Evaluation of Urban Soil Pollution: A Combined Approach of Toxic Metals and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)
- 149 Downloads
Overcrowded urban areas are exposed to quotidian loads of toxic metals and PAHs. Simultaneous analysis of mentioned pollutants in surface soil samples of a crowded urban area in Tehran City is considered in this study. A total number of 112 samples were collected from pollution hotspots including gas stations, construction sites, bus terminal and waste recovery centers in summer 2016. Total, anthropogenic and bioavailable concentrations of metals, cadmium, cobalt, chromium, copper, manganese, nickel, lead and zinc, as well as ecological risk index (RI) values were calculated. Rather than Cd, the concentration of other metals was not remarkably different from reference values. The descending order of anthropogenic and bioavailable fractions in metals was proved to be as follows: Cd (87.87%) > Cr (40.14%) > Ni (38.64%) > Pb (37.40%) > Co (8.42%) > Cu (7.98%) > Zn (5.57%) > Mn (3.94%) and Cu (6.84%) > Zn (6.47%) > Pb (3.98%) > Ni (3.97%) > Cr (1.99%) > Cd (1.98%) > Mn (1.45%) > Co (1.39%), respectively. The results of the RI values also indicated that around 80% of total samples lie within a considerable ecological risk level. The total concentration of 16 EPA-approved PAHs was detected to be within the range of 0.62 and 3.51 mg/kg. The majority of PAHs detected in all samples was those with relatively higher molecular weights (higher number of aromatic rings). Accordingly, the major source of PAHs in surface soils was determined to be petroleum/gas combustion due to traffic loads and heating systems. The synergy observed in spatial distribution of toxic metals and PAHs confirms relatively identical pollution sources and at the same time exacerbates the adverse effects on human and ecological health.
The combined approach of toxic metals and PAHs in urban soil analysis is considered.
The source detection of PAHs in urban soils is determined.
The source detection of toxic metals in urban soils is investigated.
The fractionation of toxic metals in bulk, anthropogenic and bioavailable fractions is performed.
KeywordsToxic metals PAHs Soil pollution Megacity Risk index Synergy
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Abbaslou H, Bakhtiari S (2017) Phytoremediation potential of heavy metals by two native pasture plants (Eucalyptus grandis and Ailanthus altissima) assisted with AMF and fibrous minerals in contaminated mining regions. Pollution 3(3):471–486Google Scholar
- Adetitun D, Akinmayowa V, Atolani O, Olayemi A (2018) Biodegradation of jet fuel by three Gram negative bacilli isolated from kerosene contaminated soil. Pollution 4(2):291–303Google Scholar
- Eghbal N, Nasrabadi T, Karbassi AR, Taghavi L (2019) Evaluating the potential of plants (leaves) in removal of toxic metals from urban soils (case study of a district in Tehran city). Pollution 5(2):387–394Google Scholar
- Fazeli G, Karbassi AR, Khoramnejadian Sh, Nasrabadi T (2018) Anthropogenic share of metal contents in soils of urban areas. Pollution 4(4):697–706Google Scholar
- Hosseini Alhashemi AS, Karbassi AR, Hassanzadeh Kiabi B, Monavari SM, Nabavi SMB (2011) Accumulation and bioaccessibility of trace elements in wetland sediments. Afr J Biotechnol 10(9):1625–1636Google Scholar
- Saffari M (2018) Chemical stabilization of some heavy metals in an artificially multi-elements contaminated soil, using rice husk biochar and coal fly ash. Pollution 4(4):547–562Google Scholar
- Usman M, Waseem M, Mani N, Andiego N (2018) Optimization of soil aquifer treatment by chemical oxidation with hydrogen peroxide addition. Pollution 4(3):369–379Google Scholar