Advertisement

International Journal of Cognitive Therapy

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 124–139 | Cite as

Guided Discovery: a Clinical Strategy Derived from the Socratic Method

  • James C. Overholser
Special Issue on Socratic Dialogue
  • 64 Downloads

Abstract

Guided discovery is closely linked to the Socratic method. The present paper explains one view of guided discovery based on an integration of ancient philosophy, contemporary cognitive therapy, and recent clinical experience. Guided discovery can be viewed as a process that relies on eight components (i.e., intellectual modesty, empathic listening, systematic questioning, trust in the client’s abilities, redirection to maintain focus, activities completed between sessions, highlighting useful material, and occasional brief explanations). Guided discovery uses inductive reasoning to help clients search for new information on their path toward effective solutions. The process of therapy is improved through a sincere search for new information, minimizing the role of therapist as expert or teacher. The therapeutic dialogue relies on several core beliefs that underlie the use of guided discovery and may provide appropriate goals for the discovery process. Finally, a metaphor is used to appreciate the proper use of guided discovery.

Keywords

Cognitive psychotherapy Socratic method 

References

  1. Alford, B., & Beck, A. T. (1997). The integrative power of cognitive therapy. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, R. E. (1984). The dialogues of Plato, volume I. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, J. (2011). Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, A. T., & Emery, G. (1985). Anxiety disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  6. Bell, A., & D’Zurilla, T. (2009). Problem-solving therapy for depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(4), 348–353.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Benson, H. (1990a). Meno, the slave boy, and the elenchus. Phronesis, 35, 128–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benson, H. (1990b). The priority of definition and the Socratic elenchus. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 8, 19–65.Google Scholar
  9. Bostock, D. (1986). Plato’s Phaedo. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Braun, J., Strunk, D., Sasso, K., & Cooper, A. (2015). Therapist use of Socratic questioning predicts session-to-session symptom change in cognitive therapy for depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 70(1), 30–37.Google Scholar
  11. Brickhouse, T., & Smith, N. (1994). Plato’s Socrates. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Calero-Elvira, A., Frojan-Parga, M., Ruiz-Sancho, E., & Alpanes-Freitag, M. (2013). Descriptive study of the Socratic method. Behavior Therapy, 44, 625–638.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Carey, T., & Mullan, R. (2004). What is Socratic questioning? Psychotherapy, 41(3), 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carpenter, M., & Polansky, R. (2002). Variety of Socratic elenchi. In G. Scott (Ed.), Does Socratic have a method? (pp. 89–100). University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Clark, G., & Egan, S. (2015). The Socratic method in cognitive-behavioural therapy. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 39, 863–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Rathunde, K. (1990). The psychology of wisdom. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development (pp. 25–51). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Day, J. (1994). Plato’s Meno. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dorter, K. (1994). Form and good in Plato’s eleatic dialogues. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Ellis, A. (1994). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy (Revised). New York: Birch Lane Press.Google Scholar
  20. Eskin, M., Ertekin, K., & Demir, H. (2008). Efficacy of a problem-solving therapy for depression and suicide potential in adolescents and young adults. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32(2), 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frojan-Parga, M., Calero-Elvira, A., & Montano-Fidalgo, M. (2011). Study of the Socratic method during cognitive restructuring. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 18, 110–123.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gambrill, E. (2006). Critical thinking in clinical practice: improving the quality of judgments and decisions. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Graybar, S., & Leonard, L. (2005). In defense of listening. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 59(1), 1–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Greenberger, D., & Padesky, C. (2016). Mind over mood (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  25. Griswold, C. (1986). Self-knowledge in Plato’s Phaedrus. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hauck, P. (2001). When reason is not enough. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 19(4), 245–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hoffart, A., Versland, S., & Sexton, H. (2002). Self-understanding, empathy, guided discovery, and schema belief in schema-focused cognitive therapy of personality problems. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26(2), 199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. James, I., & Moore, R. (2007). The use of questions in cognitive behaviour therapy. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 35, 507–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. James, I., Morse, R., & Howarth, A. (2010). The science and art of asking questions in cognitive therapy. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 38, 83–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kazantzis, N., Freeman, A., Fruzzetti, A., Persons, J., & Smucker, M. (2013). Unresolved issues regarding collaborative empiricism in cognitive behavioural therapies. Behaviour Change, 30(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kazantzis, N., Fairburn, C., Padesky, C., Reinecke, M., & Teesson, M. (2014). Unresolved issues regarding the research and practice of cognitive behavior therapy: The case of guided discovery using Socratic questioning. Behaviour Change, 31(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liese, B., & Franz, R. (1996). Treating substance use disorders with cognitive therapy. In P. Salkoviskis (Ed.), Frontiers of cognitive therapy (pp. 470–508). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  33. Mahoney, M. J. (2003). Constructive psychotherapy. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  34. Mansell, W. (2008). The seven C’s of CBT: A consideration of the future challenges for cognitive behaviour therapy. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 36, 641–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McMurran, M., Neza, A., & Nezu, C. (2008). Problem-solving therapy for people with personality disorders. Mental Health Review Journal, 13(2), 35–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Meichenbaum, D. (1977). Cognitive-behavior modification. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meichenbaum, D. (1985). Stress inoculation training. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  38. Moss, D. (1992). Cognitive therapy, phenomenology, and the struggle for meaning. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 23(1), 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Navia, L. (1985). Socrates: The man and his philosophy. Lanham: University press of America.Google Scholar
  40. Overholser, J. C. (1993a). Elements of the Socratic method: I. Systematic questioning. Psychotherapy, 30, 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Overholser, J. C. (1993b). Elements of the Socratic method: II. Induective reasoning. Psychotherapy, 30, 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Overholser, J. C. (1994). Elements of the Socratic method: III. Universal definitions. Psychotherapy, 31, 286–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Overholser, J. C. (1995). Elements of the Socratic method: IV. Disavowal of knowledge. Psychotherapy, 32, 283–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Overholser, J. C. (1996). Elements of the Socratic method: V. Self-improvement. Psychotherapy, 33, 549–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Overholser, J. C. (1999). Elements of the Socratic method: VI. Promoting virtue in everyday life. Psychotherapy, 36, 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Overholser, J. C. (2010). Psychotherapy according to the Socratic method: Integrating ancient philosophy with contemporary cognitive therapy. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 24(4), 355–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Overholser, J. C. (2011). Collaborative empiricism, guided discovery, and the Socratic method: Core processes for effective cognitive therapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 18(1), 62–66.Google Scholar
  48. Overholser, J. C. (2013a). Guiding clients through difficult situations and complicated decisions. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 10(1), 229–236.Google Scholar
  49. Overholser, J. C. (2013b). Guided discovery: Problem-solving therapy integrated within the Socratic method. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 43(2), 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Overholser, J. C. (2015). Positive psychotherapy according to the Socratic method. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 45(2).Google Scholar
  51. Overholser, J. C., Braden, A., & Fisher, L. (2010). You've got to believe: Core beliefs that underlie effective psychotherapy. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 40(4), 185–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Padesky, C. (1993). Socratic questioning: Changing minds or guiding discovery? Presented at the European Congress of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies, London. Available online at padesky.com.
  53. Padesky, C. (1996). Developing cognitive therapist competency. In P. Salkoviskis (Ed.), Frontiers of cognitive therapy (pp. 266–292). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  54. Padesky, C., & Beck, A. T. (2003). Science and philosophy: Comparison of cognitive therapy and rational emotive behavior therapy. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 17(3), 211–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Padesky, C., & Mooney, K. (2012). Strengths-based cognitive-behavioural therapy. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 19, 283–290.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Persons, J. (1989). Cognitive therapy in practice. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  57. Prior, W. (1991). Virtue and knowledge: An introduction to ancient Greek ethics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Reale, G. (1987). A history of ancient philosophy: I. From the origins to Socrates. Buffalo: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  59. Robinson, R. (1971). Elenchus. In G. Vlastos (Ed.), The philosophy of Socrates (pp. 78–93). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rose, C., Moore, J., VanLehn, K., & Allbritton, D. (2001). A comparative evaluation of Socratic versus didactic tutoring. 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 869–874.Google Scholar
  61. Rush, A. J., & Beck, A. T. (1978). Cognitive therapy of depression and suicide. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 32, 201–219.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Rutter, J., & Friedberg, R. (1999). Guidelines for the effective use of Socratic dialogue in cognitive therapy. Innovations in Clinical Practice, 17, 481–490.Google Scholar
  63. Ryan, R., Huta, V., & Deci, E. (2008). Living well: a self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 139–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Santas, G. (1979). Socrates: Philosophy in Plato’s early dialogues. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  65. Scraper, R. (2000). The art and science of maieutic questioning within the Socratic method. International Forum for Logotherapy, 23(1), 14–16.Google Scholar
  66. Seeskin, K. (1987). Dialogue and discovery: A study in Socratic method. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  67. Sesonske, A., & Fleming, N. (1965). Plato’s Meno. Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  68. Steger, M., Kashdan, T., & Oishi, S. (2008). Being good by doing good: Daily eudaimonic activity and well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tee, J., & Kazantzis, N. (2011). Collaborative empiricism in cognitive therapy: A definition and theory for the relationship construct. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 18(1), 47–61.Google Scholar
  70. Vlastos, G. (1992). Elenchus and mathematics: A turning point in Plato’s philosophical development. In H. Benson (Ed.), Essays on the philosophy of Socrates (pp. 137–161). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Vlastos, G. (1994). Socratic studies. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association of Cognitive Psychotherapy 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Case Western Reserve UniversityClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations