Advertisement

Existence for a one-equation turbulent model with strong nonlinearities

  • H. B. de Oliveira
  • A. Paiva
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to improve the existence theory for the steady problem of an one-equation turbulent model. For this study, we consider a very general model that encompasses distinct situations of turbulent flows described by the k-epsilon model. Although the boundary-value problem we consider here is motivated by the modelling of turbulent flows through porous media, the importance of our results goes beyond this application. In particular, our results are suited for any turbulent flows described by the k-epsilon model whose mean flow equation incorporates a feedback term, as the Coriolis force, the Lorentz force or the Darcy–Forchheimer’s drag force. The consideration of feedback forces in the mean flow equation will affect the equation for the turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) with a new term that is known as the production and represents the rate at which TKE is transferred from the mean flow to the turbulence. For the associated boundary-value problem, we prove the existence of weak solutions by assuming that the feedback force and the turbulent dissipation are strong nonlinearities, i.e. when no upper restrictions on the growth of these functions with respect to the mean velocity and to the turbulent kinetic energy, respectively, are required. This result improves, in particular, the existence theory for the classical turbulent k-epsilon model which corresponds to assume that both the feedback force and the production term are absent in our model.

Keywords

Turbulence k-epsilon modelling Strong nonlinearities Existence 

Mathematics Subject Classification

76F60 76S05 35J57 35D30 76D03 

References

  1. 1.
    Antohe, B.V., Lage, J.L.: A general two-equation macroscopic turbulence model for incompressible flow in porous media. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 40, 3013–3024 (1997)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Antontsev, S.N., Díaz, J.I., de Oliveira, H.B.: Stopping a viscous fluid by a feedback dissipative field: I. The stationary Stokes problem. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 6, 439–461 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Antontsev, S.N., Diaz, J.I., de Oliveira, H.B.: Stopping a viscous fluid by a feedback dissipative field: II. The stationary Navier-Stokes problem. Rend. Mat. Acc. Lincei 15, 257–270 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bernis, F.: Elliptic and parabolic semilinear problems without conditions at infinity. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 106, 217–241 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boccardo, L., Gallouët, T.: Strongly nonlinear elliptic equations having natural growth terms and \(L^1\) data. Nonlinear Anal. 19(6), 573–579 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brezis, H., Browder, F.E.: Strongly non-linear elliptic boundary value problems. Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. 5, 587–603 (1978)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chacón-Rebollo, T., Lewandowski, R.: Mathematical and numerical foundations of turbulence models and applications. Springer, New York (2014)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ciarlet, P.: The finite element method for elliptic problems. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1978)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dreyfuss, P.: Results for a turbulent system with unbounded viscosities: weak formulations, existence of solutions, boundedness and smoothness. Nonlinear Anal. 68, 1462–1478 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Druet, P.-É., Naumann, J.: On the existence of weak solutions to a stationary one-equation RANS model with unbounded eddy viscosities. Ann. Univ. Ferrara 55, 67–87 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gallouët, T., Lederer, J., Lewandowski, R., Murat, F., Tartar, L.: On a turbulent system with unbounded eddy viscosities. Nonlinear Anal. 52, 1051–1068 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Landes, R.: On the existence of weak solutions of perturbated systems with critical growth. J. Reine Angew. Math. 393, 21–38 (1989)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lederer, J., Lewandowski, R.: A RANS 3D model with unbounded eddy viscosities. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 24, 413–441 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    de Lemos, M.J.S.: Turbulence in Porous Media, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Waltham (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lewandowski, R.: The mathematical analysis of the coupling of a turbulent kinetic energy equation to the Navier-Stokes equation with an eddy viscosity. Nonlinear Anal. 28, 393–417 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mohammadi, B., Pironneau, O.: Analysis of the K-Epsilon Turbulence Model. Wiley-Masson, Paris (1993)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nakayama, A., Kuwahara, F.: A macroscopic turbulence model for flow in a porous medium. J. Fluid Eng. 121, 427–433 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Naumann, J.: Existence of weak solutions to the equations of stationary motion of heat-conducting incompressible viscous fluids. Progr. Nonlinear Differ. Equ. Appl. 64, 373–390 (2005)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Naumann, J., Wolf, J.: On Prandtl’s turbulence model: existence of weak solutions to the equations of stationary turbulent pipe-flow. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S 6(5), 1371–1390 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    H.B. de Oliveira and A. Paiva. On a one equation turbulent model with feedbacks. In Differential and Difference Equations with Applications, S. Pinelas et al. (eds.), Springer Proc. Math. Stat. 164 (2016), 51–61Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    H.B. de Oliveira and A. Paiva. A stationary turbulent one-equation model with applications in porous media. J. Math. Fluid Mech. First Online: 12 May 2017Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pedras, M.H.J., de Lemos, M.J.S.: On the definition of turbulent kinetic energy for flow in porous media. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer 27(2), 211–220 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rakotoson, J.-M.: Quasilinear elliptic problems with measures as data. Differ. Integral Equ. 4(3), 449–457 (1991)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Temam, R.: Navier-Stokes equations. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1979)zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Orthogonal Publishing and Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.FCT, Universidade do AlgarveFaroPortugal
  2. 2.CMAFCIO, Universidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations