Public in-Kind Relief and Private Self-Insurance

  • Timo GoeschlEmail author
  • Shunsuke Managi
Original Paper


This paper provides a new angle on the question of crowding effects of public policies. We examine how non-hypothetical self-insurance behavior by households responds to variations in public investments in relief capabilities based on a large disaster preparedness survey (n = 19,071) conducted in Japan in 2012. In our specific setting which looks at emergency drinking water, (i) government provides in-kind, rather than cash, relief and (ii) the crowding effect observed is more apt to be total, rather than partial. In contrast to much of the literature studying crowding effects of cash relief, we find little evidence for crowding out in emergency drinking water, with an upper bound of 2% at the intensive margin. We also identify important benefits of targeting in-kind relief to households with minors.


Crowding-out Disaster preparedness Government relief, natural hazards, in-kind relief 

JEL classification

D78 D81 G22 Q54 



Valuable comments on previous drafts of this paper have been provided by Christian Almer, Richard Butler, Luisa Dressler, Malte Lech, Paul Raschky, and Paul Schaudt as well as conference and seminar audiences at the 2016 EAERE conference, the Workshop on the Geospatial Analysis of Disasters and the CEAR/MRIC Behavorial Insurance Workshop 2016. We are grateful to Hiroki Onuma and Shinya Horie for research assistance. T. Goeschl’s research has been supported by a travel grant from the HeKKSaGOn network. S. Managi’s research has been supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Specially Promoted Research (26000001) by the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science.

Supplementary material

41885_2018_31_MOESM1_ESM.docx (41 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 40 kb)


  1. Asseldonk M, Meuwissen M, Huirne R (2002) Belief in disaster relief and the demand for public-private insurance program. Rev Agric Econ 24(1):196–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Botzen WJW, van den Bergh JC (2012a) Risk attitudes to low-probability climate change risks: WTP for flood insurance. J Econ Behav Organ 82(1):151–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Botzen WJW, van den Bergh JC (2012b) Monetary valuation of insurance against flood risk under climate change. Int Econ Rev 53(3):1005–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Botzen WJW, Aerts JCJH, van den Bergh JC (2009) Willingness of homeowners to mitigate climate risk through insurance. Ecol Econ 68(8):2265–2277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Browne MJ, Hoyt RE (2000) The demand for flood insurance: empirical evidence. J Risk Uncertain 20(3):291–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brunette M, Cabantous L, Couture S, Stenger A (2013) The impact of governmental assistance on insurance demand under ambiguity: a theoretical model and an experimental test. Theor Decis 75(2):153–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buchanan JM (1975) The Samaritan's dilemma. In: Phelps ES (ed) Altruism, morality and economic theory. Russel Sage Foundation, New York, pp 71–85Google Scholar
  8. Cohen C, Werker ED (2008) The political economy of “natural” disasters. J Confl Resolut 52(6):795–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Connolly MA, Gayer M, Ryan MJ, Salama P, Spiegel P, Heymann DL (2004) Communicable diseases in complex emergencies: impact and challenges. Lancet 364(9449):1974–1983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Donahue AK (2010) Household risk perception, preferences, and preparedness survey findings. Retrieved from
  11. Donahue AK, Fitzpatrick C (2010) Household risk perception, preferences, and preparedness. University of Connecticut DIEM: A DHS Center of Excellence, UConn Department of Public Policy Disaster Risk Perception, Preferences, and Preparedness ProjectGoogle Scholar
  12. Donahue AK, Eckel CC, Wilson RK (2013) Ready or not? How citizens and public officials perceive risk and preparedness. Am Rev Public Admin 44(4_suppl):89S–111SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ehrlich I, Becker G (1972) Market insurance, self-protection and self-insurance. J Polit Econ 80:623–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Government of Japan (GoJ) (2012), National progress report on the implementation of the Hyogo framework for action (2011-2013), Cabinet office, Oct 18, 2012Google Scholar
  15. Kahn ME (2005) The death toll from natural disasters: the role of income, geography, and institutions. Rev Econ Stat 87(2):271–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kanemoto Y (1997) The housing question in Japan. Reg Sci Urban Econ 27(6):613–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keirstead J, Shah N. (2012). Urban energy systems planning, design and implementation. In: A Grubler and D. Fisk (eds.): Energizing sustainable cities: assessing urban energy, chapter 11, 155–162Google Scholar
  18. Koerth J, Vafeidis AT, Hinkel J, Sterr H (2013) What motivates coastal households to adapt pro-actively to sea-level rise and increasing flood risk? Reg Environ Chang 13(4):897–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kousky C, Shabman L (2013) The hazard of the moral hazard-or not. Natural Hazards Observer XXXVII(5):12–15Google Scholar
  20. Kousky C, Michel-Kerjan EO, Raschky PA (2018) Does federal disaster assistance crowd out flood insurance?. J Environ Econ Manag 87:150–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kunreuther H (1996) Mitigating disaster losses through insurance. J Risk Uncertain 12:171–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kunreuther HC (2006) Has the time come for a comprehensive natural disaster insurance?. In: Daniels RJ, Kettl DF, Kunreuther HC (eds) On risk and disaster: lessons from Hurricane Katrina. University of Pennsylvania Press, Pennsylvania, pp 175–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kunreuther H, Sanderson W, Vetschera R (1985) A behavioral model of the adoption of protective activities. J Econ Behav Organ 6(1):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lewis T, Nickerson, D (1989) Self-insurance against natural disasters. J Environ Econ Manag 16(3):209–223Google Scholar
  25. Managi S, Guan D (2017) Multiple disasters management: lessons from the Fukushima triple events. Econ Anal Policy 53:114–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Munro A, Managi S (2017) Going back: radiation and intentions to return amongst households evacuated after the great Tohoku earthquake. Econ Disasters Clim Chang 1(1):77–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nakayachi K, Okuyama HM, Oki S (2015) Public anxiety after the 2011 Tohoku earthquake : fluctuation in hazard perception after catastrophe. J Risk Res 18(2):156–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Neumayer E, Plümper T, Barthel F (2014) The political economy of natural disaster damage. Glob Environ Chang 24:8–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Osberghaus D (2015) The determinants of private flood mitigation measures in Germany—evidence from a nationwide survey. Ecol Econ 110:36–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Petrolia DR, Landry CE, Coble KH (2013) Risk preferences, risk perceptions, and flood insurance. Land Econ 89(2):227–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Quiggin, J. (1992). Risk, self-protection and ex ante economic value-some positive results. J Environ Econ Manag 23(1):40-53Google Scholar
  32. Raschky PA, Schwindt M (2016) Aid, natural disasters and the Samaritan's dilemma. Economica 83(332):624–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Raschky PA, Weck-Hannemann H (2008) Charity hazard – a real hazard to natural disaster insurance? Environ Hazard 7(4):321–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Raschky PA, Schwarze R, Schwindt M, Zahn F (2013) Uncertainty of governmental relief and the crowding out of flood insurance. Environ Resour Econ 54:179–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shogren JF, Crocker TD (1999) Risk and its consequences. J Environ Econ Manag 37(1):44–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tanaka H, Oda J, Iwai A, Kuwagata Y, Matsuoka T, Takaoka M, Yoshioka T (1999) Morbidity and mortality of hospitalized patients after the 1995 Hanshin-Awaji earthquake. Am J Emerg Med 17(2):186–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Turner G, Said F, Afzal U (2014) Microinsurance demand after a rare flood event: evidence from a field experiment in Pakistan. Geneva Pap 39:201–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Watson JT, Gayer M, Connolly MA (2007) Epidemics after natural disasters. Emerg Infect Dis 13(1):1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zehaie F (2009) The timing and strategic role of self-protection. Environ Resour Econ 44(3):337–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics & Heidelberg Center for the EnvironmentHeidelberg UniversityHeidelbergGermany
  2. 2.Urban Institute & School of EngineeringKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations