Advertisement

Indian Economic Review

, Volume 54, Issue 2, pp 203–237 | Cite as

Jaw–jaw and war–war: a game-theoretic exploration of violence in electoral politics

  • Soumyanetra MunshiEmail author
Article
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

This paper studies the interplay between violence and electoral politics. Often political parties not only compete electorally with each other, but also use violence in the electoral processes. This paper game-theoretically models the interplay of such ‘extra-electoral’ investments and electoral outcomes in an otherwise standard probabilistic voting model. We find that the political party that is likely to be more popular is also more likely to expend greater resources towards ‘extra-electoral’ elements, in turn spawning greater violence, even when such investments are disliked by all voters. We also look at some plausible extensions of the benchmark model where the basic conclusions still hold true. The essential flavour and predictions of the model are borne out by several historical and contemporary instances of politics.

Keywords

Violence and politics Partisanships and conflict Electoral competition and violence Conflict and elections 

JEL Classification

C72 D72 D74 

Notes

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2006). Economic Origins of Dictator Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2008). Persistence of Power, Institutions. American Economic Review, 98, 267–93.Google Scholar
  3. Altbach, P. G. (1968). Student politics and higher education in India. Daedalus, 97(1), 254–273.Google Scholar
  4. Andersen, W., & Pant, A. (1970). Student politics at Allahabad University - II. Economic and Political Weekly, 5(24), 941–948.Google Scholar
  5. Ansolabehere, S., Iyengar, S., Simon, A., & Valentino, N. (1994). Does attack advertising demobilize the electorate? American Political Science Review, 88, 829–838.Google Scholar
  6. Besley, T., & Persson, T. (2011). The logic of political violence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(3), 1411–1445.Google Scholar
  7. Collier, P. (2009). Wars, guns and votes, democracy in dangerous places. Harper Collins, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Collier, P., & Vicente, P. C. (2012). Violence, bribery, and fraud: The political economy of elections in Sub-Saharan Africa. Public Choice, 153(1/2), 117–147.Google Scholar
  9. Chacón, M., Robinson, J. A., & Torvik, R. (2011). When is democracy an equilibrium? Theory and evidence from Colombia’s La Violencia. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 55(3), 366396.Google Scholar
  10. Chaturvedi, A. (2005). Rigging elections with violence. Public Choice, 125(1/2), 189–202.Google Scholar
  11. Dadu, A. (2014). Student Politics in India, ”Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research”, type = ”M. Phil. thesis”, year = ”2014”.Google Scholar
  12. Dasgupta, I. (2009). Living wage, class conflict and ethnic strife. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72, 750–765.Google Scholar
  13. Dixit, A. (1987). Strategic behavior in contests. American Economic Review, 77(5), 891–898.Google Scholar
  14. Dunning, T. (2011). Fighting and voting: Violent conflict and electoral politics. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 55(3), 327–339.Google Scholar
  15. Ellman, M., & Wantchekon, L. (2000). Electoral competition under the threat of political unrest. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(2), 499531.Google Scholar
  16. Feddersen, T. J., & Sandroni, A. (2006). A theory of participation in elections. American Economic Review, 96(4), 1271–1282.Google Scholar
  17. Garramone, G. M. (1984). Voter response to negative political Ads. Journalism Quarterly, 61, 250–59.Google Scholar
  18. Giovanopoulos, C., & Dalakoglou, D. (2011). From ruptures to eruption: A genealogy of the December 2008 Revolt in Greece, in Revolt And Crisis in Greece: Between a Present Yet to Pass and a Future Still to Come, Edited by Antonis Vradis and Dimitris Dalakoglou; AK Press & Occupied London Oakland, Baltimore, Edinburgh, London & Athens.Google Scholar
  19. Glazer, M. (1968). Student politics in a Chilean University. Daedalus, 97(1), 99–115.Google Scholar
  20. Grossman, G., & Helpman, E. (2001). Special Interest Politics. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gutiérrez-Romero, Roxana (2014)Google Scholar
  22. Halsey, A. H., & Marks, S. (1968). British student politics. Daedalus, 97(1), 116–136.Google Scholar
  23. Hibbs, D. (1973). Mass Political Violence: A Cross-national Causal Analysis. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Levy, D. (1981). Student politics in contemporary Latin America. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 14(2), 353–376.Google Scholar
  25. Lipset, S. M. (1964). University students and politics in underdeveloped countries. Minerva, 3(1), 15–56.Google Scholar
  26. Lyman, P. N. (1965). Students and politics in Indonesia and Korea. Pacific Affairs, 38(3/4), 282–293.Google Scholar
  27. Machado, F., Scartascini, C., & Tommasi, M. (2011). Political institutions and street protests in Latin America. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 55(3), 340365.Google Scholar
  28. Mares, I., & Zhu, B. (2015). The production of electoral intimidation: Economic and political incentives. Comparative Politics, 48(1), 23–41.Google Scholar
  29. McClung, R. L., Warfield, G. A., & Martin, O. R. (1930). Place and role of student organizations in schools of business. The Journal of Business of the University of Chicago, 3(4), 87–97.Google Scholar
  30. Miettinen, T., Ropponen, O., & Saaskilahti, P. (2017). Prospect theory, fairness, and the escalation of conflict at negotiation impasse. mimeo.Google Scholar
  31. Oommen, T. K. (1974). Student politics in India: The case of Delhi University. Asian Survey, 14(9), 777–794.Google Scholar
  32. Palfrey, T. R., & Rosenthal, H. (1983). A strategic calculus of voting. Public Choice, 41(1), 7–53.Google Scholar
  33. Palfrey, T. R., & Rosenthal, H. (1985). Voter participation and strategic uncertainty. The American Political Science Review, 79(1), 62–78.Google Scholar
  34. Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2000). Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  35. Pinner, F. A. (1964). Student trade-unionism in France, Belgium and Holland: Anticipatory socialization and role-seeking. Sociology of Education, 37(3), 177–199.Google Scholar
  36. Pinner, F. A. (1968). Tradition and transgression: Western European students in the postwar world. Daedalus, 97(1), 137–155.Google Scholar
  37. Rudolph, L. I., Rudolph, S. H., & Ahmed, K. (1971). Student Politics and National Politics in India. Economic and Political Weekly. Special Number.Google Scholar
  38. Schlesinger, B. (1963). Student unrest in Indian universities. Comparative Education Review, 6(3), 218–23.Google Scholar
  39. Seymour, C., & Frary, D. P. (1918). How the world votes—The story of democratic development in elections. Springfield: C.A. Nichols Company.Google Scholar
  40. Silverstein, J. (1968). Burmese student politics in a changing society. Daedalus, 97(1), 274–292.Google Scholar
  41. Silverstein, J. (1970). Burmese and Malaysian student politics: A preliminary comparative inquiry. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 1(1), 3–22.Google Scholar
  42. Simpser, A. (2012). Does electoral manipulation discourage voter turnout? Evidence from Mexico. The Journal of Politics, 74(3), 782–795.Google Scholar
  43. Skaperdas, S., & Grofman, B. (1995). Modeling negative campaigning. The American Political Science Review, 89(1), 49–61.Google Scholar
  44. Skaperdas, S. (1996). Contest success functions. Economic Theory, 7(2), 283–290.Google Scholar
  45. Skaperdas, S. (2003). Restraining the genuine homo economicus: Why the economy cannot be divorced from its governance. Economics and Politics, 15, 135–162.Google Scholar
  46. Strauss, S., & Taylor, C. (2009). Democratization and electoral violence in Sub-Saharan Africa, 1990–2007. APSA 2009 Toronto Meeting Paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1451561.
  47. Thurner, P. W., & Eymann, A. (2000). Policy-specific alienation and indifference in the calculus of voting: A Simultaneous Model of Party Choice and Abstention. Public Choice, 102(1/2), 51–77.Google Scholar
  48. Wantchekon, L. (1999). On the nature of first democratic elections. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 43. The Democratic Transition Process, 2, 245–258.Google Scholar
  49. Weinberg, I., & Walker, K. N. (1969). Student politics and political systems: Toward a typology. American Journal of Sociology, 75(1), 77–96.Google Scholar
  50. Wilkinson, S. I. (2004). Votes and violence: Electoral competition and Ethnic Riots in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Other resources:

  1. European Commission and United Nations Development Programme constituted Joint Task Force on Electoral Assistance, Summary Report of Thematic Workshop on Elections, Violence and Conflict Prevention held during June 20 24, 2011 at the Barcelona International Peace Centre Montjuic Castle, Barcelona, Spain. https://www.undp.org/content/dam/brussels/docs/Other/JTF%202011.06_Summary_report-Barcelona_workshop_Elections&conflict.pdf.

Copyright information

© Editorial Office, Indian Economic Review 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Economic Research Unit (ERU)Indian Statistical Institute (ISI)KolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations