Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Results from a 14-Year Intervention Program Designed to Impact Pursuit of a PhD in Research among Underrepresented Students in STEM Disciplines

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal for STEM Education Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Minority research and training (MRT) programs have been used across U.S. colleges and universities as a method to close the educational achievement gap and generate a highly skilled and diverse workforce. Previous studies have improved our understanding of the need to diversify the science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) disciplines and the various interventions that have been developed to support these efforts. However, there is still little evidence about what strategies are most effective in promoting interest, continuation, and matriculation into STEM graduate programs among underrepresented groups. The study herein utilized a case study design with a mixed methods approach to evaluate the program impacts and outcomes of an MRT program at a research-intensive institution in the southern part of the U.S., and for program replication. This evaluation study examines the types of activities and services provided, the measurable outcomes of those activities and services, the resources used to deliver the services, the practical problems encountered, and the ways in which problems were resolved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, K. W., & Bennett, J. S. (2003). Alumni perceptions used to assess undergraduate research experience. Journal of Higher Education, 74, 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2003.11777197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonner, A., & Tolhurst, G. (2002). Insider-outsider perspectives of participant observation. Nurse Researcher, 9(4), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2002.07.9.4.7.c6194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borum, V., & Walker, E. (2012). What makes the difference? Black women’s undergraduate and graduate experiences in mathematics. Journal of Negro Education, 81(4), 366–378. https://doi.org/10.7709/jnegroeducation.81.4.0366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzzetto-More, N., Ukoha, O., & Rustagi, N. (2010). Unlocking the barriers to women and minorities in computer science and information systems studies: Results from a multimethodolical study conducted at two minority serving institutions. Journal of Information Technology Education, 9, 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1011–1245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charleston, L., Adserias, R. P., Lang, N. M., & Jackson, J. F. L. (2014). Intersectionality and STEM: The role of race and gender in the academic pursuits of African American women in STEM. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 2, 17–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colvin, J. W., & Ashman, M. (2010). Roles, risks, and benefits of peer mentoring relationships in higher education. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 18(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611261003678879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook on mixed methods in the behavioral and social sciences (pp. 209–240). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2008). The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellington, R. (2006). Having their say: Eight high-achieving African American undergraduate mathematics majors discuss their success and persistence in mathematics. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from ProQuest dissertations and theses database, publication no. 305304604.

  • Falconer, J. W., & Hays, K. A. (2006). Influential factors regarding the career development of African American college students: A focus group approach. Journal of Career Development, 32(3), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845305279166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farnsworth, J., & Boon, B. (2010). Analysing group dynamics within the focus group. Qualitative Research, 10, 605–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110375223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. J. (1993). Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(2), 3–315. https://doi.org/10.1086/209351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, A., & Arthur, L. (2012). Researching from within: External and internal ethical engagement. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 35(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2012.670481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. (2007). Educational Research: An Introduction (8th ed.). New York: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, K. D., Jr., McGready, J., Bennett, J. C., & Griffin, K. (2014). Biomedical science Ph.D. career interest patterns by race/ethnicity and gender. PLoS One, 9(12), e114736. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M. (2009). The misuses and effective uses of constructivist teaching. Journal of Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(6), 737–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600903357058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gushue, G. V., Scanlan, K. R. L., Pantzer, K. M., & Clarke, C. P. (2006). The relationship of career decision-making self-efficacy, vocational identity, and career exploration behavior in African American high school students. Journal of Career Development, 33(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845305283004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackett, G., & Betz, N. E. (1981). A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18(3), 326–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(81)90019-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, A.-B., Laursen, S. L., & Seymour, E. (2007). Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal, and professional development. Science Education, 91(1), 36–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. R. (2012). Campus racial climate perceptions and overall sense of belonging among racially diverse women in STEM majors. Journal of College Student Development, 53(2), 336–346. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2012.0028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A. C., Brown, J., Carlone, H., & Cuevas, A. K. (2011). Authoring identity amidst the treacherous terrain of science: A multiracial feminist examination of the journeys of three women of color in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(4), 339–366. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.47.1.36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopatto, D. (2007). Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning. CBE Life Sciences Education, 6, 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.07-06-0039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumina Foundation. (2017). A Stronger Nation: State Reports. Retrieved from: http://strongernation.luminafoundation.org/report/2017/#page/downloads.

