Advertisement

Effectiveness of physiological traits in adopting safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) genotypes to water deficit condition

  • Khadijeh Alizadeh Yeloojeh
  • Ghodratollah SaeidiEmail author
  • Parviz Ehsanzadeh
Research
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

Water deficit is the most limiting factor for seed yield of crop species in the arid and semi-arid regions. Due to increasing limitation of fresh water resources and importance of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) as a significant oilseed crop in Iran, it is necessary to evaluate physiological responses of drought tolerance and its association with seed yield of this crop in water stress condition. In this study, 21 safflower genotypes were planted by hand in the field under water stress and non-stress conditions in a randomized complete block design with two replications during 2 years (2016–17). The results indicated that water deficit stress significantly reduced relative water content (RWC), chlorophyll a (Chl-a) and chlorophyll b (Chl-b) concentrations and seed yield, but increased ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and peroxidase (POX) activities and leaf proline concentration. Significant differences were observed among the genotypes for all studied traits except Chl-b concentration. Genotypes were discriminated according to their response to drought using stress tolerance index (STI). Drought tolerant genotypes displayed a higher capability for accumulation of proline in association with maintaining RWC, antioxidant enzymes activity and higher seed yield, compared to the drought sensitive genotypes. Presented results suggested that safflower genotypes with higher levels of antioxidant enzymes activity, RWC and proline accumulation are characterized by a higher STI. Therefore, these physiological traits can be employed as effective criteria for selecting safflower genotypes with more tolerance to water deficit stress.

Keywords

Drought tolerance Physiological traits Safflower Seed yield Water stress 

Abbreviations

APX

Ascorbate peroxidase

CAT

Catalase

Chl

Chlorophyll

POX

Peroxidase

ROS

Reactive oxygen species

RWC

Relative water content

STI

Stress tolerance index

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate the contributions of the Isfahan University of Technology for its scientific and financial support. They would also like to thank Dr. A.F. Mirlohi from Isfahan University of Technology, Iran for editing the final English draft of this manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abd El-Lattife, E. A. (2013). Safflower yields and water use efficiency as effected by irrigation at different soil moisture depletion levels and plant population density under arid conditions. Archives of Agronmy and Soil Science, 59, 1545–1557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D. & Smith, M. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage paper, 56. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.Google Scholar
  3. Amini, H., Arzani, A., & Karami, M. (2014). Effect of water deficiency on seed quality and physiological traits of different safflower genotypes. Turkish Journal of Biology, 38, 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amiri, H., Dousty, B., & Hosseinzedeh, S. R. (2018). Water stress-induced changes of morphological, physiological and essential oil compounds in Thymus eriocalyx from Iran. Journal of Essential oil-Bearing Plants, 21, 1210–1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anupamaa, A., Bhugrab, S., Lallb, B., Chaudhuryp, S., & Chugh, A. (2018). Assessing the correlation of genotypic and phenotypic responses of indica rice varieties under drought stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 127, 343–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Askari, E., & Ehsanzadeh, P. (2015). Drought stress mitigation by foliar application of salicylic acid and their interactive effects on physiological characteristics of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.) genotypes. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 37, 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bahrami, F., Arzani, A., & Karimi, V. (2014). Evaluation of yield-based drought tolerance indices for screening safflower genotypes. Agronomy Journal, 106, 1219–1224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bates, L. S., Waldran, R. P., & Teare, I. D. (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water studies. Plant and Soil, 39, 205–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bouchemal, K., Bouldjadj, R., Belbekri, M. N., Ykhlef, N., & Djekounn, A. (2017). Differences in antioxidant enzyme activities and oxidative markers in ten wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) genotypes in response to drought, heat and paraquat stress. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 63, 710–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowler, C., Montagu, M. V., & Inez, D. (1992). Superoxide dismutase and stress tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 43, 83–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bradford, M. M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry, 72, 248–254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caser, M., Angiolillo, F., Chitarra, W., Lovisolo, C., Ruffoni, B., Pistelli, L., et al. (2018). Ecophysiological and phytochemical responses of Salvia sinaloensis Fern. to drought stress. Plant Growth Regulation, 84, 383–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chance, B., & Maehly, A. C. (1955). Assay of catalase and peroxidase. Methods in Enzymology, 2, 746–775.Google Scholar
  14. Chen, Z., Wang, Z., Yang, Y., Li, M., & Xu, B. (2018). Abscisic acid and brassinolide combined application synergistically enhances drought tolerance and photosynthesis of tall fescue under water stress. Scientia Horticulturae, 228, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cheng, L., Han, M., Yang, L.-M., Yang, L., Sun, Z., & Zhang, T. (2018). Changes in the physiological characteristics and baicalin biosynthesis metabolism of Scutellaria biacalensis Georgi under drought stress. Industrial Crops and Products, 122, 473–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fariaszewska, A., Aper, J., Huylenbroeck, V., Baert, J., De Riek, J., Staniak, M., et al. (2017). Mild drought stress-induced changes in yield, physiological processes and chemical composition in Festuca, Lolium and Festulolium. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 203, 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fazeli, F., Ghorbani, M., & Niknam, V. (2007). Effect of drought on biomass, protein content, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzymes in two sesame cultivars. Biologia Plantarum, 51, 98–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fernandez, G.C.J. (1992). Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In ʻProceeding International Symposium on Adaption of Food Crops to Temperature and Water Stress’. (Ed. C. C. Kuo), pp. 257–270. (Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center: Shanhua, Taiwan).Google Scholar
  19. Ghadyeh-Zarrinabadi, I., Razmjoo, J., Abdali Mashhadi, A., Karim Mojeni, H., & Boroomand, A. (2019). Physiological response and productivity of pot marigold (Calendula officinalis) genotypes under water deficit. Industrial Crops and Products, 139, 111488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gharibi, Sh, Tabatabaei, B. E. S., Saeidi, G., & Goli, S. A. H. (2016). Effect of drought stress on total phenolic, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant activity of Achillea species. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 178, 796–809.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gholami-Zali, A., & Ehsanzadeh, P. (2018a). Exogenously applied proline as a tool to enhance water use efficiency: case of fennel. Agricultural Water Management, 197, 138–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gholami-Zali, A., & Ehsanzadeh, P. (2018b). Exogenous proline improves osmoregulation, physiological functions, essential oil, and seed yield of fennel. Industrial Crops and Products, 111, 133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ghotbzadeh-Kermani, S., Saeidi, Gh, Sabzalian, M. R., & Gianinetti, A. (2019). Drought stress influenced sesamin and sisamolin content and polyphenolic components in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) populations with contrasting seed coat colors. Food Chemistry, 289, 360–368.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grieve, C. M., Grattan, S. R., & Maas, E. V. (2011). Plant salt tolerance. Agricultural Salinity Assessment and Management, Edition, 2, 405–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hammad, S. A. R., & Ali, O. A. M. (2014). Physiological and biochemical studies on drought tolerance of whet plants by application of amino acids and yeast extract. Annals of Agricultural Science, 59, 133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hassanzadeh, M., Ebadi, A., Panahyan-e-Kivi, M., Eshghi, A. G., Jamaati-e-Somarin, S. H., Saeidi, M., et al. (2009). Evaluation of drought stress on relative water content and chlorophyll content of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) genotypes at early flowering stage. Research Journal of Environmental Sciences, 3, 345–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Herzog, V., & Fahimi, H. (1973). Determination of the activity of peroxidase. Analytical Biochemistry, 55, 554–562.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hoque, M. A., Banu, M. N., Okuma, N., Amako, K., Nakamura, Y., Shimoishi, Y., et al. (2007). Exogenous proline and glycinebetaine increase NaCl-induced ascorbate-glutatione cycle enzyme activities, and proline improves salt tolerance more than glycinebetaine in tobacco Bright Yellow-2 suspension-cultured cells. Journal of Plant Physiology, 164, 1457–1468.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hosseini, M. S., Samsampour, D., Ebrahimi, M., Abadia, J., & Khanahmadi, M. (2018). Effect of drought stress on growth parameters, osmolyte contents, antioxidant enzymes and glycyrrhizin synthesis in licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra L.) grown in the field. Phytochemistry, 156, 124–134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I., Escuredo, P. R., Arrese-Igor, C., & Becana, M. (1998). Oxidative damage in pea plants exposed to water deficit or paraquat. Plant Physiology, 116, 173–181.PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Janmohammadi, M., Mohammadi, N., Shekari, F., Abbasi, A., & Esmailpour, M. (2017). The effects of silicon and titanium on safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) growth under moisture deficit condition. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica, 109, 443–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kadkhodaie, A., Zahedi, M., Razmjoo, J., & Pessarakli, M. (2014). Changes in some antioxidative enzymes and physiological indices among sesame genotypes (Sesamum indicum L.) in response to soil water deficits under field conditions. Acta Phisiologiae Plantarum, 36, 641–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Karimzadeh-Soureshjani, H., Nezami, A., Kafi, M., & Tadayon, M. (2019). Responses of two common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes to deficit irrigation. Agricultural Water Management, 213, 270–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Khalili, M., Pour-Aboughadareh, A., & Naghavi, M. R. (2016). Assessment of drought tolerance in barley: integrated selection criterion and drought tolerance indices. Environmental and Experimental Biology, 14, 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Khanna-Chopra, R., & Selote, D. S. (2007). Acclimation to drought stress generates oxidative stress tolerance in drought-resistant than susceptible wheat cultivar under field conditions. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 60, 276–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lichtenthaler, H. K., & Buschmann, C. (2005). Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Measurement and characterization by UV-VIS spectroscopy. Current Protocols in Food Analytical Chemistry, 2005, F4.3.1–F4.3.8.Google Scholar
  37. Maswada, H. F., Abd El-Razek, U. A., El-Shshtawy, A. N. A., & Elzaawely, A. A. (2018). Morpho-physiological and yield responses to exogenous moringa leaf extract and salicylic acid in maize (Zea mays L.) under water stress. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 64, 994–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mercado, J. A., Matas, A. J., Heredia, A., Valpuesta, V., & Quesada, M. A. (2004). Changes in the water binding characteristics of the cell walls from transgenic Nicotiana tabacum leaves with enhanced levels of peroxidase activity. Physiologia Plantarum, 122, 504–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Merwad, A. M. A., Desoky, E. S. M., & Rady, M. M. (2018). Response of water deficit-stressed Vigna unguiculata performances to silicon, proline or methionine foliar application. Scientia Horticulturae, 228, 132–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mirjahanmardi, H., & Ehsanzadeh, P. (2016). Iron supplement ameliorates drought-induced alterations in physiological attributes of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare). Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 106, 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mitler, R. (2002). Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends in Plant Science, 7, 405–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Movahhedy-Dehnavy, M., Modarres-Sanavy, S. A. M., & Mokhtassi-Bidgoli, A. (2009). Foliar application of zinc and manganese improves seed yield and quality of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) grown under water deficit stress. Industrial Crops and Products, 30(1), 82–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nakano, Y., & Asada, K. (1981). Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant and Cell Physiology, 22(5), 867–880.Google Scholar
  44. Osorio, M. L., Osorio, J., & Romano, A. (2013). Photosynthesis, energy partitioning, and metabolic adjustments of the endangered Cistaceae species Tuberaria major under high temperature and drought. Photosynthetica, 51, 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pour-Aboughadareh, A., Ahmadi, J., Mehrabi, A. A., Etminan, A., Moghaddam, M., & Siddique, H. M. (2017). Physiological responses to drought stress in wild relatives of wheat: implications for wheat improvement. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 39, 106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sajedi, N. A., Ferasat, M., Mirzakhani, M., & Boojar, M. M. A. (2012). Impact of water deficit stress on biochemical characteristics of safflower cultivars. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 18, 323–329.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Santos, C. V. (2004). Regulation of chlorophyll biosynthesis and degredation by salt stress in sunflower leaves. Scientia Horticulturae, 103, 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shahrokhnia, M. H., & Sepaskhah, A. R. (2017). Physiologic and agronomic traits in safflower under various irrigation strategies, planting methods and nitrogen fertilization. Industrial Crops and Products, 95, 126–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sheikh-Mohammadi, M. H., Etemadi, N., Nikhbakht, A., Arab, M., Majidi, M. M., & Pessarakli, A. (2017). Antioxidant defence system and physiological responses of Iranian crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum L.) to drought and salinity stress. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 39, 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sheoran, S., Thakur, V., Narwal, S., Turan, R., Mamruta, H. M., Singh, V., et al. (2015). Differential activity and expression profile of antioxidant enzymes and physiological changes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under drought. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 177, 1282–1298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Silva, M., Jifon, J., Silva, J. A. G., & Sharma, V. (2007). Use of physiological parameters as fast tools to screen for drought tolerance in sugarcane. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology, 19, 193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Singh, S., Angadi, S. V., Hilaire, R. S., Grover, K., & Vanleeuwen, D. M. (2016). Spring safflower performance under growth stage based irrigation in the southern high plains. Crop Science, 56, 1878–1889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sobhaninan, N., Heidari, B., Tahmasebi, S., Dadkhodaei, A., & McIntyre, C. L. (2019). Response of quantitative and physiological traits to drought stress in the SeriM82/Babax wheat population. Euphytica, 215, 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tabatabaei, S., & Ehsanzadeh, P. (2016). Photosynthetic pigments, ionic and antioxidative behavior of hulled tetraploid wheat in response to NaCl. Photosynthetica, 54, 340–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yousefzadeh-Najafabadi, M., & Ehsanzadeh, P. (2017). Photosynthetic and antioxidative upregulatios in drought-stressed sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) subjected to foliar-applied salicylic acid. Photosynthetica, 55, 611–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, College of AgricultureIsfahan University of TechnologyIsfahanIran

Personalised recommendations