Advertisement

Oral Cancer

, Volume 2, Issue 3–4, pp 77–81 | Cite as

Factors affecting postoperative removal of nasogastric tube and tracheostomy tube in oral cancer: a retrospective analysis of 234 cases

  • Prateek V. Jain
  • Kapila Manikantan
  • Dipanwita Roy
  • Pattatheyil Arun
Original Article
  • 321 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Rehabilitation and Supportive Care

Abstract

Introduction

Prolonged use of nasogastric and tracheostomy tubes in the postoperative period is a major cause of morbidity after surgery for oral cancer and prolongs discharge from hospital. In this study, we sought to determine the variables that predict prolongation of nasogastric and tracheostomy tubes in patients undergoing surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.

Methods

Data from 234 patients who underwent surgery for oral squamous cell carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed for patient variables including oral cavity sub-site, T stage, extent of surgical resection, need and type of reconstruction and adjuvant treatment.

Results and discussion

The sample was composed of 234 patients with a mean age of 53.08 years (range 24–85 years) and 29% were women. Median duration for removal of nasogastric tube and tracheostomy tube after surgery was 15 days (n = 234, range 6–897 days) and 7 days (n = 111, range 2–160 days), respectively. Performance of reconstructive procedures (15 vs 9 days, p = 0.003) was the only significant factor affecting nasogastric tube removal. Tracheostomy tube removal was affected by age and tongue as the primary site (19 vs 7 days, p = 0.009). Delay in removal of tracheostomy tube and nasogastric tube delayed discharge of the patients from hospital (12 mean days, range 1–35 days).

Conclusion

Use of flaps for reconstruction impedes oral feeding in postoperative period, while delayed decannulation is seen in older patients and in patients operated for carcinoma of the tongue. Delay in decannulation and nasogastric tube removal prolonged the hospital stay of the patients.

Keywords

Dysphagia Swallowing Tracheostomy 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Bensadoun RJ, Riesenbeck D, Lockhart PB, Elting LS, Spijkervet FK, Brennan MT (2010) A systematic review of trismus induced by cancer therapies in head and neck cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 18:1033–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen PC, Chuang CH, Leong CP, Guo SE, Hsin YJ (2011) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of the water swallow test for screening aspiration in stroke patients. J Adv Nurs 72:2575–2586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deshmukh A, Kannan S, Thakkar P, Chaukar D, Yadav P, D’Cruz A (2013) Tongue flap revisited. J Cancer Res Ther 9:215–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Isaac A, Zhang H, Varshney S, Hamilton S, Harris JR, Seikaly H (2016) Predictors of failed and delayed decannulation after head and neck surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 55:437–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lee LY, Chen SC, Chen WC, Huang BS, Lin CY (2015) Postradiation trismus and its impact on quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 119:187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Logemann J (1998) Evaluation and treatment of swallowing disorders, 2nd edn. PRO-ED, AustinGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mathur NN, Sohliya LM (2015) Pre-decannulation peristomal findings in tracheostomized cases and their effect on the success of decannulation. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 67:91–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McQuestion M, Fitch M, Howell D (2011) The changed meaning of food: physical, social and emotional loss for patients having received radiation treatment for head and neck cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs 15:145–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    O’Connor HH, White AC (2010) Tracheostomy decannulation. Respir Care 55:1076–1081PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P (2001) Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000. Int J Cancer 94:153–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pauli N, Johnson J, Finizia C, Andrell P (2013) The incidence of trismus and long-term impact on health-related quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer. Acta Oncol 52:1137–1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Prateek V. Jain
    • 1
  • Kapila Manikantan
    • 1
  • Dipanwita Roy
    • 1
  • Pattatheyil Arun
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Head and Neck SurgeryTata Medical CenterKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations