Advertisement

Use of carbon dioxide lasers in dentistry

  • Kenneth Luk
  • Irene Shuping Zhao
  • Norbert GutknechtEmail author
  • Chun Hung ChuEmail author
Review Article

Abstract

Aim

This paper aims to perform a descriptive analysis by reviewing publications concerned with the production of carbon dioxide (CO2) lasers and their technological advancement, optical properties, and parameters in relation to clinical applications in dentistry.

Methods

This review was based on the literature search in Scopus, Google Scholar, and PubMed in English. The last search was made in December 2017 and there was no publication-year limit.

Results

: The 10,600-nm CO2 laser is a readily available dental laser on the market. It enables performance of a bloodless surgical procedure and reduces post-operative discomfort in soft tissue dental surgery. Due to the advancement of technology, CO2 lasers with short pulse duration and high peak power are available. This new-parameter CO2 laser causes less collateral thermal damage to soft tissue than conventional lasers with continuous wave mode. Recently, a 9,300-nm wavelength CO2 laser has been introduced for clinical use in dental hard tissue removal. These developments make CO2 lasers fitting for dental hard tissue preparation.

Conclusions

The 10,600-nm CO2 laser is widely accepted for soft tissue surgery applications. Although CO2 lasers have been studied extensively in caries prevention, they have not been applied in clinical practice. The optical properties of 9,300-nm and 9,600-nm CO2 wavelengths are suitable for dental hard tissue treatment. Technological advancements in software and laser parameters will aid in new clinical application and technique development. CO2 lasers as hard tissue lasers will become more popular and more widely accessible to researchers and clinicians.