  • MacPhee, D., Farro, S., & Canetto, S. (2013). Academic self-efficacy and performance of underrepresented STEM majors: Gender, ethnic, and social class patterns. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13(1), 347–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malcom, L. E., & Malcom, S. (2011). The double bind: The next generation. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 162–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J., Goode, J., & Bernier, D. (2011). The need for computer science. Educational Leadership, 68(5), 68–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markovà, I., Linell, P., Grossen, M., & Orvig, S. A. (2007). Dialogue in focus groups: Exploring socially shared knowledge. London: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, D. M. (2007). Transformative paradigm: Mixed methods and social justice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807302811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, D. (2012). Transformative mixed methods. American Behavioral Scientist, 56, 802–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211433797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). An expanded source book: Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Museus, S. D., Palmer, R. T., Davis, R. J., & Maramba, D. C. (2011). Special issue: Racial and ethnic minority students' success in STEM education. ASHE Higher Education Report, 36(6), 1–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/aehe.3606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2005). Assessment of NIH minority research and training programs: Phase 3. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Board. (2014). Science and engineering indicators 2014. Arlington: Nat. Center for Science and Engineering Statistics Retrieved from: https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2017). Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2017. Special Report NSF 17–310. Arlington, VA. Retrieved from: www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/.

  • Ong, M. (2005). Body projects of young women of color in physics: Intersections of gender, race, and science. Social Problems, 52, 593–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ong, M., Wright, C., Espinosa, L., & Orfield, G. (2011). Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 172–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ovink, S. M., & Veazey, B. D. (2011). More than "getting us through:" a case study in cultural capital enrichment of underrepresented minority undergraduates. Research in Higher Education, 52(4), 370–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-010-9198-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, P. W., Hernandez, P. R., Woodcock, A., Estrada, M., Chance, R. C., Aguilar, M., & Serpe, R. T. (2011). Patching the pipeline: Reducing educational disparities in the sciences through minority training programs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373710392371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, J. R., & Williams, A. M. (2012). The role of stereotype threats in undermining. girls’ and women’s performance and interest in STEM fields. Sex Roles, 66, 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0051-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D., Dundar, A., Wakhungu, P., Yuan, X., & Harrell, A. (2015). Completing College: A State-Level View of Student Attainment Rates (Signature Report No. 8a). Herndon: National Student Clearinghouse Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: US: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. A. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, P., & Potts, A. (Eds.). (2008). Researching education from the inside: Investigations from within. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiry, H., Laursen, S. L. (2011). The role of student-advisor interactions in apprenticing undergraduate researchers into a scientific community of practice. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20 (6), 771-784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trujillo, G., Aguinaldo, P. G., Anderson, C., Bustamante, J., Gelsinger, D. R., Pastor, M. J., Wright, J., Márquez-Magaña, L., … Riggs, B. (2015). Near-peer STEM mentoring offers unexpected benefits for mentors from traditionally underrepresented backgrounds. Perspectives on Undergraduate Research and Mentoring, 4(1). Retrieved from: http://blogs.elon.edu/purm/files/2015/11/Riggs.GT-et-al-PURM-4.1.pdf.

  • U. S. Census Bureau. (2015). Quick facts. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/PST045216/22,00.

  • Vennix, J., den Brok, P., & Taconis, R. (2018). Do outreach activities in secondary STEM education motivate students and improve their attitudes toward STEM? International Journal of Science Education, 40(11), 1263–1283. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1473659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, E. G., Thomas, E. E., & Disch, W. B. (2012). Protégé growth themes emergent in a holistic, undergraduate peer-mentoring experience. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 20(3), 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2012.701966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitten, B. L., Foster, S. R., Duncombe, M. L., Allen, P. E., Heron, P., McCullough, L., Shaw, K. A., Taylor, B. A. P., & Zorn, H. M. (2004). “Like a family”: What works to create friendly and respectful student-faculty interactions. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 10(3), 229–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Z. S., Holmes, L., deGravelles, K., Sylvain, M. R., Batiste, L., Johnson, M., McGuire, S., Pang, S. S., & Warner, I. M. (2012). Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(1), 148–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9292-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gretchen Schneider Burton.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burton, G.S., Kennedy, E. & Vicente, M.d.G.H. Results from a 14-Year Intervention Program Designed to Impact Pursuit of a PhD in Research among Underrepresented Students in STEM Disciplines. Journal for STEM Educ Res 2, 128–153 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-019-00019-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-019-00019-6

Keywords

Navigation