Embracing the Power of Digital in Literacy Education: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Digital Activities
This mixed methods program evaluation explores the perceptions of students and teachers who participated in digital activities at a university-sponsored literacy festival. The goal of the digital activities was to introduce a diverse student population to digital tools that may be used to assist in understanding, evaluating, and creating literature. Thoughtfully planned and executed digital activities have the potential to increase student motivation, collaboration, and creativity, which may lead to an improvement in student achievement. Incorporating technology in instruction empowers students and promotes opportunities for authentic learning. The purpose of this evaluation was to examine the efficacy of the digital activities to provide formative feedback to guide enhancements of the digital workshop at future annual literacy festivals and contribute to the discussion of digital learning activities on student literacy achievement.
KeywordsTechnology Integration Digital activities Literacy Motivation Student achievement
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 3Doodler the world’s first and best 3D pen. (2018). Retrieved from http://the3doodler.com/.
- Creswell, J. W. (2013a). Steps in conducting a scholarly mixed methods study. DBER Speaker Series, 48. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1047&context=dberspeakers).
- English, J. A. (2016). A digital literacy initiative in honors: perceptions of students and instructors about its impact on learning and pedagogy. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council, 17(2), 125–155.Google Scholar
- Florida Department of Education. (2017). Florida Standards Assessments Results. Retrieved from http://www.fldoe.org/accountability/assessments/k-12-student-assessment/results/2017.stml.
- Hanson, K. (2013). Promoting the benefits of digital literacy [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://www.ntia.doc.gov/blog/2013/promoting-benefits-digital-literacy.
- Jose, K. (2016). Digital literacy matters: Increasing workforce productivity through blended English language programs. Higher Learning Research Communication, 6(4).Google Scholar
- Kena, G., Hussar, W., & McFarland, J. (2016). The condition of education 2016 (NCES 2016-144). Retrieved from National Center for Education Statistics website: http://nces.ed.gov/.
- Quiver 3D augmented reality coloring apps. (2018). Retrieved from http://www.quivervision.com/.
- Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Sarkar, N., Ford, W., & Manzo, C. (2017). Engaging digital natives through social learning. Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 15(2), 1–4.Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Education, National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: the imperative for educational reform: a report to the Nation and the Secretary of Education (Supt. of Docs., U.S. G.P.O. distributor).Google Scholar
- Visser, M. (2012). Digital literacy definition. Retrieved from American Library Association website: http://connect.ala.org/node/181197.
- Warner-Griffin, C., Liu, H., Tadler, C., Herget, D., & Dalton, B. (2017). Reading achievement of US fourth-grade students in an international context: first look at the progress in international reading literacy study (PIRLS) 2016 and ePIRLS 2016 (NCES 2018-017). Retrieved from National Center for Education Statistics website: http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp.
- Warschauer, M. (2006). Laptops and literacy: learning in the wireless classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar