Advertisement

Negative Cognitive Style and Cortisol Reactivity to a Laboratory Stressor: a Preliminary Study

  • Ivan VargasEmail author
  • Gerald J. Haeffel
  • Ross Jacobucci
  • Julia T. Boyle
  • Stefanie E. Mayer
  • Nestor L. Lopez-Duran
Article
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

According to the hopelessness theory of depression, some individuals have a cognitive vulnerability (i.e., negative cognitive style) that interacts with stressful life events to produce depression. A negative cognitive style is associated with a maladaptive cognitive response to stress (i.e., increased negative attributions); however, no study has assessed whether this cognitive vulnerability is also associated with a maladaptive endocrine (e.g., cortisol) response to stress. If shown to be related, individual differences in cognitive style may potentially explain why the literature on the association between cortisol stress reactivity and depression is mixed, as cortisol responses to stress may vary as a function of attributional style. The aim of the present study was to provide a preliminary test of whether cognitive vulnerability was related to cortisol reactivity to an acute laboratory stressor among a sample of young adults (n = 20; Mage = 23.1 years; 10 females). Negative cognitive style and depressive symptoms were assessed via the Cognitive Style Questionnaire and the Patient Health Questionnaire, respectively. All participants also completed the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST). Salivary cortisol was collected before, during, and after the TSST. Results showed a significant association between negative cognitive style and cortisol stress reactivity, such that a greater negative cognitive style was related to a larger cortisol response to the TSST. Post hoc analyses revealed that this association was moderated by gender (i.e., effect observed in males only). Cortisol responses to the TSST, in general, were lower among females, but this relationship was not moderated by cognitive style. These findings may be related to underlying gender differences in stress vulnerability, which may have clinical implications for understanding the interactive effect of cognitive and neuroendocrine processes on vulnerability and resiliency to depression.

Keywords

Cognitive style Stress Depression Cortisol HPA axis 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank the Michigan Psychoneuroendocrinology Affective Laboratory staff, particularly Andrew Garton, Rebecca Mulder, Tonia Ballantyne, Lara Fawaz, Allie Hammond, and Rachel Cannon who assisted in data collection.

Funding Information

The funding for this research was provided by the University of Michigan, Department of Psychology, University of Michigan Rackham Graduate School, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation, and the American Psychological Association of Graduate Students.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The Institutional Review Board at the University of Michigan approved the study, and participants signed a written informed consent.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Disclaimer

The funding source had no role in the study design, data collection, analyses, or manuscript preparation.

References

  1. Abelson, J. L., Khan, S., Liberzon, I., Erickson, T. M., & Young, E. A. (2008). Effects of perceived control and cognitive coping on endocrine stress responses to pharmacological activation. Biological Psychiatry, 64(8), 701–707.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.05.007.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Abramson, L. Y., Metalsky, G. I., & Alloy, L. B. (1989). Hopelessness depression: a theory-based subtype of depression. Psychological Review, 96(2), 358–372.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.2.358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abramson, L. Y., Alloy, L. B., Hogan, M. E., Whitehouse, W. G., Donovan, P., Rose, D. T., et al. (1999). Cognitive vulnerability to depression: theory and evidence. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 13(1), 5–20 Retrieved from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/springer/jcogp/1999/00000013/00000001/art00002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alloy, L. B., Abramson, L. Y., Whitehouse, W. G., Hogan, M. E., Panzarella, C., & Rose, D. T. (2006). Prospective incidence of first onsets and recurrences of depression in individuals at high and low cognitive risk for depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115(1), 145–156.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2006.02.012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Burke, H., Davis, M., Otte, C., & Mohr, D. (2005). Depression and cortisol responses to psychological stress: a meta-analysis. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 30, 846–856 Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306453005000831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Daniels, K., Daugherty, J. D., & Mosher, W. D. (2015). Current contraceptive use and variation by selected characteristics among women aged 15-44:United States, 2011-2013.Google Scholar
  7. de Kloet, E. R. (1991). Brain corticosteroid receptor balance and homeostatic control. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 12(2), 95–164.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520701469617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fife, D. A., Mendoza, J. L., & Terry, R. (2012). The assessment of reliability under range restriction: a comparison of α, ω, and test-retest reliability for dichotomous data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72(5), 862–888.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164411430225 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gaab, J., Blättler, N., Menzi, T., Pabst, B., Stoyer, S., & Ehlert, U. (2003). Randomized controlled evaluation of the effects of cognitive-behavioral stress management on cortisol responses to acute stress in healthy subjects. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 28(6), 767–779.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4530(02)00069-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gibb, B. E., Beevers, C. G., Andover, M. S., & Holleran, K. (2006). The hopelessness theory of depression: a prospective multi-wave test of the vulnerability-stress hypothesis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 30(6), 763–772.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-006-9082-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Green, P., & Macleod, C. J. (2016). SIMR: an R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(4), 493–498.  https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Greenberg, P. E., Fournier, A.-A., Sisitsky, T., Pike, C. T., & Kessler, R. C. (2015). The economic burden of adults with major depressive disorder in the United States (2005 and 2010). The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 76(2), 155–162.  https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.14 m09298.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gunnar, M., & Quevedo, K. (2007). The neurobiology of stress and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 145–173.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085605.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Haeffel, G. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2007). Cognitive vulnerability to depression: exploring risk and resilience. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 16(2), 435–448.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2006.11.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Haeffel, G. J., & Vargas, I. (2011). Resilience to depressive symptoms: the buffering effects of enhancing cognitive style and positive life events. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 42(1), 13–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.09.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Haeffel, G. J., Abramson, L. Y., Metalsky, G. I., Dykman, B. M., Donovan, P., Hogan, M. E., et al. (2005). Negative cognitive styles, dysfunctional attitudes, and the remitted depression paradigm: a search for the elusive cognitive vulnerability to depression factor among remitted depressives. Emotion, 5(3), 343–348.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.5.3.343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haeffel, G. J., Gibb, B. E., Metalsky, G. I., Alloy, L. B., Abramson, L. Y., Hankin, B. L., et al. (2008). Measuring cognitive vulnerability to depression: development and validation of the cognitive style questionnaire. Clinical Psychology Review, 28(5), 824–836.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2007.12.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hankin, B. L., Abramson, L. Y., Miller, N., & Haeffel, G. J. (2004). Cognitive vulnerability-stress theories of depression: examining affective specificity in the prediction of depression versus anxiety in three prospective studies. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 28(3), 309–345.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:COTR.0000031805.60529.0d.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson, E., Kamilaris, T., Chrousos, G., & Gold, P. (1992). Mechanisms of stress: a dynamic overview of hormonal and behavioral homeostasis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 16(1), 115–130 Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763405801757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kirschbaum, C., Wüst, S., & Hellhammer, D. (1992). Consistent sex differences in cortisol responses to psychological stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 54(6), 648–657 Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1454958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kirschbaum, C., Pirke, K. M., & Hellhammer, D. H. (1993). The ‘Trier Social Stress Test’—a tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting. Neuropsychobiology.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000119004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kirschbaum, C., Kudielka, B. M., Gaab, J., Schommer, N. C., & Hellhammer, D. H. (1999). Impact of gender, menstrual cycle phase, and oral contraceptives on the activity of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis. Psychosomatic Medicine, 61(2), 154–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. W. (2001). The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 605–613.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kudielka, B. M., & Kirschbaum, C. (2005). Sex differences in HPA axis responses to stress: a review. Biological Psychology, 69(1), 113–132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.11.009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kudielka, B. M., Buske-Kirschbaum, A., Hellhammer, D. H., & Kirschbaum, C. (2004a). HPA axis responses to laboratory psychosocial stress in healthy elderly adults, younger adults, and children: impact of age and gender. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29, 83–98 Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306453002001464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kudielka, B. M., Schommer, N., Hellhammer, D. H., & Kirschbaum, C. (2004b). Acute HPA axis responses, heart rate, and mood changes to psychosocial stress (TSST) in humans at different times of day. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29, 983–992 Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030645300300180X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kudielka, B. M., Hellhammer, D. H., & Kirschbaum, C. (2007). Ten years of research with the Trier Social Stress Test—revisited. In E. Harmon-Jones & P. Winkielman (Eds.), Social Neuroscience: Integrating biological and psychological explanations of social behavior (pp. 56–83). New York: The Guilford Press Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=mKSqxaHGaicC&oi=fnd&pg=PA56&dq=(Kudielka,+Hellhammer,+Kirschbaum,+2007)&ots=6UP9dn-rIa&sig=CDI37Nlm-jGt7d-tvKY92NxjbFQ.Google Scholar
  28. Lopez-Duran, N. L., Mayer, S. E., & Abelson, J. L. (2014). Modeling neuroendocrine stress reactivity in salivary cortisol: adjusting for peak latency variability. Stress.  https://doi.org/10.3109/10253890.2014.915517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lopez-Duran, N. L., McGinnis, E., Kuhlman, K., Geiss, E., Vargas, I., & Mayer, S. (2015). HPA-axis stress reactivity in youth depression: evidence of impaired regulatory processes in depressed boys. Stress, 18(5), 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.3109/10253890.2015.1053455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mac Giollabhui, N., Hamilton, J. L., Nielsen, J., Connolly, S. L., Stange, J. P., Varga, S., et al. (2018). Negative cognitive style interacts with negative life events to predict first onset of a major depressive episode in adolescence via hopelessness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 127(1), 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000301.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Mazurka, R., Wynne-Edwards, K. E., & Harkness, K. L. (2018). Sex differences in the cortisol response to the Trier Social Stress Test in depressed and nondepressed adolescents. Clinical Psychological Science, 6(3), 301–314.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702617739973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Merikangas, K. R., Ames, M., Cui, L., Stang, P. E., Ustun, T. B., Von Korff, M., & Kessler, R. C. (2007). The impact of comorbidity of mental and physical conditions on role disability in the US adult household population. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64(10), 1180–1188.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.64.10.1180.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Metalsky, G. I., & Joiner, T. E. J. (1992). Vulnerability to depressive symptomatology: a prospective test of the diathesis-stress and causal mediation components of the hopelessness theory of depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 667–675.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.667.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Metalsky, G. I., Halberstadt, L. J., & Abramson, L. Y. (1987). Vulnerability to depressive mood reactions: toward a more powerful test of the diathesis-stress and causal mediation components of the reformulated theory of depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(2), 386–393.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.2.386.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Monroe, S. M., & Harkness, K. L. (2005). Life stress, the “kindling” hypothesis, and the recurrence of depression: considerations from a life stress perspective. Psychological Review, 112(2), 417–445.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.2.417.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Monroe, S. M., & Simons, A. D. (1991). Diathesis stress theories in the context of life stress research—implications for the depressive-disorders. Psychological Bulletin, 110(3), 406–425.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.110.3.406.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Schlotz, W., Hammerfald, K., Ehlert, U., & Gaab, J. (2011). Individual differences in the cortisol response to stress in young healthy men: testing the roles of perceived stress reactivity and threat appraisal using multiphase latent growth curve modeling. Biological Psychology, 87(2), 257–264.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.03.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Shapero, B. G., McClung, G., Bangasser, D. A., Abramson, L. Y., & Alloy, L. B. (2017). Interaction of biological stress recovery and cognitive vulnerability for depression in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(1), 91–103.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0451-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Shull, A., Mayer, S. E., McGinnis, E., Geiss, E., Vargas, I., & Lopez-Duran, N. L. (2016). Trait and state rumination interact to prolong cortisol activation to psychosocial stress in females. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 74, 324–332.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.09.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Southwick, S. M., Vythilingam, M., & Charney, D. S. (2005). The psychobiology of depression and resilience to stress: implications for prevention and treatment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 255–291.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143948.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Stroud, L. R., Salovey, P., & Epel, E. S. (2002). Sex differences in stress responses: social rejection versus achievement stress. Biological Psychiatry, 52(4), 318–327.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(02)01333-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Tsigos, C., & Chrousos, G. P. (2002). Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, neuroendocrine factors and stress. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 53(4), 865–871.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00429-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Vargas, I., & Lopez-Duran, N. (2017). Investigating the effect of acute sleep deprivation on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-axis response to a psychosocial stressor. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 79, 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.01.030.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Williams, L. S., Brizendine, E. J., Plue, L., Bakas, T., Tu, W., Hendrie, H., & Kroenke, K. (2005). Performance of the PHQ-9 as a screening tool for depression after stroke. Stroke, 36(3), 635–638.  https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000155688.18207.33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychological ScienceUniversity of ArkansasFayettevilleUSA
  2. 2.Behavioral Sleep Medicine ProgramDepartment of Psychiatry, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyPhiladelphia College of Osteopathic MedicinePhiladelphiaUSA
  5. 5.Center for Health & Community, Department of PsychiatryUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA
  6. 6.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations