Demarcation of Groundwater Possible Zones in a Hard Rock Terrain, Nagavathi Watershed of Dharmapuri District, Tamil Nadu, India—Geophysical and Geoinformatics Approach
- 24 Downloads
The electrical resistivity survey has been very successful for decades in delineating prospective groundwater zones around the world. In general, the method is used to decipher the horizontal and vertical electrical resistivity distribution of the subsurface earth’s layers. In the perspective of hydrogeology, understanding the subsurface conditions and lithological variations is quite necessary to target groundwater potential zones. One-dimensional (1D) geoelectrical resistivity survey, vertical electrical sounding (VES), was carried out in selected locations across the Nagavathi watershed, Dharmapuri district of Tamil Nadu in India. The Nagavathi watershed is positioned in an undulated terrain and is dominantly underlain by charnockite and gneissic rocks. Forty-six VES using Schlumberger’s electrode arrangement were conducted over the entire Nagavathi watershed, using an equal grid method. The field data were processed by IPI2 Windows software and different types of sounding curves were identified. The lineaments such as faults, joints, and fractures act as pathways to groundwater movement, major lineaments were identified from satellite data using ArcGIS 9.3. In the study area consisting of hard rocks, groundwater prospecting is a difficult task without proper understanding of subsurface lithology. From the VES results, geoelectric layers such as topsoil, weathered, fractured, and infinitely hard rock layers were identified and eight thematic maps involving spatial distribution of resistivities and thickness were prepared, in addition to geology, hydrogeomorphology, and lineament thematic layers. The combination of the eleven thematic layers in ArcGIS resulted in a groundwater potential map, providing the information about very good (75.799 km2), good (85.595 km2), medium (134.240 km2), poor (115.124 km2), and very poor (69.336 km2) groundwater possible zones.
KeywordsGroundwater possible zone GIS IPI2win software Vertical electrical sounding
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The authors of this paper will agree, accept, and comply with all the ethical standards set by the journal.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This paper does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Basavarajappa HT, Manjunatha MC (2015) Groundwater quality analysis in Precambrian rocks of Chitradurga district, Karnataka, India using geo-informatics technique. International Conference on Water Resources, Coastal and Ocean Engineering, IJEE, Elsevier, SurathkalGoogle Scholar
- Krishnamurthy NS, Kumar D, Rao Anand V, Jain SC, Ahmed S (2003) Comparison of surface and sub-surface geophysical investigations in delineating fracture zones. Curr Sci 84(9):1242–1246Google Scholar
- Minor T, Carter J, Charley M, Knowks B, Gustafson P (1994) The use of GIS and remote sensing in groundwater exploration for developing countries. Proceeding of the 10th ERIM thematic conference on geologic remote sensing held in San Antonio, USA, 168–179Google Scholar
- Ramaiah SN, Gopalakrishna GS, Srinivasa Vittala S, K Najeeb K (2012) Geomorphological mapping for identification of groundwater potential zones in hard rock areas using geo-spatial information – a case study in Malur Taluk, Kolar District, Karnataka, India. Nat Environ Pollut Technol 11(3):369–376Google Scholar
- Ramasamy SM, Nagappan N, Selvakumar R (2005) Fracture pattern modeling and groundwater hydrology in hard rock aquifer system, Central Tamil Nadu, India. Ramasamy SM (ed) Remote Sensing in Water Resources. Rawat Publication, Jaipur, p 121–136Google Scholar
- Richards C, Roaza HP, Pratt TR (1996) Applying GIS to groundwater assessments. Proceedings of AWRA symposium on GIS and water resources held in Ft.Lauderdala, Florida USA, Florida Ft. LauderdaleGoogle Scholar
- Sharma SP, Baranwal VC (2005) Delineation of groundwater bearing fracture zones in a hard rock area integrating very low frequency electromagnetic and resistivity data. J Appl Geophys 57(155):166Google Scholar
- Suresh M, Gurugnanam B, vasudevan S, Ramesh D, Lingeswara rao SV (2009) GIScience in exploring groundwater studies at Upper Thirumanimuthar Sub-Basin, Cauvery River, Tamilnadu, India. Ultra Sci 21(1):51–62Google Scholar
- Teevw RM (1999) Groundwater exploration using remote sensing and a low cost GIS. Hydrogeol J 3(3):21–30Google Scholar
- Venkateswaran S, Vijay Prabhu M, Karuppannan S (2014) Delineation of groundwater potential zones using geophysical and GIS techniques in the Sarabanga Sub Basin, Cauvery River, Tamil Nadu. Int J Curr Res Aca Rev 2:58–75Google Scholar
- Waikar ML, Nilawar AP (2014) Identification of groundwater potential zone using remote sensing and GIS technique. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol 3(5):12163–12164Google Scholar
- Zohdy AAR, Eaton GP, Mabey DR (1974) Applications of surface geophysics to groundwater investigations. In: USGS–TWRI book, vol 2, p 116Google Scholar