Multifunctionality of Carbon-based Frameworks in Lithium Sulfur Batteries
- 1.9k Downloads
Compared with conventional lithium ion batteries (LIBs), lithium sulfur (Li–S) batteries possess advantages such as higher theoretical energy densities and better cost efficiencies, making them promising next-generation energy storage systems. However, the commercialization of Li–S batteries is impeded by several drawbacks, including low cycling stabilities, limited sulfur utilizations, existing shuttle effects of polysulfide intermediates, serious safety concerns, as well as inferior cycling performances of lithium metal anodes. To address these issues, researchers have achieved rapid developments for sulfur cathodes and increased their attention to lithium metal anodes to facilitate the widespread application of Li–S batteries. And among the substrate materials for electrodes in Li–S batteries being developed, carbon-based materials have been especially promising because of their multifunctionality, demonstrating great potential for application in advanced energy storage and conversion systems. In this review, recent advancements of carbon-based frameworks applied to Li–S batteries will be summarized and diverse utilization methods of these carbon-based materials for both sulfur cathodes and lithium metal anodes will be provided. Future research directions and the prospects of Li–S batteries with high performance and practicability will also be discussed.
KeywordsMultifunctionality Carbon-based framework Lithium sulfur battery Sulfur cathode Lithium metal anode
PACS81.05.U- Carbon/carbon-based materials 88.80.ff Batteries 88.80.F- Energy storage technologies
With rapid industrial and economic growth, global fossil fuel consumption has increased significantly, resulting in severe resource depletion and environmental concerns [1, 2, 3]. Therefore, to optimize energy generation systems and achieve sustainable industrial and economic growth, it is essential to develop and utilize advanced efficient energy storage and conversion systems. As efficient electrochemical energy storage devices, batteries are based on the conversion between chemical and electrical energy and can play important roles in the optimization of energy utilization and the improvement of environmental suitability. And aside from widespread applications in portable electronics, batteries are also expected to be applied in smart grid electricity storage and release applications because their electrochemical and energy characteristics are suitable for the storage and release of excess energy as required [1, 4]. However, with growing application requirements, there is an urgent need for advanced battery systems with higher energy densities, longer cycling lives and improved cost-effectiveness [5, 6]. Therefore, to meet these requirements, the focus must turn to the exploration of advanced battery systems with higher energy densities and longer life spans beyond current conventional battery packs. This is because lithium ion battery (LIB) technologies are approaching theoretical energy densities and cannot satisfy the demands of hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), electric vehicles (EVs) and stationary electricity storage devices [7, 8, 9, 10]. Therefore, tremendous efforts have been undertaken to find alternative advanced battery systems.
The lithium sulfur (Li–S) battery system is one such advanced battery system that is regarded as a promising next-generation energy storage system because of its higher theoretical energy density in comparison with LIBs [11, 12, 13, 14]. The investigation of Li–S batteries can be traced back to the 1960s with breakthroughs made in 2009 by Nazar et al. [15, 16, 17] who synthesized mesoporous carbon sulfur composites as cathode materials in Li–S batteries and reported high specific capacities and stable cycling performances. In general, Li–S batteries are composed of lithium metal anodes coupled with sulfur cathodes and the energy conversion mechanism of Li–S batteries is based on the electrochemical reactions between Li and S8. This is different from the intercalation and deintercalation mechanisms of lithium ions in LIBs whose theoretical energy density is limited to ~420 Wh kg−1 or ~ 1400 Wh L−1 [18, 19, 20].
In terms of cathode materials for lithium batteries, sulfur cathodes possess high theoretical specific capacities of up to 1672 mAh g−1 and are nearly an order of magnitude higher than that of traditional cathode materials in LIBs such as LiCoO2, LiMn2O4 and LiFePO4 [14, 21, 22, 23, 24]. And because of this, Li–S battery cells using lithium metal anodes and sulfur cathodes with an average cell voltage of 2.15 V versus Li+/Li can provide theoretical specific energy densities of ~2500 Wh kg−1 and volumetric energy densities of~2800 Wh L−1 [17, 25, 26, 27]. Furthermore, sulfur is an abundant resource that is inexpensive, making Li–S batteries cost-effective and a competitive candidate in the field of energy storage devices.
In terms of anode materials for lithium batteries, metallic lithium possesses both a high theoretical specific capacity reaching 3860 mAh g−1 and a low electrochemical potential of − 3.04 V versus standard hydrogen electrode [22, 28, 29, 30]. These advantages make lithium metal one of the most attractive candidates for the anode materials of next-generation high-energy density lithium batteries such as Li–S batteries and lithium air batteries [28, 31, 32, 33, 34]. However, although the concept of lithium second batteries has been proposed since the 1970s, the instability and safety issues of metallic lithium anodes have prohibited their widespread application, resulting in the greater success of graphite anodes which were introduced in the 1990s [35, 36, 37, 38]. Despite this, with the rapid development of sulfur cathode, recent research has increased focuses on the lithium metal anodes, main factors hindering the practical application of Li–S batteries.
Carbon materials and their composites have also attracted increasing attention from researchers because of their good conductivity, high surface specific area and mechanical strength, allowing their applications as potential matrices for both sulfur cathodes and metallic lithium anodes [39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46]. Based on this, numerous reviews summarizing progresses and introducing diversified electrode materials in Li–S batteries have been conducted recently [31, 47, 48, 49]; however, in this review, more attention will be paid to the multifunctionality of carbon-based frameworks with their advancements in the field of Li–S batteries being highlighted, including sulfur cathode materials and protective strategies for lithium metal anodes. Overall in this review, the electrochemical reactions of Li–S batteries will first be presented and the challenges existing in sulfur cathodes and lithium metal anodes will be discussed. The advantages of carbon-based frameworks as electrode materials in Li–S batteries will subsequently be highlighted, and effective methods to utilize carbon-based materials for both sulfur cathodes and lithium metal anodes will be provided. Finally, perspectives for the future research directions of high-performance and practical Li–S batteries will be presented.
2 Electrochemical Reactions and Challenges of Li–S Batteries
The typical configuration of a Li–S battery consists of a lithium metal anode, a sulfur composite cathode, an electrolyte and a porous separator isolating the electrodes [10, 12, 50]. And as the active material in the cathodes of Li–S batteries, sulfur exists as multiple types of allotropes with octa-sulfur (S8) being the most stable [6, 51]. Here, the most common sulfur composite cathodes are fabricated through mixing S8 and conductive carbon materials together by using a binder . Unlike traditional LIBs, carbonate-based electrolytes are unsuitable for Li–S batteries because of the chemical instability of polysulfides in these types of electrolytes. Therefore, carbonate-based electrolytes are replaced by inert ether-based electrolytes that are composed of dimethoxyethane and dioxolane by using lithium bis-trifluoromethane sulfonimide as an electrolyte conductive agent [13, 14, 53, 54]. However, although numerous Li–S battery studies employ ether-based electrolytes, carbonate-based electrolytes do possess comparative advantages including the limited solubility of polysulfide intermediates as compared with ether-based electrolytes, reducing shuttle effects [55, 56]. As a result, researchers have reported that the utilization of microporous carbon or sulfur selenides can avoid nucleophilic reactions between polysulfides and carbonate-based electrolytes [57, 58, 59].
2.1 Electrochemical Reaction
Although Li–S batteries possess high theoretical capacities, high energy densities and better cost efficiencies, several key challenges impede their commercialization.
Insulating nature of sulfur and lithium sulfide
The electrical conductivity of sulfur is 5 × 10−30 S cm−1, and the electronic resistivity of lithium sulfide is larger than 1014 Ω cm [17, 60]. In addition, both sulfur and lithium sulfide possess low lithium ion diffusivity . Because of these properties, sulfur and lithium sulfide are electronically and ionically insulating, leading to low electrochemical kinetics during charge and discharge cycling. Furthermore, this insulating nature increases the internal resistance of batteries, limits the adequate utilization of active materials and lowers the rate performance [17, 61]. Moreover, the deposition of lithium sulfide on cathode surfaces can hinder the contact between electrolytes and active materials, leading to decreased specific capacities. And because of all of this, it is difficult for Li–S batteries to achieve theoretical capacities in practical situations. Therefore, to enhance the conductivity of sulfur cathodes and improve the performance of Li–S batteries, it is necessary to construct conductive frameworks and disperse sulfur uniformly to achieve intimate contact within the cathode structure.
Volume expansion of sulfur
The density of sulfur is 2.03 g cm−3, and the density of lithium sulfide is lower, 1.66 g cm−3 [25, 62, 63]. After full lithiation, the volumetric expansion of sulfur can reach about 80% . And through repeated charge and discharge cycles, the large volume changes of the electrodes can result in the pulverization of cathodes and the exfoliation of active materials from the conductive framework, leading to the permanent losses of capacity and cycling life. To avoid this, cathodes should have appropriate spaces to accommodate electrode volume changes in the electrochemical reaction process. However, although this additional void space can improve the performance of sulfur cathodes, it can also decrease the volumetric energy density of batteries. Therefore, it is essential to balance the volumetric energy density and the porosity of the cathode.
Shuttle effect of polysulfides
Long-chain polysulfide intermediates can be generated during cycling and are soluble in ether-based electrolytes [49, 65]. These dissolved polysulfide intermediates subsequently travel through the separator and diffuse from the sulfur cathode to the metallic lithium anode because of the concentration gradient between the electrodes . And because of the reactivity between these polysulfides intermediates and lithium metal, the polysulfide intermediates can be reduced by lithium, generate short-chain polysulfides and even insoluble Li2S2 and Li2S, the precipitation of which on the surface of anodes can result in capacity fading and lithium metal destruction. In addition, short-chain polysulfides can also migrate back to the cathode and oxidize to long-chain polysulfides, leading to low Coulombic efficiencies [6, 15]. This overall phenomenon is known as the “shuttle effect,” which is a serious problem that lowers capacity, decreases Coulombic efficiency and increases self-discharge. However, the dissolution of polysulfides is a key factor in the adequate utilization of sulfur; therefore, the optimal designs of Li–S batteries must balance the high utilization of sulfur and the restraining of the shuttle effect.
Growth of lithium dendrites
The uncontrollable growth of lithium dendrites on the surface of lithium metal is caused by the distribution in the homogeneity of surface current density and the uneven distribution and deposition of lithium [37, 66]. These lithium dendrite formations can cause serious safety problems, including the risk of fire and explosion, because lithium dendrites can penetrate separators and come into contact with cathode materials directly, leading to the short circuiting of batteries. This short circuiting in lithium metal batteries in turn severely impedes commercialization . However, the breaking of these dendrites can result in the formation of “dead Li,” which can decrease battery capacities and Coulombic efficiencies . Moreover, accompanying the growth of lithium dendrites, metallic lithium anodes can form porous lithium deposits, leading to the large polarizations and the volume changes of anodes [32, 67, 68].
Cracking of the solid electrolyte interface (SEI) layer
The repeated plating/stripping process on the surface of lithium anodes during the cycling induces large volume changes in the electrode as well as the iterative destruction and restoration of the SEI layer , causing cracking. After the cracking of the SEI layer, fresh lithium metal surfaces are exposed to the electrolyte and can react to form new SEI layers due to the high reactivity of lithium metal, causing the constant consumption of electrolytes and metallic lithium anode materials. Because of this, unstable SEI layers on anodes decrease lithium metal battery Coulombic efficiencies and cycling lives [39, 70].
Currently, there are several major challenges impeding the practical application of Li–S batteries; however, numerous strategies have been utilized in the construction of sulfur cathodes and the protection of metallic lithium anodes to fabricate battery systems with high performances and cycling stabilities. In the subsequent sections of this review, the multifunctionality of carbon-based frameworks in Li–S batteries including sulfur cathodes and lithium metal anodes will be discussed and highlighted.
3 Carbon-Based Materials for Sulfur Cathodes
Carbon-based materials possess desirable multifunctionality and have been widely applied in applications such as electrochemical catalysis [71, 72], lithium batteries [73, 74], solar cells [75, 76] and other energy conversion systems [77, 78, 79]. In addition, carbon-based materials have also shown great potential for application in advanced energy storage and conversion systems . Currently, carbon-based materials have been utilized in the majority of battery types and especially for Li–S batteries because of their high conductivity, high specific surface area and controllable functionality. These materials are suitable for fabricating Li–S battery sulfur cathodes with good performance and long life spans [47, 48]. In addition, the porous structure of carbon-based materials can effectively encapsulate sulfur, accommodate volume changes and trap polysulfide intermediates during cycling . In this section, the advancements of carbon-based materials for sulfur cathodes will be discussed in detail, including the porosity and conductivity of carbon-based frameworks, polarity with functional groups and the affinity in carbon-based composites.
3.1 Porosity and Conductivity of Carbon-Based Frameworks
3.1.1 Porous Carbon Materials
In an example of porous carbon materials, Nazar et al.  synthesized a highly ordered mesoporous CMK-3 as the host of sulfur, taking advantage of the desirable properties of mesoporous carbon including the high surface area, homogeneous porosity structure and high conductivity. And as a result, the capacity of the resulting sulfur/mesoporous carbon composite reached 1005 mAh g−1 at a current density of 168 mA g−1 at room temperature. It is worth noting in this study that sulfur infiltrated into the channels of the carbon thoroughly at 155 °C at which temperature the viscosity of sulfur is lowest. This study significantly improved the performance of Li–S batteries and broadened the horizons of design strategies for sulfur/carbon composite cathodes.
To further enhance the sulfur content encapsulated in carbon hosts and minimize the shuttle effects of polysulfides, Jayaprakash et al.  synthesized mesoporous hollow carbon capsules using a hard template approach and reported that after the loading of sulfur into the carbon cavity and shell, the resulting hollow carbon@sulfur composite cathode maintained a specific capacity of 974 mAh g−1 after 100 cycles at 850 mA g−1. Similarly, Schuster et al.  reported the spherical ordered mesoporous carbon with a mean diameter of 300 nm that possessed a high specific surface of 2445 m2 g−1 and mesopores of 6.0 and 3.1 nm. Here, the mesoporous structure facilitated the homogeneous dispersion of sulfur and charge transfer during cycling and the resulting sulfur/carbon cathode produced an initial capacity of 1070 mAh g−1 and a high capacity retention of 700 mAh g−1 after 100 cycles at 1675 mA g−1.
3.1.2 1D Carbon Materials
Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are a type of typical one-dimensional (1D) carbon material that possess conductive characteristics and provide electron pathways for Li–S batteries with increasing performances [88, 89, 90, 91]. CNTs can be used as conductive networks and mixed with sulfur to fabricate carbon–sulfur cathodes and aligned CNT/sulfur electrode materials with high sulfur loadings of up to 90 wt% through ball milling . And although these aligned CNT/sulfur electrode materials can achieve higher energy densities than electrodes possessing lower sulfur loadings, their stability is still an issue. Moreover, the specific surface of CNTs is small and lacks porosity, leading to a lack of void spaces to encapsulate sulfur and restrain the shuttle effects of polysulfides. This issue can be resolved, however, by using CNT networks or 3D structures [93, 94, 95].
Another viable approach to achieve high sulfur loadings and construct conductive pathways by using CNTs is to fabricate electrodes with CNT networks. For example, Fang et al.  assembled a single-wall carbon nanotube (SWCNT) network electrode that was capable of achieving an ultrahigh sulfur content reaching 95 wt%. In this study, the theoretical sulfur content in the SWCNT composite was first investigated based on SWCNTs that we recoated with sulfur possessing core–shell structures. And in accordance with the calculations, the sulfur content varied with the thickness of the sulfur shell. In addition, the researchers reported that the sulfur layers can uniformly wrap SWCNTs with a thickness of around 6 nm and that the resistance of the electrode was similar to that of the SWCNT network. Moreover, the SWCNT network can promote the transportation of electrons and ions as well as adsorb polysulfides during cycling, allowing this carbon matrix-based sulfur cathode to exhibit good cycling performances at high sulfur loading masses. And in practical results, this study reported that with an areal sulfur loading of 4.8 mg cm−2, the initial discharge capacity of the electrode was about 1212 mAh g−1 and the capacity retained 842 mAh g−1 at 170 mA g−1 after 140 cycles.
Graphene is a typical 2D carbon material with a high theoretical specific area of 2630 m2 g−1 , a high electrical conductivity whose charge carrier mobility is > 2 × 105 cm2 V−1 s−1  and a high Young’s modulus of > 0.5~1 TPa, suggesting high mechanical strength [97, 98]. These advantages of graphene make it a promising substrate to be used in energy storage and conversion systems, especially for Li–S batteries.
As an example, Chen et al.  utilized reduced graphene oxide as a substrate and monodispersed sulfur nanoparticles with the average diameters of 5, 10, 20, 40 and 150 nm onto it. Here, it is worth noting that the electrochemical performance of Li–S batteries can be significantly affected by the size of sulfur particles. And with increasing active substance sizes, sulfur utilization becomes limited because of the electronically and ionically insulating nature of sulfur and lithium sulfide. As a result, in the case in which 5 nm sulfur was dispersed on the graphene substrate, the graphene/sulfur cathode composite was reported to exhibit a high initial capacity of 1672 mAh g−1 at 167.2 mA g−1 and a capacity of 1089 mAh g−1 at 6688 mA g−1. The researchers attributed this performance to the small size of the dispersed sulfur, indicating that minimizing the size of sulfur can facilitate electrochemical kinetic processes during cycling.
3.1.4 3D Carbon Materials
3D carbon framework sulfur cathodes of Li–S batteries are mainly synthesized through fabricating substance transportation channels and conductive networks [102, 103], providing many advantages. These include: (1) large void spaces that can accommodate large amounts of sulfur, providing high active material loading masses in the cathode; (2) large quantities of transportation channels inside the framework, leading to rapid transportation rates of electrons and ions; and (3) conductive networks that can decrease composites resistances and promote sulfur utilization. Therefore, assembling Li–S battery cathodes by using 3D carbon frameworks can enhance electrochemical performances.
In addition to the previously mentioned advantages of 3D carbon frameworks, Peng et al.  also reported that these carbon architectures can prohibit the electrochemical corrosion of Al foil electrode current collectors, leading to improved cycling stabilities. There are three types of current collectors utilized in Li–S batteries, including 2D Al foils, 2D graphene films (2D GF) and 3D CNT current collectors (Fig. 6c). Of these, 2D Al foils cannot resist the corrosion of electrolytes and are often badly damaged over time. As for 2D GF, although they are stable, they still generate passivation layers on cathode surfaces. The construction of a 3D CNT film, however, is effective in preventing both the corrosion of the current collector and the formation of passivation layers because of its chemical stability and porous structure framework. Therefore, the protection of current collectors by using 3D carbon frameworks is essential in the development of Li–S batteries with enhanced cycling stabilities.
Another synthesis process to obtain 3D graphene frameworks through the growth of graphene on Ni foam can use CVD methods . Cheng et al.  grew graphene on Ni foam and coated the resulting graphene foam (GF) with poly(dimethylsiloxane) which can enhance the flexibility of the electrode. Here, the GF was used as both the current collector and the sulfur host and possessed a sulfur content of up to 70 wt%, providing a residual capacity of 448 mAh g−1 at 1500 mA g−1 after 1000 cycles at an areal sulfur loading of 10.1 mg cm−2.
3.2 Polarity with Functional Groups
3.2.1 Porous Carbon Materials with Functional Groups
The sulfur loading of cathodes in Li–S batteries must reach 4~6 mg cm−2 to compete with LIBs; therefore, high sulfur loading is required to meet practical application demands [13, 128, 129]. However, because of the insulating nature of sulfur, the high sulfur loading results in low rate capabilities and rapid capacity fading. To achieve high volumetric capacity, Hu et al.  synthesized monodispersed porous nitrogen-doped carbon nanospheres (NCNSs) with a diameter about 350 nm using a template method. Here, the structure of the resulting carbon material was found to be interconnected with closely packed nanosphere clusters which are beneficial to the fabrication of sulfur/carbon cathodes with high sulfur loadings and good conductivity. Moreover, the surface area of the resulting NCNS reached 2900 m2 g−1 with a total pore volume of 2.3 cm3 g−1 and a pore size distribution dominated by microporous structures. And because of this, the sulfur loading density of the resulting NCNSs reached 5 mg cm−2. And at such high sulfur loading masses, the initial discharge capacity of the resulting battery was 1196 mAh g−1 with a retention capacity of 672 mAh g−1 at 836 mA g−1 after 500 cycles.
3.2.2 1D Carbon Materials with Functional Groups
Conductive CNTs are suitable hosts for sulfur in cathode materials, but their lack of surface polarity sites is not favorable for the enhancement of further polysulfide interactions. Based on this, Peng et al.  separately investigated pristine CNTs, O-doped CNTs and N-doped CNTs as sulfur hosts to construct stable Li–S batteries. In this study, the researchers revealed that although functional groups containing oxygen can interact with sulfur, oxygen doping can lead to poor conductivity and faster capacity decay. And according to calculations, pyridinic-N and quaternary-N can exhibit higher binding energies with Li2S/Li2S4, in which pyridinic-N can act as electron donation sites to Li in Li2Sx (x = 1~4), whereas sulfur-containing species can possibly interact with the neighboring carbon sites of quaternary-N. In addition, the researchers in this study reported that nitrogen doping in CNT skeletons can not only enhance the interactions between N-doped CNTs and sulfur species, but also provide high conductivity. Therefore, N-doped CNTs can provide the highest cycling performance in comparison with pristine CNTs and O-doped CNTs. And in the tests, at a current density of 167.2 mA g−1, the initial capacity of N-doped CNTs was found to be 937 mAh g−1 with a residual capacity of 645 mAh g−1 after 200 cycles.
Other types of 1D carbon materials including carbon tubes and carbon fibers have also been utilized as sulfur hosts in Li–S batteries, and several studies have used anodic aluminum oxide templates to synthesize carbon hollow tubes [131, 132]. Here, the hollow structure of the carbon tubes can accommodate sulfur in its empty central part but cannot trap polysulfides effectively because of the non-polar feature of the carbon host. To overcome this problem and enhance the cycling stability of such sulfur cathodes, carbon hollow tubes derived from anodic aluminum oxide templates can be modified with functional groups to possess strong chemical interactions with polysulfides. As an example, Zheng et al.  modified an electrode using polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) with functional groups containing oxygen atoms to effectively trap polysulfides, and the resulting PVP-modified electrode demonstrated better electrochemical performances with cathode capacities of 1180, 920 and 820 mAh g−1 at current densities of 334.6, 836.5 and 1673 mA g−1, respectively. Other than carbon hollow tubes, carbon nanofibers can also improve the cycling performances of Li–S batteries and electrospinning is a method that has been extensively used to prepare carbon fiber precursors [133, 134]. For example, Xu et al.  prepared carbonized fibers containing polyacrylonitrile and iron(III)(acac)3 and after etching and activation steps, the resulting carbon nanofiber not only possessed a hierarchical porous structure but also achieved a nitrogen doping of 7.5 at%, suggesting that carbon fibers can effectively immobilize polysulfides and provide better electrochemical performances. In this study, the composite sulfur loading reached 71 wt%, and the results showed an initial capacity of 945 mAh g−1 and a retention capacity of 765 mAh g−1 at 1675 mA g−1 after 200 cycles.
3.2.3 Graphene with Functional Groups
As for modified graphene materials, Wang et al.  utilized ethylene diamine-functionalized reduced graphene oxide (EFG) as a platform to trap sulfur and lithium sulfide and reported stable cycling performances. In their study, ethylene diamine was grafted with the graphene oxide at 75 °C, allowing the graphene oxide to be partially reduced and conductive to a certain extent. And based on density-functional theory calculations, the binding energies between lithium sulfides and the resulting EFG were 1.13~1.38 eV, indicating strong interactions between them. And as a result, the sulfur cathode based on the resulting EFG provided stable cycling performances with a capacity of 650 mAh g−1 at 836 mA g−1 after 350 cycles. Exploiting modified graphene oxides consisting of new functional groups is also an efficient method to obtain sulfur cathodes with high performances. Based on this, Chen et al.  designed the quinonoid imine-modified graphene oxide (NPGO) by polymerizing aniline and phytic acid on the graphene oxide (Fig. 10b–d). Here, phytic acid played an important role in facilitating the formation of quinonoid imine groups and stabilizing graphene oxide-based composites. In addition, phytic acid can also promote the protonation of quinonoid imine groups, increasing the ratio of –NH+=. And because of this, the formation of quinonoid imine onto the graphene oxide can effectively adsorb polysulfides and favor the precipitation of Li2S. And in this study, at a sulfur loading of 3.3 mg cm−2, the modified graphene oxide provided an area capacity of 4.4 and 3.7 mAh cm−2 at 335 and 1675 mA g−1 respectively.
Additionally, like other carbon materials discussed before, doped heteroatoms can functionalize graphene and enhance the adsorption of polysulfides. There are many types of heteroatom-doped graphene, including boron-doped [141, 142], nitrogen-doped , phosphorus-doped  and sulfur-doped graphene , and the synthesis of doped graphene with heteroatoms such as B , N , P  and S [148, 149] has been reported to enhance electrochemical performances and provide trapping sites for polysulfides, indicating that the heteroatom doping is an effective method to obtain high-performance Li–S batteries. Of these heteroatom-doped materials, nitrogen-doped graphene materials have been widely explored in Li–S batteries. In one example, Hou et al.  investigated the interactions between doped nitrogen atoms in graphene and polysulfides by conducting various theoretical analyses in the field. And according to their computational results, pyrrolic-N and pyridinic-N both possess strong interactions with polysulfides, with pyrrolic-N possessing a slightly higher binding energy to polysulfides than pyridinic-N. In addition, the binding energy of quaternary-N to polysulfides was found to be weaker in comparison with that of pyrrolic-N and pyridinic-N, because quaternary-N cannot provide an extra lone-pair of electrons to interact with lithium . Overall, this study provides valuable guidance for researchers to design methods to adjust the concentration of functional nitrogen doping sites to obtain high-performance Li–S batteries. And in accordance with these theoretical results, Song et al.  synthesized nitrogen-doped graphene with 6.53 wt% of doped nitrogen including pyrrolic-N and pyridinic-N and reported that at an areal sulfur loading of 5 mg cm−2, stable cycling performances and a high rate capability of 650 mAh g−1 at 1580 mA g−1 can be obtained.
3.2.4 3D carbon Frameworks with Functional Groups
Electrospinning can also be applied to fabricate three-dimensional freestanding electrodes in Li–S batteries. Here, carbon nanofibers interconnected with each other can construct freestanding electrodes without the addition of binders or current collectors, and are beneficial to the assembly of high-energy density batteries . In one example, Yao et al.  constructed C–S bonds to restrain polysulfides using chemical bonding through the thermal treatment of electrospinning nanofibers and S0.6Se0.4. And because of the chemical interactions between Se and S, as well as between S0.6Se0.4 and the carbon nanofiber substrate, the shuttle effects of polysulfides were effectively suppressed, and at a current density of 1000 mA g−1, a retaining capacity of 346 mAh g−1 after 1000 cycles was reported, demonstrating stable cycling performances.
As a typical 3D carbon framework, 3D graphene frameworks can be fabricated by using solvothermal methods [154, 155]. In one study, Wang et al.  synthesized 3D nitrogen-doped graphene (3D-NG) derived from the graphene oxide and the ammonia solution as a nitrogen source in a solvothermal process. This resulting 3D-NG was reported to be capable of accommodating large amounts of sulfur, with the sulfur content reaching 87.6 wt%. In addition, because of the conductive configuration and polarized surface on the 3D-NG, it also improved cathode conductivity and effectively stabilized polysulfides.
Furthermore, in a study by Hu et al. , 3D hybrid graphene with graphene foam as the substrate was grown on the Ni foam via CVD and interconnected with the reduced graphene oxide. Here, the introduction of the reduced graphene oxide which still contained some oxygen functional groups can stabilize sulfur and enhance interactions with polysulfides. In addition, because of the large void spaces inside the graphene hybrid, the resulting 3D hybrid graphene was capable of accommodating large amounts of sulfur, with an areal sulfur loading reaching 9.8 mg cm−2. And based on this areal sulfur loading, a sulfur content of 83 wt% was achieved, with the 3D hybrid graphene exhibiting good rate capability and cycling performance. Furthermore, the researchers in this study reported that at an increased current density of 3350 mA g−1, the discharge capacity of the 3D hybrid graphene was higher than 538 mAh g−1 and returned to over 800 mAh g−1 at 83.75 mA g−1, comparable to the initial capacity during the rate testing. In addition, at 335 mA g−1, the graphene hybrid sulfur cathode provided an initial capacity of 1000 mAh g−1 and a retention capacity of 645 mAh g−1 after 350 cycles.
3.3 Affinity in Carbon-Based Composites
3.3.1 Carbonaceous Carbon Composites
Carbonaceous carbon composites are the mixtures of two or more types of carbon materials that can combine the advantages of each component and provide high performances due to synergistic effects [158, 159, 160]. In terms of Li–S batteries, carbonaceous carbon composites can be divided into two sections: conductive frameworks in sulfur cathodes and functional sections [161, 162]. For example, the conductivity of the electrode can have powerful influences on the performance of Li–S batteries. And because of the insulating nature of sulfur and lithium sulfide, the construction of beneficial conductive frameworks in the electrode is essential to provide conductive pathways for electrons and enhance the utilization percentage of sulfur. Therefore, the fabrication of networks with good conductivity is an essential aspect to obtain high-performance Li–S batteries. Unfortunately, although various carbon materials possess high conductivity, such as carbon nanotubes and graphene [47, 80, 161], they lack porosity configurations and possess non-polar surfaces. Here, poor porosity indicates a lack of void spaces to accommodate large amounts of sulfur, limiting the sulfur content of cathodes and decreasing the energy density of Li–S batteries. Additionally, the interactions between non-polar carbon materials and polysulfides are weak, resulting in the inability of carbon substrates to effectively restrain the shuttle effects of polysulfides, leading to poor cycling stability. Therefore, optimal conductive carbon substrates should be combined with functional carbon materials possessing porous structures or functional groups to enhance sulfur loadings and act as trapping sites for polysulfides.
For example, Sun et al.  prepared carbon hybrid cathodes based on mesoporous carbon CMK-3 and CNTs and reported high electrochemical performances. Here, mesoporous carbon can provide void spaces to accommodate sulfur and its porous structure can inhibit the diffusion of polysulfide intermediates. In addition, the aligned CNTs can not only provide conductive networks for the transportation of electrons and ions, but also interconnect the sulfur host based on mesoporous carbons. And as a result of the combination of these two materials, the researchers reported that at an areal sulfur loading of 1 mg cm−2, this laminated carbon hybrid exhibited high electrochemical performances with a discharge capacity of 1226 mAh g−1 and a retention capacity of 919 mAh g−1 after 100 cycles at 167.5 mA g−1. In addition, at an ultrahigh areal sulfur loading of 20 mg cm−2, the capacity maintained at 900 mAh g−1 at 167.5 mA g−1.
Aside from amorphous carbon with porous structures, carbonaceous carbon composites existing as CNTs can also be integrated with graphene, and these graphene/CNT cathode materials can be fabricated through a one-step catalytic approach . For example, Zhao et al.  used FeMgAl-layered double hydroxide (FeMgAl LDO) as both a template and a catalyst and achieved the growth of graphene and SWCNTs in one step. In this study, it was reported that the co-growth of graphene and SWCNTs only occurred at temperatures above 950 °C in the CVD process with FeMgAl LDO as an iron source, and that the acquired graphene/CNT hybrid possessed a high conductivity of 3130 S cm−1 and a surface area of 806.2 m2 g−1. Additionally, at a sulfur content of 60 wt% in the resulting carbon hybrid, the capacity was reported to be 928 mAh g−1 at 1672 mA g−1. And even at 8360 mA g−1, the capacity could still reach 650 mAh g−1 after 100 cycles. Similarly, nitrogen-doped aligned carbon nanotube/graphene hybrids can be synthesized with template methods . For example, Tang et al.  used metal oxide flakes as templates for the growth of graphene and CNTs, which was catalyzed by metal nanoparticles. Here, nitrogen doping was achieved by introducing NH3 as a nitrogen source during the CVD process. And as a result, the researchers reported that the resulting carbon hybrid after the nitrogen doping possessed increased sulfur utilization and exhibited high electrochemical performances with a high initial capacity of 1152 mAh g−1 at 1672 mA g−1. In another example, Zhang et al.  used the pre-prepared graphene oxide as a substrate and catalyzed the growth of CNTs onto it using a cobalt catalyst. In addition to the graphene oxide, these researchers also used urea as a carbon and nitrogen source to prepare CNTs and achieved nitrogen doping in the resulting carbon hybrid (3D GN-CNT). And as a result, the 3D configuration of the 3D GN-CNT matrix allowed for formation of rapid transport channels for electrons and electrolytes, and the heteroatom doping allowed for the effective immobilization of polysulfide intermediates, resulting in a composite with a high initial discharge capacity of 1049.6 mAh g−1 and a residual capacity of 639.1 mAh g−1 after 200 cycles at 167.5 mA g−1 with slow capacity fading rates.
Because of the large amounts of oxygen functional groups in the graphene oxide, it can be considered as a type of functional graphene. Based on this, Chen et al.  used MWCNTs as sulfur hosts and mixed an MWCNT/sulfur composite with the graphene oxide to construct a graphene-based hierarchical carbon hybrid. Here, although the graphene was reduced to graphene sheets during the synthesis process, the researchers can still detect the existence of oxygen because of the existence of residual functional groups. In addition, the configuration of the carbon composite can provide 3D conductive networks, buffering volume changes during electrochemical reaction processes and restraining solvable polysulfides. And as a result, the resulting carbon composite produced a high initial capacity of 1396 mAh g−1 at 334.4 mA g−1, demonstrating increased utilization percentages of sulfur.
Yu et al.  also reported that nitrogen-doped graphene, if used as a component for carbonaceous carbon composites, can not only improve the conductivity of the composites, but also inhibit the shuttle effects of polysulfides. In their study, the researchers constructed a carbon composite possessing a carbon configuration based on interconnected nitrogen-doped graphene/sulfur composites dispersed in a CNT/nanofibrillated cellulose framework. And because of the hierarchical architecture and functional groups in the 3D carbon framework, the transport of electrons and electrolytes was enhanced, accommodating increased sulfur loadings and confining the shuttle effects of polysulfides. And at a sulfur loading of 8.1 mg cm−2, this carbon composite provided an initial capacity of 935.6 mAh g−1 and a retaining capacity of 303.2 mAh g−1 after 1000 cycles at 837.5 mA g−1, demonstrating slowed capacity fading rates. Aside from the nitrogen doping to improve the cycling performances of carbon composites in Li–S batteries, Yuan et al.  reported that the co-doping of heteroatoms such as boron and nitrogen can also have positive influences on sulfur cathode materials. In their study, graphene-based materials were functionalized with a nitrogen and boron co-doped carbon layer and produced enhanced performances. Here, negative nitrogen atoms and positive boron atoms can separately adsorb lithium ions and polysulfides, effectively enhancing cycling stabilities of carbon-based sulfur cathodes. And because of this, the graphene-based N/B co-doped carbon layer examined in this study exhibited a high discharge capacity and a stable cycling performance at 836 mA g−1.
Another method to construct graphene-based carbonaceous carbon composites is to combine porous carbon materials with a graphene matrix. For example, Zhang et al.  utilized graphene as a substrate that was decorated with graphitic carbon nanocages (Fig. 11b–d), which resulted in a graphene-based composite that possessed a high specific surface area of 1210 m2 g−1 with an average pore size of 3 nm. And because of the architecture of this graphene composite, corresponding electrochemical nanoreactors in Li–S batteries can demonstrate improved cycling performances and rate capabilities for sulfur cathodes. In this study, a tested sulfur cathode based on the resulting graphene composite provided an initial capacity of 900 mAh g−1 with a high retaining capacity of 706 mAh g−1 after 1000 cycles at a current density of 1675 mA g−1. In addition, Wu et al.  used zinc nanoparticles as templates to synthesize 2D “bubble-like” interconnected carbon fabrics (ICFs) that were encapsulated by the reduced graphene oxide after a hydrothermal process (Fig. 11e). Here, the reduced graphene oxide acted as a backbone for the composite and binder-free sulfur cathodes can be fabricated. And as a result, the resulting composite exhibited high cycling performances with an initial capacity of 1149 mAh g−1 and a retaining capacity of 892.3 mAh g−1 after 200 cycles.
3.3.2 Inorganic Carbon-Based Composites
Inorganic materials, such as metal oxides [175, 176], metal sulfides , metal carbides  and other polar inorganic substances [179, 180] that possess stronger affinities for polysulfides and provide adsorption sites in comparison with non-polar carbon matrixes, have been widely applied to Li–S batteries and have been demonstrated to effectively improve electrochemical performances and cycling stabilities of Li–S batteries [181, 182]. Moreover, the combinations of inorganic substances with carbon matrices can also promote electron transport, further improving the cycling performances of Li–S batteries .
Titanium oxide materials belong to another type of metal oxides that are widely utilized in Li–S batteries . For example, Zhou et al.  reported that TiO2 nanowire/graphene composites can be used as high-performance cathode materials in Li–S batteries, and according to their design strategy, graphene was chosen as a highly conductive building block and TiO2 can act as the functional section, possessing strong chemical adsorptions with polysulfide intermediates. And as a result, the resulting sulfur cathode in this study demonstrated a high cycling stability, with a residual capacity of 1053 mAh g−1 after 200 cycles at 335 mA g−1. To further enhance the electrochemical performance of titanium oxides in Li–S batteries, TiO@carbon hollow nanospheres can also be utilized as sulfur hosts (Fig. 12c–e) . This is because TiO possesses high densities of oxygen and titanium vacancies, demonstrating theoretically higher electrical conductivities and stronger interactions with lithium polysulfides than TiO2. Therefore, TiO carbon composites can effectively restrain polysulfides and exhibit high electrochemical performances (Fig. 12f).
Metal carbides and metal nitrides can also deliver high conductivities and acceptable adsorption properties for polysulfides [178, 183, 203]. And as a typical type of metal carbides, MXene phases which combine the advantages of high conductivity and abundant chemical trapping sites for lithium polysulfides can be utilized as sulfur hosts in Li–S batteries . For example, Liang et al.  synthesized MXene nanosheets, including Ti2C, Ti3C2 and Ti3CN, that were interconnected with CNTs which demonstrated high cycling performances. Here, the researchers suggested that the existence of CNTs in the composite can both fabricate the conductive networks of the sulfur cathode and guarantee the stability of the architecture, inhibiting the restacking of MXene nanosheets. The researchers also suggested that the high interactions between the MXene nanosheets of Ti2C, Ti3C2 or Ti3CN and lithium polysulfides were the result of a two-step process involving the formation of thiosulfate and the Lewis acid–base interaction of Ti–S bonds. And as a result, the MXene nanosheet/CNT composites exhibited high cycling performances with a retaining capacity of ~ 450 mAh g−1 at 837.5 mA g−1 after 1200 cycles. In terms of metal nitrides, Sun et al.  prepared a cathode for the Li–S battery based on a porous vanadium nitride/graphene composite that contained Li2S6 catholyte (Fig. 14b). And as a type of highly conductive metal nitrides, vanadium nitride, with a conductivity of 1.17 × 106 S cm−1 at room temperature, can combine the unique properties of strong chemical interactions with polysulfides and the catalytic functions of redox reaction kinetics, resulting in the vanadium nitride/graphene composite exhibiting a high discharge capacity of 1128 mAh g−1 at 1675 mA g−1 and a high cycling performance with a retaining capacity of 917 mAh g−1 after 200 cycles.
4 Carbon-Based Materials for Lithium Metal Anodes
Rapid developments have been made in recent years for sulfur cathodes, promoting the commercialization of Li–S batteries. In particular, lithium metal anodes, the primary cause limiting the widespread commercial application of Li–S batteries, have attracted increasing attention in an attempt to better understand lithium metal chemistry and pursue better performing metallic lithium anodes . Deficiencies that hinder the practical application of lithium metal anodes include the uncontrollable growth of lithium dendrites and the cracking of SEI layers on the anode, leading to serious safety concerns and decreased lithium metal battery Coulombic efficiencies and cycling life spans. Therefore, to improve lithium metal anode performances, the interface between lithium and electrolytes must be stabilized and the lithium stripping/plating process must be optimized to suppress the formation of lithium dendrites and promote the uniform distribution of lithium during cycling.
Currently, several promising protective methods to stabilize lithium metal anodes have been explored, such as the stabilization of interfaces , the construction of lithium hosts  and the fabrication of nucleation sites . For example, stable SEI layers must satisfy the requirement of mechanical strength to restrain the growth of lithium dendrites, taking advantage of the mechanical properties of the material. Another factor in the preparation of high-performance lithium metal anodes is the homogeneous deposition of lithium onto anodes to suppress dendrite growth during cycling. This factor includes several effective methods such as the construction of lithium hosts with high specific surface areas to decrease local current densities and the enhancement of the affinity between lithium and substrates to lower nucleation barriers. Among all these strategies, carbon-based materials have exhibited multifunctionality and their application in the protection of lithium metal anodes will be discussed.
4.1 Stabilization of SEI Layers
The formation of SEI layers on the surface of lithium anodes can prevent the unwanted side reactions between lithium metal and electrolytes during the electrochemical reaction process. However, SEI layers are generally brittle and prone to cracking during cycling . This cracking of the SEI layer can result in the growth of lithium dendrites and the constant consumption of electrolytes. As a result, this phenomenon leads to low Coulombic efficiencies and rapid capacity losses . Therefore, the SEI layer must be stabilized to suppress the growth of lithium dendrites and prevent the consumption of electrolytes, ensuring high-performance batteries.
Aside from amorphous carbon layers, Yan et al.  in their study reported that graphene can also be utilized as modified layers for copper substrates and that similar to amorphous carbon, graphene is also chemically stable and possesses a high mechanical strength with a Young’s modulus approaching 1.0 TPa. In addition, the pore diameter of the graphene hexagonal ring is too small to allow electrolytes or lithium metals to diffuse through, but the point and line defects in the plane of the graphene can allow for the penetration of lithium ions which can be sealed by SEI layers to prevent the infiltration of electrolytes. And because of this, lithium deposits smoothly between graphene and the current collector and a stable SEI layer can be generated on the top of the graphene. Based on this, graphene/copper anodes can provide a high Coulombic efficiency of 93% after 50 cycles at a current density of 1.0 mA cm−2. Kim et al.  also reported that the controllable growth of lithium can be achieved by combining the advantages of multilayered graphene-modified lithium foil with electrolyte additives. Here, the researchers suggest that multilayered graphene can inhibit direct contact between SEI layers and lithium metal to improve the Coulombic efficiency of the battery, and that the addition of Cs ions can enhance the diffusion of lithium ions and suppress the growth of lithium dendrites. And as a result, multilayered graphene with Cs ion additives displays synergistic effects and improved cycling stabilities.
4.2 Carbon-Based Lithium Hosts
Carbon materials possess high specific surface areas and electrical conductivities that can decrease local current densities and reduce the possibility of dendrite formation [37, 209]. Based on this, Mukherjee et al.  synthesized a porous graphene network using a thermal shock process with graphene oxide paper and reported that, the defect sites in the graphene can act as seed points and that lithium tends to deposit near divacancies forming high lithium content intercalated states. And because of the increased density of defects, significant improvements in lithium capacity of the porous graphene network were observed. In addition, the lithium metal was found to be encapsulated in the pores of the porous graphene architecture and the growth of lithium dendrites was effectively suppressed.
Lin et al.  also synthesized sparked rGO films and infiltrated molten lithium into them (Fig. 16b) to obtain anodes with good electrochemical performances. In this study, after the spark reaction between GO films and molten lithium, the GO films were reduced to rGO films, generating uniform nanogaps that can accommodate the deposition of lithium simultaneously. Here, the synergetic effects between the lithiophilicity of rGO and the capillary forces of the nanogaps facilitated the uniform distribution and deposition of lithium. In addition, the rGO films were reported to be able to accommodate volume changes during lithium stripping/plating and can play an important role in the formation of a stable artificial interface to stabilize the SEI layer. And as a result, the resulting anode exhibited good electrochemical performances with a capacity of ~ 3390 mAh g−1 and a high cycling stability at 3 mA cm−2 (Fig. 16c).
4.3 Lithiophilicity of Carbon-Based Composites
The strength of the affinity between lithium and substrates can lower nucleation barriers and achieve the uniform distribution and deposition of lithium . Therefore, to enhance the lithiophilicity of carbon fiber networks, Liang et al.  modified carbon fibers with silicon shells using CVD methods to synthesize a lithium composite with high gravimetric capacity and high cycling stability. The researchers here reported that compared with naked carbon frameworks, their silicon-decorated carbon framework displayed good wettability to molten lithium, allowing lithium to be uniformly deposited onto the surface of carbon fiber networks, with the 3D conductive pathways guaranteeing the rapid transport of electrons. And as a result, the resulting lithium composite exhibited a high gravimetric capacity of 2000 mAh g−1 and a high cycling stability with a low lithium plating/stripping overpotential of less than 90 mV at 3 mA cm−2 after 80 cycles. In addition, Yang et al.  reported that carbon nanofibers decorated with ultrafine silver nanoparticles acting as nucleation sites of lithium metal can facilitate the uniform deposition of lithium onto the surface of 3D architectures as well. The researchers here reported that such modified 3D carbon networks can effectively prevent the growth of lithium dendrites and generate smooth lithium deposition layers on the anode with a low lithium plating/stripping overpotential of ~ 25 mV at 0.5 mA cm−2.
In addition, nitrogen-doped graphene is also a lithiophilic material with dispersed lithiophilic functional groups that can facilitate the nucleation of lithium and prevent the growth of dendrites . And according to calculations, pyrrolic-N nitrogen and pyridinic-N possess large binding energies with lithium, suggesting that not only are these nitrogen groups lithiophilic, they are also electrochemically stable and will not react with lithium atoms. The interactions between quaternary nitrogen and lithium atoms are weak however, because quaternary nitrogen cannot provide extra lone-pair electrons to adsorb lithium. Based on these findings, nitrogen-doped graphene can suppress dendrite growth and exhibit long-term cycling stability and high Coulombic efficiency, achieving a Coulombic efficiency of 98% and remaining stable near 200 cycles at a current density of 1.0 mA cm−2.
5 Conclusion and Outlook
This review has summarized the recent advancements of carbon-based materials in Li–S batteries and focused on the electrochemical performance, cycling stability, Coulombic efficiency and safety concerns of electrodes. Specifically, several rational design factors for carbon-based sulfur cathodes were systematically discussed, including porosity and conductivity of carbon-based frameworks, polarity with functional groups and the affinity in carbon-based composites. In addition, efficient protective strategies for carbon-based lithium metal anodes were also discussed, such as stabilization of SEI layers, carbon-based lithium hosts and lithiophilicity of carbon-based composites. In terms of sulfur cathodes, the creative studies discussed in this review provide significant design concepts and attempts to solve related problems such as the poor conductivity of sulfur and lithium sulfide, the volume changes of the cathode and the shuttle effects of polysulfides. In general, the conductive characteristics of carbon-based materials are beneficial to overcome the insulating nature of sulfur and lithium sulfide; and rational cathode nanostructures should possess void spaces to encapsulate active materials and accommodate sulfur volume changes, and possess strong interactions with polysulfide intermediates. Therefore, sulfur cathodes must possess high surface areas, hierarchical porous structures and chemical adsorption sites for lithium polysulfides. In terms of the configuration of lithium metal anodes, studies have demonstrated that carbon-based materials with high specific surface areas, mechanical intensity and lithiophilicity can facilitate the formation of stable SEI layers and suppress dendrite growth. And based on these reasonable design factors to stabilize lithium metal anodes, resulting lithium metal anodes can achieve high Coulombic efficiencies and long cycling stabilities. Moreover, because of the complexity of the solid–liquid–solid transition process during the charge and discharge process in Li–S batteries, it is essential to comprehensively understand the mechanisms of the electrochemical reactions of Li–S batteries and the mechanism details need to be extensively explored.
Although the development of Li–S batteries has made certain progress recently, a significant progress is still required to fulfill the demands of practical application. Currently, increasing amounts of reported studies have paid more attention to the enhancement of sulfur loadings in Li–S batteries to achieve higher energy densities, but the large excess of electrolytes decreases energy densities in Li–S batteries, making it difficult for Li–S batteries to become competitive with state-of-the-art LIBs . Therefore, to promote the commercialization of Li–S batteries, several reference standards must be met, including a sulfur content of > 75 wt%, a sulfur utilization percentage of > 70%, an areal sulfur loading of > 5 mg cm−2, a ratio of electrolyte to sulfur of < 3 and a lithium excess of < 100% . However, the high sulfur content and high areal sulfur loading requirements of high-energy density Li–S batteries will lead to the serious destruction of lithium metal anodes at high current densities, resulting in Li–S battery failures and safety issues. Moreover, because of the high electrochemical reactivity of lithium metal, electrolytes are consumed continuously during cycling. Because of these factors, several effective protection methods must also be put in place to enhance Coulombic efficiencies, stabilize lithium metal anodes and overcome safety issues. This is because if safety issues of lithium metal anodes cannot be properly addressed, Li–S batteries cannot achieve commercialization.
In conclusion, the utilization of carbon-based materials with high conductivity, high specific surface area and controllable functionality both in the sulfur cathode and in the lithium anode can provide effective methods to solve interrelated problems of electrodes in Li–S batteries. And although the commercialization of Li–S batteries is still far off, the emergence of great quantities of outstanding studies has broadened the horizons of researchers. Therefore, to further promote the commercialization of Li–S batteries, continued intensive efforts need to be devoted to the understanding and resolution of scientific and technological problems in Li–S batteries, with the rational design of advanced electrodes being able to significantly enhance the electrochemical performance of Li–S batteries and fulfill the ultimate goal of commercialization.
We acknowledge the financial support from the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFA0200102, 2017YFA0206301) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51631001, 51590882, 51672010, 81421004).
- 1.Liu, W., Oh, P., Liu, X., et al.: Nickel-rich layered lithium transition-metal oxide for high-energy lithium-ion batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 4440–4457 (2015)Google Scholar
- 2.Eshetu, G.G., Armand, M., Scrosati, B., et al.: Energy storage materials synthesized from ionic liquids. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 13342–13359 (2014)Google Scholar
- 4.Kundu, D., Talaie, E., Duffort, V., et al.: The emerging chemistry of sodium ion batteries for electrochemical energy storage. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 3431–3448 (2015)Google Scholar
- 5.Yan, B., Li, X., Bai, Z., et al.: A review of atomic layer deposition providing high performance lithium sulfur batteries. J. Power Sources 338, 34–48 (2017)Google Scholar
- 6.Fang, R., Zhao, S., Sun, Z., et al.: More reliable lithium-sulfur batteries: status, solutions and prospects. Adv. Mater. 29, 1606823 (2017)Google Scholar
- 8.Mahmood, N., Hou, Y.: Electrode nanostructures in lithium-based batteries. Adv. Sci. 1, 1400012 (2014)Google Scholar
- 10.Bruce, P.G., Freunberger, S.A., Hardwick, L.J., et al.: Li–O2 and Li–S batteries with high energy storage. Nat. Mater. 11, 19–29 (2012)Google Scholar
- 11.Wang, D.W., Zeng, Q., Zhou, G., et al.: Carbon-sulfur composites for Li–S batteries: status and prospects. J. Mater. Chem. A 1, 9382–9394 (2013)Google Scholar
- 13.Hagen, M., Hanselmann, D., Ahlbrecht, K., et al.: Lithium-sulfur cells: the gap between the state-of-the-art and the requirements for high energy battery cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1401986 (2015)Google Scholar
- 14.Pope, M.A., Aksay, I.A.: Structural design of cathodes for Li–S batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1500124 (2015)Google Scholar
- 18.Rosenman, A., Markevich, E., Salitra, G., et al.: Review on Li–sulfur battery systems: an integral perspective. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1500212 (2015)Google Scholar
- 19.Zhang, S., Ueno, K., Dokko, K., et al.: Recent advances in electrolytes for lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1500117 (2015)Google Scholar
- 21.Huang, J.Q., Zhang, Q., Wei, F.: Multi-functional separator/interlayer system for high-stable lithium-sulfur batteries: progress and prospects. Energy Storage Mater. 1, 127–145 (2015)Google Scholar
- 23.Choi, N.S., Chen, Z., Freunberger, S.A., et al.: Challenges facing lithium batteries and electrical double-layer capacitors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 9994–10024 (2012)Google Scholar
- 27.Ji, X., Nazar, L.F.: Advances in Li–S batteries. J. Mater. Chem. 20, 9821–9826 (2010)Google Scholar
- 28.Xu, W., Wang, J., Ding, F., et al.: Lithium metal anodes for rechargeable batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 513–537 (2014)Google Scholar
- 29.Zhang, R., Li, N.W., Cheng, X.B., et al.: Advanced micro/nanostructures for lithium metal anodes. Adv. Sci. 4, 1600445 (2017)Google Scholar
- 30.Cheng, X.B., Zhang, Q.: Dendrite-free lithium metal anodes: stable solid electrolyte interphases for high-efficiency batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 7207–7209 (2015)Google Scholar
- 31.Rehman, S., Khan, K., Zhao, Y., et al.: Nanostructured cathode materials for lithium-sulfur batteries: progress, challenges and perspectives. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 3014–3038 (2017)Google Scholar
- 33.Wang, D., Zhang, W., Zheng, W., et al.: Towards high-safe lithium metal anodes: suppressing lithium dendrites via tuning surface energy. Adv. Sci. 4, 1600168 (2017)Google Scholar
- 36.Brandt, K.: Historical development of secondary lithium batteries. Solid State Ionics 69, 173–183 (1994)Google Scholar
- 37.Zhang, C., Huang, Z., Lv, W., et al.: Carbon enables the practical use of lithium metal in a battery. Carbon 123, 744–755 (2017)Google Scholar
- 38.Bai, P., Li, J., Brushett, F.R., et al.: Transition of lithium growth mechanisms in liquid electrolytes. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 3221–3229 (2016)Google Scholar
- 41.Lv, W., Li, Z., Deng, Y., et al.: Graphene-based materials for electrochemical energy storage devices: Opportunities and challenges. Energy Storage Mater. 2, 107–138 (2016)Google Scholar
- 42.Zhang, A., Fang, X., Shen, C., et al.: A carbon nanofiber network for stable lithium metal anodes with high Coulombic efficiency and long cycle life. Nano Res. 9, 3428–3436 (2016)Google Scholar
- 45.Datta, D., Li, J., Koratker, N., et al.: Enhanced lithiation in defective graphene. Carbon 80, 305–310 (2014)Google Scholar
- 46.Lin, D., Liu, Y., Liang, Z., et al.: Layered reduced graphene oxide with nanoscale interlayer gaps as a stable host for lithium metal anodes. Nat. Nanotechol. 11, 626–632 (2016)Google Scholar
- 48.Liang, J., Sun, Z.H., Li, F., et al.: Carbon materials for Li–S batteries: functional evolution and performance improvement. Energy Storage Mater. 2, 76–106 (2016)Google Scholar
- 49.Yin, Y.X., Xin, S., Guo, Y.G., et al.: Lithium-sulfur batteries: electrochemistry, materials, and prospects. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 13186–13200 (2013)Google Scholar
- 52.Shim, J., Striebel, K.A., Cairns, E.J.: The lithium/sulfur rechargeable cell—effects of electrode composition and solvent on cell performance. J. Electrochem. Soc. 149, A1321–A1325 (2002)Google Scholar
- 53.Gao, J., Lowe, M.A., Kiya, Y., et al.: Effects of liquid electrolytes on the charge-discharge performance of rechargeable lithium/sulfur batteries: electrochemical and in-situ X-ray absorption spectroscopic studies. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 25132–25137 (2011)Google Scholar
- 54.Yim, T., Park, M.S., Yu, J.S., et al.: Effect of chemical reactivity of polysulfide toward carbonate-based electrolyte on the electrochemical performance of Li–S batteries. Electrochim. Acta 107, 454–460 (2013)Google Scholar
- 56.Zeng, L., Zeng, W., Jiang, Y., et al.: A Flexible porous carbon nanofibers-selenium cathode with superior electrochemical performance for both Li–Se and Na–Se batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1401377 (2015)Google Scholar
- 57.Hu, L., Lu, Y., Li, X., et al.: Optimization of microporous carbon structures for lithium-sulfur battery applications in carbonate-based electrolyte. Small 13, 1603533 (2017)Google Scholar
- 58.Li, X., Liang, J., Zhang, K., et al.: Amorphous S-rich S1-xSex/C (x <= 0.1) composites promise better lithium-sulfur batteries in a carbonate-based electrolyte. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 3181–3186 (2015)Google Scholar
- 59.Zeng, L., Yao, Y., Shi, J., et al.: A flexible S1-xSex@ porous carbon nanofibers (x ≤ 0.1) thin film with high performance for Li–S batteries and room- temperature Na-S batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 5, 50–57 (2016)Google Scholar
- 61.Choi, Y.J., Kim, K.W., Ahn, H.J., et al.: Improvement of cycle property of sulfur electrode for lithium/sulfur battery. J. Alloys Compd. 449, 313–316 (2008)Google Scholar
- 63.Zhang, S.S.: Liquid electrolyte lithium/sulfur battery: fundamental chemistry, problems, and solutions. J. Power Sources 231, 153–162 (2013)Google Scholar
- 65.Yamin, H., Gorenshtein, A., Penciner, J., et al.: Lithium sulfur battery—oxidation reduction-mechanisms of polysulfides in THF solutions. J. Electrochem. Soc. 135(5), 1045–1048 (1988)Google Scholar
- 67.Lopez, C.M., Vaughey, J.T., Dees, D.W.: Morphological transitions on lithium metal anodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 156, A726–A729 (2009)Google Scholar
- 68.Lv, D., Shao, Y., Lozano, T., et al.: Failure mechanism for fast-charged lithium metal batteries with liquid electrolytes. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1400993 (2015)Google Scholar
- 69.Zuo, T.T., Wu, X.W., Yang, C.P., et al.: Graphitized carbon fibers as multifunctional 3D current collectors for high areal capacity Li anodes. Adv. Mater. 29, 1700389 (2017)Google Scholar
- 70.Xu, K.: Nonaqueous liquid electrolytes for lithium-based rechargeable batteries. Chem. Rev. 104, 4303–4417 (2004)Google Scholar
- 72.Yin, H., Zhang, C., Liu, F., et al.: Hybrid of iron nitride and nitrogen-doped graphene aerogel as synergistic catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 2930–2937 (2014)Google Scholar
- 73.Mahmood, N., Tang, T., Hou, Y.: Nanostructured anode materials for lithium ion batteries: progress, challenge and perspective. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1600374 (2016)Google Scholar
- 75.Kobayashi, T., Bando, M., Kimura, N., et al.: Production of a 100-m-long high-quality graphene transparent conductive film by roll-to-roll chemical vapor deposition and transfer process. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 023112 (2013)Google Scholar
- 81.Jayaprakash, N., Shen, J., Moganty, S.S., et al.: Porous hollow carbon@sulfur composites for high-power lithium-sulfur batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 5904–5908 (2011)Google Scholar
- 82.Schuster, J., He, G., Mandlmeier, B., et al.: Spherical ordered mesoporous carbon nanoparticles with high porosity for lithium-sulfur batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 3591–3595 (2012)Google Scholar
- 85.Zhang, B., Qin, X., Li, G.R., et al.: Enhancement of long stability of sulfur cathode by encapsulating sulfur into micropores of carbon spheres. Energy Environ. Sci. 3, 1531–1537 (2010)Google Scholar
- 86.Zheng, Z., Guo, H., Pei, F., et al.: High sulfur loading in hierarchical porous carbon rods constructed by vertically oriented porous graphene-like nanosheets for Li–S batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 8952–8959 (2016)Google Scholar
- 87.Lyu, Z., Xu, D., Yang, L., et al.: Hierarchical carbon nanocages confining high-loading sulfur for high-rate lithium-sulfur batteries. Nano Energy 12, 657–665 (2015)Google Scholar
- 92.Cheng, X.B., Huang, J.Q., Zhang, Q., et al.: Aligned carbon nanotube/sulfur composite cathodes with high sulfur content for lithium-sulfur batteries. Nano Energy 4, 65–72 (2014)Google Scholar
- 94.Zhang, S.M., Zhang, Q., Huang, J.Q., et al.: Composite cathodes containing SWCNT@S coaxial nanocables: facile synthesis, surface modification, and enhanced performance for Li-ion storage. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 30(2), 158–165 (2013)Google Scholar
- 95.Wang, C., Wan, W., Chen, J.T., et al.: Dual core-shell structured sulfur cathode composite synthesized by a one-pot route for lithium sulfur batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 1, 1716–1723 (2013)Google Scholar
- 96.Fang, R., Li, G., Zhao, S., et al.: Single-wall carbon nanotube network enabled ultrahigh sulfur-content electrodes for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Nano Energy 42, 205–214 (2017)Google Scholar
- 97.Li, Q., Mahmood, N., Zhu, J., et al.: Graphene and its composites with nanoparticles for electrochemical energy applications. Nano Today 9, 668–683 (2014)Google Scholar
- 101.Tang, C., Li, B.Q., Zhang, Q., et al.: CaO-templated growth of hierarchical porous graphene for high-power lithium-sulfur battery applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 577–585 (2016)Google Scholar
- 103.Ding, Y.L., Kopold, P., Hahn, K., et al.: Facile solid-state growth of 3D well-interconnected nitrogen-rich carbon nanotube-graphene hybrid architectures for lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 1112–1119 (2016)Google Scholar
- 104.Yuan, Z., Peng, H.J., Huang, J.Q., et al.: Hierarchical free-standing carbon-nanotube paper electrodes with ultrahigh sulfur-loading for lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 6105–6112 (2014)Google Scholar
- 106.Peng, H.J., Xu, W.T., Zhu, L., et al.: 3D carbonaceous current collectors: the origin of enhanced cycling stability for high-sulfur-loading lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 6351–6358 (2016)Google Scholar
- 108.Zhou, G., Li, L., Ma, C., et al.: A graphene foam electrode with high sulfur loading for flexible and high energy Li–S batteries. Nano Energy 11, 356–365 (2015)Google Scholar
- 109.Seh, Z.W., Zhang, Q., Li, W., et al.: Stable cycling of lithium sulfide cathodes through strong affinity with a bifunctional binder. Chem. Sci. 4, 3673–3677 (2013)Google Scholar
- 112.Xu, J., Lawson, T., Fan, H.et al.: Updated metal compounds (MOFs, -S, -OH, -N, -C) used as cathode materials for lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Energy Mater., 1702607 (2018)Google Scholar
- 113.Song, J., Xu, T., Gordin, M.L., et al.: Nitrogen- doped mesoporous carbon promoted chemical adsorption of sulfur and fabrication of high- areal- capacity sulfur cathode with exceptional cycling stability for lithium- sulfur batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 1243–1250 (2014)Google Scholar
- 114.Hou, T.Z., Xu, W.T., Chen, X., et al.: Lithium bond chemistry in lithium-sulfur batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 8178–8182 (2017)Google Scholar
- 119.Chen, S., Sun, B., Xie, X., et al.: Multi-chambered micro/mesoporous carbon nanocubes as new polysulfides reservoirs for lithium-sulfur batteries with long cycle life. Nano Energy 16, 268–280 (2015)Google Scholar
- 120.Mao, J., Yang, L., Yu, P., et al.: Electrocatalytic four-electron reduction of oxygen with Copper (II)-based metal-organic frameworks. Electrochem. Commun. 19, 29–31 (2012)Google Scholar
- 121.Tang, H., Yin, H., Wang, J., et al.: Molecular architecture of cobalt porphyrin multilayers on reduced graphene oxide sheets for high-performance oxygen reduction reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 5585–5589 (2013)Google Scholar
- 124.Cao, X., Zheng, B., Rui, X., et al.: Metal oxide-coated three-dimensional graphene prepared by the use of metal-organic frameworks as precursors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 1404–1409 (2014)Google Scholar
- 125.Xu, G., Ding, B., Shen, L., et al.: Sulfur embedded in metal organic framework-derived hierarchically porous carbon nanoplates for high performance lithium-sulfur battery. J. Mater. Chem. A 1, 4490–4496 (2013)Google Scholar
- 126.Xia, W., Mahmood, A., Zou, R., et al.: Metal-organic frameworks and their derived nanostructures for electrochemical energy storage and conversion. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 1837–1866 (2015)Google Scholar
- 127.Hao, G.P., Tang, C., Zhang, E., et al.: Thermal exfoliation of layered metal-organic frameworks into ultrahydrophilic graphene stacks and their applications in Li–S batteries. Adv. Mater. 29, 1702829 (2017)Google Scholar
- 128.Hu, C., Kirk, C., Cai, Q., et al.: A high-volumetric-capacity cathode based on interconnected close-packed N-doped porous carbon nanospheres for long-life lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1701082 (2017)Google Scholar
- 129.Lv, D., Zheng, J., Li, Q., et al.: High energy density lithium-sulfur batteries: challenges of thick sulfur cathodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1402290 (2015)Google Scholar
- 130.Peng, H.J., Hou, T.Z., Zhang, Q., et al.: Strongly coupled interfaces between a heterogeneous carbon host and a sulfur-containing guest for highly stable lithium-sulfur batteries: mechanistic insight into capacity degradation. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 1, 1400227 (2014)Google Scholar
- 133.Xu, Z.L., Huang, J.Q., Chong, W.G., et al.: In situ TEM study of volume expansion in porous carbon nanofiber/sulfur cathodes with exceptional high-rate performance. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1602078 (2017)Google Scholar
- 140.Chen, C.Y., Peng, H.J., Hou, T.Z., et al.: A quinonoid-imine-enriched nanostructured polymer mediator for lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Mater. 29, 1606802 (2017)Google Scholar
- 141.Sheng, Z.H., Gao, H.L., Bao, W.J., et al.: Synthesis of boron doped graphene for oxygen reduction reaction in fuel cells. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 390–395 (2012)Google Scholar
- 142.Zheng, Y., Jiao, Y., Ge, L., et al.: Two-step boron and nitrogen doping in graphene for enhanced synergistic catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 3110–3116 (2013)Google Scholar
- 147.Gu, X., Tong, C.J., Lai, C., et al.: A porous nitrogen and phosphorous dual doped graphene blocking layer for high performance Li–S batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 16670–16678 (2015)Google Scholar
- 148.Xu, J., Su, D., Zhang, W., et al.: A nitrogen-sulfur co-doped porous graphene matrix as a sulfur immobilizer for high performance lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 17381–17393 (2016)Google Scholar
- 149.Yun, Y.S., Le, V.D., Kim, H., et al.: Effects of sulfur doping on graphene-based nanosheets for use as anode materials in lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 262, 79–85 (2014)Google Scholar
- 150.Hou, T.Z., Peng, H.J., Huang, J.Q., et al.: The formation of strong-couple interactions between nitrogen-doped graphene and sulfur/lithium (poly)sulfides in lithium-sulfur batteries. 2D Mater. 2, 014011 (2015)Google Scholar
- 153.Yao, Y., Zeng, L., Hu, S., et al.: Binding S0.6Se0.4 in 1D carbon nanofiber with C–S bonding for high-performance flexible Li–S batteries and Na–S batteries. Small 13, 1603513 (2017)Google Scholar
- 154.Ma, J., Wang, J., He, Y.S., et al.: A solvothermal strategy: one-step in situ synthesis of self-assembled 3D graphene-based composites with enhanced lithium storage capacity. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 9200–9207 (2014)Google Scholar
- 155.Ma, J., He, Y.S., Zhang, W., et al.: An experimental insight into the advantages of in situ solvothermal route to construct 3D graphene-based anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Nano Energy 16, 235–246 (2015)Google Scholar
- 156.Wang, C., Su, K., Wan, W., et al.: High sulfur loading composite wrapped by 3D nitrogen-doped graphene as a cathode material for lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 5018–5023 (2014)Google Scholar
- 158.Wang, G., Kuang, S., Zhang, J., et al.: Graphitic carbon nitride/multiwalled carbon nanotubes composite as Pt-free counter electrode for high-efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells. Electrochim. Acta 187, 243–248 (2016)Google Scholar
- 159.Ma, T.Y., Dai, S., Jaroniec, M., et al.: Graphitic carbon nitride nanosheet-carbon nanotube three-dimensional porous composites as high-performance oxygen evolution electrocatalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 7281–7285 (2014)Google Scholar
- 162.Fan, Y., Yang, Z., Hua, W., et al.: Functionalized boron nitride nanosheets/graphene interlayer for fast and long-life lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1602380 (2017)Google Scholar
- 163.Sun, Q., Fang, X., Weng, W., et al.: An aligned and laminated nanostructured carbon hybrid cathode for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 10539–10544 (2015)Google Scholar
- 164.Song, J., Gordin, M.L., Xu, T., et al.: Strong lithium polysulfide chemisorption on electroactive sites of nitrogen-doped carbon composites for high-performance lithium-sulfur battery cathodes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 4325–4329 (2015)Google Scholar
- 165.Pan, H., Cheng, Z., Xiao, Z., et al.: The fusion of imidazolium-based ionic polymer and carbon nanotubes: one type of new heteroatom-doped carbon precursors for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 1703936 (2017)Google Scholar
- 169.Zhang, Z., Kong, L.L., Liu, S., et al.: A high-efficiency sulfur/carbon composite based on 3D graphene Nanosheet@Carbon nanotube matrix as cathode for lithium-sulfur battery. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1602543 (2017)Google Scholar
- 171.Yu, M., Ma, J., Xie, M., et al.: Freestanding and sandwich-structured electrode material with high areal mass loading for long-life lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1602347 (2017)Google Scholar
- 172.Yuan, S., Bao, J.L., Wang, L., et al.: Graphene-supported nitrogen and boron rich carbon layer for improved performance of lithium-sulfur batteries due to enhanced chemisorption of lithium polysulfides. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1501733 (2016)Google Scholar
- 177.Pang, Q., Kundu, D., Nazar, L.F.: A graphene-like metallic cathode host for long-life and high-loading lithium-sulfur batteries. Mater. Horiz. 3, 130–136 (2016)Google Scholar
- 178.Fang, R., Zhao, S., Sun, Z., et al.: Polysulfide immobilization and conversion on a conductive polar MoC@MoOx material for lithium-sulfur batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 10, 56–61 (2018)Google Scholar
- 179.Mosavati, N., Salley, S.O., Ng, K.Y.S.: Characterization and electrochemical activities of nanostructured transition metal nitrides as cathode materials for lithium sulfur batteries. J. Power Sources 340, 210–216 (2017)Google Scholar
- 180.Li, X., Ding, K., Gao, B., et al.: Freestanding carbon encapsulated mesoporous vanadium nitride nanowires enable highly stable sulfur cathodes for lithium-sulfur batteries. Nano Energy 40, 655–662 (2017)Google Scholar
- 181.Ye, C., Zhang, L., Guo, C., et al.: A 3D hybrid of chemically coupled nickel sulfide and hollow carbon spheres for high performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 1702524 (2017)Google Scholar
- 182.Liu, X., Huang, J.Q., Zhang, Q., et al.: Nanostructured metal oxides and sulfides for lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Mater. 29, 1601759 (2017)Google Scholar
- 183.Zhou, T., Zhao, Y., Zhou, G., et al.: An in-plane heterostructure of graphene and titanium carbide for efficient polysulfide confinement. Nano Energy 39, 291–296 (2017)Google Scholar
- 186.Liang, X., Kwok, C.Y., Lodi-Marzano, F., et al.: Tuning transition metal oxide-sulfur interactions for long life lithium sulfur batteries: the “goldilocks” principle. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1501636 (2016)Google Scholar
- 187.Li, Z., Zhang, J., Lou, X.W.: Hollow carbon nanofibers filled with MnO2 nanosheets as efficient sulfur hosts for lithium-sulfur batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 12886–12890 (2015)Google Scholar
- 188.Rehman, S., Tang, T., Ali, Z., et al.: Integrated design of MnO2@Carbon hollow nanoboxes to synergistically encapsulate polysulfides for empowering lithium sulfur batteries. Small 13, 1700087 (2017)Google Scholar
- 189.Zhou, G., Zhao, Y., Zu, C., et al.: Free-standing TiO2 nanowire-embedded graphene hybrid membrane for advanced Li/dissolved polysulfide batteries. Nano Energy 12, 240–249 (2015)Google Scholar
- 192.Zhang, Z., Lai, Y., Zhang, Z., et al.: Al2O3-coated porous separator for enhanced electrochemical performance of lithium sulfur batteries. Electrochim. Acta 129, 55–61 (2014)Google Scholar
- 193.Xiang, M., Wu, H., Liu, H., et al.: A flexible 3D multifunctional MgO-decorated carbon Foam@CNTs hybrid as self-supported cathode for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 1702573 (2017)Google Scholar
- 195.Kim, A.Y., Kim, M.K., Kim, J.Y., et al.: Ordered SnO nanoparticles in MWCNT as a functional host material for high-rate lithium-sulfur battery cathode. Nano Res. 10, 2083–2095 (2017)Google Scholar
- 197.He, J., Luo, L., Chen, Y., et al.: Yolk-shelled C@Fe3O4 nanoboxes as efficient sulfur hosts for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Mater. 29, 1702707 (2017)Google Scholar
- 198.Kong, Y., Luo, J., Jin, C., et al.: Enhanced sulfide chemisorption by conductive Al-doped ZnO decorated carbon nanoflakes for advanced Li–S batteries. Nano Research 11, 477–489 (2018)Google Scholar
- 199.Xiao, D., Lu, C., Chen, C., et al.: CeO2-webbed carbon nanotubes as a highly efficient sulfur host for lithium-sulfur batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 10, 216–222 (2018)Google Scholar
- 204.Liang, X., Garsuch, A., Nazar, L.F.: Sulfur cathodes based on conductive MXene nanosheets for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 3907–3911 (2015)Google Scholar
- 205.Liang, X., Rangom, Y., Kwok, C.Y., et al.: Interwoven MXene nanosheet/carbon-nanotube composites as Li–S cathode hosts. Adv. Mater. 29, 1603040 (2017)Google Scholar
- 207.Guo, Y., Li, H., Zhai, T.: Reviving lithium-metal anodes for next-generation high-energy batteries. Adv. Mater. 29, 1700007 (2017)Google Scholar
- 211.Kim, J.S., Kim, D.W., Jung, H.T., et al.: Controlled lithium dendrite growth by a synergistic effect of multilayered graphene coating and an electrolyte additive. Chem. Mater. 27, 2780–2787 (2015)Google Scholar
- 213.Yang, C., Yao, Y., He, S., et al.: Ultrafine silver nanoparticles for seeded lithium deposition toward stable lithium metal anode. Adv. Mater. 29, 1702714 (2017)Google Scholar
- 214.Zhang, R., Chen, X.R., Chen, X., et al.: Lithiophilic sites in doped graphene guide uniform lithium nucleation for dendrite-free lithium metal anodes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 7764–7768 (2017)Google Scholar
- 215.Peng, H.J., Huang, J.Q., Cheng, X.B., et al.: Review on high-loading and high-energy lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1700260 (2017)Google Scholar