Advertisement

European Geriatric Medicine

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 121–126 | Cite as

Validation of the 8-item Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale in a cohort of community-dwelling older people: data from The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA)

  • R. Briggs
  • D. Carey
  • A. M. O’Halloran
  • R. A. Kenny
  • S. P. Kennelly
Brief Report

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to validate the 8-item Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D-8) against the 20-item version (CES-D-20) in a large sample of community-dwelling older people.

Methods

Scales were compared for correlation and internal consistency. The ideal cut-off score for the CES-D-8 was determined by comparing scores ranging from 7 to 12 on the CES-D-8 to CES-D-20.

Results

8033 participants were included. The Spearman co-efficient between the scales was 0.8980 indicating high degree of correlation. At a score of 9/24, the sensitivity and specificity of the CES-D-8 were 98 and 83%, respectively. The Cohen’s κ for a score of 9 was 0.7855, indicating strong agreement and the ROC area was 0.88.

Conclusion

When compared to the CES-D-20, the CES-D-8 is a valid and reliable measure of depressive symptoms in community-dwelling older people, and a score of 9 can be used to identify those with clinically significant symptoms.

Keywords

Depression CES-D Validation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Irish Government, the Atlantic Philanthropies and Irish Life plc. These funders had no involvement in the study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, writing of the paper or submission for publication. Any views expressed in this report are not necessarily those of the Department of Health and Children or of the Minister for Health.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Faculty of Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee at Trinity College Dublin. All experimental procedures adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed consent

All participants gave informed written consent.

References

  1. 1.
    Vilagut G, Forero CG, Barbaglia G, Alonso J (2016) Screening for depression in the general population with the center for epidemiologic studies depression (CES-d): a systematic review with meta-analysis. PloS One 11(5):e0155431CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beekman AT, Deeg DJ, Van Limbeek J, Braam AW, De Vries MZ, Van Tilburg W (1997) Criterion validity of the center for epidemiologic studies depression scale (CES-d): results from a community-based sample of older subjects in the netherlands. Psychol Med 27(1):231–235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lewinsohn PM, Seeley JR, Roberts RE, Allen NB (1997) Center for epidemiologic studies depression scale (CES-d) as a screening instrument for depression among community-residing older adults. Psychol Aging 12(2):277–287CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang W, O’Brien N, Forrest JI, Salters KA, Patterson TL, Montaner JSG et al (2012) Validating a Shortened Depression Scale (10 Item CES-D) among HIV-Positive People in British Columbia, Canada. PLoS One 7(7):e40793CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lee AE, Chokkanathan S (2008) Factor structure of the 10-item CES-d scale among community dwelling older adults in singapore. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 23(6):592–597CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    González P, Nuñez A, Merz E, Brintz C, Weitzman O, Navas EL et al (2017) Measurement properties of the center for epidemiologic studies depression scale (CES-d 10): findings from HCHS/SOL. Psychol Assess 29(4):372–381CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zivin K, Llewellyn DJ, Lang IA, Vijan S, Kabeto MU, Miller EM et al (2010) Depression among older adults in the United States and England. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 18(11):1036–1044CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Van de Velde S, Bracke P, Levecque K, Meuleman B (2010) Gender differences in depression in 25 European countries after eliminating measurement bias in the CES-D 8. Soc Sci Res 39(3):396–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    O’Halloran AM, Kenny RA, King-Kallimanis BL (2014) The latent factors of depression from the short forms of the CES-D are consistent, reliable and valid in community-living older adults. Eur Geriatr Med 5:97–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Whelan BJ, Savva GM (2013) Design and methodology of the irish longitudinal study on ageing. J Am Geriatr Soc 61(Suppl):2Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carleton RN, Thibodeau MA, Teale MJ, Welch PG, Abrams MP, Robinson T et al (2013) The center for epidemiologic studies depression scale: a review with a theoretical and empirical examination of item content and factor structure. PloS One 8(3):e58067+CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Missinne S, Vandeviver C, Van de Velde S, Bracke P (2014) Measurement equivalence of the CES-d 8 depression-scale among the ageing population in eleven european countries. Soc Sci Res 46:38–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Karim J, Weisz R, Bibi Z, ur Rehman S (2015) Validation of the eight-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) among older adults. Curr Psychol 34(4):681–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Geriatric Medicine Society 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Briggs
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • D. Carey
    • 1
  • A. M. O’Halloran
    • 1
  • R. A. Kenny
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. P. Kennelly
    • 3
  1. 1.The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA)Trinity College DublinDublinIreland
  2. 2.Mercer’s Institute for Successful AgeingSt James’s HospitalDublinIreland
  3. 3.Age-related Health CareTallaght HospitalDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations