The interpretation and prediction of event participants in Mandarin verb-final active and passive sentences
- 34 Downloads
The role of the markers bèi and bǎ for thematic role assignment in Chinese NP1-marker-NP2-V sentences was investigated in adult native speakers. While word order is identical, thematic roles are distributed reversely in these structures [patient-bèi-agent, (passive); agent-bǎ-patient, (active)]. If Mandarin speakers interpret NP1 as the agent of an event, viewing behavior was expected to differ between conditions for NP1-objects, indicating the revision of initial role assignment in the case of bèi. Given reliability differences between markers for role assignment, differences in anticipatory eye movements to NP2-objects were expected. 16 visual stimuli were combined with 16 sets of sentence pairs; one pair partner featuring a bèi-, the other a bǎ-structure. Growth curve analysis of 28 participants’ eye movements revealed no attention differences for NP1-objects. However, anticipatory eye movements to NP2-objects differed. This suggests that a stable event representation is constructed only after NP1 and the marker have been processed, but before NP2. As a control variable, syntactic/semantic complexity of NP1 was manipulated. The differences obtained indicate that the visual world paradigm is in principle sensitive to detect language-induced processing costs, which was taken to validate the null-finding for NP1. Interestingly, NP1 complexity also modulated predictive processing. Findings are discussed with respect to a differentiation between interpretative and predictive aspects incremental processing.
KeywordsPredictive processing Eye movements Thematic role assignment Agent-first strategy Mandarin passive Semantic complexity
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (2004). Now you see it, now you do not: Mediating the mapping between language and the visual world. In J. Henderson & F. Ferreira (Eds.), The interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world (pp. 347–386). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language (Vol. 279, pp. 1–61). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., Kretzschmar, F., Tune, S., Wang, L., Genç, S., Philipp, M., et al. (2011). Think globally: Cross-linguistic variation in electrophysiological activity during sentence comprehension. Brain and Language,117(3), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2010.09.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chao, Y. R. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Frawley, W. (1992). Linguistic semantics. Hillsdale: Laurence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Gerwien, J., & Rudka, M. (2019). Expectation changes over time: How long it takes to process focus imposed by German ‘sogar.’ In Ó. Loureda, I. Recio Fernández, L. Nadal, & A. Cruz (Eds.), Empirical studies of the construction of discourse (pp. 229–251). https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.305.08ger.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gerwien, J., Wang, Y., & Wu, F. (2019). Predictive processing is affected by linguistic complexity of cue-preceding input. Poster presented at the 32nd annual CUNY conference on human sentence processing, March 29–March 31, 2019. https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/jerp4.
- Gerwien, J., & Xi, K. (2017). Predicting object states in Mandarin Chinese—insights from the bǎ-construction. Poster presented at the 30th annual CUNY conference on human sentence processing, March 30–April 1, 2017. https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35243.85286.
- Kamide, Y., Scheepers, C., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2003b). Integration of syntactic and semantic information in predictive processing: Cross-linguistic evidence from German and English. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,32(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021933015362.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- LaPolla, R. J. (2009). Chinese as a topic-comment (not topic-prominent and not SOV) language. In J. Xing (Ed.), Studies of Chinese linguistics: Functional approaches (Vol. 1, pp. 9–22). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
- Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1976). Subject and topic: A new typology of language. Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Miao, X. (1981). Word order and semantic strategies in Chinese sentence comprehension. International Journal of Psycholinguistics,8(3), 109–122.Google Scholar
- Miao, X., Chen, G., & Ying, H. (1986). Sentence comprehension in Chinese. Studies in Child Language Development,1986, 40–53.Google Scholar
- Mirman, D. (2014). Growth curve analysis and visualization using R. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Philipp, M., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., Bisang, W., & Schlesewsky, M. (2008). The role of animacy in the real time comprehension of Mandarin Chinese: Evidence from auditory event-related brain potentials. Brain and Language,105(2), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2007.09.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar