Advertisement

Assessment of Cyclone Vulnerability, Hazard Evaluation and Mitigation Capacity for Analyzing Cyclone Risk using GIS Technique: a Study on Sundarban Biosphere Reserve, India

  • Sk Ajim AliEmail author
  • Rumana Khatun
  • Ateeque Ahmad
  • Syed Naushad Ahmad
Original Article
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

Cyclones are one of the devastating natural hazards in the earth that have extensive consequences on both life and livelihood. Assessment of cyclone risk is important not only for the survival of people but also for designing adaptation strategies in major cyclone-prone areas. Risk can be defined as the integrated function of vulnerability, hazard, and mitigation capacity. Risk assessment is a very protracted task needing analysis of multiple factors which are also changes with changing geographical location. Thus, we applied the multi-criteria decision-making technique to assess the block-level risk to cyclone in the Sundarban region, India. The weight-based analysis reveals that nearness to coastline and distance from cyclone tract have the greatest vulnerability exposure; windspeed has the highest hazard score; and nearness to cyclone shelter and cyclone awareness, on the other hand, has utmost mitigation capacity to cyclone risk analysis. The risk analysis shows that out of the total blocks (19) in the Sundarban, nearly half of the blocks are with very high to moderate cyclone risk with the least mitigation capacity to cope with such natural hazards. The blocks like Gosaba and Kultali to be found in the southern portions and nearby to the coast exposed more risk to cyclone while those situated farther to the coast in the central and northern parts exposed low risk. The findings of the present study may have high implications for developing more mitigation capacity in a very-high- to a moderate-cyclone-risk area. Therefore, the applied approach can help the local authorities in identifying vulnerable and hazard areas and building actionable strategies for mitigation and reworked copy of cyclone hazards in the Sundarban Biosphere Reserve.

Keywords

Cyclone vulnerability Risk evaluation MCDM technique Sundarban biosphere reserve 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thankfully acknowledge the anonymous reviewers, handling editor and editor-in-chief for their valuable time, prolific comments and appreciated suggestions during the review which helped in improving the overall quality of the manuscript.

