An Overview of the Technological Environmental Hazards over the Last Century

  • George HalkosEmail author
  • Argyro Zisiadou
Original Paper


The purpose of the paper is to present an extended literature review with statistical results on technological environmental hazards relying on data from the last 117 years (1900–2016). More specifically, this paper is a sequel of the authors previous paper which analyzed the natural environmental hazards. Particularly, we hypothesize that the most developed countries will have high economic losses and that the least developed countries will have great fatalities. In this way we examine if fatalities are proved to be significant in the least developed countries and the total economic damages are proved to be significant in the most developed countries. A number of graphical presentations come to strengthen the statistical results by using map visualization techniques.


Environmental hazards risk Disaster Economic impact Damage Fatalities 


D62 H12 I31 Q50 Q55:Q58 



We would like to thank the Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovations (HFRI) for the financial support in the form of a scholarship for the implementation of the doctoral thesis dissertation.


  1. Aoki M, Rothwell G (2013) A comparative institutional analysis of the Fukushima nuclear disaster: lessons and policy implications. Energy Policy 53:240–247. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cox, D., Crossland, B., Darby, S. C., Forman, D., Fox, A. J., Gore, S. M., ... & Neill, N. V. (1992). Estimation of risk from observation on humans. Risk: analysis, perception and management. Report of a Royal Society Study Group, 67–87Google Scholar
  3. Drogaris, G. (1993). Major accident reporting system (lessons learned from accidents notified). EUR (Luxembourg)Google Scholar
  4. EM-DAT (2017), The International Disaster Database, Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disaster – CRED, , Accessed: 5 May 2017
  5. Ferstl R, Utz S, Wimmer M (2012) The effect of the Japan 2011 disaster on nuclear and alternative energy stocks worldwide: an event study. Bus Res 5(1):25–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gardner GT, Gould LC (1989) Public perceptions of the risks and benefits of technology. Risk Anal 9(2):225–242. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Glickman TS, Golding D, Silverman ED (1992) Acts of god and acts of man: recent trends in natural disasters and major industrial accidents. Resources for the Future, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  8. Halkos G, Zisiadou A (2018a) Examining the natural environmental hazards over the last century. Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, pp:1–32. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Halkos G., & Zisiadou A. (2018b). Reporting the natural environmental hazards occurrences and fatalities over the last century. MPRA paper no. 87936, university library of Munich, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  10. Halkos G, Zisiadou A (2018c) Analysing last century’s occurrence and impacts of technological and complex environmental hazards. In: MPRA Paper No 90503. University Library of Munich, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  11. Hasegawa K (2012) Facing nuclear risks: lessons from the Fukushima nuclear disaster. Int J Jpn Sociol 21(1):84–91. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kawashima S, Takeda F (2012) The effect of the Fukushima nuclear accident on stock prices of electric power utilities in Japan. Energy Econ 34(6):2029–2038. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim Y, Kim M, Kim W (2013) Effect of the Fukushima nuclear disaster on global public acceptance of nuclear energy. Energy Policy 61:822–828. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Managi S, Guan D (2017) Multiple disasters management: lessons from the Fukushima triple events. Economic Analysis and Policy 53:114–122. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McDaniels TL, Kamlet MS, Fischer GW (1992) Risk perception and the value of safety. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 13(2):172–173Google Scholar
  16. Shi P, Li N, Ye Q, Dong W, Han G, Fang W (2010a) Research on integrated disaster risk governance in the context of global environmental change. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 1(1):17–23. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shi P, Shuai J, Chen W, Lu L (2010b) Study on large-scale disaster risk assessment and risk transfer models. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 1(2):1–8. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shi P (2012) On the role of government in integrated disaster risk governance—based on practices in China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 3(3):139–146. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Showalter PS, Myers MF (1994) Natural disasters in the United States as release agents of oil, chemicals, or radiological materials between 1980-1989: analysis and recommendations. Risk Anal 14(2):169–182. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Smith, K. (1996). Environmental hazards: assessing risk and reducing disaster. University of Cambridge, London and New York, Routledge. ISBN: 978-0-4151-2203-0Google Scholar
  21. Soby BA, Ball DJ, Ives DP (1993) Safety investment and the value of life and injury. Risk Anal 13(3):365–370. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. UNIDSDR (2009), United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, , Accessed: 3 February 2017
  23. Wada K, Yoshikawa T, Hayashi T, Aizawa Y (2012) Emergency response technical work at Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant: occupational health challenges posed by the nuclear disaster. Occupational Environmental Medicine 69(8):599–602. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Webb GAM, Anderson RW, Gaffney MJS (2006) Classification of events with an off-site radiological impact at the Sellafield site between 1950 and 2000, using the international nuclear event scale. J Radiol Prot 26(1):33–49. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Weisaeth, L. (1994). Psychological and psychiatric aspects of technological disasters. Individual and community responses to trauma and disaster: the structure of human chaos, 72–102, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  26. Yagar, S. (1984). Transport risk assessment. In Symposium on Risk Transport. University of WaterlooGoogle Scholar
  27. Yamamura E (2012) Experience of technological and natural disasters and their impact on the perceived risk of nuclear accidents after the Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan 2011: a cross-country analysis. J Socio-Econ 41(4):360–363. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ye T, Shi P, Liu L, Fan Y, Hu J (2012) China’s drought disaster risk management: perspective of severe droughts in 2009–2010. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 3(2):84–97. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Operations Research, Department of EconomicsUniversity of ThessalyVolosGreece

Personalised recommendations