Effects of Er,Cr:YSGG laser and radial firing tips in dye removal from simulated curved canals: visualization study
The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of erbium, chromium–doped yttrium scandium gallium garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) using radial firing tips in dye removal from simulated narrow curved canals (20°).
Material and methods
Sixty polyester resin blocks were mechanically prepared up to ISO 30/0.07 and divided into six groups (n = 10). Each resin block was filled with red fuchsine dye. Three different laser settings [15 mJ and 50 Hz, 20 mJ and 50 Hz, and 16 mJ and 75 Hz] were used under two conditions of radial firing tip withdraw movements (pulling or circular). Radial firing tip was initially kept stationary 4 mm shorter than full working length and activated for 3 s. Irradiation was continued in an apical to coronal direction, withdrawing at a speed of 2 mm s−1, either with circular or straight pulling movements. Four irradiation cycles were performed in each sample. Irrigation with saline solution (NaCl) was performed between each laser irradiation. Standardized pictures were taken after laser irradiation, and a computerized calculation of the pixel intensity for the remaining dye in the apical region was made.
Dye removal results showed no significant differences (P > 0.05) between pulling and circular movements. With regard to output settings, and regardless of the movements, 20 mJ and 50 Hz showed a significantly better performance (P < 0.05) in dye removal than 15 mJ and 50 Hz and 16 mJ and 75 Hz.
Er,Cr:YSGG laser and radial firing tip working at 20 mJ and 50 Hz were the most efficient methods of removing red dye from the apical region of simulated narrow curved canals. The difference between irradiation protocols (fiber movements) was statistically negligible.
KeywordsLaser Radial firing tip Curved canal Root canal treatment
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 2.Kurtzman GM (2012) Improving endodontic success through use of the EndoVac irrigation system. Endo Tribune US Edition 7 (3)Google Scholar
- 3.Adcock JM, Sidow SJ, Looney SW, Liu Y, McNally K, Lindsey K, Tay FR (2011) Histologic evaluation of canal and isthmus debridement efficacies of two different irrigant delivery techniques in a closed system. J Endod 37(4):544–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.01.006 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Sahar-Helft S, Sarp AS, Stabholtz A, Gutkin V, Redenski I, Steinberg D (2015) Comparison of positive-pressure, passive ultrasonic, and laser-activated irrigations on smear-layer removal from the root canal surface. Photomed Laser Surg 33(3):129–135. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2014.3788 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Susin L, Yoon JC, Liu Y, Parente JM, Loushine RJ, Ricucci D, Bryan T, Weller RN, Pashley DH, Tay FR (2010) Canal and isthmus debridement efficacies of two irrigant agitation techniques in a closed system. Int Endod J 43(12):1077–1090. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01778.x PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Leoni GB, Versiani MA, Silva-Sousa YT, Bruniera JF, Pecora JD, Sousa-Neto MD (2016) Ex vivo evaluation of four final irrigation protocols on the removal of hard-tissue debris from the mesial root canal system of mandibular first molars. Int Endod J 50:398–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12630 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Gutknecht NMA, Conrads G, Lampert F (1997) The diode laser and its bactericidal effect in root canal. An in vitro study. Endodontie 3:217–222Google Scholar
- 19.Franzen R, Esteves-Oliveira M, Meister J, Wallerang A, Vanweersch L, Lampert F, Gutknecht N (2009) Decontamination of deep dentin by means of erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser irradiation. Lasers Med Sci 24(1):75–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-007-0522-2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Vergauwen TE, Michiels R, Torbeyns D, Meire M, De Bruyne M, De Moor RJ (2014) Investigation of coronal leakage of root fillings after smear layer removal with EDTA or Er,Cr:YSGG laser through capillary flow porometry. Int J Dent 2014:593160. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/593160 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Blanken JVR (2007) Cavitation as a working mechanism of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser in endodontics: a visualization study. Oral Laser Appl 7(2):97–106Google Scholar
- 26.Martins MR, Carvalho MF, Vaz IP, Capelas JA, Martins MA, Gutknecht N (2013) Efficacy of Er,Cr:YSGG laser with endodontical radial firing tips on the outcome of endodontic treatment: blind randomized controlled clinical trial with six-month evaluation. Lasers Med Sci 28(4):1049–1055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1172-6 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Miguel Rodrigues Martins MFC, Pina-Vaz I, Capelas J, Martins MA, Portugal & Norbert Gutknecht (2013) Er,Cr:YSGG laser and radial firing tips in highly compromised endodontic scenarios. Int Mag Laser Dent 5(4):10–14Google Scholar