Funding

No fund was received from any sources.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alam E, Collins AE (2010) Cyclone disaster vulnerability and response experiences in coastal Bangladesh. Disasters 34(4):931–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali SA, Ahmad A (2018) Using analytic hierarchy process with GIS for dengue risk mapping in Kolkata Municipal Corporation, West Bengal, India. Spat Inf Res 26(4):449–469.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-018-0187-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ali SA, Khatun R, Ahmad A, Ahmad SN (2019) Application of GIS-based analytic hierarchy process and frequency ratio model to flood vulnerable mapping and risk area estimation at Sundarban region. Model Earth Syst Environ, India.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-019-00593-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Birkmann J (2007) Risk and vulnerability indicators at different scales: applicability, usefulness and policy implications. Environ Hazards 7(1):20–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bobby SA (2012) Disaster Risk Index (DRI) for Tropical Cyclone of Bangladesh. Int J Eng Res Technol 1(3):1–6Google Scholar
  6. Brooks N, Neil Adger W, Mick Kelly P (2005) The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation. Global Environ Change 15(2):151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen H, Ito Y, Sawamukai M, Tokunaga T (2015) Flood hazard assessment in the Kujukuri Plain of Chiba Prefecture, Japan, based on GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Nat Hazards 78(1):105–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coppola DP (2006) Introduction to international disaster management. Butterworth-Heinemann, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  9. Das S (2012) The role of natural ecosystems and socio-economic factors in the vulnerability of coastal villages to cyclone and storm surge. Nat Hazards 64(1):531–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Das D (2017) Tropical cyclones and coastal communities: the dialectics of social and environmental change in the Sundarban delta. J Indian Ocean Region 13(2):257–275.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19480881.2017.1326701 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dewan AM (2013a) Vulnerability and risk assessment in floods in a megacity. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 139–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dewan AM (2013b) Hazards, risk, and vulnerability in floods in a megacity. Springer, pp 35–74.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5875-9_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dückers M, Frerks G, Birkmann J (2015) Exploring the plexus of context and consequences: an empirical test of a theory of disaster vulnerability. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 13:85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frazier T, Wood N, Yarnal B (2009) A framework for using GIS and stakeholder input to assess vulnerability to coastal hazards: a case study from Sarasota County, Florida, Building safer communities. Risk governance, spatial planning and responses to natural hazards 58:226–245Google Scholar
  15. Frazier T, Thompson C, Dezzani R (2013) Development of a spatially explicit vulnerability–resilience model for community level hazard mitigation enhancement. Disaster Management and Human Health Risk III, (Ed. CA Brebbia), 13-24Google Scholar
  16. Ganova L, Zelenakova M, Purcz P, Kuzevicova Z, Hlavata H (2013) A rainfall distribution and their influence on flood generation in the Eastern Slovakia. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 182(6):1645–1652.  https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201361061645 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ghanbarpour MR, Salimi S, Hipel KW (2013) A comparative evaluation of flood mitigation alternatives using GIS-based river hydraulics modelling and multicriteria decision analysis. Flood Risk Management 6:319–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gong J, Maher A (2014) Use of mobile lidar data to assess hurricane damage and visualize community vulnerability. Transportation research record. J Transp Res Board 2459(1):119–126.  https://doi.org/10.3141/2459-14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haq M, Akhtar M, Muhammad S, Paras S, Rahmatullah J (2012) Techniques of remote sensing and GIS for flood monitoring and damage assessment: a case study of Sindh province, Pakistan. Egypt J Remote Sens Space Sci 15:135–141Google Scholar
  20. Hoque MAA, Phinn S, Roelfsema C, Childs I (2017) Tropical cyclone disaster management using remote sensing and spatial analysis: a review. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 22:345–354.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.02.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hossain MS, Karlson M, Neset TS (2019) Application of GIS for cyclone vulnerability analysis of Bangladesh. Earth Sciences Malaysia (ESMY) 3(1):25–34. http://doi.org/10.26480/esmy.01.2019.25.34
  22. Hwang C, Lin M (1987) Group decision making under multiple criteria. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Khan MSA (2008) Disaster preparedness for sustainable development in Bangladesh. Disaster Prevent Manag 17(5):662–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Khomarudin MR (2010) Tsunami risk and vulnerability: remote sensing and GIS approaches for surface roughness determination, settlement mapping and population distribution modelling, der Ludwig- Maximilians-Universität München: der Fakultät für Geowissenschaften. Bonn, Germany, p 195Google Scholar
  25. Kumar TS, Mahendra RS, Nayak S, Radhakrishnan K, Sahu KC (2010) Coastal vulnerability assessment for Orissa State, East Coast of India. J Coastal Res 263:523–534.  https://doi.org/10.2112/09-1186.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Landsea CW (2000) Climate variability of tropical cyclones: past, present, and future. In: Pielke R, Jr., Pielke R, Sr. (eds) Storms, vol. 1. Routledge, New York, pp 220–241Google Scholar
  27. Li K, Li GS (2013) Risk assessment on storm surges in the coastal area of Guangdong Province. Nat Hazards 68:1129–1139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mahapatra M, Ramakrishnan R, Rajawat AS (2015) Coastal vulnerability assessment using analytical hierarchical process for South Gujarat coast, India. Nat Hazards 76(1):139–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mahendra RS et al (2011) Assessment and management of coastal multi-hazard vulnerability along the Cuddalore–Villupuram, east coast of India using geospatial techniques. Ocean Coast Manag 54(4):302–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Malczewski J (1999a) GIS and multi criteria decision analysis. Wiley, Canada, p 392Google Scholar
  31. Malczewski J (1999) GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. WileyGoogle Scholar