Keywords

CO2 laser Carbon dioxide laser Dental caries 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Chung H, Dai T, Sharma SK, Huang YY, Carroll JD, Hamblin MR (2012) The nuts and bolts of low-level laser (light) therapy. Ann Biomed Eng 40:516–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Verma SK, Maheshwari S, Singh RK et al (2012) Laser in dentistry: an innovative tool in modern dental practice. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 3:124–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nasim H, Jamil Y (2014) Diode lasers: from laboratory to industry. Opt Laser Technol 56:211–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fornaini C, Merigo E, Rocca J et al (2016) 450 nm blue laser and oral surgery: preliminary ex vivo study. J Contemp Dent Pract 17:795–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Braun A, Berthold M, Frankenberger R (2015) The 445-nm semiconductor laser in dentistry—introduction of a new wavelength. Quintessenz 66:205–211Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sarver DM, Yanosky M (2005) Principles of cosmetic dentistry in orthodontics: part 2. Soft tissue laser technology and cosmetic gingival contouring. Techno Bytes 127:85–90Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mizutani K, Aoki A, Coluzzi D et al (2016) Lasers in minimally invasive periodontal and peri-implant therapy. Periodontol 2000(71):185–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Merigo E, Clini F, Fornaini C, Oppici A, Paties C, Zangrandi A, Fontana M, Rocca JP, Meleti M, Manfredi M, Cella L, Vescovi P (2013) Laser-assisted surgery with different wavelengths: a preliminary ex vivo study on thermal increase and histological evaluation. Lasers Med Sci 28:497–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Malmstrom HS, McCormack SM, Fried D et al (2001) Effect of CO2 laser on pulpal temperature and surface morphology: an in vitro study. J Dent 29:521–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Watanabe I, Lopes RA, Brugnera A, Katayama AY, Gardini AE (1996) Effect of CO2 laser on class V cavities of human molar teeth under a scanning electron microscope. Braz Dent J 7:27–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Friedman S, Liu M, Izawa T et al (1992) Effects of CO2 laser irradiation on pulpal blood flow. Proc Finn Dent Soc 88(Suppl 1):167–171PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Beaulieu AJ (1970) Transversely excited atmospheric pressure CO2 lasers. 16:504–505Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fantarella D, Kotlow L (2014) The 9.3-μm CO2 dental laser: technical development and early clinical experiences. J Laser Dent 22:10–27Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Patel C (1964) Continuous-wave laser action on vibrational-rotational transitions of CO2. Phys Rev 136:1187–1193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zuerlein MJ, Fried D, Seka WD et al (1998) Absorption coefficients of dental enamel in the infrared: a solution to a seemingly straightforward problem, Lasers in Dentistry IV, International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp: 137–146Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fried D, Zuerlein MJ, Le CQ et al (2002) Thermal and chemical modification of dentin by 9–11-μm CO2 laser pulses of 5–100-μs duration. Lasers Surg Med 31:275–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zuerlein MJ (1999) Interactions of IR lasers with dental hard tissues at clinically relevant wavelengths. PhD Thesis, University of California, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McCormack SM, Fried D, Featherstone JD et al (1995) Scanning electron microscope observations of CO2 laser effects on dental enamel. J Dent Res 74:1702–1708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fried D, Glena RE, Featherstone JD et al (1995) Multiple-pulse irradiation of dental hard tissues at CO2 laser wavelengths. Lasers Dent Int Soc Opt Photonics 2394:41–51Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fried D, Seka WD, Glena RE et al (1996) Thermal response of hard dental tissues to 9-through 11-um CO2-laser irradiation. Opt Eng 35:1976–1985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fowler BO, Kuroda S (1986) Changes in heated and in laser-irradiated human tooth enamel and their probable effects on solubility. Calcif Tissue Int 38:197–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Krapchev VB, Rabii CD, Harrington JA (1994) Novel CO2 laser system for hard tissue ablation. Advanced Characterization, Therapeutics, and Systems IV, International Society for Optics and Photonics, Laser Surgery, pp 341–349Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Featherstone JD, Fried D (2001) Fundamental interactions of lasers with dental hard tissues. Med Laser Appl 16:181–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nguyen D, Chang K, Hedayatollahnajafi S et al (2011) High-speed scanning ablation of dental hard tissues with a λ= 9.3-μm CO2 laser: heat accumulation and peripheral thermal damage. J Biomed Opt 16:071410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Featherstone JD, Nelson DGA (1987) Laser effects on dental hard tissues. Adv Dent Res 1:21–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Featherstone JD, Barrett-Vespone NA, Fried D et al (1998) CO2 laser inhibition of artificial caries-like lesion progression in dental enamel. J Dent Res 77:1397–1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nammour S, Nyssen-Behets C (1992) Increased resistance to artificial caries-like lesions in dentin treated with CO2 laser. Caries Res 26:170–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chang NN, Jew JM, Simon JC et al (2017) Influence of multi-wavelength laser irradiation of enamel and dentin surfaces at 0.355, 2.94, and 9.4 μm on surface morphology, permeability, and acid resistance. Lasers Surg Med 49:913–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fekrazad R, Najafi A, Mahfar R, Namdari M, Azarsina M (2017) Comparison of enamel remineralization potential after application of titanium tetra fluoride and carbon dioxide laser. Laser therapy 26:113–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rechmann P, Charland DA, Rechmann BM et al (2013) In-vivo occlusal caries prevention by pulsed CO2-laser and fluoride varnish treatment—a clinical pilot study. Lasers Surg Med 45:302–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rechmann P, Rechmann BM, Groves WH Jr et al (2016) Caries inhibition with a CO2 9.3 μm laser: an in vitro study. Lasers Surg Med 48:546–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Le CQ, Fried D, Featherstone JD (2008) Lack of dentin acid resistance following 9.3 μm CO2 laser irradiation. Lasers in Dentistry XIV 6843: 68430JGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Convissar RA, Diamond LB, Fazekas CD (1996) Laser treatment of orthodontically induced gingival hyperplasia. Gen Dent 44:47–51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Fan K, Bell PW, Fried D (2006) Rapid and conservative ablation and modification of enamel, dentin, and alveolar bone using a high repetition rate transverse excited atmospheric pressure CO2 laser operating at λ= 9.3 μm. J Biomed Optic 11:064008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fried D, Ragadio J, Akrivou M, Featherstone JDB, Murray MW, Dickenson KM (2001) Dental hard tissue modification and removal using sealed transverse excited atmospheric-pressure lasers operating at λ= 9.6 and 10.6 μm. J Biomed Opt 6:231–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Müllejans R, Eyrich G, Raab WM et al (2002) Cavity preparation using a superpulsed 9.6-μm CO2 laser—a histological investigation. Lasers Surg Med 30:331–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wigdor HA, Walsh JT, Mostafi R (2000) Effect of the CO2 laser (9.6 μm) on the dental pulp in humans, Lasers in dentistry VI, International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp: 158–164Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Geraldo-Martins VR, Tanji EY, Wetter NU, Nogueira RD, Eduardo CP (2005) Intrapulpal temperature during preparation with the Er: YAG laser: an in vitro study. Photomed Laser Ther 23:182–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gaspar L, Kásler M, Szabó G et al (1991) Separate and combined use of Nd: YAG and carbon dioxide lasers in oral surgery. J Clin Laser Med Surg 9:381–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gaspar L, Szabó G (1990) Manifestation of the advantages and disadvantages of using the CO2 laser in oral surgery. J Clin Laser Med Surg 8:39–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fiorotti RC, Bertolin MM, Nicola JH et al (2004) Early lingual frenectomy assisted by CO2 laser helps prevention and treatment of functional alterations caused by ankyloglossia. Int J Orofac Myology 30:64–71Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Pick RM, Pecaro BC, Silberman CJ (1985) The laser gingivectomy: the use of the CO2 laser for the removal of phenytoin hyperplasia. J Periodontol 56:492–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Israel M, Cobb CM, Rossmann JA, Spencer P (1997) The effects of CO2, Nd: YAG and Er: YAG lasers with and without surface coolant on tooth root surfaces. J Clin Periodontol 24:595–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Adams TC, Pang PK (2004) Lasers in aesthetic dentistry. Dental Clinics 48:833–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kopp WK, St-Hilaire H (2004) Mucosal preservation in the treatment of mucocele with CO2 laser. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62:1559–1561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Roodenburg JLN, Panders AK, Vermey A (1991) Carbon dioxide laser surgery of oral leukoplakia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 71:670–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Romanos GE, Nentwig GH (2008) Regenerative therapy of deep peri-implant infrabony defects after co2 laser implant surface decontamination. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 28:245–255Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of DentistryThe University of Hong KongHong KongChina
  2. 2.School of StomatologyShenzhen University Health Science CenterShenzhenChina
  3. 3.Department of Operative DentistryRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations