Advertisement

International Journal of Information Technology

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 289–302 | Cite as

An empirical study of challenges in online distance education in Saudi Arabia

  • Sulafah Basahel
  • Abdullah Basahel
Original Research
  • 166 Downloads

Abstract

Information communication technologies (ICTs) are constantly improving and increasing human activities. Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) around the world are using these technologies to enhance learning experiences and overcome geographical barriers in the creation and delivery of educational knowledge. In this context, online distance education (ODE) has become popular in HEIs as process of education that can help them achieve international prestige as well as increase their student numbers via ICT-based learning. However, successful implementation of ODE using ICT presents a number of challenges. This paper explores challenges of institutional, technological, cultural and learner, whose manifestations can vary from one country to another using Checkland soft systems methodology as a learning methodology. We present an empirical examination of ODE challenges in the Saudi cultural context in King Abdulaziz University during the academic year 2014–2015. The outcome of the empirical work addresses additional challenges that will help future designers and managers of ODE towards successful ODE implementation.

Keywords

Online distance education Challenges Higher Education Institutions Soft systems methodology Information systems Saudi Arabia 

References

  1. 1.
    Basahel S, Cordoba-Pachon JR (2014) Systems approach to distance education (de)—initial conceptualisation and proposal. In: Paper presented at 8th international technology, education and development conference, Valencia, SpainGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aljabre A (2012) An exploration of distance learning in Saudi Arabian universities: current practices and future possibilities. Int J Bus Humanit Technol 2(2):132–137Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    GASTAT The General Authority for Statistics in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (2014) Annual yearbook. https://www.stats.gov.sa/en/46
  4. 4.
    GASTAT The General Authority for Statistics in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (2016) Annual yearbook. https://www.stats.gov.sa/en/46
  5. 5.
    Moore M, Kearsley G (2012) Distance education: a systems view of online learning, 3rd edn. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, BelmontGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zakari M, Alkhezzi F (2010) The role of the Arab Open University, as a distance education institution, in social communication and development in the Arab region. Education 131(2):273–287Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Saunders M, Lewis P, Thornhill A (2009) Research methods for business students, 5th edn. Pearson Education Limited, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gatewood K (2014) Why defining distance education is an important task. EdTech Magazine. http://www.edtechmagazine.com/higher/article/2014/02/why-defining-distance-education-important-task
  9. 9.
    Lowenthal P, Wilson BG (2010) Labels do matter! a critique of AECT’s redefinition of the field. TechTrends 54(1):38–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moore JL, Dickson-Deane C, Galyen K (2011) E-learning, online learning and distance learning environments: are they the same? Internet High Educ 14(2):129–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Alkhalaf S, Nguyen A and Drew S (2010) Assessing elearning systems in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s higher education sector: an exploratory analysis. In: Paper presented at the international conference on intelligent network and computing, IEEE, Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Isik AH, Guler I (2012) Comprehensive comparison of traditional and distance learning master systems. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 31:120–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Luo Y, Shenkar O (2011) Toward a perspective of cultural friction in international business. J Int Manag 1(17):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rashid N and Rashid M (2011) Issues and problems in distance education. Turk Online J Distance Educ 4(12):108–114Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Garrison DR, Anderson T (2003) E-learning in the 21st century: a framework for research and practice. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Al-Kandari A, Gaither TK (2011) Arabs, the West and public relations: a critical/cultural study of Arab cultural values. Public Relat Rev 3(37):266–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mitsuishi M, Warisawa S, Tanaka K (2002) Distance learning and technology transfer with reality transmission capability. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 1(51):403–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stein S and Harman B (2000) Distance learning—the global challenge. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on advanced learning technologies, IEEE, Palmerston North, USAGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maurino PSM (2007) Looking for critical thinking in online threaded discussions. J Educ Technol Syst 35(3):241–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Al-Asmari AM, Rabb Khan MS (2014) E-learning in Saudi Arabia: past, present and future. Near Middle East J Res Educ 2014(2):1–11Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stansfield M, Connolly T, Cartelli A, Jimoyiannis A, Magalhães H, Maillet K (2009) The identification of key issues in the development of sustainable e-learning and virtual campus initiatives. Electron J e-Learn 7(2):155–164Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Khan BH (2005) Managing e-learning strategies: Design, delivery, implementation and evaluation. Idea, HersheyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lauring J, Selmer J (2012) International language management and diversity climate in multicultural organizations. Int Bus Rev 2(21):156–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Moodley S (2002) Inclusive education: challenges for distance learning, policy and practice. Academic Development Centre, Technikon South Africa, Johannesburg. http://www.adcet.edu.au/StoredFile.aspx?id=968&fn=Siva%20Moodley.pdf
  25. 25.
    Altameem A (2013) What drives successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the key technical issues in Saudi Arabian universities. J Theor Appl Inf Technol 53(1):63–70Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Janes G (2006) Addressing the learning needs of multidisciplinary students at a distance using a virtual learning environment (VLE): a novice teacher reflects. Nurse Educ Pract 2(6):87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Al-Harthi AS (2005) Distance higher education experiences of Arab Gulf students in the United States: a cultural perspective. Int Rev Open Distance Learn 3(6):1–14Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Berge ZL (2013) Barriers to communication in distance education. Turk Online J Distance Educ 1(14):374–388Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sethy SS (2012) Cognitive skills: a modest way of learning through technology. Turk Online J Distance Educ 3(13):260–274Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    El-Mansour B (2011) Institutional challenges facing online education. In: Méndez-Vilas A (ed) Education in a technological world: communicating current and emerging research and technological efforts. Formatex, Badajoz, pp 266–269Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ting Y-LR (2005) Mobile learning: current trends and future challenges. In: Proceedings of the fifth IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. pp 603–607Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bates AWT (2005) Technology, e-learning and distance education. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Boettcher JV, Kumar MSV (2000) The other infrastructure: distance education’s digital plant. Syllabus New Dir Educ Technol 10(13):14–22Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Liu X, Liu S, Lee S-H, Magjuka RJ (2010) Cultural differences in online learning: international student perceptions. Educ Technol Soc 13(3):177–188Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Blum K (1999) Gender differences in asynchronous learning in higher education: learning styles, participation barriers and communication patterns. J Asynchronous Learn Netw 1(3):46–67Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ma WWK, Yuen AHK (2011) Gender differences of knowledge sharing in online learning environment. In: Kwan et al (eds) Lecture notes in computer science. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 116–128Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gonzalez-Gomez F, Guardiola J, Rodriguez OM, Alonso MAM (2012) Gender differences in e-learning satisfaction. Comput Educ 58(1):283–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Astleitner H, Steinberg R (2005) Are there gender differences in web-based learning? An integrated model and related effect sizes. AACE J 1(13):47–63Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Al-Fahad FN (2009) Students’ attitudes and perceptions towards the effectiveness of mobile learning in King Saud University, Saudi Arabia. Turk Online J Educ Technol 8(2):111–119Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Barrett E, Lally V (1999) Gender differences in an on-line learning environment. J Comput Assist Learn 15(1):48–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zhang Z, Kenny RF (2010) Learning in an online distance education course: experiences of three international students. Int Rev Res Open Distance Learn 1(11):17–36Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hamdan AK (2014) The reciprocal and correlative relationship between learning culture and online education: a case from Saudi Arabia. Int Rev Res Open Distance Learn 15(1):309–336Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Al-Shehri AM (2010) E-learning in Saudi Arabia: ‘to e or not to e, that is the question’. J Fam Community Med 17(3):147–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yamin M, Aljihani S (2016) E-learning and women in Saudi Arabia: an empirical study. BVICAM’s Int J Inf Technol 8(1):950–954Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Al-Harbi KA (2010) E-learning in the Saudi tertiary education: potential and challenges. Appl Comput Inform 9(1):31–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    NCel. The National Centre of E-learning and Distance Education (2016). http://www.elc.edu.sa/?q=en/aboutus
  47. 47.
    Chanchary F and Islam S (2011) Is Saudi Arabia ready for e-learning? A case study. http://www.nauss.edu.sa/acit/PDFs/f2534.pdf
  48. 48.
    Alenezi A, Abdul Karim A, Veloo A (2010) An empirical investigation into the role of enjoyment, computer anxiety, computer self-efficacy and Internet experience in influencing the students’ intention to use e-learning: a case study from Saudi Arabian governmental universities. Turk Online J Educ Technol 9(4):22–34Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Checkland PB, Poulter J (2006) Learning for action: a short definitive account of soft systems methodology and its use for practitioner, teachers and students. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Checkland PB, Scholes J (1990) Soft systems methodology in action. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Avison D, Fitzgerald G (2006) Information systems development: methodologies, techniques and tools, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, LondonGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Mingers J, Taylor S (1992) The use of soft systems methodology in practice. J Oper Res Soc 43(4):321–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Jackson MC (2000) Systems approaches to management. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Checkland PB (2000) The emergent properties of SSM in use: a symposium by reflective practitioners. Syst Pract Action Res 13(6):799–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Basahel S (2017) A soft systems framework for online distance education: the case of Saudi Arabia. Ph.D. thesis, Royal Hollaway University, LondonGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Bryman A, Bell E (2011) Business research methods, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Creswell JW (2009) Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Bharati Vidyapeeth's Institute of Computer Applications and Management 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Information Systems ManagementJeddahSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.Faculty of Economics and AdministrationKing Abdulaziz UniversityJeddahSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations