Abstract
Minority research and training (MRT) programs have been used across U.S. colleges and universities as a method to close the educational achievement gap and generate a highly skilled and diverse workforce. Previous studies have improved our understanding of the need to diversify the science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) disciplines and the various interventions that have been developed to support these efforts. However, there is still little evidence about what strategies are most effective in promoting interest, continuation, and matriculation into STEM graduate programs among underrepresented groups. The study herein utilized a case study design with a mixed methods approach to evaluate the program impacts and outcomes of an MRT program at a research-intensive institution in the southern part of the U.S., and for program replication. This evaluation study examines the types of activities and services provided, the measurable outcomes of those activities and services, the resources used to deliver the services, the practical problems encountered, and the ways in which problems were resolved.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Bauer, K. W., & Bennett, J. S. (2003). Alumni perceptions used to assess undergraduate research experience. Journal of Higher Education, 74, 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2003.11777197.
Bonner, A., & Tolhurst, G. (2002). Insider-outsider perspectives of participant observation. Nurse Researcher, 9(4), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2002.07.9.4.7.c6194.
Borum, V., & Walker, E. (2012). What makes the difference? Black women’s undergraduate and graduate experiences in mathematics. Journal of Negro Education, 81(4), 366–378. https://doi.org/10.7709/jnegroeducation.81.4.0366.
Buzzetto-More, N., Ukoha, O., & Rustagi, N. (2010). Unlocking the barriers to women and minorities in computer science and information systems studies: Results from a multimethodolical study conducted at two minority serving institutions. Journal of Information Technology Education, 9, 115–131.
Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1011–1245.
Charleston, L., Adserias, R. P., Lang, N. M., & Jackson, J. F. L. (2014). Intersectionality and STEM: The role of race and gender in the academic pursuits of African American women in STEM. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 2, 17–37.
Colvin, J. W., & Ashman, M. (2010). Roles, risks, and benefits of peer mentoring relationships in higher education. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 18(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611261003678879.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication, Inc..
Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook on mixed methods in the behavioral and social sciences (pp. 209–240). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2008). The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Ellington, R. (2006). Having their say: Eight high-achieving African American undergraduate mathematics majors discuss their success and persistence in mathematics. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from ProQuest dissertations and theses database, publication no. 305304604.
Falconer, J. W., & Hays, K. A. (2006). Influential factors regarding the career development of African American college students: A focus group approach. Journal of Career Development, 32(3), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845305279166.
Farnsworth, J., & Boon, B. (2010). Analysing group dynamics within the focus group. Qualitative Research, 10, 605–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110375223.
Fisher, R. J. (1993). Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(2), 3–315. https://doi.org/10.1086/209351.
Floyd, A., & Arthur, L. (2012). Researching from within: External and internal ethical engagement. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 35(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2012.670481.
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. (2007). Educational Research: An Introduction (8th ed.). New York: Pearson.
Gibbs, K. D., Jr., McGready, J., Bennett, J. C., & Griffin, K. (2014). Biomedical science Ph.D. career interest patterns by race/ethnicity and gender. PLoS One, 9(12), e114736. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114736.
Gordon, M. (2009). The misuses and effective uses of constructivist teaching. Journal of Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(6), 737–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600903357058.
Gushue, G. V., Scanlan, K. R. L., Pantzer, K. M., & Clarke, C. P. (2006). The relationship of career decision-making self-efficacy, vocational identity, and career exploration behavior in African American high school students. Journal of Career Development, 33(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845305283004.
Hackett, G., & Betz, N. E. (1981). A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18(3), 326–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(81)90019-1.
Hunter, A.-B., Laursen, S. L., & Seymour, E. (2007). Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal, and professional development. Science Education, 91(1), 36–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20173.
Johnson, D. R. (2012). Campus racial climate perceptions and overall sense of belonging among racially diverse women in STEM majors. Journal of College Student Development, 53(2), 336–346. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2012.0028.
Johnson, A. C., Brown, J., Carlone, H., & Cuevas, A. K. (2011). Authoring identity amidst the treacherous terrain of science: A multiracial feminist examination of the journeys of three women of color in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(4), 339–366. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20411.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.47.1.36.
Lopatto, D. (2007). Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning. CBE Life Sciences Education, 6, 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.07-06-0039.
Lumina Foundation. (2017). A Stronger Nation: State Reports. Retrieved from: http://strongernation.luminafoundation.org/report/2017/#page/downloads.
MacPhee, D., Farro, S., & Canetto, S. (2013). Academic self-efficacy and performance of underrepresented STEM majors: Gender, ethnic, and social class patterns. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13(1), 347–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12033.
Malcom, L. E., & Malcom, S. (2011). The double bind: The next generation. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 162–172.
Margolis, J., Goode, J., & Bernier, D. (2011). The need for computer science. Educational Leadership, 68(5), 68–72.
Markovà, I., Linell, P., Grossen, M., & Orvig, S. A. (2007). Dialogue in focus groups: Exploring socially shared knowledge. London: Equinox.
Mertens, D. M. (2007). Transformative paradigm: Mixed methods and social justice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807302811.
Mertens, D. (2012). Transformative mixed methods. American Behavioral Scientist, 56, 802–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211433797.
Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). An expanded source book: Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Museus, S. D., Palmer, R. T., Davis, R. J., & Maramba, D. C. (2011). Special issue: Racial and ethnic minority students' success in STEM education. ASHE Higher Education Report, 36(6), 1–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/aehe.3606.
National Research Council. (2005). Assessment of NIH minority research and training programs: Phase 3. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
National Science Board. (2014). Science and engineering indicators 2014. Arlington: Nat. Center for Science and Engineering Statistics Retrieved from: https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/.
National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2017). Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2017. Special Report NSF 17–310. Arlington, VA. Retrieved from: www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/.
Ong, M. (2005). Body projects of young women of color in physics: Intersections of gender, race, and science. Social Problems, 52, 593–617.
Ong, M., Wright, C., Espinosa, L., & Orfield, G. (2011). Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 172–209.
Ovink, S. M., & Veazey, B. D. (2011). More than "getting us through:" a case study in cultural capital enrichment of underrepresented minority undergraduates. Research in Higher Education, 52(4), 370–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-010-9198-8.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage publications.
Schultz, P. W., Hernandez, P. R., Woodcock, A., Estrada, M., Chance, R. C., Aguilar, M., & Serpe, R. T. (2011). Patching the pipeline: Reducing educational disparities in the sciences through minority training programs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373710392371.
Shapiro, J. R., & Williams, A. M. (2012). The role of stereotype threats in undermining. girls’ and women’s performance and interest in STEM fields. Sex Roles, 66, 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0051-0.
Shapiro, D., Dundar, A., Wakhungu, P., Yuan, X., & Harrell, A. (2015). Completing College: A State-Level View of Student Attainment Rates (Signature Report No. 8a). Herndon: National Student Clearinghouse Research Center.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: US: Sage Publications, Inc.
Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. A. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021385.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Sykes, P., & Potts, A. (Eds.). (2008). Researching education from the inside: Investigations from within. London: Routledge.
Thiry, H., Laursen, S. L. (2011). The role of student-advisor interactions in apprenticing undergraduate researchers into a scientific community of practice. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20 (6), 771-784.
Trujillo, G., Aguinaldo, P. G., Anderson, C., Bustamante, J., Gelsinger, D. R., Pastor, M. J., Wright, J., Márquez-Magaña, L., … Riggs, B. (2015). Near-peer STEM mentoring offers unexpected benefits for mentors from traditionally underrepresented backgrounds. Perspectives on Undergraduate Research and Mentoring, 4(1). Retrieved from: http://blogs.elon.edu/purm/files/2015/11/Riggs.GT-et-al-PURM-4.1.pdf.
U. S. Census Bureau. (2015). Quick facts. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/PST045216/22,00.
Vennix, J., den Brok, P., & Taconis, R. (2018). Do outreach activities in secondary STEM education motivate students and improve their attitudes toward STEM? International Journal of Science Education, 40(11), 1263–1283. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1473659.
Ward, E. G., Thomas, E. E., & Disch, W. B. (2012). Protégé growth themes emergent in a holistic, undergraduate peer-mentoring experience. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 20(3), 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2012.701966.
Whitten, B. L., Foster, S. R., Duncombe, M. L., Allen, P. E., Heron, P., McCullough, L., Shaw, K. A., Taylor, B. A. P., & Zorn, H. M. (2004). “Like a family”: What works to create friendly and respectful student-faculty interactions. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 10(3), 229–242.
Wilson, Z. S., Holmes, L., deGravelles, K., Sylvain, M. R., Batiste, L., Johnson, M., McGuire, S., Pang, S. S., & Warner, I. M. (2012). Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(1), 148–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9292-5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burton, G.S., Kennedy, E. & Vicente, M.d.G.H. Results from a 14-Year Intervention Program Designed to Impact Pursuit of a PhD in Research among Underrepresented Students in STEM Disciplines. Journal for STEM Educ Res 2, 128–153 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-019-00019-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-019-00019-6