2009). 90 days to success as a project manager course technology. Boston: Cengage Learning Customer.Google Scholar
- Meredith, J. R., & Mantel, S. J. (2012). Project management a managerial approach (8th ed.). Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Portny, S. E. (2017). Project management for dummies (5th ed.). Mississauga: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Project Management Institute (PMI). (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (6th ed.). Newtown Square: PMI.Google Scholar
- Sanghera, P. (2009). 90 days to success as a project manager. Cengage Learning Customer.Google Scholar
- Varghese, A. R., & Varghese, S. (2015). Analysis of delays in construction projects. International Journal of Engineering Research and General Science, 3(6), 108–112.Google Scholar
- Wysocki, R. K. (2004). Project management process improvement. Boston: Artech House.Google Scholar