  32. Malczewski J (2004) GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: a critical overview. Prog Plan 62(1):3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Malczewski J (2006) GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 20:703–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mallick F, Rahman A (2013) Cyclone and tornado risk and reduction approaches in Bangladesh. In: Shaw R, Mallick F, Islam A (ed) Disaster risk reduction approaches in Bangladesh. Springer, Berlin, pp 91–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Matyas D, Pelling M (2012) disaster vulnerability and resilience: theory, modelling and prospective, foresight. Government Office for Science, London, UK. 73. Assessed from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/287456/12-1298-disaster-vulnerability-resilience-theory.pdf
  36. Mayaja NA, Srinivasa CV (2016) Flood hazard zoning using analytic hierarchy process: a case study for Pampa river basin, Kerala, India. J Geomatics 10:1. http://www.isgindia.org
  37. Moel HD, Vliet MV, Aerts JCJH (2014) Evaluating the effect of flood damage-reducing measures: a case study of the unembanked area of Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Reg Environ Change 14(895):908Google Scholar
  38. Papaioannou G, Vasiliades L, Loukas A (2015) Multi-criteria analysis framework for potential flood prone areas mapping. Water Resour Manag 29:399–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Paul A, Rahman M (2006) Cyclone mitigation perspectives in the Islands of Bangladesh: a case of Sandwip and Hatia Islands. Coastal Management 34(2):199–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Paul SK, Routray JK (2010) Household response to cyclone and induced surge in coastal Bangladesh: coping strategies and explanatory variables. Nat Hazards 57(2):477–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pournamdarian A (2010) Multi-criteria decision making by using inner product of vectors. Knol. Accessed from http://knol.google.com/k/ali-pournamdarian/multi-criteria-decision-making-byusing/uhvrtfzaegen
  42. Pramanik MK et al (2015) Coastal vulnerability assessment of the predicted sea level rise in the coastal zone of Krishna-Godavari delta region, Andhra Pradesh, east coast of India. Environ Dev Sustain 8(6):1635–1655.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9708-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rahman AF, Dragoni D, El-Masri B (2011) Response of the Sundarbans coastline to sea level rise and decreased sediment flow: a remote sensing assessment. Remote Sens Environ 115(12):3121–3128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.06.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rahmati O, Pourghasemi HR, Zeinivand H (2015) Flood susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence models in the Golastan Province, Iran. Geocarto Int  https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2015.1041559 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rahmati O, Zeinivand H, Besharat M (2016) Flood hazard zoning in Yasooj region, Iran, using GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 7(3):1000–1017.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2015.1045043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rashid AKMM (2013) Understanding vulnerability and risks. In: Shaw R, Mallick F, Islam A (eds) Disaster risk reduction approaches in Bangladesh. Springer, pp 23–43.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54252-0_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Roy DC, Blaschke T (2015) Spatial vulnerability assessment of floods in the coastal regions of Bangladesh. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 6(1):21–44.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2013.816785 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Roy DC Blaschke T (2013) Spatial vulnerability assessment of floods in the coastal regions of Bangladesh. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 1–24Google Scholar
  49. Saaty TL (1980) The analytical hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48:9–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Saaty TL, Vargas LG (2000) Models, methods, concepts and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Kluwer Academic, BostonGoogle Scholar
  52. Sahana M, Sajjad H (2018) Vulnerability to storm surge flood using remote sensing and GIS techniques: a study on Sundarban Biosphere Reserve, India. Remote Sens Appl Soc Environ 13:106–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2018.10.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sakib M, Nihal F, Haque A, Rahman M, Ali M (2015) Sundarban as a buffer against storm surge flooding. World J Eng Technol 3:59–64.  https://doi.org/10.4236/wjet.2015.33C009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shahabi H, Hashim M (2015) Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based statistical models and Remote sensing data in tropical environment. Sci Rep 5Google Scholar
  55. Solin L (2012) Spatial variability in the flood vulnerability of urban areas in the headwater basins of Slovakia. Flood Risk Manag 5:303–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Taramelli AL, Melelli L, Pasqui M, Sorichetta A (2008) Estimating hurricane hazards using a GIS system. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 8:839–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Taramelli AL, Melelli L, Pasqui M, Sorichetta A (2010) Modelling risk hurricane elements in potentially affected areas by a GIS system. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 1(4):349–373.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2010.532972 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. UNISDR (2011) Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction: revealing risk, redefining development. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  59. Vahidnia MH, Alesheikh AA, Alimohammadi A, Hosseinali F (2010) A GIS-based neurofuzzy procedure for integrating knowledge and data in landslide susceptibility mapping. Comput Geosci 36:1101–1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yin J, Xu S, Wang, J., Zhong H, Hu Y, Yin Z, Wang K, Zhang X (2010) Vulnerability assessment of combined impacts of sea level rise and coastal flooding for China’s coastal region using remote sensing and GIS. In: 18th international conference. Geoinformatics, pp 1–4Google Scholar
  61. Yin J, Yin Z, Xu S (2013) Composite risk assessment of typhoon-induced disaster for China’s coastal area. Nat Hazards 69(3):1423–1434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zelenakova M, Ganova L, Kuzevicova Z (2011) Using ranking method and geographical information system for evaluation flood vulnerable areas in eastern Slovakia. J Landsc Manag 2(2):21–25Google Scholar

Copyright information

© King Abdulaziz University and Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography, Faculty of ScienceAligarh Muslim UniversityAligarhIndia

Personalised recommendations