Advertisement

Asian Bioethics Review

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 279–293 | Cite as

Asian Elephant Conservation: Too Elephantocentric? Towards a Biocultural Approach of Conservation

  • Nicolas LainéEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Drawing from the example of Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) conservation in Laos, this article primarily intends to reveal the elephantocentric vision adopted by mainstream conservation project in direction to the species. In the second part, I will present some ethnographic notes collected among local population who daily live and work with pachyderms. These notes will help in opening up a broader and more ecocentric approach of elephant conservation by highlighting links between biological and cultural diversity. By revealing the cosmo-ecological view of elephants as thought locally, I will then propose an enlarged vision of elephant conservation.

Keywords

Conservation Ethics Asian Elephant Biocultural approach Lao PDR 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Brunois, Florence. 2005. Pour une approche interactive des savoirs locaux: l’ethno-éthologie. Journal de la Société des océanistes 120-121: 31–39.  https://doi.org/10.4000/jso.335.
  2. Campos-Arceiz, Ahimsa, and Steve Blake. 2011. Megagardeners of the Forest – the Role of Elephants in Seed Dispersal. Acta Oecologica 37 (6): 542–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2011.01.014.
  3. Choudhury, Anwaruddin, Deep Kanta Lahiri Choudhury, Ajay Desai, J. William Duckworth, P. S. Easa, Asir Jawahar Thomas Johnsingh, Prithiviraj Fernando, Simon Hedges, Manori Gunawardena, Fred Kurt, Ullas Karanth, Adrian Lister, Vivek Menon., Heidi Riddle, Alex Rübel, and Eric Wikramanayake. (IUCN SSC Asian Elephant Specialist Group). 2008. Elephas maximus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2008: e.T7140A12828813.  https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T7140A12828813.en.
  4. Duffy, Rosaleen. 2014. Interactive elephants: Tourism, nature and neoliberalism in Southern Africa. Annals of Tourism Research 44 (1): 88–101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2013.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Elvin, Mark. 2008. The retreat of the elephants: An environmental history of China. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Emourgeon, Clève. 2010. Usage et représentations de l’éléphant en Thaïlande: L’animal, le patrimoine, le symbole. PhD Dissertation, Université Paris Ouest Nanterre.Google Scholar
  7. Haricha Franziska, K., Anna C. Treydtea, Joseph O. Ogutub, John E. Roberts, Chution Savinid, Jan M. Bauere, and Savinif Tommaso. 2016. Seed dispersal potential of Asian elephants. Acta Oecologica 77: 144–151.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2016.10.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jeangène Vilmer, Jean-Baptiste. 2008. Éthique animale. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  9. Keil, Paul G. 2016. Colonising in the Footsteps of Elephants: Interspecies Pathways through North-East India and Beyond. In SOAS Elephant Conference. Bangalore, India. Available at: http://www.geocities.ws/soaselephantconference2016/keil.pdf.
  10. Khounbouline, Khamkhoun. 2011. Current status of Asian elephants in Lao PDR. Gajah 35: 62–66.Google Scholar
  11. Kopnina, Helen, Haydn Washington, Bron Raymond Taylor, and Joe Gray. 2018. The ‘future of conservation’ debate: Defending ecocentrism and the nature needs half movement. Biological Conservation 217: 140–148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.10.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kopnina, Helen. 2016. Wild animals and justice: The case of the dead elephant in the room. Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy 19 (3): 219–235.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13880292.2016.1204882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kremmer, Christopher. 1997. Stalking the Elephant Kings: in Search of Laos. Honolulu: University of Hawai Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lainé, Nicolas. 2012. Effects of the 1996 timber ban in Northeast India: The case of the Khamtis of Lohit District, Arunachal Pradesh. In Nature, environment and society: Conservation, governance and transformation in India, edited by Nicholas Lainé and T.B. Subba, 3–93. New Delhi: Orient Blackswan.Google Scholar
  15. Lainé, Nicolas. 2014. Vivre et travailler avec les éléphants: une option durable pour la protection et la conservation de l’espèce. Enquête sur les relations entre les Khamti et les éléphants dans le nord-est de l’Inde. PhD dissertation, Université Paris Ouest Nanterre.Google Scholar
  16. Lainé, Nicolas. 2015. Enjeux et paradoxes autour de la conservation des éléphants dans l’Inde comtemporaine. Écologie et Politique 50: 147–162.Google Scholar
  17. Lainé, Nicolas. 2016. Conduct and Collaboration in human-Elephant working Communities in Northeast India. In Conflict, Negotiation, and Coexistence: Rethinking Human-Elephant Relations in South Asia, edited by Piers Locke and Jane Buckingham, 180-205. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199467228.001.0001.
  18. Lainé, Nicolas. 2017a. Travail interespèces et conservation. Le cas des éléphants d'Asie. Écologie et Politique 54: 45–64.Google Scholar
  19. Lainé, Nicolas. 2017b. Surveiller les animaux, conserver l’espèce. Enjeux et défis de la surveillance de la tuberculose des éléphants au Laos. Revue d’Anthropologie des Connaissances 11 (1): 23–44.  https://doi.org/10.3917/rac.034.0023.
  20. Lainé, Nicolas. 2018a. Why the Khamti did not domesticate their elephants? Building a hybrid sociality with tamed elephants. In Hybrid Communities. Biosocial Approaches to Domestication and Other Trans-species Relationships, edited byCharles Stépanoff and Jean-Denis Vigne, 221–235. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Lainé, Nicolas. 2018b. Bo mee xang pa kor bo mee xang (sans éléphants de forêt, il n’y a plus d’éléphants). Péninsule 75 (2): 73–99.Google Scholar
  22. Lestel, Dominique. 2013. The withering of shared life through the loss of biodiversity. Social Science Information 52 (2): 307–325.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018413477335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lorimer, Jamie, Chris Sandom, Paul Jepson, Chris Doughty, Maan Barua, and Keith J. Kirby. 2015. Rewilding: sciences, practice, and politics. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 40 (1): 39–62.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maffi, Luisa. 2005. Linguistic, cultural, and biological diversity. Annual Review of Anthropology (29): 599–617.Google Scholar
  25. Malikhao, Patchanee and Lisa Servaes. 2017. Elephants in tourism. Sustainable and practical approaches to captive elephant welfare and conservation in Thailand. In Culture and Communication in Thailand. Singapore: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4125-9_9
  26. McConkey, Kim R., Anuttara Nathalang, Warren Y. Brockelman, Chanpen Saralamba, Jantima Santon, Umaporn Matmoon, Rathasart Somnuk, Kanchit Srinoppawan. 2018. Different megafauna vary in their seed dispersal effectiveness of the megafaunal fruit Platymitra macrocarpa (Annonaceae). PLoS One 13 (7): e0198960.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198960.
  27. Manceron, Vanessa. 2012. Les vivants outragés: usages militants des corps et perceptions des animaux d’élevage chez les défenseurs de la cause animale en France. In Des hommes malades des animaux, edited by Frédéric Keck and Noélie Vialles, 57–78. Paris: Editions de L'Herne.Google Scholar
  28. Nogues-Bravo, David, Daniel Simberloff, Carsten Rahbek and Nathan J Sanders. 2016. “Rewilding is the new Pandora’s box in conservation.” Current Biology (26): R87–R91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.12.044.
  29. Piccolo, John J., Haydn Washington, Helen Kopnina, and Bron Taylor. 2018. Why conservation biologists should re-embrace their ecocentric roots. Conservation Biology 32 (4): 959–961.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13067.
  30. Porcher, Jocelyne, and Tiphaine Schmitt. 2010. Les vaches collaborent-elles au travail ?: Une question de sociologie. Revue du MAUSS 35 (1): 235.  https://doi.org/10.3917/rdm.035.0235.
  31. Sagoff, Mark. 1984. Animal liberation and environmental ethics: Bad marriage, quick divorce. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 22 (2): 297–307.Google Scholar
  32. Santiapillai, Charles, Peter Jackson, and IUCN/SSC Asian Elephant Specialist Group. 1990. The Asian elephant: an action plan for its conservation. Gland: IUCN.Google Scholar
  33. Singh, Sarindra. 2012. Natural Potency and Political Power: Forest and State Authority in Contemporary Laos. Honolulu: University of Hawai Press.Google Scholar
  34. Soulé, Michael E. 1985. What is conservation biology? A new synthetic discipline addresses the dynamics and problems of perturbed species, communities, and ecosystems. BioScience 35 (11): 727–734.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1310054.
  35. Sutter, Ingrid C. 2010. ElefantaAsia in the Lao PDR – An overview. Gajah 33: 53–57.Google Scholar
  36. Suter, Ingrid C., Gilles P. Maurer, and Greg Baxter. 2014. Population viability of captive Asian elephants in the Lao PDR. Endangered Species Research 24: 1-7.  https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00578.
  37. Trautmann, Thomas R. 2015. Elephants and Kings: an Environmental History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt. 2003. Agrarian allegory and global futures. In Nature in the Global South: Environmental Projects in South and Southeast Asia, edited by Paul Greenough and Anna Lowenhaupt Tsing, 124–170. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Zago, Marcel. 1972. Rites et cérémonies en milieu bouddhiste lao. Roma: Università Gregoriana.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National University of Singapore and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Associate, Laboratoire d’anthropologie socialeCollège de FranceParisFrance

Personalised recommendations