Advertisement

Asian Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 197–207 | Cite as

Effect of dynamic soil–structure interaction on the seismic response of bridges with elastomeric bearings

  • B. NeethuEmail author
  • Diptesh Das
Original Paper
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

The influence of soil–structure interaction (SSI) on the responses of an isolated bridge structure, subjected to seismic excitation, is investigated. The study considers the laminated rubber bearing and the lead rubber bearing for the seismic isolation of the bridge. The specific objective of the study is to evaluate the performance of the isolators and to investigate the effect of SSI on the seismic performance of the isolated bridge. A significant variation in the responses and the performance of the isolators are observed when the SSI is considered. It is concluded that consideration of SSI can lead to a more realistic structural modeling and more economical design of structures.

Keywords

Isolation Bridges Soil–structure interaction Rubber bearings 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. Buckle, I., Nagarajaiah, S., & Ferrell, K. (2002). Stability of elastomeric isolation bearings: Experimental study. Journal of the Structural Engineering. American Society of Civil Engineers, 128, 3–11.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:1(3).Google Scholar
  2. Chen, C., & Liu, K. F. (2009). Adaptive fuzzy sliding mode control for seismically excited bridges with lead rubber bearing isolation. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 17, 705–727.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Choun, Y. S., Park, J., & Choi, I. K. (2014). Effects of mechanical property variability in lead rubber bearings on the response of seismic isolation system for different ground motions. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 46, 605–618.  https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.09.2014.718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dicleli, M., Albhaisi, S., & Mansour, M. Y. (2005). Static soil–structure interaction effects in seismic-isolated bridges. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 10, 22–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gazetas G (2006) Seismic design of foundations and soil–structure interaction. In: First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, pp 3–8.Google Scholar
  6. Ghobarah, A., & Ali, H. M. (1988). Seismic performance of highway bridges. Engineering Structures, 10, 157–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Girish, M., & Pranesh, M. (2015). Sliding isolation systems: State-of-the-art review. IOSR Journal of Mechanical Civil Engineering, 12, 30–35.Google Scholar
  8. Govardhan, Paul D. K. (2016). Effect of lead in elastomeric bearings for structures located in seismic region. Procedia Technology, 25, 146–153.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2016.08.091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hameed, A., Koo, M.-S., Do, T. D., & Jeong, J.-H. (2008). Effect of lead rubber bearing characteristics on the response of seismic-isolated bridges. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 12, 187–196.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-008-0187-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Han, X., Warn, G. P., & Kasalanati, A. (2013). Dynamic stability testing of isolation systems composed of elastomeric bearings and implications for design. Structures Congress 2013 (pp. 2140–2150). Reston: American Society of Civil Engineers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jangid, R. S. (2008). Equivalent linear stochastic seismic response of isolated bridges. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 309, 805–822.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2007.07.071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kumar, M., Whittaker, A. S., & Constantinou, M. C. (2014). An advanced numerical model of elastomeric seismic isolation bearings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 43, 1955–1974.  https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kunde, M. C., & Jangid, R. S. (2003). Seismic behavior of isolated bridges: A-state-of-the-art review. Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering, 3, 140–170.Google Scholar
  14. Kunde, M. C., & Jangid, R. S. (2006). Effects of pier and deck flexibility on the seismic response of isolated bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 11, 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li S, Dezfuli FH, Wang J, & Alam MS. (2018). Seismic Fragility of a Long-Span Cable-Stayed Bridge Isolated By Sma Wire-Based Lead Rubber Bearings. (Eleventh U.S National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
  16. Matsagar, V. A., & Jangid, R. S. (2004). Influence of isolator characteristics on the response of base-isolated structures. Engineering Structures, 26, 1735–1749.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.06.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mikami A, Sawada T (2004) Time-domain identification system of dynamic soil–structure interaction. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver.Google Scholar
  18. Naeim, F., & Kelly, J. M. (1999). Design of seismic isolated structures: From theory to practice. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Neethu, B., & Das, D. (2015). Influence of passive isolator parameters on seismic response control of multi-span bridges. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5, 1–10.Google Scholar
  20. Neethu, B., Das, D., & Garia, S. (2017). Effects of ground motion frequency content on performance of isolated bridges with SSI. Earthquakes and Structures, 13, 375–385.  https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.13.4.375.Google Scholar
  21. Park, K., Jung, H., & Lee, I. (2002). A comparative study on aseismic performances of base isolation systems for multi-span continuous bridge. Engineering Structures, 24, 1001–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Patil, S., & Reddy, G. (2012). State of art review—base isolation systems for structures. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 2, 438–453.Google Scholar
  23. Sanchez, J., Masroor, A., Mosqueda, G., & Ryan, K. (2013). Static and dynamic stability of elastomeric bearings for seismic protection of structures. Journal of the Structural Engineering. American Society of Civil Engineers, 139, 1149–1159.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000660.Google Scholar
  24. Spyrakos, C. C. (1990). Assessment of SSI on the longitudinal seismic response short span bridges. Construction and Building Materials, 4, 170–175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-0618(90)90036-Z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tongaonkar, N. P., & Jangid, R. S. (2003). Seismic response of isolated bridges with soil–structure interaction. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 23, 287–302.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(03)00020-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tubaldi, E., Mitoulis, S. A., & Ahmadi, H. (2018). Comparison of different models for high damping rubber bearings in seismically isolated bridges. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 104, 329–345.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.09.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Turkington, D., Carr, A. J., & Moss, P. J. (1989). Seismic design of bridges on lead-rubber bearings. Journal of the Structural Engineering. American Society of Civil Engineers, 115, 3000–3016.Google Scholar
  28. Ucak, A., & Tsopelas, P. (2008). Effect of soil–structure interaction on seismically isolated bridges. Journal of the Structural Engineering. American Society of Civil Engineers, 134, 1154–1164.Google Scholar
  29. Vasiliadis, L. K. (2016). Seismic evaluation and retrofitting of reinforced concrete buildings with base isolation systems. Earthquakes and Structures, 10, 293–311.  https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.2.293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vemuru, V. S. M., Nagarajaiah, S., Masroor, A., & Mosqueda, G. (2014). Dynamic lateral stability of elastomeric seismic isolation bearings. Journal of the Structural Engineering. American Society of Civil Engineers, 140, A4014014.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang, Y.-P., Chung, L.-L., & Liao, W.-H. (1998). Seismic response analysis of bridges isolated with friction pendulum bearings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 27, 1069–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wen, Y.-K. (1976). Method for random vibration of hysteretic systems. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 102, 249–263.Google Scholar
  33. Yuan, Y., Wei, W., Igarashi, A., et al. (2017). Experimental and analytical studies of seismic response of highway bridges isolated by rate-dependent rubber bearings. Engineering Structures, 150, 288–299.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhu, T. J., Heidebrecht, A. C., & Tso, W. K. (1988). Effect of peak ground acceleration to velocity ratio on ductility demand of inelastic systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 16, 63–79.  https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290160106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringNational Institute of Technology DurgapurDurgapurIndia

Personalised recommendations