Stochastic Estimation of Potential and Depleted Productivity of Soybean Grain and Oil
Soybean is one of the most important food crops around the world. Despite its economic importance, the effect of sowing date and climatic conditions on soybean development and productivity of grain and oil has not yet been studied in detail. Such a study can yield valuable information regarding the interaction of this crop with its environment. In this context, the aim of this study was to estimate the soybean potential productivity of grains and oil for eight sowing dates, using historical series of climate data from Piracicaba (SP), Brazil. For this a stochastic model is proposed, with truncated normal distribution for maximum, minimum and average temperature data. The information generated in this study is important in order to provide farmers with relevant information about the importance of an adequate sowing date, as well as to further understand of the influence of the climate variations on soybean production. The September 1 sowing date, without lack of water, provides more adequate conditions for accumulated dry matter, grain and oil productivity. It was concluded that: (i) the stochastic model (Potential and Depleted Model for Soybean Grain and Oil Production) can be used as a valuable tool for analyzing variability and complex interactions between plants and climate conditions. In this model, the air temperature and global radiation parameters were adequate to estimate the duration of the crop cycle, dry matter production, photoassimilates partition, and grain and oil productivity of soybean plants grown in different sowing dates in Piracicaba–SP; (ii) considering the historical data of air temperature, global radiation and other optimal ecophysiological needs for the crop, the model results define September as best period for sowing soybean in Piracicaba (SP), Brazil.
KeywordsClimate parameters Crop growth models Photoassimilates partition Sowing date
We acknowledge funding from the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)—Grant no. 2016/06310-0 and 2017/24059-5 and thank financial support from Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) and from National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq)—Grant no. 140209/2015-8).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Board, J. E., & Harville, B. G. (1992). Explanation for greater light interception in narrow-vs. Wide-row. Crop Science. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1992.0011183X003200010041x.Google Scholar
- Bressan, G. (2002). Modelagem e simulação de sistemas computacionais (p. 12). São Paulo: LarcPCS/EPUSP, IME/USP.Google Scholar
- CONAB. Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento. (2017). Acompanhamento da safra brasileira de grãos. 2016/2017. http://www.conab.gov.br/OlalaCMS/uploads/arquivos/16_12_22_12_08_27_boletim_graos_dezembro_2016.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2018.
- Embrapa. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. (2007). Instalação da lavoura de soja: época, cultivares, espaçamento e população de plantas. CNPSO–Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Soja. http://www.cnpso.embrapa.br/download/cirtec/circtec51.pdf. Accessed 30 Jan 2018.
- Embrapa. (2005). Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. Tecnologias de Produção de Soja—Região Central do Brasil—2006 (p. 220). (Sistemas de Produção/Embrapa Soja, 9).Google Scholar
- FAO. (2019). Crops and livestock products. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/TP . Accessed 5 Feb 2019.
- Fehr, W. R., & Caviness, C. E. (1977). Stages of soybean development (p. 81p). Iowa: Agricultural Experimental Station.Google Scholar
- Koester, R. P., Skonecza, J. A., Cary, T. R., Diers, B. W., & Ainsworth, E. A. (2014). Historical gains in soybean (Glycine max Merr.) seed yield are driven by linear increases in light interception, energy conversion, and partitioning efficiencies. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru187.Google Scholar
- Martins, K. V., Dourado-Neto, D., Reichardt, K., de Jong van Lier, Q., Favarin, J. L., Sartori, F. F., et al. (2017). Preliminary studies to characterize the temporal variation of micronutrient composition of the above ground organs of maize and correlated uptake rates. Frontiers in Plant Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01482.Google Scholar
- Penning De Vries, F. W. T., Jansen, D. M., Ten Berge, H. F. M., & Bakema, A. (1989). Simulation of ecophysiological processes of growth in several annual crops (p. 271). Wageningen: Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation (Pudoc).Google Scholar
- Petter, F. A., Da Silva, J. A., Zuffo, A. M., Andrade, F. R., Pacheco, L. P., & De Almeida, F. A. (2016). Does high seeding density increase soybean productivity? Photosynthetically active radiation responses (abstract in English, text in Portuguese). Bragantia. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.447.Google Scholar
- Pierozan-Junior, C., Kawakami, J., Schwarz, K., Umburanas, R. C., Del Conte, M. V., & Müller, M. M. L. (2017). Sowing dates and soybean cultivars influence seed yield, oil and protein contents in subtropical environment. Journal of Agricultural Science. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v9n6p188.Google Scholar
- Rochette, P., Desjardins, R. L., Pattey, E., & Lessard, R. (1996). Instantaneous measurement of radiation and water use efficiencies of a maize crop. Agronomy Journal. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1996.00021962008800040022x.Google Scholar
- Sinclair, T. R. (1991). Predicting carbon assimilation and crop radiation-use efficiency dependence on leaf nitrogen content. In K. J. Boote & R. S. Loomis (Eds.), Modeling crop photosynthesis—From biochemistry to canopy (pp. 75–94). Madison: American Society of Agronomy; Crop Science Society of America.Google Scholar
- Sinclair, T. R., Shiraiwa, T., & Hammer, G. L. (1992). Variation in crop radiation-use efficiency with increased diffuse radiation. Crop Science, 32, 1281–1284. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1992.0011183X003200050043x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Spaeth, S. C., Randall, H. C., Sinclair, T. R., & Vendeland, J. S. (1984). Stability of soybean harvest index 1. Agronomy Journal. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1984.00021962007600030028x.Google Scholar
- Taiz, L., Zeiger, E., Møller, I. M., & Murphy, A. (2017). Plant physiology (Portuguese version) (6th ed., p. 888). Porto Alegre: Artmed.Google Scholar
- Zuil, S. G., Izquierdo, N. G., Luján, J., Cantarero, M., & Aguirrezábal, L. A. N. (2012). Oil quality of maize and soybean genotypes with increased oleic acid percentage as affected by intercepted solar radiation and temperature. Field Crops Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.11.019.Google Scholar