Advertisement

Earth Systems and Environment

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 621–632 | Cite as

Understanding the Interdependence Between Worker Livelihoods and Decent Work at Certified and Non-Certified Mango Orchards in Pakistan

  • Muhammad Bilal AhsanEmail author
  • Mubashir Mehdi
  • Burhan Ahmad
  • Umar Sohaib Ahmad
Original Article
  • 119 Downloads

Abstract

There is little evidence of published literature regarding the incorporation of on-farm workers into global fresh produce value chains. Agriculture, a major sector in Pakistan, employs 50% of the total labor force, and contributes 21 and 30% to GDP and GNP, respectively. Two-thirds of the population resides in rural areas. Mango is the second major fruit product in the country. The horticulture industry of Pakistan in general, and the mango sector specifically, has been the focus of research and development efforts by governmental and various international developmental organizations. A participatory value chain approach has been adopted to enhance technological advancements and increase the competitiveness of farm enterprises. The adoption of best practices is slow due to a lack of attention to occupational health measures, lack of training and low wages among on-farm workers. Market incentives, compliance standardization and increasing demand for certified products has driven mango farms in Pakistan to seek certification by organizations such as GLOBALG.A.P., which has established provisions for decent work to focus on worker rights and safety. A sustainable livelihood for workers can be achieved by upgrading the value chain system through institutional reforms and an emerging philosophy of decent work put forth by the International Labour Organization. In this study, the effects of decency in the value chain on the income of on-farm workers were assessed at both GlobalG.A.P.-certified and non-certified orchards in Sindh and southern Punjab. Because of the food quality and safety standards required for certified orchards within the global value chain system, these compliant orchards offer greater potential for improving the livelihoods of on-farm workers. To overcome constraints, extensive awareness campaigns should be launched within the mango industry by institutional supportive bodies.

Keywords

Decent work Global value chains Pakistan mango industry Sustainable livelihood GlobalG.A.P. compliance On-farm workers 

References

  1. ACIAR (2007) A constraint analysis of Pakistan mango supply chain. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  2. Adato M, Meinzen-Dick R (2002) Assessing the impact of agricultural research on poverty using the sustainable livelihoods framework. International Food Policy Research Institute, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  3. Astill A, Griffith M (2004) Clean up your computer: working conditions in the electronics sector. CAFOD, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Banerjee B, Knight JB (1985) Caste discrimination in the Indian urban labour market. J Dev Econ 17(3):277–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barrientos S, Gereffi G, Rossi A (2010) Economic and social upgrading in global production networks: developing a framework for analysis. Int Labor Rev 150(3–4):319–340Google Scholar
  6. Bartel AP (1995) Training, wage growth, and job performance: evidence from a company database. J Labor Econ 13(3):401–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Best S, Mamic I (2008) Global agri-food chains: employment and social issues in fresh fruit and vegetables. International Labour Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown D (2007) Globalization and employment conditions study. World Bank, Washington (social protection discussion paper 0708) Google Scholar
  9. Chambers R, Conway G (1992) Sustainable rural livelihoods: practical concepts for the 21st century. IDS, Brighton (IDS discussion paper 296) Google Scholar
  10. Collins JL (2009) Threads: gender, labor, and power in the global apparel industry. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  11. Collins RJ, Dunne AJ (2007) A rapid supply chain appraisal approach for agribusiness development projects. In: II International symposium on improving the performance of supply chains in the transitional economies paper no. 794 Sep 23, pp 73–80Google Scholar
  12. Collins R, Iqbal M (2010) Integrating post-harvest, marketing and supply chain systems for sustainable industry development: the Pakistan mango industry as work in progress. In: Batt PJ (ed) Third international symposium on improving the performance of supply chains in the transitional economies, 4–8 July 2010, Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  13. CSF (2007) Horticulture action plan: background paper. Competitive Support Fund. Ministry of Finance, Government of Pakistan, IslamabadGoogle Scholar
  14. Das MB, Dutta P (2007) Does caste matter for wages in the Indian labor market?. World Bank, Washington (draft paper) Google Scholar
  15. Diewert WE (1974) The effects of unionization on wages and employment: a general equilibrium analysis. Econ Inq 12(3):319–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. FAO (2015) FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) October 03, 2015Google Scholar
  17. Freeman RB (1981) The effect of unionism on fringe benefits. ILR Rev 34(4):489–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Freeman RB (1982) Union wage practices and wage dispersion within establishments. ILR Rev 36(1):3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Freeman RB (1984) Longitudinal analyses of the effects of trade unions. J Labor Econ 2(1):1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ghafoor A, Mustafa K, Mushtaq K, Abedullah (2009) Cointegration and causality: an application to major mango markets in Pakistan. Lahore J Econ 14:85–113Google Scholar
  21. Ghani MA (2012) Article: labour laws and agriculture workers. Pakistan. Business recorder. Available at ​ https://fp.brecorder.com/2012/01/201201151142813/. Accessed 15 Jan 2012
  22. Global GAP (2016) Database, certified orchards in Pakistan. Available at  https://www.GlobalGAP.org
  23. Government of Pakistan (2009) Pakistan economic survey 2013–14. Government of Pakistan, Finance Division, Economic Affairs Wing, IslamabadGoogle Scholar
  24. Government of Pakistan (2016) Agricultural statistics of Pakistan 2013–14. Pakistan Bureau of Statistics, Statistics Division, IslamabadGoogle Scholar
  25. Griliches Z, Mason WM (1972) Education, income, and ability. J Political Econ 80(3, part 2):74–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gujarati DN (1995) Basic econometrics, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, MaidenheachGoogle Scholar
  27. Gundersen B (2003) Unions and the well-being of low-skill workers. Dissertation, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington UniversityGoogle Scholar
  28. Hale A, Wills J (2007) Women working worldwide: transnational networks, corporate social responsibility and action research. Glob Netw 7(4):453–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hirsch BT (1997) Unionization and economic performance: evidence on productivity, profits, investment, and growth. Fraser Institute, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  30. Hirsch BT, Macpherson DA (2003) Union membership and coverage database from the current population survey: note. ILR Review 56(2):349–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hirsch BT, Macpherson DA, DuMond JM (1997) Workers’ compensation recipiency in union and nonunion workplaces. ILR Rev 50(2):213–236Google Scholar
  32. HRW (2002) Tainted harvest. child labor and obstacles to organizing on Ecuador’s banana plantations. Human Rights Watch, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Humphrey J, Memedovic O (2006) Global value chains in the agri-food sector. A report submitted to (FAO) Food and Agriculture Organizations of United Nations. https://agris.fao.org
  34. Hurst P, Termine P, Karl M (2005) Agricultural workers and their contribution to Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development, International Labour Organization (ILO), International Union of Food, Agricultural, Hotel, Restaurant, Catering, Tobacco and Allied Workers’ Associations (IUF). Report submitted to (FAO) Food and Agriculture Organizations of United Nations. 03 AprilGoogle Scholar
  35. ICDD (2014) Supply Chain Governance: A decent work approach to optimize mango value chain in Pakistan. Project details. Available at http://www.uni-kassel.de/einrichtungen/international-center-for-development-and-decent-work-icdd/research/research-2015-2019/1-global-agricultural-production-systems-gaps.html
  36. ILO (2015) International Labour Organization, Goal #8, agenda for sustainable development; decent work and economic growth. International Labour Organization, Geneva. Available at ​https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---relconf/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_545837.pdf
  37. ILO (2016), Decent Work Programme in Pakistan, SDG N0. 8, International Labour Organization. Available at​ https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_mas/---program/documents/genericdocument/wcms_561025.pdf
  38. Kadigi RM, Mdoe NS, Senkondo E, Mpenda Z (2007) Effects of food safety standards on the livelihoods of actors in the Nile perch value chain in Tanzania (No. 2007: 24). DIIS working paperGoogle Scholar
  39. Locke R, Kochan T, Romis M, Qin F (2007) Beyond corporate codes of conduct: work organization and labour standards at Nike’s suppliers. Int Labour Rev 146(1–2):21–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mehdi M, Adeel A, Ahmad Z, Abdullah M, Hussain F (2014) Effectiveness of a “whole of chain” approach in linking farmers to market: a case of Pakistan mango market. UMK Procedia 1:57–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mehdi M, Ahmad B, Yaseen A, Adeel A, Sayyed N (2016) A comparative study of traditional versus best practices mango value chain. Pak J Agri Sci 53(3):733–742Google Scholar
  42. Mincer J (1974) Schooling, experience, and earnings. Human Behavior and Social Institutions No. 2Google Scholar
  43. Mishel L, Walters M (2003) How unions help all workers. EPI Briefing Paper# 143Google Scholar
  44. Nuwayhid IA (2004) Occupational health research in developing countries: a partner for social justice. Am J Public Health 94(11):1916–1921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Oxfam International (2004) Trading away our rights: women working in global supply chains. Oxfam International, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  46. PHDEC (2005) Mango marketing strategy, Pakistan Horticultural Development and Export Company, LahoreGoogle Scholar
  47. Raworth K (2004) Trading away our rights: women working in global supply chains. Oxfam Policy Pr Priv Sect 1(1):1–52Google Scholar
  48. Raynolds LT, Douglas M, Peter LT (2004) Fair trade coffee: building producer capacity via global networks. J Int Dev 16(8):1109–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Scherrer C (2017) Addressing the decent work deficit in agricultural supply chains. Paper presented in 5th conference on regulating for decent work, 3–5 July, ILO GenevaGoogle Scholar
  50. Serrat O (2008). The sustainable livelihoods approach, DC: Asian Development Bank. Knowledge Solutions. November, 15. https://www.adb.org/Knowledgesolutions
  51. Smith S, Tallontire A, Dolan C, Barrientos S (2005) Reaching the marginalised? Gender value chains and ethical trade in African horticulture. Dev Pract 15(3–4):559–571Google Scholar
  52. Sono HS (2013) The effects of Adra’s mango project on livelihoods in the Yilo Krobo district. Doctoral dissertation, University of Ghana)Google Scholar
  53. Wognum PM, Bremmers H, Trienekens JHVD, Vorst JGAJ, Bloemhof JM (2011) Systems for sustainability and transparency of food supply chains—current status and challenges. Adv Eng Inform 25(1):65–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammad Bilal Ahsan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mubashir Mehdi
    • 1
  • Burhan Ahmad
    • 1
  • Umar Sohaib Ahmad
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Business Management SciencesUniversity of AgricultureFaisalabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations