Advertisement

Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science

, Volume 2, Issue 1–2, pp 9–20 | Cite as

Effect of Hindi, Sanskrit and Urdu medium schooling on spatial language and encoding

  • Ramesh C. MishraEmail author
  • Rajesh K. Jha
Research Paper

Abstract

Spatial cognition refers to the process through which people acquire knowledge of the location of objects in their surrounding environment. Studies suggest that people use different spatial frames of reference to describe the location of objects in space. The present study examines the frames of reference used by 10–15-year-old students attending Hindi, Sanskrit and Urdu medium schools at Varanasi in performing spatial cognitive tasks. Traditional schools, such as Sanskrit and Urdu medium schools, provide substantial experience and training in the use of a geocentric frame of reference based on cardinal directions (i.e., north, south, east and west). In view of this, it was expected that children attending these schools would use a geocentric frame of reference more than those attending Hindi medium school. Using a variety of procedures, the spatial frames of reference used in description and encoding of objects by students in Hindi, Sanskrit and Urdu medium schools were assessed. The results indicated that traditional Sanskrit and Urdu medium school students used more geocentric language for description of spatial objects and they also engaged in greater geocentric encoding of those objects than the students of Hindi medium schools.

Keywords

Cardinal directions Geocentric frame of reference Hindi medium schools Spatial encoding Traditional schools 

References

  1. Acredolo, L. P. (1990). Behavioral approaches to spatial orientation ininfancy. In A. Diamond (Ed.), The development and neural bases ofhighercorticalfunction (pp. 596–612). New York: The New York Academy of Science.Google Scholar
  2. Berry, J. W. (1983). Textured contexts: Systems and situations in cross-cultural psychology. In S. H. Irvine & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Human assessment and cultural factors (pp. 117–126). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowerman, M. (1993). The origins of children’s spatial semantic categories: Cognitive versus linguistic determinants. In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 7–15). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bremner, G. (1989). Development of spatial awareness in infacy. In A. Slater & G. Bremner (Eds.), Infants development (pp. 123–141). Hove: Lawrence Erbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, H. (1973). Space, time, semantics and the child. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cottereau-Reiss, P. (1999). Kanak space or how not to get lost. Annales Fyssen, 14(1), 34–45.Google Scholar
  7. Cottereau-Reiss, P. (2001). Langages d espace l exemple kanak. In C. Sabatier & P. R. Dasen (Eds.), Cultures, developpement et education: autres, enfants, autres ecoles (pp. 159–168). Paris: L Hartmann.Google Scholar
  8. Dasen, P. R., & Mishra, R. C. (2010). Development of geocentric spatial language and cognition: An eco-cultural perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dasen, P. R., & Mishra, R. C. (2013). Cultural differences in cognitive styles. In B. R. Kar (Ed.), Cognition and brain development: Converging evidences from various methodologies (pp. 232–249). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  10. Dasen, P. R., Mishra, R. C., Niraula, S., & Wassmann, J. (2006). Développement du language et de la cognition spatial géocentrique. Enfance, 58(2), 146–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gumperz, J. J., & Levinson, S. C. (1996). Rethinking linguistic relativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hatwell, Y. (1990). The development of spatial concepts from Piaget to information processing theories. In G. Netchine-Grynberg (Ed.), Cognitive development and functioning in children (pp. 53–69). Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  13. Jha, R.K., & Mishra, R.C. (2017). Spatial cognition and perspective taking in children in different types of school. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, Banaras Hindu University.Google Scholar
  14. Kirk, R. (1982). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  15. Kumar, N. (2000). Lessons from schools. The history of education in Banaras. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Levinson, S. C. (1996). Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: Cross-linguistic evidence. In P. Bloom, M. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 109–169). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Levinson, S. C., Kita, S., Haun, B. M., & Rasch, B. H. (2002). Returning the tables: Language affects spatial reasoning. Cognition, 84(2), 155–188.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Li, P., & Gleitman, L. (2002). Turning the tables: Language and spatial reasoning. Cognition, 8(3), 265–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Miller, G., & Johnson-Laird, P. (1976). Language and perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mishra, R. C. (1988). Learning strategies among children in modern and traditional schools. Indian Psychologist, 5(1), 17–24.Google Scholar
  22. Mishra, R. C. (1997). Cognition and cognitive development. In J. W. Berry, P. R. Dasen, & T. S. Saraswathi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 143–176). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  23. Mishra, R. C. (2014). Effects of Sanskrit schooling on cognitive and social processes. Psychology and Developing Societies, 26(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mishra, R. C., & Dasen, P. R. (2004). The influence of schooling on cognitive development: A review of research in India. In B. N. Setiadi, A. Supratiknya, W. J. Lonner, & Y. H. Poortinga (Eds.), Ongoing themes in psychology and culture (pp. 207–222). Yogjakarta: Kanisius.Google Scholar
  25. Mishra, R. C., & Dasen, P. R. (2005). Spatial language and cognitive development in India: An urban/rural comparison. In W. Friedlmiere, P. Chakkarath, & B. Schwarz (Eds.), Culture and human development: The importance of cross-cultural research to the social sciences (pp. 153–178). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  26. Mishra, R. C., & Dasen, P. R. (2013). Development of spatial language and cognition in Hindi- and Sanskrit-medium schools. Psychological Studies, 58(4), 446–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mishra, R. C., Dasen, P. R., & Niraula, S. (2003). Ecology, language, and performance on spatial cognitive tasks. International Journal of Psychology, 38(6), 366–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mishra, R. C., Singh, S., & Dasen, P. R. (2009). Geocentric dead reckoning in Sanskrit and Hindi medium school children. Culture & Psychology, 15(3), 386–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mishra, R. C., & Vajpayee, A. (2008). Sanskrit schools in India. In P. R. Dasen & A. Akkari (Eds.), Educational theories and practices from the majority world (pp. 245–267). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Newcombe, N. S., & Huttenlocher, J. (2000). Making space: The development of spatial representation and reasoning. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Niraula, S., & Mishra, R. C. (2001). Spatial orientation of the Newar children in Nepal. Social Science International, 17(1), 38–48.Google Scholar
  32. Niraula, S., Mishra, R. C., & Dasen, P. R. (2004). Linguistic relativity and spatial concept development in Nepal. Psychology and Developing Societies, 17(1), 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pederson, E. (1995). Language as context, language as means: Spatial cognition and habitual language use. Cognitive Linguistics, 6(1), 33–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pederson, E., Danziger, E., Wilkins, D., Levinson, S., Kita, S., & Senft, G. (1998). Semantic typology and spatial conceptualization. Language, 74(3), 557–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1956). The child’s conception of space. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  36. Rogoff, B. (1981). Schooling and development of cognitive skills. In H. C. Triandis & A. Heron (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 233–294). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  37. Senft, G. (2001). Frames of spatial reference in Kilivila. Studies in Language, 25(3), 521–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spencer, C., & Darvizeh, Z. (1983). Young children’s place descriptions, maps and route findings: A comparison of nursery school children in Iran and Britain. International Journal of Early Childhood, 15(1), 26–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Taylor, H. A., & Tversky, B. (1996). Perspective in spatial description. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(4), 371–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tulviste, P. (1991). The cultural historical development of verbal thinking. New York: Nova Science.Google Scholar
  41. Vajpayee, A., Dasen, P. R., & Mishra, R. C. (2008). Spatial encoding: A comparison of Sanskrit- and Hindi-medium schools. In N. Srinivasan, A. K. Gupta, & J. Pandey (Eds.), Advances in cognitive science (pp. 255–265). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  42. Wassmann, J., & Dasen, P. R. (1998). Balinese spatial orientation: Some empirical evidence for moderate linguistic relativity. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Incorporating Man, 4(4), 689–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyBanaras Hindu UniversityVaranasiIndia
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyHarishchandra P.G. CollegeVaranasiIndia

Personalised recommendations