Extraction of Starch from Marine Microalgae, Chlorella salina: Efficiency and Recovery
- 35 Downloads
The issues of plastic waste arise owing to the global increase in plastic demand, which has surpassed the plastic recycling rate. Microalgae have become a sustainable feedstock to produce biodegradable thermoplastic starch because of their high yield, high photosynthetic efficiency, ease of cultivation and eco-friendliness. This research was conducted to determine the efficiency of different methods for starch extraction and recovery. Starch was extracted through ultrasonication, bead-beating and physicochemical methods and then separated, dried and analysed with a Megazyme total starch analysis kit. Of these tested methods, the physicochemical method (90 °C, 30 min) was the most efficient method for starch extraction, where the starch increment was 323.05% ± 32.03% relative to the control. However, the bead-beating method was the most efficient method when starch recovery was conducted on Chlorella salina cells, exhibiting the highest increment (96.60% ± 2.73%). Therefore, the physicochemical and bead-beating methods were the viable methods for enhancing the efficiency of starch extraction and recovery, respectively.
Physicochemical method (90 °C, 30 min) was the most efficient method for starch extraction.
Bead-beating method was the most efficient method in starch recovery (96.60% ± 2.73%) from Chlorella salina cells
The physicochemical and bead-beating methods were the ideal methods for starch extraction and recovery, respectively
KeywordsThermoplastic starch (TPS) Chlorella salina Starch extraction Starch recovery
The author (Wong, P.Y.) is grateful to his supervisor (Dr. Lee Chee Keong) for his encouragement, advice and patient guidance throughout the whole research project. The authors would like to thank the School of Industrial Technology, USM for allowing her to use the available facilities and equipment in the laboratory throughout the study. The author (Lee, C.K.) would like to express his greatest gratitude to USM for giving him a USM Research Universiti grant (1001/PTEKIND/811273).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
- Ferreira SP, Holz JCP, Costa JAV (2018) Influence on cultivation conditions in the heterotrophic lipid production of the microalga Chlorella minutissima. Int Food Res J 25(1):408–417Google Scholar
- Gourmelon G (2015) Global plastic production rises, recycling lags. WorldWatch Institute, Washington, DC, pp 1–7Google Scholar
- Imma G, Giuseppe O, Irene RK, Gerardino D, Antonino P, Antonio M (2017) Microalgae as new sources of starch: isolation and characterization of microalgal starch granules. Italian Assoc Chem Eng. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1757238
- Jayakar SS, Singhal RS (2012) Development of an efficient cell disruption method for release of lipoic acid from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Glob J Biotechnol Biochem 7(4):90–99Google Scholar
- Koushal V, Sharma R, Sharma M, Sharma R, Sharma V (2014) Plastics: issues challenges and remediation. Int J Waste Resources 4:134Google Scholar
- Ludmil B, Jameela A (2002) Disrupting Escherichia coli: a comparison of methods. J Biochem Mol Biol 35(4):428–431Google Scholar
- McCleary BV, Mcnally M, Rossiter P (2002) Measurement of resistant starch by enzymatic digestion in starch and selected plant materials: collaborative study. J AOAC Int 85(5):1103–1111Google Scholar
- Mistry AH, Eckhoff SR (1992) Characteristics of alkali-extracted starch obtained from corn flour. Cereal Chem 69(3):296–303Google Scholar
- Miyachi S, Kamiya A (1987) Wavelength effects on photosynthetic carbon metabolism in Chlorella. Plant Cell Physiol 19:277–288Google Scholar
- Monika PR, Trishnamoni G, Nikunj S (2015) Effect of salinity, ph, light intensity on growth and lipid production of microalgae for bioenergy application. J Biol Sci 15(4):260–267Google Scholar
- Pérez-Pacheco E, Canto-Pinto JC, Moo-Huchin VM, Estrada-Mota IA, Estrada-León RJ, Chel-Guerrero L (2016) Thermoplastic starch (TPS)-cellulosic fibers composites. In Matheus P (eds) Mechanical properties and water vapor barrier: a review. InTech, LondonGoogle Scholar
- PlasticsEurope, Plastics–The Facts 2017 (2017) An analysis of european plastics production, demand and waste data. http://www.plasticseurope.org/applications/files/5715/1717/4180/Plastics_the_facts_2017FINAL_for_website_one_page. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
- Ŕeháćek J, Beran K, Bićik V (1969) Disintegration of microorganisms and preparation of yeast cell walls in a new type of disintegrator. Appl Microbiol 17:462–466Google Scholar
- Sahari J, Sapuan SM, El-shekeil YA, Ishak MR, Akhtar R (2016) Natural Fibre-reinforced thermoplastic starch composites. In: Visakh PM, Yu L (eds) Starch-based Blends, composites and nanocomposites, vol 37. Royal Society of Chemistry, UK, pp 109–136Google Scholar
- Singh RS (2013) A comparative study on cell disruption methods for release of aspartase from E. coli K-12. Indian J Exp Biol 51:997–1003Google Scholar
- Sumit C, Ghosh SK, Suresh CP, Dey AN, Gopal S (2012) Deforestation: causes, effects and control strategies, global perspectives on sustainable forest management. In: Clement AO (ed). InTech. ISBN:978-953-51-0569-5Google Scholar
- Syed HS, Ifikhar AR (2018) Ultrasonication and microwave assisted lipids extraction process (MALE) for microalgal biodiesel production. Adv Biotechnol Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.19080/AIBM.2018.08.555746
- Usman M, Ishfaq MT, Mali SR, Iqbal M, Ishfaq B (2014) Alkaline extraction of starch from broken rice of Pakistan. Int J Innov Appl Stud 7(1):146–152Google Scholar
- Vijay (2017) Non-food crops as feedstock for bioplastics. Is there a critical need? http://www.eai.in. Accessed 25 Feb 2018
- Weller CI, Paulsen MR, Steinberg MP (1988) Correlation of starch recovery with assorted quality factors of four corn hybrids. J Cereal Chem 65(5):392–397Google Scholar
- Zhang B (2009) Alkaline extraction method of cottonseed protein isolate. Mod Appl Science 3(3):77–82Google Scholar