Journal of the Indian Institute of Science

, Volume 97, Issue 2, pp 245–259 | Cite as

TetR Regulators: A Structural and Functional Perspective

Review Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Tetracycline repressor family of transcription regulators (TetR-FTRs) is one of the most predominant families of transcription factors in the prokaryotic system. Classically, they are associated with antimicrobial resistance since they regulate the genes encoding the efflux pumps that export antibiotics out of the cell. Analysis shows that TetR-FTRs adopt a broader role in bacterial function than earlierly envisioned. Apart from efflux of antibiotics these proteins also regulate pathways associated with cell–cell signaling, antibiotic biosynthesis, biofilm formation, etc. Furthermore, an in-depth scrutiny of the available three-dimensional structures of TetR-FTRs and comparison of their various forms (apo, liganded and DNA-bound) helped to obtain valuable insights into the underlying molecular mechanism of action. TetR-FTRs possess a modular architecture with the N-terminal DNA-binding domain comprising canonical DNA-binding helix-turn-helix motif that is mostly conserved, whereas, the C-terminal signal reception domain is evolutionarily more diverse as it is tailored to accept the appropriate ligand. The TetR-FTRs serve as repressors when bound to their target DNA sequence, in the absence of their signaling molecule. On ligand binding, de-repression occurs by the coordinated motions of helices at the interface of the two domains. The DNA-binding domain undergoes a pendulum-like shift along the connecting helix, α4, and this motion transmits the signal. Overall, an understanding of the allosteric mechanism allows these proteins to switch from one state to another, an important transformation of their regulatory function.

Keywords

Tetracycline repressor Antimicrobial resistance Quorum sensing DNA binding Allostery TetR CprB Streptomyces 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Shallcross LJ, Howard SJ, Fowler T, Davies SC (2015) Tackling the threat of antimicrobial resistance: from policy to sustainable action. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 370:20140082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wilson DN (2014) Ribosome-targeting antibiotics and mechanisms of bacterial resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol 12:35–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cuthbertson L, Nodwell JR (2013) The TetR family of regulators. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 77:440–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schumacher MA, Miller MC, Grkovic S, Brown MH, Skurray RA, Brennan RG (2001) Structural mechanisms of QacR induction and multidrug recognition. Science 294:2158–2163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bolla JR, Do SV, Long F, Dai L, Su C-C, Lei H-T, Chen X, Gerkey JE, Murphy DC, Rajashankar KR, Zhang Q, Yu EW (2012) Structural and functional analysis of the transcriptional regulator Rv3066 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nucleic Acids Res 40:9340–9355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McMurry L, Petrucci RE, Levy SB (1980) Active efflux of tetracycline encoded by four genetically different tetracycline resistance determinants in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:3974–3977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yamaguchi A, Iwasaki-Ohba Y, Ono N, Kaneko-Ohdera M, Sawai T (1991) Stoichiometry of metal-tetracycline/H + antiport mediated by transposon Tn10-encoded tetracycline resistance protein in Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett 282:415–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bertrand KP, Postle K, Wray LV Jr, Reznikoff WS (1983) Overlapping divergent promoters control expression of Tn10 tetracycline resistance. Gene 23:149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hinrichs W, Kisker C, Duvel M, Muller A, Tovar K, Hillen W, Saenger W (1994) Structure of the Tet repressor-tetracycline complex and regulation of antibiotic resistance. Science 264:418–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kisker C, Hinrichs W, Tovar K, Hillen W, Saenger W (1995) The complex formed between Tet repressor and tetracycline-Mg2+ reveals mechanism of antibiotic resistance. J Mol Biol 247:260–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Le TBK, Schumacher MA, Lawson DM, Brennan RG, Buttner MJ (2011) The crystal structure of the TetR family transcriptional repressor SimR bound to DNA and the role of a flexible N-terminal extension in minor groove binding. Nucleic Acids Res 39:9433–9447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Itou H, Watanabe N, Yao M, Shirakihara Y, Tanaka I (2010) Crystal structures of the multidrug binding repressor Corynebacterium glutamicum CgmR in complex with inducers and with an operator. J Mol Biol 403:174–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sawai H, Yamanaka M, Sugimoto H, Shiro Y, Aono S (2012) Structural basis for the transcriptional regulation of heme homeostasis in Lactococcus lactis. J Biol Chem 287:30755–30768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tonthat NK, Milam SL, Chinnam N, Whitfill T, Margolin W, Schumacher MA (2013) SlmA forms a higher-order structure on DNA that inhibits cytokinetic Z-ring formation over the nucleoid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:10586–10591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cho H, McManus HR, Dove SL, Bernhardt TG (2011) Nucleoid occlusion factor SlmA is a DNA-activated FtsZ polymerization antagonist. Proc Natl Acad Sci, USAGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang Y-M, Zhu K, Frank MW, Rock CO (2007) A Pseudomonas aeruginosa transcription factor that senses fatty acid structure. Mol Microbiol 66:622–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yang M, Gao C, Cui T, An J, He Z-G (2012) A TetR-like regulator broadly affects the expressions of diverse genes in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Nucleic Acids Res 40:1009–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Palanca C, Rubio V (2016) Structure of AmtR, the global nitrogen regulator of Corynebacterium glutamicum, in free and DNA-bound forms. FEBS J 283(6):1039–1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ho NAT, Dawes SS, Crowe AM, Casabon I, eumll Gao C, Kendall SL, Baker EN, Eltis LD, Lott JS (2016) The structure of the transcriptional repressor Kstr in complex with CoA thioester cholesterol metabolites sheds light on the regulation of cholesterol catabolism in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Biol. Chem 291:7256–7266 (Vol and page nos for this ref and ref. 14 also) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ramos JL, Martinez-Bueno M, Molina-Henares AJ, Teran W, Watanabe K, Zhang X, Gallegos MT, Brennan R, Tobes R (2005) The TetR family of transcriptional repressors. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 69:326–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Horinouchi S, Beppu T (2007) Harmonal control by A-factor of morphological development and secondary metabolism in Streptomyces. J Bacteriol 83:277–295Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Berdy J (2005) Bioactive microbial metabolites. J Antibiot 58:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Von Dohren H (2003) Antibiotics: actions, origins, resistance by C. Walsh. ASM Press, Washington, p 345 (Protein Sci 13: 3059–3060 (2004)) Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Williams P (2007) Quorum sensing, communication and cross-kingdom signalling in the bacterial world. Microbiol 153:3923–3938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tahlan K, Yu Z, Xu Y, Davidson AR, Nodwell JR (2008) Ligand recognition by ActR, a TetR-like regulator of actinorhodin export. J Mol Biol 383:753–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Onaka H, Ando N, Nihira T, Yamada Y, Beppu T, Horinouchi S (1995) Cloning and characterization of the A-factor receptor gene from Streptomyces griseus. J Bacteriol 177:6083–6092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yamazaki H, Ohnishi Y, Horinouchi S (2000) An A-factor-dependent extracytoplasmic function sigma factor (σAdsA) that is essential for morphological development in Streptomyces griseus. J Bacteriol 182:4596–4605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Onaka H, Horinouchi S (1997) DNA-binding activity of the A-factor receptor protein and its recognition DNA sequences. Mol Microbiol 24:991–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bassler BL, Losick R (2006) Bacterially speaking. Cell 125:237–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wolf D, Rippa V, Mobarec JC, Sauer P, Adlung L, Kolb P, Bischofs IB (2016) The quorum-sensing regulator ComA from Bacillus subtilis activates transcription using topologically distinct DNA motifs. Nucleic Acids Res 44:2160–2172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ryan RP, Dow JM (2008) Diffusible signals and interspecies communication in bacteria. Microbiol 154:1845–1858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fuqua C, Parsek MR, Greenberg EP (2001) Regulation of gene expression by cell-to-cell communication: acyl-homoserine lactone quorum sensing. Ann Rev Genet 35:439–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Camilli A, Bassler BL (2006) Bacterial small-molecule signaling pathways. Science 311:1113–1116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Waters CM, Bassler BL (2005) Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 21:319–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Horinouchi S (2002) A microbial hormone, A-factor, as a master switch for morphological differentiation and secondary metabolism in Streptomyces griseus. Front Biosci 7:d2045–d2057Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kitani S, Kinoshita H, Nihira T, Yamada Y (1999) In vitro analysis of the butyrolactone autoregulator receptor protein (FarA) of Streptomyces lavendulae FRI-5 reveals that FarA acts as a DNA-binding transcriptional regulator that controls its own synthesis. J Bacteriol 181:5081–5084Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kinoshita H, Ipposhi H, Okamoto S, Nakano H, Nihira T, Yamada Y (1997) Butyrolactone autoregulator receptor protein (BarA) as a transcriptional regulator in Streptomyces virginiae. J Bacteriol 179:6986–6993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Nakano H, Takehara E, Nihira T, Yamada Y (1998) Gene replacement analysis of the Streptomyces virginiae barA gene encoding the butyrolactone autoregulator receptor reveals that bara acts as a repressor in virginiamycin biosynthesis. J Bacteriol 180:3317–3322Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Williamson NR, Fineran PC, Leeper FJ, Salmond GPC (2006) The biosynthesis and regulation of bacterial prodiginines. Nat Rev Microbiol 4:887–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Onaka H, Nakagawa T, Horinouchi S (1998) Involvement of two A-factor receptor homologues in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) in the regulation of secondary metabolism and morphogenesis. Mol Microbiol 28:743–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Takano E, Chakraburtty R, Nihira T, Yamada Y, Bibb MJ (2001) A complex role for the γ-butyrolactone SCB1 in regulating antibiotic production in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). Mol Microbiol 41:1015–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Takano E, Kinoshita H, Mersinias V, Bucca G, Hotchkiss G, Nihira T, Smith CP, Bibb M, Wohlleben W, Chater K (2005) A bacterial hormone (the SCB1) directly controls the expression of a pathway-specific regulatory gene in the cryptic type I polyketide biosynthetic gene cluster of Streptomyces coelicolor. Mol Microbiol 56:465–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Xu D, Seghezzi N, Esnault C, Virolle M-J (2010) Repression of antibiotic production and sporulation in Streptomyces coelicolor by overexpression of a TetR family transcriptional regulator. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:7741–7753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Xu G, Wang J, Wang L, Tian X, Yang H, Fan K, Yang K, Tan H (2010) “Pseudo” γ-butyrolactone receptors respond to antibiotic signals to coordinate antibiotic biosynthesis. J Biol Chem 285:27440–27448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wang J, Wang W, Wang L, Zhang G, Fan K, Tan H, Yang K (2011) A novel role of ‘pseudo’ γ-butyrolactone receptors in controlling γ-butyrolactone biosynthesis in Streptomyces. Mol Microbiol 82:236–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bignell DRD, Bate N, Cundliffe E (2007) Regulation of tylosin production: role of a TylP-interactive ligand. Mol Microbiol 63:838–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Stratigopoulos G, Bate N, Cundliffe E (2004) Positive control of tylosin biosynthesis: pivotal role of TylR. Mol Microbiol 54:1326–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Stratigopoulos G, Gandecha AR, Cundliffe E (2002) Regulation of tylosin production and morphological differentiation in Streptomyces fradiae by TylP, a deduced γ-butyrolactone receptor. Mol Microbiol 45:735–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Orth P, Schnappinger D, Hillen W, Saenger W, Hinrichs W (2000) Structural basis of gene regulation by the tetracycline inducible Tet repressor-operator system. Nat Struct Mol Biol 7:215–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Bhukya H, Bhujbalrao R, Bitra A, Anand R (2014) Structural and functional basis of transcriptional regulation by TetR family protein CprB from S. coelicolor A3(2). Nucleic Acids Res 42:10122–10133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Natsume R, Ohnishi Y, Senda T, Horinouchi S (2004) Crystal structure of a γ-butyrolactone autoregulator receptor protein in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). J Mol Biol 336:409–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Schumacher MA, Miller MC, Grkovic S, Brown MH, Skurray RA, Brennan RG (2002) Structural basis for cooperative DNA binding by two dimers of the multidrug-binding protein QacR. EMBO J 21:1210–1218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Miller DJ, Zhang Y-M, Subramanian C, Rock CO, White SW (2010) Structural basis for the transcriptional regulation of membrane lipid homeostasis. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17:971–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Natsume R, Ohnishi Y, Senda T, Horinouchi S (2004) Crystal structure of a γ-butyrolactone autoregulator receptor protein in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). J Mol Biol 336:409–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Sugiyama M, Onaka H, Nakagawa T, Horinouchi S (1998) Site-directed mutagenesis of the A-factor receptor protein: Val-41 important for DNA-binding and Trp-119 important for ligand-binding. Gene 222:133–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Biswas A, Swarnkar RK, Hussain B, Sahoo SK, Pradeepkumar PI, Patwari GN, Anand R (2014) Fluorescence quenching studies of γ-butyrolactone binding protein (CprB) from Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). J Phys Chem B 118:10035–10042CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Institute of Science 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Structural Biochemistry Lab, Department of ChemistryIndian Institute of Technology BombayMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.IITB-Monash Research Academy, Indian Institute of Technology BombayMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations