Optimal seismic design of steel moment frames by un-damped multi-objective vibrating particles system
- 5 Downloads
Structural design usually comes up with objectives that compete with each other. The present optimization problem is formulated by applying minimal weight and drift ratio in spectral analysis of steel frames. It is further solved introducing an undamped multi-objective vibrating particle search. It not only takes benefit of VPS walks but also utilizes special evolutionary and multi-objective operators such as mutation and non-dominated sorting to update an auxiliary memory of the best solutions. A variety of frame examples with 2–24 stories and 3–6 bays are treated to cover a practical range of aspect ratios. Performance of the proposed MOVPS is further evaluated in the treated examples via comparison with two popular multi-objective methods: NSGA-II and MOPSO. In this regard, some metrics are traced for multi-objective optimization in addition to generating boxplots of the C-function to compare relative dominance priority between each pair of methods. According to the present study, Pareto fronts are similar for low-rise frames as the latter two metrics converge with iterations; however, in taller frames, either Pareto front or performance metrics exhibit more difference. Consequently, the most extended, the utopia–closest and the fastest optimal results were obtained by MOVPS, NSGA-II and MOPSO, respectively.
KeywordsMulti-objective vibrating particles search Spectral design Steel buildings Moment frames Performance metrics Pareto optimization
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- Deb K., Agrawal S., Pratap A., & Meyarivan T. (2000). A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. In The international conference on parallel problem solving from nature, 1917 (pp. 849–858). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Farah-Abadi, H. (2017). Multi-objective optimization of steel moment frames for seismic spectral drift response and structural weight. MSc. dissertation in Earthquake Engineering, Supervisor: Dr. M.Shahrouzi, Kharazmi University, Karaj.Google Scholar
- Fonseca, C.M., Fleming, P.J. (1993) Genetic algorithms for multiobjective optimization: Formulation, discussion and generalization. In Genet. Algorithms Proc. Fifth Int. Conf. (pp. 416–423).Google Scholar
- Ghosh, A., & Dehuri, S. (2004). Evolutionary algorithms for multi-criterion optimization: A survey. International Journal of Computing and Information Sciences, 2, 38–57.Google Scholar
- ICSRDBS. (2014). Iranian code for seismic resistant design of buildings: standard-2800 (4th ed.). Tehran: Research Center for Roads, Housing and Urban Development of Iran.Google Scholar
- INBC:Part-10. (2013). Iranian national building code, part-10: design of steel structures (4th ed.). Tehran: Housing and Urban Development of Iran.Google Scholar
- Panda, A., & Pani, S. (2016). Multi-objective colliding bodies optimization. In M. Pant, K. Deep, J. Bansal, A. Nagar, K. Das (Eds.) Proceedings of fifth international conference on soft computing for problem solving. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 436 (pp. 651–664). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
- Pareto, V. (1906) Manuale di Economia Politica. Piccola Biblioteca Scientifica, Milan. Translated to English by Schwier, A.S. (1971), Manual of political economy. London: McMillan.Google Scholar
- Schaffer, J.D. (1985) Multiple objective optimization with vector evaluated genetic algorithms. In 1st Int Conf Genet Algorithms (pp. 93–100).Google Scholar
- Schott, J.R. (1995). Fault tolerant design using single and multicriteria genetic algorithm optimization. MSc. Dissertation, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institude of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
- Shahrouzi, M., & Farahabadi, H. (2018). A fast fuzzy-tuned multi-objective optimization for sizing problems. International Journal of Optimization in Civil Engineering, 8, 53–75.Google Scholar
- Shahrouzi, M., & Pashaei, M. (2014). Stochastic directional search: An efficient heuristic for structural optimization of building frames. Scientia Iranica, 20, 1124–1132.Google Scholar
- Stahl (2012) Lieferprogramm (Stahl Profiles). GKS-CCNA: Gemeinschaft kooperierender Stahlhändler, St. Alban-Anlage 62, 4002 Basel.Google Scholar
- Zitzler, E., Laumanns, M., & Thiele, L. (2001). SPEA2: improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm. Evol Methods Des Optim Control with Appl to Ind Probl 95–100. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-004284029.