Effectiveness of physiological traits in adopting safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) genotypes to water deficit condition
- 8 Downloads
Water deficit is the most limiting factor for seed yield of crop species in the arid and semi-arid regions. Due to increasing limitation of fresh water resources and importance of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) as a significant oilseed crop in Iran, it is necessary to evaluate physiological responses of drought tolerance and its association with seed yield of this crop in water stress condition. In this study, 21 safflower genotypes were planted by hand in the field under water stress and non-stress conditions in a randomized complete block design with two replications during 2 years (2016–17). The results indicated that water deficit stress significantly reduced relative water content (RWC), chlorophyll a (Chl-a) and chlorophyll b (Chl-b) concentrations and seed yield, but increased ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and peroxidase (POX) activities and leaf proline concentration. Significant differences were observed among the genotypes for all studied traits except Chl-b concentration. Genotypes were discriminated according to their response to drought using stress tolerance index (STI). Drought tolerant genotypes displayed a higher capability for accumulation of proline in association with maintaining RWC, antioxidant enzymes activity and higher seed yield, compared to the drought sensitive genotypes. Presented results suggested that safflower genotypes with higher levels of antioxidant enzymes activity, RWC and proline accumulation are characterized by a higher STI. Therefore, these physiological traits can be employed as effective criteria for selecting safflower genotypes with more tolerance to water deficit stress.
KeywordsDrought tolerance Physiological traits Safflower Seed yield Water stress
Reactive oxygen species
Relative water content
Stress tolerance index
The authors appreciate the contributions of the Isfahan University of Technology for its scientific and financial support. They would also like to thank Dr. A.F. Mirlohi from Isfahan University of Technology, Iran for editing the final English draft of this manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D. & Smith, M. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage paper, 56. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.Google Scholar
- Bouchemal, K., Bouldjadj, R., Belbekri, M. N., Ykhlef, N., & Djekounn, A. (2017). Differences in antioxidant enzyme activities and oxidative markers in ten wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) genotypes in response to drought, heat and paraquat stress. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 63, 710–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chance, B., & Maehly, A. C. (1955). Assay of catalase and peroxidase. Methods in Enzymology, 2, 746–775.Google Scholar
- Fariaszewska, A., Aper, J., Huylenbroeck, V., Baert, J., De Riek, J., Staniak, M., et al. (2017). Mild drought stress-induced changes in yield, physiological processes and chemical composition in Festuca, Lolium and Festulolium. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 203, 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fernandez, G.C.J. (1992). Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In ʻProceeding International Symposium on Adaption of Food Crops to Temperature and Water Stress’. (Ed. C. C. Kuo), pp. 257–270. (Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center: Shanhua, Taiwan).Google Scholar
- Hassanzadeh, M., Ebadi, A., Panahyan-e-Kivi, M., Eshghi, A. G., Jamaati-e-Somarin, S. H., Saeidi, M., et al. (2009). Evaluation of drought stress on relative water content and chlorophyll content of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) genotypes at early flowering stage. Research Journal of Environmental Sciences, 3, 345–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hoque, M. A., Banu, M. N., Okuma, N., Amako, K., Nakamura, Y., Shimoishi, Y., et al. (2007). Exogenous proline and glycinebetaine increase NaCl-induced ascorbate-glutatione cycle enzyme activities, and proline improves salt tolerance more than glycinebetaine in tobacco Bright Yellow-2 suspension-cultured cells. Journal of Plant Physiology, 164, 1457–1468.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hosseini, M. S., Samsampour, D., Ebrahimi, M., Abadia, J., & Khanahmadi, M. (2018). Effect of drought stress on growth parameters, osmolyte contents, antioxidant enzymes and glycyrrhizin synthesis in licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra L.) grown in the field. Phytochemistry, 156, 124–134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lichtenthaler, H. K., & Buschmann, C. (2005). Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Measurement and characterization by UV-VIS spectroscopy. Current Protocols in Food Analytical Chemistry, 2005, F4.3.1–F4.3.8.Google Scholar
- Nakano, Y., & Asada, K. (1981). Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant and Cell Physiology, 22(5), 867–880.Google Scholar
- Sheikh-Mohammadi, M. H., Etemadi, N., Nikhbakht, A., Arab, M., Majidi, M. M., & Pessarakli, A. (2017). Antioxidant defence system and physiological responses of Iranian crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum L.) to drought and salinity stress. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 39, 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sheoran, S., Thakur, V., Narwal, S., Turan, R., Mamruta, H. M., Singh, V., et al. (2015). Differential activity and expression profile of antioxidant enzymes and physiological changes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under drought. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 177, 1282–1298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar