Asian Bioethics Review

, Volume 9, Issue 1–2, pp 33–44 | Cite as

Is Human Embryonic Stem Cell (HESC) Research Still Necessary Today?

  • Patrick Chee-Kuen FoongEmail author
Original Paper


Given the promise of stem cell therapies, scientists throughout the world are conducting stem cell research using various kinds of stem cells including human embryonic stem cells (HESC). However, HESC research is very controversial in some societies as the extraction of stem cells involves the destruction of the human embryo. The ethical concerns of this kind of research have led scientists to search for other methods to derive stem cells that do not involve the destruction of embryos. These different types of stem cell research are said to sidestep the ethical dilemma associated with HESC research and so are considered as ethically acceptable ways to obtain stem cells; possibly, they may even mark the end of HESC research. However, each of these stem cell methods presents its own challenges, scientific and ethical, as this article explores. This paper examines the impact of the emergence of different types of stem cell research and discusses whether it is still necessary for scientists to conduct the contentious HESC research.


Stem cell research Embryo research Induced pluripotent stem cell research Comparative ethics 



The author wishes to thank the editor and reviewers for their comments.


  1. Abbott A., “Ethical Stem-Cell Paper under Attack”, (2006) Nature 443 at
  2. Baker M., “James Thomson: Shifts from Embryonic Stem Cells to Induced Pluripotency”, (2009) Nature Reports Stem Cells at
  3. Blackford R., “Stem Cell Research on Other Worlds or Why Embryos Do Not Have a Right to Life”, (2006) Journal of Medical Ethics 177–180.Google Scholar
  4. Blackman S., “Promises, Promises,” (2009) The Scientist at
  5. Chalmers D. & Nicol D., “Embryonic Stem Cell Research: Can the Law Balance Ethical, Scientific and Economic Values? Part II” (2003) 18 Law and the Human Genome Review 91–108 at 99.Google Scholar
  6. Chung, Y.G., et al. 2014. Human Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer Using Adult Cells. Cell Stem Cell 14, 777 (6).Google Scholar
  7. Cook M., “Are IVF clinics hiding the risks of PGD from parents?”, (2012) BioEdge at
  8. Cyranoski D., “Rudimentary egg and sperm cells made from stem cells” (2014)
  9. Elliot M. J., et al., “Stem-cell-based Tissue Engineered Tracheal Replacement in a Child: a 2 year follow-up study”, (2012) Lancet 994.Google Scholar
  10. Goldman B., “Embryonic Stem Cells 2.0,” (2008) Nature Reports Stem Cells at
  11. Green R., “Can We Develop Ethically Universal Embryonic Stem-cell Lines?”, (2006) Nature 480.Google Scholar
  12. Green R., “Can We Develop Ethically Universal Embryonic Stem-cell Lines?”, (2008a) Nature 480.Google Scholar
  13. Green, R. 2008b. Five Ethical Questions for SCNT Stem Cell Research. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology 9 (1): 131.Google Scholar
  14. Hall, S. 2006. Stem Cells: A Status Report. Hastings Cent Rep 36, 16 (1).Google Scholar
  15. Holden, C., and G. Vogel. 2008. A Seismic Shift for Stem Cell Research. Science 319: 560.Google Scholar
  16. Hurlbut W., “Altered Nuclear Transfer as a Morally Acceptable Means for the Procurement of Human Embryonic Stem Cells”, (2004) at
  17. Hyun I., “The Caravan of Stem Cell Science”, (2011) Shereporttimes at
  18. Landry D. & Zucker H., “Embryonic Death and the Creation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells”, (2004) Journal of Clinical Investigation 1184.Google Scholar
  19. Lanza, R., et al. 2005. Embryonic and Extraembryonic Stem Cell Lines Derived from Single Mouse Blastomeres. Nature 439: 216.Google Scholar
  20. Lanza R., et al., “Human Embryonic Stem Cell lines Derived from Single Blastomeres”, (2006) Nature at
  21. McGee, G., P. Patrizio, V. Kuhn, and C. Roverson-Kraft. 2004. The Ethics of Stem Cell Therapy. In The Human Cloning Debate, ed. G. McGee and A. Caplan, 37–56. Berkeley: Berkeley Hills Books at 45.Google Scholar
  22. Melton, D., G. Daley, and C. Jennings. 2004. Altered Nuclear Transfer in Stem Cell Research—a Flawed Proposal. N Engl J Med 351: 2791.Google Scholar
  23. Munne S., et al., “Self Correction of Chromosomally Abnormal Embryos in Culture and Implications for Stem Cell Production”, (2005) Fertilisation Sterilisation 1328.Google Scholar
  24. President Council’s on Bioethics. 2002. Human Cloning and Human Dignity: The Report of the President’s Council on Bioethics (President’s Council Report). New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  25. Sharma A.K., et al., “A Non-Human Primate Model for Urinary Bladder Regeneration Utilizing Autologous Sources of Bone Marrow Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells”, (2010) Stem Cells 241.Google Scholar
  26. Shinnawi, R., et al. 2015. Monitoring human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes with genetically encoded calcium and voltage fluorescent reporters. Stem Cell Reports 5 (4): 582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tachibana, M., et al. 2013. Human Embryonic Stem Cells derived by Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer. Cell 153 (6): 1228.Google Scholar
  28. Takahashi K., Yamanaka S., “Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors”, (2006) Cell 663.Google Scholar
  29. Vogel, G. 2006. Scientists Derive Line from Single Embryo Cell. Science 313: 1031.Google Scholar
  30. Wade N., “Stem Cell Test Tried on Mice Saves Embryo”, (2005) The New York Times at
  31. Waldby C et al., “From Altruism to Monetisation: Australian Women’s Ideas about Money, Ethics and Research Eggs” (2013) Social Science & Medicine 34.Google Scholar
  32. Yu, J., et al. 2007. Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell lines Derived from Human Somatic Cells. Science 318: 1917.Google Scholar
  33. Zhou, Q., et al. 2016. Complete Meiosis from Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Germ Cells In Vitro. Cell Stem Cell 18 (3): 330.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National University of Singapore and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Western Sydney UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations