Employing Measurers of Spatial Distribution of Carbon Storage in Periyar Tiger Reserve, Southern Western Ghats, India
- 94 Downloads
Carbon stock distribution in the protected areas (PAs) of India is rarely studied, although they constitute 21.34% of the geographical area under forest cover. A quantitative assessment of ecosystem service is used here to evaluate the PAs of India in terms of storage and spatial distribution of carbon stocks. The area selected for the study was Periyar Tiger Reserve (PTR), in the Southern Western Ghats, a UNESCO World Natural Heritage Site. Carbon storage on a land parcel largely depends on the amount of five carbon pools: aboveground biomass, belowground biomass, dead wood, litter, and soil organic matter. The Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) model uses land cover types and data on the stocks in the five carbon pools to estimate the amount of carbon stored in a landscape. The InVEST model is multiservice and has a modular design that provides an effective tool for exploring the likely outcomes of alternative management and climate scenarios and for evaluating trade-offs among sectors and services. The results showed that the average carbon (C) stock in the study area was 76 t/ha, and a sum of 15.43 million tons were stored in PTR. The multiservice, modular design of the ecosystem service analysis provides decision-makers an effective tool for evaluating and managing natural resources.
KeywordsProtected area Carbon stock Ecosystem service Western Ghats Periyar Tiger Reserve India
The authors sincerely thank officers and staff of Periyar Tiger Reserve, Periyar Tiger Conservation Foundation, Kerala Forests and Wildlife Department for their encouragement and support.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The research paper complied with all the ethical standards prescribed by the Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This work is original and has not been published elsewhere nor is it currently under consideration for publication elsewhere.
The authors confirm the consent to submit the research paper in the Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis
- Adamowicz WL, Naidoo R, Nelson E, Polasky S, Zhang J (2011) Nature-based tourism and recreation. In: Kareiva P, Daily G, Ricketts T, Tallis H, Polasky S (eds) Natural capital: theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Brown S (1997) Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests: a primer. UN FAO Forestry paper 134. http://www.fao.org/docrep/W4095E/W4095E00.htm. Accessed 18 Jan 2018
- Capoor K, Ambrosi P (2008) State and trends of the carbon market 2008. World Bank Institute, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- Champion HG, Seth SK (1968) The forest types of India – a revised survey. Manager of Publication, DelhiGoogle Scholar
- Chandrasekharan C (1962) Forest types of Kerala state (3). Indian For 88:837–847Google Scholar
- Dadhwal VK, Nayak SR (1993) A preliminary estimate of biogeochemical cycle of carbon for India. Sci Cult 59(1–2):9–13Google Scholar
- Dadhwal VK, Shukla N, Vora AB (1997) Forest litterfall in India: a review and an estimation of litterfall carbon flux. Indian Forester 123(1):45–52Google Scholar
- Forest Survey of India (FSI) (2011) India state of forest report, ministry of environment, forests and climate change. FSI, DehradunGoogle Scholar
- Forest Survey of India (FSI) (2013) India state of forest report, ministry of environment, forests and climate change. FSI, DehradunGoogle Scholar
- Forest Survey of India (FSI) (2017) Carbon stocks of India’s forests, ministry of environment, forests and climate change. FSI, DehradunGoogle Scholar
- French Institute of Pondicherry (FIP) (1997) In: Ramesh BR, de Franceschi D, Pascal JP (eds) Vegetation map of South India - Map 6: Thiruvananthapuram – Tirunelveli. 1 sheet. FIP, IndiaGoogle Scholar
- Government of India (GoI) (2014) India’s progress in combating climate change, ministry of environment, forests and climate change. GoI, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
- Hamilton K, Sjardin M, Marcello T, Xu G (2008) Forging a frontier: state of the voluntary carbon markets 2008. Ecosystem marketplace and new carbon finance, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- IPCC (2000) In: Nakicenovic N, Swart R (eds) Special report on emissions scenarios. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Lal R, Vagen TG, Singh BR (2005) Soil carbon sequestration in sub-Saharan Africa: a review. Land Degrad Dev 16:53–71Google Scholar
- Madhu V, Dhaval N, Chandan K, Advait E, Ashish D (2015) Economic valuation of tiger reserves in India: a value+ approach. Ministry of environment, forests and climate change. IIFM, Bhopal, IndiaGoogle Scholar
- Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, Polasky S, Tallis H, Cameron D, Chan K, Daily G, Goldstein J, Kareiva P, Lonsdorf E, Naidoo R, Ricketts TH, Shaw R (2008) Modeling multiple ecosystem services and tradeoffs at landscape scales. In: Front Ecol EnvironGoogle Scholar
- Ruesch A, Gibbs HK (2008) New IPCC tier-1 global biomass carbon map for the year 2000. http://cdiac.ornl.gov/epubs/ndp/global_carbon/carbon_documentation.html. Accessed 8 March 2018
- Satis CN (1991) The Southern Western Ghats – a biodiversity conservation plan, INTACHGoogle Scholar
- Shan M, Duggan JM, Eichelberger BA, McNally BW, Foster JR, Pepi E, Conte MN, Daily GC, Ziv G (2016) Valuation of ecosystem services to inform management of multiple-use landscapes. Ecosyst Serv 19(June 2016):6–18Google Scholar
- Sharp R, Tallis H, Ricketts T, Guerry A, Wood S, Chaplin-Kramer R, Nelson E, Ennaanay D, Wolny S, Olwero N (2014) InVEST user’s guide. The natural capital project, StanfordGoogle Scholar
- Tallis HT, Ricketts T, Nelson E, Ennaanay D, Wolny S, Olwero N, Vigerstol K, Pennington D, Mendoza G, Aukema J, Foster J, Forrest J, Cameron D, Arkema K, Lonsdorf E, Kennedy C (2010) InVEST 1.004 beta User’s guide. The natural capital project, Stanford University, USAGoogle Scholar
- Tallis HT, Ricketts T, Guerry A, Wood S, Sharp R, Authors C (2011) InVEST 2.0.0 user’s guide. The natural capital project, Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Tallis HT, Ricketts T, Guerry A, Wood S, Sharp R, Chaplin-Kramer R (2013) InVEST 3.0.1 user’s guide. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar
- The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2006) In: Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Eggleston HS, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K (eds) 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, volume 4: agriculture, forestry and other land use. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Hayama, JapanGoogle Scholar
- UNFCCC (2015) Climate action now. Summary for policymakers. United Nations climate change secretariat, BonnGoogle Scholar